XML 30 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Variable Interest Entities
6 Months Ended
May 31, 2016
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Variable Interest Entities Variable Interest Entities
The Company evaluated the agreements of its joint ventures that were formed or that had reconsideration events during the six months ended May 31, 2016. Based on the Company's evaluation, during the six months ended May 31, 2016, the Company consolidated entities that had total combined assets of $122.1 million and liabilities of $96.4 million. During the six months ended May 31, 2016, there were no VIEs that were deconsolidated.
The Company’s recorded investments in unconsolidated entities were as follows:
(In thousands)
May 31,
2016
 
November 30,
2015
Lennar Homebuilding
$
785,883

 
741,551

Rialto
$
238,740

 
224,869

Lennar Multifamily
$
304,171

 
250,876


Consolidated VIEs
As of May 31, 2016, the carrying amounts of the VIEs’ assets and non-recourse liabilities that consolidated were $645.1 million and $146.5 million, respectively. As of November 30, 2015, the carrying amounts of the VIEs’ assets and non-recourse liabilities that consolidated were $652.3 million and $84.4 million, respectively. Those assets are owned by, and those liabilities are obligations of, the VIEs, not the Company.
A VIE’s assets can only be used to settle obligations of that VIE. The VIEs are not guarantors of the Company’s senior notes and other debts payable. The assets held by a VIE usually are collateral for that VIE’s debt. The Company and other
partners do not generally have an obligation to make capital contributions to a VIE unless the Company and/or the other partner(s) have entered into debt guarantees with a VIE’s banks. Other than debt guarantee agreements with a VIE’s banks, there are no liquidity arrangements or agreements to fund capital or purchase assets that could require the Company to provide financial support to a VIE. While the Company has option contracts to purchase land from certain of its VIEs, the Company is not required to purchase the assets and could walk away from the contracts.
Unconsolidated VIEs
The Company’s recorded investment in unconsolidated VIEs and its estimated maximum exposure to loss were as follows:
As of May 31, 2016
(In thousands)
Investments in
Unconsolidated VIEs
 
Lennar’s Maximum
Exposure to Loss
Lennar Homebuilding (1)
$
99,026

 
130,137

Rialto (2)
60,076

 
60,076

Lennar Multifamily (3)
227,795

 
586,195

 
$
386,897

 
776,408

As of November 30, 2015
(In thousands)
Investments in
Unconsolidated VIEs
 
Lennar’s Maximum
Exposure to Loss
Lennar Homebuilding (1)
$
102,706

 
111,215

Rialto (2)
25,625

 
25,625

Lennar Multifamily (3)
177,359

 
586,842

 
$
305,690

 
723,682

(1)
At May 31, 2016, the maximum exposure to loss of Lennar Homebuilding’s investments in unconsolidated VIEs was limited to its investments in the unconsolidated VIEs, except with regard to $31.0 million repayment guarantee on an unconsolidated entity's debt. At November 30, 2015, the maximum exposure to loss of Lennar Homebuilding’s investments in unconsolidated VIEs was limited to its investments in the unconsolidated VIEs, except with regard to $8.3 million remaining commitment to fund an unconsolidated entity for further expenses up until the unconsolidated entity obtains permanent financing.
(2)
At both May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the maximum recourse exposure to loss of Rialto’s investments in unconsolidated VIEs was limited to its investments in the unconsolidated VIEs. At May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015, investments in unconsolidated VIEs and Lennar’s maximum exposure to loss included $60.1 million and $25.6 million, respectively, related to Rialto’s investments held-to-maturity.
(3)
As of May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the remaining equity commitment of $324.5 million and $378.3 million, respectively, to fund the Venture for future expenditures related to the construction and development of its projects is included in Lennar's maximum exposure to loss. In addition, at May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015, the maximum exposure to loss of Lennar Multifamily's investments in unconsolidated VIEs was limited to its investments in the unconsolidated VIEs, except with regard to $29.1 million and $30.0 million, respectively, of letters of credit outstanding for certain of the unconsolidated VIEs that could be drawn upon in the event of default under their debt agreements.
While these entities are VIEs, the Company has determined that the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance is generally shared and the Company and its partners are not de facto agents. While the Company generally manages the day-to-day operations of the VIEs, each of these VIEs has an executive committee made up of representatives from each partner. The members of the executive committee have equal votes and major decisions require unanimous consent and approval from all members. The Company does not have the unilateral ability to exercise participating voting rights without partner consent.
As of May 31, 2016, the Company and other partners do not generally have an obligation to make capital contributions to the VIEs, except for $324.5 million remaining equity commitment to fund the Venture for further expenditures related to the construction and development of its projects and $29.1 million of letters of credit outstanding for certain Lennar Multifamily unconsolidated VIEs that could be drawn upon in the event of default under their debt agreements. In addition, there are no liquidity arrangements or agreements to fund capital or purchase assets that could require the Company to provide financial support to the VIEs, except with regard to $31.0 million repayment guarantee on an unconsolidated entity's debt. Except for the unconsolidated VIEs discussed above, the Company and the other partners did not guarantee any debt of the other unconsolidated VIEs. While the Company has option contracts to purchase land from certain of its unconsolidated VIEs, the Company is not required to purchase the assets and could walk away from the contracts.
Option Contracts
The Company has access to land through option contracts, which generally enables it to control portions of properties owned by third parties (including land funds) and unconsolidated entities until the Company has determined whether to exercise the option.
The Company evaluates all option contracts for land to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Although the Company does not have legal title to the optioned land, if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary or makes a significant deposit for optioned land, it may need to consolidate the land under option at the purchase price of the optioned land.
During the six months ended May 31, 2016, consolidated inventory not owned increased by $75.7 million with a corresponding increase to liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2016. The increase was primarily related to the consolidation of an option agreement, partially offset by the Company exercising its option to acquire land under previously consolidated contracts. To reflect the purchase price of the inventory consolidated, the Company had a net reclass related to option deposits from land under development to consolidated inventory not owned in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2016. The liabilities related to consolidated inventory not owned primarily represent the difference between the option exercise prices for the optioned land and the Company’s cash deposits.
The Company’s exposure to loss related to its option contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities consisted of its non-refundable option deposits and pre-acquisition costs totaling $83.4 million and $89.2 million at May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015, respectively. Additionally, the Company had posted $73.9 million and $70.4 million of letters of credit in lieu of cash deposits under certain land and option contracts as of May 31, 2016 and November 30, 2015, respectively.