XML 44 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

21.   Fair Value Measurements

        ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach, and cost approach). The levels of the hierarchy are described below:

  • Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

    Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
  • Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

        The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

        The following tables set forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 
  Balance Sheet
Location
  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets or
Liabilities (Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  December 31,
2011 Total
 

Assets:

                             

Investment in corporate debt securities

  Other assets   $   $ 6,790   $   $ 6,790  

 

 
  Balance Sheet
Location
  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets or
Liabilities (Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  December 31,
2010 Total
 

Assets:

                             

Investment in corporate debt securities

  Other assets   $ 5,828   $   $   $ 5,828  

Liabilities:

                             

Interest rate swap contracts

  Accrued interest         16,746         16,746  

        The valuation technique used to measure the fair value of the investment in corporate debt securities and interest rate swap contracts was the market approach. See Note 3 for a description of the inputs used in calculating the fair value measurements of investment in corporate debt securities and interest rate swap contracts. Although the Company determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its interest rate swap contracts fell within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with it utilized Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2010, the Company assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its interest rate swap contracts and determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, the Company determined that its interest rate swap contracts were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company did not have any outstanding interest rate swap contracts as of December 31, 2011.

        At December 31, 2011, the Company's investment in corporate debt securities was transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 due to a lack of trading in the security in the fourth quarter of 2011.

        There were no significant long-lived assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2011. The amounts below represent the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 
  Balance Sheet
Location
  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets or
Liabilities (Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
  Balance at
December 31,
2010 Total
  Total
Reduction in
Fair Value
Recorded at
December 31,
2010
 

Assets:

                                   

Goodwill

  Goodwill   $   $   $ 235,924   $ 235,924   $ (188,855 )

Indefinite-life intangible assets

  Other intangible assets                     (4,351 )

Long-lived assets

  Other assets         17,310         17,310     (31,503 )
                                   

 

                              $ (224,709 )
                                   

        For the year ended December 31, 2010, as a result of decreased earning projections resulting from an anticipated increase in competition from the scheduled opening of a casino in the second half of 2011 in Des Plaines, Illinois, as well as continued challenging market conditions in the Chicagoland regional market, the Company recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $144.6 million at Hollywood Casino Aurora and $44.2 million at Hollywood Casino Joliet.

        Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company wrote-off the trademark intangible asset associated with the Argosy acquisition for $4.4 million due to management's strategy to transition Argosy properties to the Hollywood Casino brand.

        In addition, in conjunction with the voters determining that the Company's casino in Columbus, Ohio will be located at the site of the former Delphi Automotive plant along Columbus's West Side, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $31.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 for the parcel of land that the Company purchased in Columbus's Arena District, as the asset was reclassified as held for sale in 2010. This land was sold in August 2011, which did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated statement of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a $0.2 million charge on the replaced vessel at Hollywood Casino Lawrenceburg.

        The valuation technique used to measure the fair value of goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets and long-lived assets was the market approach. For the land held for sale in Columbus, Ohio, the Company engaged a qualified external real estate appraiser to assist in the valuation, which was based on the sales prices of properties with similar characteristics to the Company's property in the Columbus Arena District. See Note 3 for a description of the inputs and the information used to develop the inputs in calculating the fair value measurements of goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets and long-lived assets.