The following tables present the Company’s net revenue and net revenue concentration by reportable segment:

(1)	This revenue is not subject to ASC 606.

(2)	Net revenue represents net interest income plus total noninterest income. Net-revenue concentration equals segment-level net revenue divided by total Company net revenue.


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
	Core Banking												Republic Processing Group
										Total			Tax			Republic
	Traditional			Warehouse			Mortgage			Core			Refund			Credit			Total			Total
(dollars in thousands)	Banking			Lending			Banking			Banking			Solutions			Solutions			RPG			Company

Net interest income (1)	$	121,868		$	11,412		$	469		$	133,749		$	18,751		$	19,380		$	38,131		$	171,880

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		9,971			38			—			10,009			(11)			—			(11)			9,998
Net refund transfer fees		—			—			—			—			16,594			—			16,594			16,594
Mortgage banking income (1)		—			—			5,574			5,574			—			—			—			5,574
Interchange fee income		9,693			—			—			9,693			160			—			160			9,853
Program fees (1)		—			—			—			—			2,187			10,484			12,671			12,671
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI (1)		1,852			—			—			1,852			—			—			—			1,852
Net losses on OREO		(158)			—			—			(158)			—			—			—			(158)
Contract termination fee		—			—			—			—			5,000			—			5,000			5,000
Legal settlement		—			—			—			—			13,000			—			13,000			13,000
Other		1,867			—			113			1,980			250			—			250			2,230
Total noninterest income		23,225			38			5,687			28,950			37,180			10,484			47,664			76,614

Total net revenue	$	145,093		$	11,450		$	6,156		$	162,699		$	55,931		$	29,864		$	85,795		$	248,494

Net-revenue concentration (2)		58	%		5	%		2	%		65	%		23	%		12	%		35	%		100	%


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
	Core Banking												Republic Processing Group
										Total			Tax			Republic
	Traditional			Warehouse			Mortgage			Core			Refund			Credit			Total			Total
(dollars in thousands)	Banking			Lending			Banking			Banking			Solutions			Solutions			RPG			Company

Net interest income (1)	$	119,677		$	19,387		$	802		$	139,866		$	15,593		$	15,840		$	31,433		$	171,299

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		9,188			43			—			9,231			(10)			—			(10)			9,221
Net refund transfer fees		2			—			—			2			19,922			—			19,922			19,924
Mortgage banking income (1)		—			—			16,655			16,655			—			—			—			16,655
Interchange fee income		9,534			—			—			9,534			237			—			237			9,771
Program fees (1)		—			—			—			—			2,373			7,196			9,569			9,569
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI (1)		1,616			—			—			1,616			—			—			—			1,616
Net losses on OREO		(107)			—			—			(107)			—			—			—			(107)
Other		2,628			—			140			2,768			77			—			77			2,845
Total noninterest income		22,861			43			16,795			39,699			22,599			7,196			29,795			69,494

Total net revenue	$	142,538		$	19,430		$	17,597		$	179,565		$	38,192		$	23,036		$	61,228		$	240,793

Net-revenue concentration (2)		59	%		8	%		7	%		74	%		16	%		10	%		26	%		100	%

(3)	This revenue is not subject to ASC 606.

(4)	Net revenue represents net interest income plus total noninterest income. Net-revenue concentration equals segment-level net revenue divided by total Company net revenue.

The following represents information for significant revenue streams subject to ASC 606:

Service charges on deposit accounts – The Company earns revenue for account-based and event-driven services on its retail and commercial deposit accounts. Contracts for these services are generally in the form of deposit agreements, which disclose fees for deposit services. Revenue for event-driven services is recognized in close proximity or simultaneously with service performance. Revenue for certain account-based services may be recognized at a point in time or over the period the service is rendered, typically no longer than a month. Examples of account-based and event-driven service charges on deposits include per item fees, paper-statement fees, check-cashing fees, and analysis fees.

Net refund transfer fees – An RT is a fee-based product offered by the Bank through third-party tax preparers located throughout the United States, as well as tax-preparation software providers (collectively, the “Tax Providers”), with the Bank acting as an independent contractor of the Tax Providers. An RT allows a taxpayer to pay any applicable tax preparation and filing related fees directly from his federal or state government tax refund, with the remainder of the tax refund disbursed directly to the taxpayer. RT fees and all applicable tax preparation, transmitter, audit, and any other taxpayer authorized amounts are deducted from the tax refund by either the Bank or the Bank’s service provider and automatically forwarded to the appropriate party as authorized by the taxpayer. RT fees generally receive first priority when applying fees against the taxpayer’s refund, with the Bank’s share of RT fees generally

superior to the claims of other third-party service providers, including the Tax Providers. The remainder of the refund is disbursed to the taxpayer by a Bank check printed at a tax office, direct deposit to the taxpayer’s personal bank account, or loaded to a prepaid card.

The Company executes contracts with individual Tax Providers to offer RTs to their taxpayer customers. RT revenue is recognized by the Bank immediately after the taxpayer’s refund is disbursed in accordance with the RT contract with the taxpayer customer. The fee paid by the taxpayer for the RT is shared between the Bank and the Tax Providers based on contracts executed between the parties.

The Company presents RT revenue net of any amounts shared with the Tax Providers. The Bank’s share of RT revenue is generally based on the obligations undertaken by the Tax Provider for each individual RT program, with more obligations generally corresponding to higher RT revenue share. The significant majority of net RT revenue is recognized and obligations under RT contracts fulfilled by the Bank during the first half of each year. Incremental expenses associated with the fulfillment of RT contracts are generally expensed during the first half of the year.

Interchange fee income – As an “issuing bank” for card transactions, the Company earns interchange fee income on transactions executed by its cardholders with various third-party merchants. Through third-party intermediaries, merchants compensate the Company for each transaction for the ability to efficiently settle the transaction and for the Company’s willingness to accept certain risks inherent in the transaction. There is no written contract between the merchant and the Company, but a contract is implied between the two parties by customary business practices. Interchange fee income is recognized almost simultaneously by the Company upon the completion of a related card transaction.

The Company compensates its cardholders by way of cash or other “rewards” for generating card transactions. These rewards are disclosed in cardholder agreements between the Company and its cardholders. Reward costs are accrued over time based on card transactions generated by the cardholder. Interchange fee income is presented net of reward costs within noninterest income.

Net gains/(losses) on other real estate – The Company routinely sells OREO it has acquired through loan foreclosure. Net gains/(losses) on OREO reflect both 1) the gain or loss recognized upon an executed deed and 2) mark-to-market writedowns the Company takes on its OREO inventory.

The Company generally recognizes gains or losses on OREO at the time of an executed deed, although gains may be recognized over a financing period if the Company finances the sale. For financed OREO sales, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on sale, the Company adjusts the transaction price and related gain/(loss) on sale if a significant financing component is present.

Mark-to-market writedowns taken by the Company during the property’s holding period are generally at least 10% per year, but may be higher based on updated real estate appraisals or BPOs. Incremental expenditures to bring OREO to salable condition are generally expensed as-incurred.

Contract termination fee – During the first quarter of 2022, RB&T provided Green Dot a notice of termination for the May 2021 Purchase Agreement for the sale of substantially all of RB&T’s TRS assets and operations to Green Dot. As a result of this contract termination, Green Dot paid RB&T a contract termination fee of $5.0 million during the quarter.

Legal settlement – During the second quarter of 2022, Green Dot paid Republic Bank $13 million in settlement of a lawsuit.