XML 20 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Derivative Instruments:
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Derivative Instruments:  
Derivative Instruments:

Note 4 — Derivative Instruments:

 

In October 2008, GSWC executed a purchased power contract that permits GSWC to purchase power at a fixed cost over three and five year terms depending on the amount of power and the period during which the power is purchased under the contract.  The contract is subject to the accounting guidance for derivatives and requires mark-to-market derivative accounting.   GSWC began receiving power under this contract on January 1, 2009.  In May 2009, the CPUC issued a final decision approving the contract and authorized GSWC to establish a regulatory asset and liability memorandum account to offset the entries required by the accounting guidance.  Accordingly, all unrealized gains and losses generated from the new purchased power contract will be deferred on a monthly basis into a non-interest bearing regulatory memorandum account that will track the changes in fair value of the derivative throughout the term of the contract.   As of June 30, 2011 there was a $7.5 million cumulative unrealized loss which has been included in the memorandum account.  This memorandum account does not impact GSWC’s earnings.

 

Registrant adopted accounting guidance for fair value measurements effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis.  This guidance applies to all financial assets and financial liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. There was no impact in the adoption of this accounting guidance to the consolidated financial statements. However, the accounting guidance requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The guidance requires fair value measurements to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

 

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, or

 

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

 

Registrant’s valuation model utilizes various inputs that include quoted market prices for energy over the duration of the contract. The market prices used to determine the fair value for this derivative instrument were estimated based on independent sources such as broker quotes and publications that are not observable in or corroborated by the market.  Registrant receives one broker quote to determine the fair value of its derivative instrument.  When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized in Level 3. Accordingly, the valuation of the derivative on Registrant’s new purchased power contract has been classified as Level 3 for all periods presented.

 

The following table presents changes in the fair value of the derivative for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended June 30,

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

Balance, at beginning of the period

 

$

(6,874

)

$

(10,038

)

$

(6,850

)

$

(7,338

)

Unrealized gain (loss) on purchased power contracts

 

(601

)

486

 

(625

)

(2,214

)

Balance, at end of the period

 

$

(7,475

)

$

(9,552

)

$

(7,475

)

$

(9,552

)

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the unrealized gains and losses were included in regulatory assets due to regulatory mechanisms in place effective January 1, 2009.