Exhibit 99.1
INVESTOR PRESENTATION FEBRUARY-MARCH 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 ABOUT ESSEX 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 WEST COAST FUNDAMENTALS 8 LEGISLATIVE
UPDATES & KEY MARKET STATS 21 INVESTMENTS AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION 24 2020 GUIDANCE AND BALANCE SHEET 31 DEFINITIONS & RECONCILIATIONS 38
ESSEX AT A GLANCE Represents percent of pro rata NOI as of 12/31/19, rounded to the nearest
percent.Oakland includes Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. (3) As of 12/31/19. Ventura 5%Los Angeles 18%Orange County 10%San Diego 8% SOUTHERN, CA41% of NOI(1) NORTHERN, CA42% of NOI(1)San Francisco MD 9% Oakland(2) 13%Santa
Clara 20% Washington & Californiacombinedrepresent the 5th highest GDP in theworld THE ONLY PUBLIC MULTIFAMILY REIT DEDICATED TO THE WEST COASTSEATTLE17% of
NOI(1) 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – KEY HIGHLIGHTS California’s chronic housing shortage remains a key
issue and shows no signs of abating (pg. 10)New supply as a percent of stock remains well below 1% and the recent decline in permits in ESS markets compares favorably to the U.S. (pg. 11-12)The after-tax cost premium to own a home vs. rent is
approximately 74% in Essex’s markets, a strong economic incentive to rent (pg. 13)Demand drivers on the West Coast remain robust relative to the U.S. (pg. 14-15)High-quality job growth in Essex markets continues to outpace low paying jobs,
contributing to personal income growth (pg. 16)Job openings at leading tech companies located on the West Coast are at the highest level in years (pg. 17)West Coast income growth has outpaced rent growth in recent years, leading to improved
rental affordability (pg. 18)Preliminary January and February same-property revenue growth in-line with expectations. No change to 2020 guidance (pg. 32-33) 4
0% 1000% 2000% 3000% 4000% 5000% 6000% Jun-94Dec-94 Jun-95 Dec-95 Jun-96 Dec-96 Jun-97
Dec-97Jun-98 Dec-98 Jun-99 Dec-99 Jun-00 Dec-00 Jun-01 Dec-01 Jun-02 Dec-02 Jun-03 Dec-03 Jun-04 Dec-04 Jun-05 Dec-05 Jun-06 Dec-06 Jun-07 Dec-07 Jun-08 Dec-08 Jun-09 Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11 Dec-11 Jun-12 Dec-12 Jun-13 Dec-13 Jun-14
Dec-14 Jun-15 Dec-15 Jun-16 Dec-16 Jun-17 Dec-17 Jun-18 Dec-18 Jun-19 Dec-19 Total Shareholder Return Since IPO Through 12/31/19 ESS NAREIT All Equity S&P 500 NAREIT Equity Apartments Superior value creation for shareholders
since the IPOHighest total return of all public U.S. REITs since IPO in 1994 INVESTMENT STRATEGY LEADS TO SUPERIOR TOTAL RETURNS Source: Company Disclosures, S&P Global Market Intelligence June 1994 – December 2019 5 ESS CAGR:
16.6% 1,610% 1,065% 4,970% 1,172%
$10.00$8.00$6.00$4.00$2.00$0.00 $12.00 $14.00 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020E Dividend
Per Share Total FFO Per Share Since the IPO, we have generated compound Annual Dividend/SH and Total FFO/SH growth of 6.4% and 8.4%, respectively (1)Raised the Dividend every year since the IPO and paid entirely in cashS&P Dividend
AristocratDividend and FFO Per Share Growth GreatRecession FFO per share ↑ 157% since the Great Recession(2) SIGNIFICANT DIVIDEND PER SHARE AND TOTAL FFO PER SHARE GROWTH Through YE 20192019 FFO compared to 2010 6
Superior Core FFO Growth cannot be explained by strong rent growth alone, Essex drives superior bottom
line results through disciplined capital allocation decisions and an unwavering focus oncreating value for shareholders SUPERIOR SAME-PROPERTY NOI, CORE FFO, AND DIVIDEND GROWTH Source: Company DisclosuresPeer average for Same-Property NOI,
Core FFO, and dividend growth includes four multifamily REITs (EQR, AVB, UDR, AIV) 7 77% 56% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020E ESS Peer
Average 168% 40% -40% 0% 40% 80% 120% 160% 200% 20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020E Same-Property NOI Growth Core FFO Growth ESS Peer
Average 125% 32% (80%) (40%) 0% 40% 80% 120% 160% 20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020E Dividend Growth ESS Peer Average
WEST COAST FUNDAMENTALS Township | Redwood City, CA
WHY WEST COAST MARKETS? 9 LONG-TERM FAVORABLE SUPPLY/DEMAND DYNAMICS DIVERSE DEMAND
DRIVERS Highest GDP in the U.S.Centers of innovation drive job creation and income growthHigher median household incomesHigher percentage of renters vs. ownersFavorable demographics New supply (multifamily &
for-sale) historically below 1% of existing stock in CAHigh cost of homeownership makes transition from renter to homeowner more difficultDifficult and costly to build, restrictive and lengthy entitlement process LIMITED SUPPLY
CALIFORNIA’S CHRONIC HOUSING SHORTAGE Source: Up for Growth National Coalition - Housing
Underproduction in the U.S., April 2018 10 In the U.S., 23 states underproduced by ±7.3 million housing units from 2000-2015California represents nearly 50% of the housing shortfall at ±3.4 million units
In Essex’s California markets, new supply as a percent of stock has historically remained below 1%Total
permitting activity is down 17% from the recent peak in Essex CA markets LIMITED SUPPLY IN ESSEX MARKETS Source: Census Bureau, Essex, and Rosen Consulting
Group 11 Essex U.S. 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 2.0% Dec-89 Dec-92 Dec-95 Dec-98 Dec-01 Dec-04 Dec-07 Dec-10 Dec-13 Dec-16 Dec-19 Total Permits as a % of Total Stock ESS CA vs.
U.S. Essex U.S. 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.8% 2.0% Dec-89 Dec-92 Dec-95 Dec-98 Dec-01 Dec-04 Dec-07 Dec-10 Dec-13 Dec-16 Dec-19 Single-Family Permits as a % of Single-Family StockESS CA
vs. U.S.
PERMITS AND NEAR-TERM SUPPLY Source: Census Bureau, Essex, and Rosen Consulting Group(1) Trailing
twelve months (TTM) includes all residential permits for single-family and
multifamily 12 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% Jan-15 May-15 Sep-15 Jan-16 May-16 Sep-16 Jan-17 May-17 Sep-17 Jan-18 May-18 Sep-18 Jan-19 May-19 Sep-19 Total residential permits as a percent of stock for ESS Markets remains
well below the U.S.Residential Permits as % of Stock (TTM)(1) ESS Markets vs. US Total1.1%1.0%0.9% ESS Portfolio: Total Permits as a % of Total Stock U.S: Total Permits as a % of Total Stock Permits in ESS markets continue to trend
down
0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 New Jobs/Housing Units Per Year
(2010-2019) Chronic housing shortage and tax law changes have pushed the cost to own a median priced home to 74% above the average cost to rent in Essex metros Essex Metros Have Created 5x More Jobs Than Housing Units This Cycle After-Tax
Premium Cost toOwn vs. Rent in Essex Markets(1) After-tax cost of home purchasepremium over cost to rent Excluding impact of 2018 tax reform 20-year average New Jobs THE RISING PREMIUM TO OWN VS. RENT IN ESSEX MARKETS Sources:
RealPage, CoreLogic, Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Essex(1) Cost premia based on median home prices, median rents and 30-yr fixed mortgage rates with 10% down payment and PMI. Tax
impact based on marginal tax rates at median incomes. 13 New Units 52% 74% 62% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 Cost Premium to own vs. rent in Essex
Markets
17.3% 26.3% -5% 15%10%5%0% 20% 25% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Essex
markets have benefitted from superior job growth this decade, well above the national averagesCumulative Job Growth30% ESSEX MARKETS CONTINUE TO BENEFIT FROM SUPERIOR LONG-TERM EMPLOYMENT GROWTH Sources: BLS(1) ESS averages are weighted by
same-property rental income across Essex metros. +900bpscumulative spread for Essex markets over U.S. +900bps cumulative spread for Essex markets over U.S. ESS Markets(1) United States 14
0% 1% 2% 3% Dec-16 Jun-17 Dec-17 Jun-18 Dec-18 Jun-19 Dec-19 WEST COAST JOB GROWTH
CONTINUES TO OUTPACE THE U.S. Source: BLS, Census Bureau, EssexESS non-farm employment growth averages are weighted by same-property rental income across Essex metros.Major East Coast Markets include New York City, Boston, Washington D.C.
and Northern New Jersey 15 Job growth in Essex metros has accelerated while growth outside of Essex markets has decelerated. The current spread (T3M YOY) between Essex markets and all other metros of ~80bps is the widest since December
2016Job GrowthTrailing 3-Month Average As of December 2019 2.3% 1.4% 1.4% 0% 1% 2% 3% ESS Wtd Avg U.S Major East Coast Markets(2) Essex Metros (1)United States, excl. Essex Metros
JOB GROWTH IN ESS MARKETS – HIGH VS. LOW WAGE INDUSTRIES Source: BLSEssex markets weighted by 4Q19
Same-Property Revenue. 16 2.5% 2.3%2.0% 1.5%1.0%0.5%0.0% 2.0% 2.5% Dec-13 Jun-14 Dec-14 Jun-15 Dec-15 Jun-16 Dec-16 Jun-17 Dec-17 Jun-18 Dec-18 Jun-19 Dec-19 High-paying industries continue to add more jobs
than low paying industries in Essex markets, helping improve incomes and rental affordabilityTop 5 vs. Bottom 5 Paying Industries in ESS Markets YOY Trailing 3-Month AverageTop Paying Industries Bottom Paying Industries Total Job
Growth4.0%3.5%3.0%
Job openings at the Top 10 Tech firms in CA and WA is nearly 27,000 positions, +12% compared to one
year ago JOB OPENINGS – TOP 10 TECH FIRMS Source: Company Websites and
LinkedIn 17 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 1Q162Q163Q164Q161Q172Q173Q174Q171Q182Q183Q184Q181Q192Q193Q194Q19 Total Job Openings in CA & WA Top 10 Tech
Companies 12% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%26,648 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 YOY %Total Job Openings in CA & WA Top 10 Tech Companies
RISING INCOMES ARE LEADING TO IMPROVED AFFORDABILITY Sources: Census Bureau, Essex, Moody’s Analytics,
Axio and Rosen Consulting Group 18 West Coast Income vs. Rent Growth 60% 47% 46% 33% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020(e) Percent Growth In the
first half of the decade, West Coast rents grew ~2x faster than incomes. In the second half, income growth is expected to exceed rent growth by ~1.5x.West Coast rent to income growth ratios are forecasted to be lower than the national average
by 2020.ESS Portfolio vs. U.S. Cuml. Rent Growth vs. Income Growth ESS Cuml. Rent GrowthU.S. Rent Growth ESS Cuml. HH Income GrowthU.S. HH Income
Growth 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 2010-2015 2016-2020(e) Income Growth Rent Growth
DEMAND TO EXCEED SUPPLY IN ESSEX’S
MARKETS 19 s San FranciscoSan JoseLos Angeles ESS SubmarketsEssex Portfolio*Oakland Orange County Los Angeles Core Essex MarketSan Diego Essex PortfolioDenver Boston Nassau-Suffolk
Seattle Other MarketsNorthern NJ D.C. U.S.New York Portland MiamiBaltimore U.S. Phoenix Atlanta Houston Dallas $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 In Essex’s markets, where home prices are ~3x greater than the national average,
housing demand is expected to exceed supply relative to other major metros in 2020$1,400 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Median Single Family and Condo Home Price (in 000s, NAR & CoreLogic) Ratio of New Home Demand to Total New Supply
(2020F)Sources: Moody’s Analytics, National Association of Realtors, CoreLogic, BLS, and Essex*Essex Portfolio weighted by % of same-property revenueNew Home demand based upon a ratio of 2 forecast jobs to create one household (forecasts are
Moody’s).Total new supply based on Essex forecasts and Moody’s total permits, assuming a 24-month completion lag; except U.S. is based on Moody’s total starts.
WHAT $1 MILLION BUYS YOU IN THE ‘BURBS, EAST VS. WEST 20 Bay
Area Seattle D.C. New York
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE & KEY MARKET STATS The Courtyards at 65th Street | Emeryville, CA
LEGISLATION UPDATE 22 Sources: The Sacramento Bee and California Department of Finance, Finance
Bulletin Housing costs remain a key political and business issue across the country with many states implementing various forms of rent control legislation including Oregon, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New
YorkCalifornia’s AB 1482 will cap renewal rents at CPI + 5%, providing renter protections while not destroying the incentive for new home developmentEssex has a long-standing guideline capping renewals at 10% and expects AB 1482 will result
in approximately 10 bps impact to 2020 same-property revenues, primarily due to short-term rentalsCalifornia’s legislatures passed several housing related bills aimed at incentivizing affordable housing developmentA referendum to amend Costa
Hawkins will be on the November 2020 ballot. A similar proposal was soundly defeated by voters in 2018 and the apartment industry is aligned to protect the incentive to build new homesIt is highly likely that California’s 2020 ballot will
contain a proposal to modify Prop 13 for Commercial and Industrial Properties, creating a rolling 3 year re-assessment for property taxes. Fortunately, Apartment properties are not affected by the proposal“Since 2005 California has only
produced 308 housing units for every 1,000 new residents. Add in the fact that California will be home to 50 million people by 2050, and it’s obvious we’re not on pace to meet that demand…we need to generate more funding for affordable
housing, implement regulatory reform and create new financial incentives”– Governor Newsom
LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SEATTLE Units: 10,660Properties:
49 Units: 6,702Properties: 27 Units: 21,642Properties: 83 Units: 12,233Properties 57 PROPERTY MAPS & KEY MARKET STATS Sources: Axiometrics, CoreLogic, LinkedIn, CoStar, JLL Office Report, CBRE, Moody's, RCG, S&P
Global Market Intelligence, BLS, NAR, Census and Essex Disclosures.Trailing three months growth as of Dec. 2019Trailing three months YOY growth 3Q’19 vs. 3Q’18. Seattle NWMLS data as of Dec’19 23 Job Growth(1) 2019FPersonal Income
Growth MedianHome Price to Median Income Home Price Growth(2) Office Construction/ Renovation SF(in millions) Office Construction as% of Inventory Office% Preleased Los Angeles 1.5% 6.3% 7.8x 3.9% 10.5 3.4% 59% Orange
County 1.2% 5.7% 8.1x 0.3% 0.8 0.7% 16% San Francisco 3.0% 5.3% 10.8x 0.6% 7.2 3.5% 71% San Jose 2.9% 6.6% 8.4x -3.1% 7.6 7.3% 75% Seattle 3.3% 5.8% 6.4x 2.8% 9.0 6.0% 79%
INVESTMENTS AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION Velo & Ray | Seattle, WA
ACQUISITIONS:Improve the NAV/share, cash flow/share and growth prospects of the
company DEVELOPMENT:Develop high-quality tenant-desired apartment homes near transportation nodes REDEVELOPMENT:Focused on rent justified improvements to maximize NOI and value CONDO OPTIONALITY:Potential value creation through ~9,000
condo convertible apartment homes in the Essex Portfolio CO-INVESTMENT PLATFORM:Facilitates growth via private capital and provides attractive risk adjusted returns PREF. EQUITY/SUBORDINATED DEBT:Opportunistically invest in high-quality
development and stabilized assets in our existing markets Pure Redmond | Redmond, WA 500 Folsom | San Francisco, CA Bunker Hill | Los Angeles, CA Essex Skyline | Santa Ana, CA Century Towers | San Jose, CA Meridian at Midtown
| San Jose, CA CORE COMPETENCIES TO CREATE VALUE 25
Integrating the investing decision and the financing decision leads to value creation for
shareholders Cash Flow Growth Improve GrowthRate of thePortfolio NAV/Share DEALS MUST BE ACCRETIVE TO 3 METRICS: DISCIPLINED CAPITAL ALLOCATION PROCESS 26
Our innovative management team is responsive to changing market dynamics with the ability to source and
structure unique opportunities within the multifamily spaceDisciplined underwriting, rigorous analysis, and total return driven 2001 2009 Acquires $106M of multifamily REIT unsecured bonds yielding 10.3% near the bottom of
the market. 2010 Acquires and begins developing early in the cycle. Acquires over$2B of properties over the next 3 years. 2014 Acquires BRE in a deal valued at $6B, creating the only public apartment REIT dedicated
exclusively to West Coast markets. 2016 Increases investment in preferred equity and subordinated debt program due to attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to ground- up development. 2018 Sold assets and repurchased
stock to take advantage of market volatility and stock trading at a significant discount to NAV. 2020 Bought out JV partner’s interest in a $1B portfolio, partially-funded with record-low debt costs, while recognizing $6.5M in
promote income. Capital Allocation Select HighlightsESS becomes the first multifamily REIT to create a fund business (raises $250M of equity for Fund I). PROVEN HISTORY OF STRATEGIC CAPITAL ALLOCATION 27
CPP INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO BUY-OUT 28 In January 2020, the Company purchased CPP Investments 45%
interest in a land parcel and six communities valued at approximately $1.0 billion. The Company expects to recognize $6.5M in promote income in Q1 ‘20.The deal is year-one accretive to FFO and is reflected in the Company’s 2020 guidance.The
six communities totaling 2,020 apartment homes are located in markets with favorable long-term supply and demand fundamentals. Agora at South Main | Walnut Creek, CA Connolly Station | Dublin, CA Emme | Emeryville,
CA The Galloway | Pleasanton, CA Park 20 | San Mateo, CA Epic | San Jose, CA
Development Property Location Apartment Homes Total Cost(1)$M Remaining
Costs(1) $M InitialOccupancy Stabilized Operations % Leased as 02/07/20 of Mylo Santa Clara, CA 476 $226 $29 Q3 2019 Q1 2021 33.8% 500 Folsom San Francisco, CA 537 $415 $38 Q3 2019 Q4 2020 35.8% Station Park
Green Phase II San Mateo, CA 199 $141 $6 Q3 2019 Q1 2020 95.5% Station Park Green Phase III San Mateo, CA 172 $134 $15 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 - Station Park Green Phase IV San Mateo, CA 107 $94 $78 Q4 2021 Q1
2022 - Patina at Midtown San Jose, CA 269 $136 $21 Q1 2020 Q1 2021 - Wallace on Sunset Hollywood, CA 200 $105 $35 Q2 2020 Q4 2020 - Total 1,960 $1,251 $222 Minimal development funding
requirements in 2020No new development starts planned for 2020 500 Folsom | San Francisco, CA Station Park Green | San Mateo, CA Mylo | Santa Clara, CA DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE UPDATE (1) Reflected at 100% and not Essex Share.
Essex share of remaining costs as of 12/31/19 was $193M. 29
Essex aims to provide its residents with unparalleled convenience and customer service through
paperless leasing, mobile maintenance accessibility, and smart home technologies.Currently implementing several platform investments that are intended to maximize efficiency and growthand improve sustainability. OPTIMIZING PORTFOLIO
PERFORMANCE 30 Smart buildings – Expanding to ~20k unitsMobile maintenance 2.0 – Rollout underwayMobile/paperless leasing – Pilot Q4 ‘20Enhanced website functionality – Complete Portfolio analytics linked to research – Phase I
completeProspect-focused sales and lead management – Rollout Q1 ‘20Career and learning development systems – Phase I completeDigital human resources management – Complete
GUIDANCE & BALANCE SHEET Mylo | Santa Clara, CA
2020 YEAR-TO-DATE SAME-PROPERTY REVENUE GROWTH 32 ActualsJan/Feb 2019 Preliminary Jan/Feb
2020 Region Revenue Growth Financial Occupancy Revenue Growth Financial Occupancy Full-Year Guidance Range Southern California 2.6% 96.8% 2.9% 96.7% 2.2% to 3.2% Northern California 3.0% 97.2% 3.5% 97.0% 2.6% to
3.6% Seattle 2.3% 97.1% 4.5% 96.9% 3.5% to 4.5% Total Same-Property Revenue Growth 2.7% 97.0% 3.4% 96.8% 2.6% to 3.6% Preliminary January and February same-property revenue growth is in-line with the Company’s 2020 business plan
Full-Year Guidance Guidance Midpoint National GDP Forecast 2.0% National Job
Growth 1.2% ESS Job Growth 1.7% ESS Market Rent Growth 3.0% ESS Same-Property Revenue Growth 2.6% - 3.6% 3.1% ESS Same-Property Expense Growth 2.5% - 3.5% 3.0% ESS Same-Property NOI Growth 2.2% - 4.0% 3.1% Total FFO Per
Share $13.83 - $14.23 $14.03 Core FFO Per Share (1) $13.74 - $14.14 $13.94 Total FFO Per (Diluted) Share Growth 0.7% - 3.6% 2.2% Core FFO Per (Diluted) Share Growth (1) 2.7% - 5.7% 4.2% 2020 GUIDANCE(2) Source: Company
DisclosuresCore FFO excludes acquisition costs and non-routine items.Guidance remains unchanged from Q4 ‘19 earnings release. 33
All data are based on Essex Property Trust, Inc. forecasts.U.S. Economic Assumptions: 2020 G.D.P.
Growth: 2.0%, 2020 Job Growth: 1.2% 2020 MSA LEVEL FORECAST 34 Residential Supply: Total supply includes the Company's estimate of multifamily deliveries of properties with 50+ units and excludes student, senior and 100% affordable housing
communities. Single-family estimates are based on trailing single-family permits. Multifamily estimates incorporate a methodological enhancement ("delay-adjusted supply") to reflect the anticipated impact of continued construction delays in
Essex markets.Job Forecast: Refers to the difference between total non-farm industry employment (not seasonally adjusted) projected 4Q over 4Q, expressed as total new jobs and growth rates.Rent Forecast: The estimated rent growth represents
the forecasted change in effective market rents for full year 2020 vs 2019 (excludes submarkets not targeted by Essex).Weighted Average: Growth rates are weighted by scheduled rent in the Company's Portfolio. Market New MF Supply New
SF Supply Total Supply % of MF Supply to MF Stock % of Total Supply to Total Stock Est. New Jobs % Growth Economic Rent Growth Los
Angeles 11,200 5,800 17,000 0.7% 0.5% 48,400 1.1% 2.6% Orange 2,300 3,900 6,200 0.6% 0.6% 19,400 1.2% 3.0% San
Diego 3,250 3,500 6,750 0.7% 0.6% 20,500 1.4% 2.8% Ventura 450 1,000 1,450 0.7% 0.5% 3,550 1.1% 2.8% So. Cal. 17,200 14,200 31,400 0.7% 0.5% 91,850 1.2% 2.8% San
Francisco 2,350 400 2,750 0.6% 0.4% 28,650 2.4% 3.3% Oakland 4,500 3,600 8,100 1.3% 0.8% 18,800 1.6% 2.2% San Jose 4,700 2,400 7,100 1.9% 1.0% 24,900 2.2% 3.0% No.
Cal. 11,550 6,400 17,950 1.5% 0.8% 72,350 2.0% 2.9% Seattle 6,900 6,500 13,400 1.4% 1.0% 43,200 2.4% 3.5% Total/Weighted Avg. (4) 35,650 27,100 62,750 1.1% 0.7% 207,400 1.7% 3.0% 2020 MSA Level Forecast:
Supply, Jobs, and Apartment Market Conditions Residential Supply (1) Job Forecast (2) Rent Forecast (3)
CAPITAL STRUCTURE & LIQUIDITY PROFILE As of 12/31/19(1) Consolidated portfolio
only. 35 12/31/19 Unsecured Credit Facility - CommittedBalance OutstandingUndrawn Portion of Credit FacilityCash, Cash Equivalents & Marketable Securities $1,235$55 $1,180$225 Total Liquidity $1,405 Liquidity Profile ($
millions) Secured Fixed Rate 13% Secured Variable Rate4% Unsecured Bonds 76% Unsecured Term Loan 6% Debt Composition(1)Credit Facility 1% Secured 17% Unsecured 83% Equity 78% Credit
Facility<1% Unsecured Debt 18% $26.4 Billion Total CapitalizationSecured Debt 4%
STRONG CREDIT PROFILE Source: Company Disclosures Please refer to the Company’s Public Bond Filings
with the SEC for the definitions of the covenants.Unsecured Debt Ratio is unsecured assets (excluding investments in co-investments) divided by unsecured indebtedness.Net Indebtedness is total debt less unamortized premiums, debt issuance
costs, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities at pro rata share.Adjusted EBITDAre is on a pro rata basis and excludes non-routine items in earnings and other adjustments as outlined on page S-17.1 of the
supplemental financial information furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 29, 2020. 36 Credit Ratings Agency Rating Outlook FitchMoody's S&P BBB+Baa1 BBB+ StableStable
Stable Public Bond Covenants(1) and Selected Credit Ratios Q4 ’19 Q3 ’19 Q2 ’19 Q1 ’19 Q4 ’18 Covenant Debt to Total Assets 35% 37% 36% 36% 36% < 65% Secured Debt to Total Assets 6% 7% 9% 9% 12% <
40% Interest Coverage 471% 457% 450% 442% 437% > 150% Unsecured Debt Ratio (2) 277% 270% 272% 273% 285% > 150% Net Indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDAre (3)(4) 5.5X 5.6X 5.5X 5.5X 5.4X - Unencumbered NOI to Adjusted
Total NOI 88% 85% 80% 78% 74% -
500 650 600 400 500 450 350 500 550 300 288 32 43 3 3 133 99 154 68 31 2 131 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Thereafter Unsecured
Debt Secured Debt Debt Maturities in Millions ($) 5.0% 9.2% 12.0% 10.4% 7.0% 10.9% 9.5% 8.7% 1.2% 9.2% 9.5% 7.4% Debt Maturity Schedule(1) 5.8% 4.3% 3.2% 3.7% 4.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 4.1% 4.0% 3.1% 3.8% % of Total
Debt Maturing/YearWeighted Average Interest RateWeighted Average Interest Rate: 3.8% WELL LADDERED DEBT MATURITY SCHEDULE (1) Data as of 12/31/19. Excludes lines of credit. 37
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995This presentation includes
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward- looking statements are statements which are not historical
facts, including statements regarding the Company's expectations, estimates, assumptions, hopes, intentions, beliefs and strategies regarding the future. Words such as “expects,” “assumes,” “anticipates,” “may,” “will,” “intends,” “plans,”
“projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “future,” “estimates,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements
regarding the Company’s financial guidance for the full-year 2020, its intent, beliefs or expectations with respect to the timing of completion of current development and redevelopment projects and the stabilization of such projects, the
timing of lease-up and occupancy of its apartment communities, the anticipated operating performance of its apartment communities, the total projected costs of development and redevelopment projects, co-investment activities, qualification as
a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the real estate markets in the geographies in which the Company’s properties are located and in the United States in general, the adequacy of future cash flows to meet anticipated
cash needs, its financing activities and the use of proceeds from such activities, the availability of debt and equity financing, general economic conditions including the potential impacts from the economic conditions, trends affecting the
Company’s financial condition or results of operations, changes to U.S. tax laws and regulations in general or specifically related to REITs or real estate, changes to laws and regulations in jurisdictions in which communities the Company
owns are located, and other information that is not historical information.While the Company’s management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company cannot assure the future results or outcome of the matters described in these statements; rather, these statements merely reflect the Company’s current
expectations of the approximate outcomes of the matters discussed. Factors that might cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, the following: the Company may fail to achieve its business objectives; the actual completion of development and redevelopment projects may be subject to delays; the stabilization dates of such projects may be
delayed; the Company may abandon or defer development or redevelopment projects for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions which make development less desirable, increases in costs of development, increases in the
cost of capital or lack of capital availability, resulting in losses; the total projected costs of current development and redevelopment projects may exceed expectations; such development and redevelopment projects may not be completed;
development and redevelopment projects and acquisitions may fail to meetexpectations; estimates of future income from an acquired property may prove to be inaccurate; occupancy rates and rental demand may be adversely affected by competition
and local economic and market conditions; there may be increased interest rates and operating costs; the Company may be unsuccessful in the management of its relationships with its co-investment partners; future cash flows may be inadequate
to meet operating requirements and/or may be insufficient to provide for dividend payments in accordance with REITrequirements; there may be a downturn in general economic conditions, the real estate industry, and the markets in which the
Company’s communities are located; changes in laws or regulations; the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness; unexpected difficulties in leasing of development projects; volatility in financial
and securities markets; the Company’s failure to successfully operate acquired properties; unforeseen consequences from cyber-intrusion; the Company’s inability to maintain our investment grade credit rating with the rating agencies;
government approvals, actions and initiatives, including the need for compliance with environmental requirements; and those further risks, special considerations, and other factors referred to in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other reports that the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. All forward -looking statements are made as of the date hereof, the Company assumes no obligation to
update or supplement this information for any reason, and therefore, they may not represent the Company’s estimates and assumptions after the date of this presentation.REGULATION G DISCLAIMERThis presentation contains certain non-GAAP
financial measures within the meaning of Regulation G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s definitions and calculations of such measures may differ from those used by other companies and, therefore, may not be comparable. The
Company’s definitions of these terms and, if applicable, the reasons for their use and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in the Appendix. DISCLAIMERS 39
PROJECTED EPS, FFO, AND CORE FFO PER DILUTED SHARE (1) 2020 guidance excludes inestimable projected
gain on sale of real estate and land, gain on sale of marketable securities, loss on early retirement of debt, political/legislative costs, and promote income until they are realized within the reporting period presented in the
report. 40 2019 1st Quarter 2020 Full-Year 2020 Actuals Low High Low High EPS - diluted $ 6.66 $ 4.83 $ 4.93 $ 9.20 $ 9.60 With respect to the Company's guidance regarding its projected FFO and Core FFO,
which guidance is set forth in the earnings release and on page S-14 of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of 2019, a reconciliation of projected net income per share to projected FFO per share and projected Core FFO per share, as
set forth in such guidance, is presented in the table below.2020 Guidance Range (1) (0.22) (0.16) (0.16) (0.33) (0.33) 0.10 - - - - 0.17 - - - - 7.98 2.02 2.02 8.03 8.03 0.20 0.05 0.05 0.20 0.20 (0.70) - - - -
(0.46) (3.28) (3.28) (3.27) (3.27) $ 13.73 $ 3.46 $ 3.56 $ 13.83 $
14.23 - - - 0.01 0.01 0.02 - - - - (0.02) - - - - (0.09) - - - - (0.06) - - - - (0.05) - - - - (0.01) (0.10) (0.10) (0.10) (0.10) (0.05) - - - - (0.10) - - - - 0.02 - - - - (0.01) - -
- - $ 13.38 $ 3.36 $ 3.46 $ 13.74 $ 14.14 Conversion from GAAP share count Impairment LossImpairment Loss from unconsolidated co-investment Depreciation and amortizationNoncontrolling interest related to Operating Partnership units
Gain on sale of real estateGain on remeasurement of co-investmentFFO per share - dilutedExpensed acquisition and investment related costsDeferred tax expense on unrealized gain on unconsolidated co-investment Gain on sale of marketable
securitiesUnrealized gains on marketable securities Equity income from non-core co-investment Gain on early retirement of debt, netCo-investment promote incomeIncome from early redemption of preferred equity investmentsAccelerated interest
income from maturity of investment in mortgage backed security General and administrative and other, netInsurance reimbursements and legal settlements, netCore FFO per share - diluted
Net income available to common
stockholders $ 128,818 Adjustments:Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 6,364 Interest expense, net (1) 52,416 Depreciation and amortization 122,908 Income tax provision 50 Loss on sale of real
estate an land 3,164 Gain on sale of co-investment communities (50,227) Impairment loss 7,105 Impairment loss from unconsolidated co-investments 11,484 Co-investment EBITDAre
adjustments 22,573 EBITDAre 304,655 Gain on sale of marketable securities (534) Unrealized gains on marketable securities (1,430) Equity loss from non-core co-investment 418 General and administrative and other,
net 1,181 Insurance reimbursements and legal settlements, net (595) Income from early redemption of preferred equity investments (1,031) Accelerated interest income from maturity of investment in mortgage backed
security (7,032) Expensed acquisition and investment related costs 99 Gain on early retirement of debt, net (3,426) Adjusted EBITDAre $ 299,157 (1) Interest expense, net includes items such as gains on derivatives and
the amortization of deferred charges. 41 RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND OTHER TERMS ADJUSTED EBITDAre RECONCILIATIONThe National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT”) defines earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for real estate ("EBITDAre") (September 2017 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP")) before interest expense, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, and further adjusted for gains and losses from sales of depreciated operating properties, impairment write-downs of depreciated operating properties, impairment write-downs of investments in
unconsolidated entities caused by a decrease in value of depreciated operating properties within the joint venture and adjustments to reflect the Company’s share of EBITDAre of investments in unconsolidated entities.The Company believes that
EBITDAre is useful to investors, creditors and rating agencies as a supplemental measure of the Company’s ability to incur and service debt because it is a recognized measure of performance by the real estate industry, and by excluding gains
or losses related to sales or impairment of depreciated operating properties, EBITDAre can help compare the Company’s credit strength between periods or as compared to different companies.Adjusted EBITDAre represents EBITDAre further adjusted
for non-comparable items and is a component of the credit ratio, "Net Indebtedness Divided by Adjusted EBITDAre, normalized and annualized," presented on page S-6 of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of 2019 , in the section
titled "Selected Credit Ratios," and it is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as income tax payments, debt service requirements, capital
expenditures and other fixed charges.Adjusted EBITDAre is an important metric in evaluating the credit strength of the Company and its ability to service its debt obligations. The Company believes that Adjusted EBITDAre is useful to
investors, creditors and rating agencies because it allows investors to compare the Company’s credit strength to prior reporting periods and to other companies without the effect of items that by their nature are not comparable from period to
period and tend to obscure the Company’s actual credit quality.EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre are not recognized measurements under U.S. GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, the Company's presentation of EBITDAre and
Adjusted EBITDAre may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.The reconciliations of Net Income available to common stockholders to EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre are presented in the table below (Dollars in
thousands):Three Months Ended December 31,2019
ENCUMBEREDEncumbered means any mortgage, deed of trust, lien, charge, pledge, security interest,
security agreement or other encumbrance of any kind.FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (“FFO”) AND CORE FFOFFO, as defined by NAREIT, is generally considered by industry analysts as an appropriate measure of performance of an equity REIT. Generally, FFO
adjusts the net income of equity REITs for non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization of rental properties, impairment charges, gains on sales of real estate and extraordinary items. Management considers FFO and FFO which excludes
non-core items, which is referred to as “Core FFO,” to be useful supplemental operating performance measures of an equity REIT because, together with net income and cash flows, FFO and Core FFO provide investors with additional bases to
evaluate the operating performance and ability of a REIT to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures and to pay dividends. By excluding gains or losses related to sales of depreciated operating properties
and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help investors compare the operating performance of a real
estate company between periods or as compared to different companies. By further adjusting for items that are not considered part of the Company’s core business operations, Core FFO allows investors to compare the core operating performance
of the Company to its performance in prior reporting periods and to the operating performance of other real estate companies without the effect of items that by their nature are not comparable from period to period and tend to obscure the
Company’s actual operating results.FFO and Core FFO do not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by U.S. GAAP and are not intended to indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. These measures
should not be considered as alternatives to net income as an indicator of the REIT's operating performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. FFO and Core FFO do not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all cash needs
including principal amortization, capital improvements and distributions to stockholders. FFO and Core FFO also do not represent cash flows generated from operating, investing or financing activities as defined under GAAP. Management has
consistently applied the NAREIT definition of FFO to all periods presented. However, there is judgment involved and other REITs’ calculation of FFO may vary from the NAREIT definition for this measure, and thus their disclosures of FFO may
not be comparable to the Company’s calculation.The reconciliations of diluted FFO and Core FFO are detailed on page S-3 in the section titled "Consolidated Funds From Operations“ of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of
2019.INTEREST EXPENSE, NETInterest expense, net is presented on page S-1 in the section titled "Consolidated Operating Results” of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of 2019. Interest expense, net includes items such as gains on
derivatives and the amortization of deferred charges and is presented in the table below (Dollars in thousands): 42 RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND OTHER TERMS Three Months Ended December 31, Twelve
MonthsEndedDecember 31, 2019 2019 Interest expense $ 54,688 $ 217,339 Adjustments: Total return swap income (2,272) (8,446) Interest expense, net $ 52,416 $ 208,893
NET INDEBTEDNESS DIVIDED BY ADJUSTED EBITDAreThis credit ratio is presented on page S-6 in the section
titled "Selected Credit Ratios” of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of 2019. This credit ratio is calculated by dividing net indebtedness by Adjusted EBITDAre, as annualized based on the most recent quarter, and adjusted for
estimated net operating income from properties acquired or disposed of during the quarter. This ratio is presented by the Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an additional means of comparing the Company's ability to
service debt obligations to that of other companies. Net indebtedness is total debt, net less unamortized premiums, discounts, debt issuance costs, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities. The reconciliation of
Adjusted EBITDAre is set forth in "Adjusted EBITDAre Reconciliation" on page S-17.1 of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of 2019. The calculation of this credit ratio and a reconciliation of net indebtedness to total debt at pro
rata share for co-investments, net is presented in the table below (Dollars in thousands): Excludes investment in mortgage backed securityBased on the amount for the most recent quarter, multiplied by four.Adjustments made for properties in
lease-up, acquired, or disposed of during the most recent quarter and other partial quarter activity, multiplied by four. 43 RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND OTHER TERMS Total consolidated debt,
net $ 5,808,873 Total debt from co-investments at pro rata share 916,077 Adjustments: Consolidated unamortized premiums, discounts, and debt issuance costsPro rata co-investments unamortized premiums, discounts, and debt issuance
costs 33,4624,227 Consolidated cash and cash equivalents-unrestricted (70,087) Pro rata co-investment cash and cash equivalents-unrestricted (26,072) Marketable securities (1) (71,541) Net Indebtedness $ 6,594,939 Adjusted
EBITDAre, annualized (2) $ 1,196,628 Other EBITDAre normalization adjustments, net, annualized (3) 2,795 Adjusted EBITDAre, normalized and annualized $ 1,199,423 Net Indebtedness Divided by Adjusted EBITDAre, normalized and
annualized 5.5
NET OPERATING INCOME (“NOI”) AND SAME-PROPERTY NOI RECONCILIATIONSNOI and same-property NOI are
considered by management to be important supplemental performance measures to earnings from operations included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income. The presentation of same-property NOI assists with the presentation
of the Company’s operations prior to the allocation of depreciation and any corporate-level or financing-related costs. NOI reflects the operating performance of a community and allows for an easy comparison of the operating performance of
individual communities or groups of communities.In addition, because prospective buyers of real estate have different financing and overhead structures, with varying marginal impacts to overhead by acquiring real estate, NOI is considered by
many in the real estate industry to be a useful measure for determining the value of a real estate asset or group of assets. The Company defines same-property NOI as same-property revenues less same-property operating expenses, including
property taxes. Please see the reconciliation of earnings from operations to NOI and same-property NOI, which in the table below is the NOI for stabilized properties consolidated by the Company for the periods presented (Dollars in
thousands): 44 RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND OTHER TERMS Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Twelve MonthsEnded Twelve MonthsEnded December 31, December 31, December 31, December
31, 2019 2018 2019 2018 Earnings from operationsAdjustments: $ 116,818 $ 149,029 $ 481,112 $ 511,989 Corporate-level property management expenses 8,279 7,749 32,899 31,062 Depreciation and
amortization 122,908 120,597 483,750 479,884 Management and other fees from affiliates (2,504) (2,371) (9,527) (9,183) General and administrative 15,531 16,912 54,262 53,451 Expensed acquisition and
investment related costs 99 38 168 194 Impairment loss 7,105 - 7,105 - (Gain) Loss on sale of real estate and land 3,164 (39,617) 3,164 (61,861) NOI 271,400 252,337 1,052,933 1,005,536 Less:
Non-same property NOI (18,274) (12,518) (63,492) (53,044) Same-Property NOI $ 253,126 $ 239,819 $ 989,441 $ 952,492 PUBLIC BOND COVENANTSPublic Bond Covenants refer to certain covenants set forth in instruments governing
the Company's unsecured indebtedness. These instruments require the Company to meet specified financial covenants, including covenants relating to net worth, fixed charge coverage, debt service coverage, the amounts of total indebtedness and
secured indebtedness, leverage and certain investment limitations. These covenants may restrict the Company's ability to expand or fully pursue its business strategies. The Company's ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by
changes in the Company's operating and financial performance, changes in general business and economic conditions, adverse regulatory developments or other events adversely impacting it. The breach of any of these covenants could result in a
default under the Company's indebtedness, which could cause those and other obligations to become due and payable. If any of the Company's indebtedness is accelerated, the Company may not be able to repay it. For risks related to failure to
comply with these covenants, see "Item 1A: Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Financings" in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K and other reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC").The ratios set forth on page S-6 in the section titled "Public Bond Covenants" of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of 2019 are provided only to show the Company's compliance with certain specified covenants that are
contained in indentures related to the Company's issuance of Senior Notes, which indentures are filed by the Company with the SEC. See, for example, the Indenture dated August 7, 2019, filed by the Company as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Form
8-K, filed on August 7, 2019. These ratios should not be used for any other purpose, including without limitation to evaluate the Company's financial condition or results of operations, nor do they indicate the Company's covenant compliance
as of any other date or for any other period. The capitalized terms in the disclosure are defined in the indentures filed by the Company with the SEC and may differ materially from similar terms used by other companies that present
information about their covenant compliance.SECURED DEBTSecured Debt means debt of the Company or any of its subsidiaries which is secured by an encumbrance on any property or assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Company's
total amount of Secured Debt is set forth on page S-5 of the earnings supplement for the fourth quarter of 2019.
UNENCUMBERED NOI TO ADJUSTED TOTAL NOIThis ratio is presented on page S-6 in the section titled
"Selected Credit Ratios". Unencumbered NOI means the sum of NOI for those real estate assets which are not subject to an encumbrance securing debt. The ratio of Unencumbered NOI to Adjusted Total NOI for the three months ended December 31,
2019, annualized, is calculated by dividing Unencumbered NOI, annualized for the three months ended December 31, 2019 and as further adjusted for pro forma NOI for properties acquired or sold during the recent quarter, by Adjusted Total NOI
as annualized. The calculation and reconciliation of NOI is set forth in "Net Operating Income ("NOI") and Same-Property NOI Reconciliations" above. This ratio is presented by the Company because it provides rating agencies and investors an
additional means of comparing the Company's ability to service debt obligations to that of other companies. The calculation of this ratio is presented in the table below (Dollars in thousands): This table is based on the amounts for the most
recent quarter, multiplied by four.Includes intercompany eliminations pertaining to self-insurance and other expenses. 45 RECONCILIATIONS OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND OTHER TERMS NOIAdjustments:NOI from real estate assets
sold $ 1,085,600- Other, net (2) (7,123) Adjusted Total NOI 1,078,477 Less: Encumbered NOI (125,684) Unencumbered NOI $ 952,793 Encumbered NOI $ 125,684 Unencumbered NOI 952,793 Adjusted Total
NOI $ 1,078,477 Unencumbered NOI to Adjusted Total NOI 88% AnnualizedQ4'19 (1)
