XML 182 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Disclosures
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures  
Fair Value Disclosures

NOTE 13. Fair Value Disclosures

 

BB&T carries various assets and liabilities at fair value based on applicable accounting standards, including prime residential mortgage and commercial mortgage loans originated as LHFS. Accounting standards define fair value as the exchange price that would be received on the measurement date to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market available to the entity in an orderly transaction between market participants, with a three level valuation input hierarchy

      Fair Value Measurements for Assets and 
    June 30, Liabilities Measured on a  Recurring Basis 
     2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
                
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Assets:            
  Trading securities $ 537 $ 224 $ 301 $ 12 
  AFS securities:            
   GSE securities  441     441   
   RMBS issued by GSE   20,343     20,343   
   States and political subdivisions   1,888     1,888   
   Non-agency RMBS  285     285   
   Other securities   5   5     
   Covered securities   1,515     562   953 
  LHFS  2,488     2,488   
  Residential MSRs  892       892 
  Derivative assets:            
   Interest rate contracts   1,311     1,304   7 
   Foreign exchange contracts   4     4   
  Private equity and similar investments  269       269 
   Total assets$ 29,978 $ 229 $ 27,616 $ 2,133 
                
 Liabilities:            
  Derivative liabilities:            
   Interest rate contracts $ 1,334 $ $ 1,238 $ 96 
   Foreign exchange contracts   2     2   
  Short-term borrowings  259     259   
   Total liabilities $ 1,595 $ $ 1,499 $ 96 

      Fair Value Measurements for Assets and 
    December 31, Liabilities Measured on a  Recurring Basis 
    2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
                
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Assets:            
  Trading securities $ 497 $ 302 $ 194 $ 1 
  AFS securities:            
   GSE securities  290     290   
   RMBS issued by GSE   20,930     20,930   
   States and political subdivisions   2,011     2,011   
   Non-agency RMBS  312     312   
   Other securities   3   2   1   
   Covered securities   1,591     597   994 
  LHFS  3,761     3,761   
  Residential MSRs   627       627 
  Derivative assets:            
   Interest rate contracts   1,446     1,391   55 
   Foreign exchange contracts   4     4   
  Private equity and similar investments  323       323 
   Total assets$ 31,795 $ 304 $ 29,491 $ 2,000 
                
 Liabilities:            
  Derivative liabilities:            
   Interest rate contracts $ 1,434 $ $ 1,433 $ 1 
   Foreign exchange contracts   3     3   
  Short-term borrowings  98     98   
   Total liabilities $ 1,535 $ $ 1,534 $ 1 

The following discussion focuses on the valuation techniques and significant inputs for BB&T's Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities.

 

BB&T generally utilizes a third-party pricing service in determining the fair value of its securities portfolio. Fair value measurements are derived from market-based pricing matrices that were developed using observable inputs that include benchmark yields, benchmark securities, reported trades, offers, bids, issuer spreads and broker quotes. As described by security type below, additional inputs may be used, or some inputs may not be applicable. In the event that market observable data was not available, which would generally occur due to the lack of an active market for a given security, the valuation of the security would be subjective and may involve substantial judgment by management.

 

Trading securities: Trading securities are composed of various types of debt and equity securities, but the majority consists of debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, GSEs, or states and political subdivisions. The valuation techniques used for these investments are more fully discussed below.

 

GSE securities and RMBS issued by GSE: These are debt securities issued by GSEs. GSE pass-through securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including benchmark TBA security pricing and yield curves that were estimated based on U.S. Treasury yields and certain floating rate indices. The pricing matrices for these securities may also give consideration to pool-specific data supplied directly by the GSE. GSE CMOs are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above.

 

States and political subdivisions: These securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including MSRB reported trades, issuer spreads, material event notices and benchmark yield curves.

 

Non-agency RMBS: Pricing matrices for these securities are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above.

 

Other securities: These securities consist primarily of mutual funds and corporate bonds. These securities are valued based on a review of quoted market prices for assets as well as through the various other inputs discussed previously.

 

Covered securities: Covered securities are covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements and consist of re-remic non-agency RMBS, municipal securities and non-agency RMBS. Covered state and political subdivision securities and certain non-agency RMBS are valued in a manner similar to the approach described above for these asset classes. The re-remic non-agency RMBS, which are categorized as Level 3, were valued based on broker dealer quotes that reflected certain unobservable market inputs. Sensitivity to changes in the fair value of covered securities is significantly offset by changes in BB&T's indemnification asset from the FDIC.

 

LHFS: BB&T originates certain mortgage loans to be sold to investors, which are carried at fair value. The fair value is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. The changes in fair value of these assets are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the mortgage LHFS.

 

Residential MSRs: BB&T estimates the fair value of residential MSRs using an OAS valuation model to project MSR cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios, which are then discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The OAS model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service and other economic factors. Fair value estimates and assumptions are compared to industry surveys, recent market activity, actual portfolio experience and, when available, other observable market data.

 

Derivative assets and liabilities: The fair values of derivatives are determined based on quoted market prices and internal pricing models that are primarily sensitive to market observable data. The fair values of interest rate lock commitments, which are related to mortgage loan commitments and are categorized as Level 3, are based on quoted market prices adjusted for commitments that BB&T does not expect to fund and include the value attributable to the net servicing fees.

 

Private equity and similar investments: BB&T has private equity and similar investments that are measured at fair value based on the investment's net asset value. In many cases there are no observable market values for these investments and therefore management must estimate the fair value based on a comparison of the operating performance of the company to multiples in the marketplace for similar entities. This analysis requires significant judgment and actual values in a sale could differ materially from those estimated.

 

Short-term borrowings: Short-term borrowings represent debt securities sold short that are entered into through BB&T's brokerage subsidiary as a hedging strategy for the purposes of supporting institutional and retail client trading activities.

       Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                  Private Equity
          Covered Residential Net and Similar
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Trading Securities MSRs Derivatives Investments
   
       (Dollars in millions)
Balance at April 1, 2013 $ 1 $ 996 $ 735 $ 35 $ 330
 Total realized and unrealized gains or losses:               
  Included in earnings:               
   Interest income      8      
   Mortgage banking income       100   30  
   Other noninterest income            6
  Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI      (15)      
 Purchases   11         7
 Issuances       98   (9)  
 Sales           (70)
 Settlements     (36)   (41)   (145)   (4)
Balance at June 30, 2013 $ 12 $ 953 $ 892 $ (89) $ 269
                     
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in               
 earnings for the period, attributable to assets               
 and liabilities still held at June 30, 2013 $ $ 8 $ 100 $ (89) $ 5

       Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                   Private Equity
          Covered Residential Net and Similar
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Trading Securities MSRs Derivatives Investments
   
       (Dollars in millions)
Balance at April 1, 2012 $ 1 $ 1,023 $ 696 $ 30 $ 281
 Total realized and unrealized gains or losses:               
  Included in earnings:               
   Interest income      14      
   Mortgage banking income       (130)   89  
   Other noninterest income            (1)
  Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI     (22)      
 Purchases           28
 Issuances       50   77  
 Sales           (6)
 Settlements     (33)   (38)   (128)   (1)
Balance at June 30, 2012 $ 1 $ 982 $ 578 $ 68 $ 301
                     
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in               
 earnings for the period, attributable to assets               
 and liabilities still held at June 30, 2012 $ $ 14 $ (130) $ 68 $ (2)

      Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                  Private
                  Equity and
         Covered Residential Net Similar
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Trading Securities MSRs Derivatives Investments
                
      (Dollars in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2013 $ 1 $ 994 $ 627 $ 54 $ 323
 Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):               
  Included in earnings:               
   Interest income      18      
   Mortgage banking income       155   65  
   Other noninterest income            11
  Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI     10      
 Purchases   11         30
 Issuances       192   27  
 Sales           (89)
 Settlements     (69)   (82)   (235)   (6)
Balance at June 30, 2013 $ 12 $ 953 $ 892 $ (89) $ 269
                    
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for               
 the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held               
 at June 30, 2013 $ $ 18 $ 155 $ (89) $ 8

      Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
                  Private
               Equity and
         Covered Residential Net Similar
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Trading Securities MSRs Derivatives Investments
                
      (Dollars in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2012 $ 1 $ 984 $ 563 $ 59 $ 261
 Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):            
  Included in earnings:               
   Interest income      18      
   Mortgage banking income       (39)   185  
   Other noninterest income            4
  Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI     40      
 Purchases            52
 Issuances       134   138  
 Sales           (18)
 Settlements     (60)   (80)   (314)   2
Balance at June 30, 2012 $ 1 $ 982 $ 578 $ 68 $ 301
                    
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for               
 the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held               
 at June 30, 2012 $ $ 18 $ (39) $ 68 $ 7

BB&T's policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out of Levels 1, 2 and 3 as of the end of a reporting period. During the first six months of 2013 and 2012, BB&T did not have any transfer of securities between levels in the fair value hierarchy.

 

The majority of BB&T's private equity and similar investments are in SBIC qualified funds, which primarily focus on equity and subordinated debt investments in privately-held middle market companies. The majority of these investments are not redeemable and distributions are received as the underlying assets of the funds liquidate. The timing of distributions, which are expected to occur on various dates through 2025, is uncertain and dependent on various events such as recapitalizations, refinance transactions and ownership changes among others. Excluding the investment of future funds, BB&T estimates these investments have a weighted average remaining life of approximately three years; however, the timing and amount of distributions may vary significantly. As of June 30, 2013, restrictions on the ability to sell the investments include, but are not limited to, consent of a majority member or general partner approval for transfer of ownership. BB&T's investments are spread over numerous privately-held middle market companies, and thus the sensitivity to a change in fair value for any single investment is limited. The significant unobservable inputs for these investments are EBITDA multiples that ranged from 3x to 10x, with a weighted average of 7x, at June 30, 2013.

The following table details the fair value and UPB of LHFS that were elected to be carried at fair value:
                       
     June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 
     Fair Aggregate   Fair Aggregate   
     Value UPB Difference Value UPB Difference 
                       
     (Dollars in millions) 
 LHFS reported at fair value$ 2,488 $ 2,558 $ (70) $ 3,761 $ 3,652 $ 109 

Excluding government guaranteed, there were no LHFS that were nonaccrual or 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest.

The following tables provide information about certain financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
                 
           June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 
                 
           (Dollars in millions) 
 Assets that are still held (Level 3):            
  Impaired loans, excluding covered      $ 67 $ 137 
  Foreclosed real estate, excluding covered        89   107 
                 
     Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 
     2013 2012 2013 2012 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Negative valuation adjustments recognized:            
  Impaired loans, excluding covered$ 14 $ 25 $ 35 $ 55 
  Foreclosed real estate, excluding covered    68   2   136 

Additionally, accounting standards require the disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value. A financial instrument is defined as cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity or a contract that creates a contractual obligation or right to deliver or receive cash or another financial instrument from a second entity. For the financial instruments that BB&T does not record at fair value, estimates of fair value are based on relevant market data and information about the instrument and are based on the value of one trading unit without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of ownership, possible tax ramifications, estimated transaction costs that may result from bulk sales or the relationship between various financial instruments.

 

No readily available market exists for a significant portion of BB&T's financial instruments. Fair value estimates for these instruments are based on current economic conditions, currency and interest rate risk characteristics, loss experience and other factors. Many of these estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and cannot be determined with precision. Therefore, the fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the instrument. In addition, changes in assumptions could significantly affect these fair value estimates. The following methods and assumptions were used by BB&T in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments.

 

Cash and cash equivalents and segregated cash due from banks: For these short-term instruments, the carrying amounts are a reasonable estimate of fair values.

 

HTM securities: The fair values of HTM securities are based on a market approach using observable inputs such as benchmark yields and securities, TBA prices, reported trades, issuer spreads, current bids and offers, monthly payment information and collateral performance.

 

Loans receivable: The fair values for loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, applying interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality, which are deemed to be indicative of orderly transactions in the current market. For commercial loans and leases, discount rates may be adjusted to address additional credit risk on lower risk grade instruments. For residential mortgage and other consumer loans, internal prepayment risk models are used to adjust contractual cash flows. Loans are aggregated into pools of similar terms and credit quality and discounted using a LIBOR based rate. The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair values.

 

FDIC loss share receivable: The fair value of the FDIC loss share receivable is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, applying a risk free interest rate that is adjusted for the uncertainty in the timing and amount of these cash flows. The expected cash flows to/from the FDIC related to loans were estimated using the same assumptions that were used in determining the accounting values for the related loans. The expected cash flows to/from the FDIC related to securities are based upon the fair value of the related securities and the payment that would be required if the securities were sold for that amount. The FDIC loss share agreements are not transferrable and, accordingly, there is no market for this receivable.

 

Deposit liabilities: The fair values for demand deposits, interest-checking accounts, savings accounts and certain money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand. Fair values for CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to aggregate expected maturities. In addition, nonfinancial instruments such as core deposit intangibles are not recorded at fair value. BB&T has developed long-term relationships with its customers through its deposit base and, in the opinion of management, these items add significant value to BB&T.

 

Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of Federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowed funds approximate their fair values.

 

Long-term debt: The fair values of long-term debt are estimated based on quoted market prices for the instrument if available, or for similar instruments if not available, or by using discounted cash flow analyses, based on BB&T's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments.

 

Contractual commitments: The fair values of commitments are estimated using the fees charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair values also consider the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of guarantees and letters of credit are estimated based on the counterparties' creditworthiness and average default rates for loan products with similar risks. These respective fair value measurements would be categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value are summarized below:
 
     Carrying Total     
 June 30, 2013 Amount Fair Value Level 2 Level 3 
             
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Financial assets:             
  HTM securities $ 13,751 $ 13,445 $ 13,407 $ 38 
  Loans and leases, net of ALLL excluding covered loans   111,270   111,207     111,207 
  Covered loans, net of ALLL   2,623   3,003     3,003 
  FDIC loss share receivable   299   (19)     (19) 
                 
 Financial liabilities:             
  Deposits    131,079   131,297   131,297   
  Long-term debt    19,362   20,314   20,314   

     Carrying Total     
 December 31, 2012 Amount Fair Value Level 2 Level 3 
             
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Financial assets:             
  HTM securities $ 13,594 $ 13,848 $ 13,810 $ 38 
  Loans and leases, net of ALLL excluding covered loans   109,419   109,621     109,621 
  Covered loans, net of ALLL   3,166   3,661     3,661 
  FDIC loss share receivable   479   149     149 
                 
 Financial liabilities:             
  Deposits    133,075   133,377   133,377   
  Long-term debt    19,114   20,676   20,676   

The following is a summary of selected information pertaining to off-balance sheet financial instruments:
                
    June 30, 2013  December 31, 2012 
    Notional/   Notional/   
    Contract   Contract   
   Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value 
            
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit  $ 42,605 $ 78 $ 41,410 $ 74 
 Residential mortgage loans sold with recourse    886   12   1,019   12 
 Other loans sold with recourse    5,012   12   4,970   13 
 Letters of credit and financial guarantees written    5,012   44   5,164   30