XML 31 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Jan. 02, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as of the years ended 2015 and 2014 by reportable segment are as follows (in thousands):

 
 
Envelope
 
Print
 
Label
 
Total
Balance as of the year ended 2013
 
$
23,433

 
$
42,976

 
$
109,277

 
$
175,686

Foreign currency translation
 

 
(144
)
 

 
(144
)
Balance as of the year ended 2014
 
23,433

 
42,832

 
109,277

 
175,542

Foreign currency translation
 

 
(204
)
 

 
(204
)
Balance as of the year ended 2015
 
$
23,433

 
$
42,628

 
$
109,277

 
$
175,338


 
The impairment test for goodwill uses a two-step approach. Step one compares the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, step two must be performed. Step two compares the carrying value of the reporting unit to the fair value of all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangibles) as if the reporting unit was acquired in a business combination. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess. The Company's valuation of all of its reporting units was performed using the income approach in which the Company utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the present value of expected future cash flows of each reporting unit. The Company performed a market approach analysis in order to support the reasonableness of the fair value determined under the income approach.

The estimated fair value for each of the Company's reporting units, as of the year ended 2015, exceeded the respective carrying values of each reporting unit. As a result, it was concluded that the goodwill assigned to each reporting unit, as of January 2, 2016, was not impaired. Refer to Note 3 for detail on goodwill impairment recorded in discontinued operations. Additionally, there were no goodwill impairments recorded in the years ended 2014 and 2013

Other intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
Weighted Average Remaining Amortization Period (Years)
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated Impairment Charges
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated Impairment Charges
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
Intangible assets with definite lives:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Customer relationships
 
7
 
$
114,345

 
$
(27,234
)
 
$
(55,209
)
 
$
31,902

 
$
114,301

 
$
(27,234
)
 
$
(48,356
)
 
$
38,711

Trademarks and trade names
 
23
 
64,540

 
(46,493
)
 
(8,649
)
 
9,398

 
64,550

 
(46,493
)
 
(8,157
)
 
9,900

Leasehold interest
 
17
 
4,430

 

 
(516
)
 
3,914

 
4,430

 

 
(291
)
 
4,139

Patents
 
10
 
3,528

 

 
(3,192
)
 
336

 
3,528

 

 
(3,159
)
 
369

Subtotal
 
11
 
186,843

 
(73,727
)
 
(67,566
)
 
45,550

 
186,809

 
(73,727
)
 
(59,963
)
 
53,119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Trade names
 
 
 
84,900

 

 

 
84,900

 
84,900

 

 

 
84,900

Total
 
 
 
$
271,743

 
$
(73,727
)
 
$
(67,566
)
 
$
130,450

 
$
271,709

 
$
(73,727
)
 
$
(59,963
)
 
$
138,019


 
Annual amortization expense of intangible assets for the next five years is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
Annual Estimated
 Expense
2016
 
$
5,664

2017
 
5,273

2018
 
5,003

2019
 
4,885

2020
 
4,885

Thereafter
 
19,840

Total
 
$
45,550


    

Asset Impairments
 
During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company made the decision to retire a certain indefinite lived trade name during 2014 as a result of rebranding the Company's print business line. Accordingly, based on its evaluation using a relief-from-royalty and other discounted cash flow methodologies, the Company concluded that the trade name asset was impaired. An impairment charge of $24.5 million was recorded to reduce the carrying value to the estimated fair value. The trade name was fully amortized during 2014. There were no intangible asset impairments in the years ended 2015 or 2014.