Subsequent Event	6 Months Ended
Jun. 27, 2015
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Event	Subsequent Event As previously disclosed, on July 21, 2015, the Company dismissed Grant Thornton LLP ("GT") as the Company’s registered public accounting firm, effective immediately, due to GT’s determination that it was not independent of the Company with respect to the first two quarters of 2015, and not for any reason related to the Company’s financial reporting or accounting operations, policies or practices. GT concluded that it was not independent solely as a result of inadvertent "scope creep" by an employee of GT in its work for the Company regarding a non-material tax matter. In particular, the GT employee appeared on behalf of the Company at an administrative hearing on the matter, took action on the matter without required authorization from the Company and otherwise acted in excess of actual authorization, thus impairing GT’s independence. The decision to dismiss GT was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee"). The Audit Committee determined that GT was not independent of the Company with respect to the first two quarters of 2015, but only after the filing of the Company’s 2014 Form 10-K, which remains unaffected by the subsequent independence violation. The Audit Committee has commenced the process of selecting a new independent accounting firm. The Company expects that the new firm will be engaged to complete a re-review of the first quarter of 2015. The Company will devote all necessary resources to facilitate the new firm’s completion of its work on an expedited basis. There can be no assurance that the new firm will reach the same conclusions as GT regarding the application of accounting standards, management estimates or other factors affecting the Company’s financial statements. GT has confirmed that its impaired independence is unrelated to the Company’s financial statements, its accounting practices, the integrity of the Company’s management or for any other matter relating to the Company. As a result of GT’s impaired independence, the unaudited interim financial information as presented in the Company’s Q1 10-Q has not been reviewed by an outside independent registered public accounting firm as required by the rules of the SEC. As a result, the Q1 10-Q is considered deficient and the Company continues not to be timely or current in its filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). While the Q1 10-Q does not comply with the requirements of Regulation S-X and should not be interpreted to be a substitute for the review that would normally occur by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Company’s Audit Committee and management believe that the interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the end of and for the applicable quarter. Except for the absence of this review of the unaudited interim financial information discussed above, the Company believes that the Q1 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of the Exchange Act. As with the Q1 10-Q as described above, the unaudited interim financial information presented in this Form 10-Q has not been reviewed by an outside independent registered public accounting firm as required by SEC rules. While this Form 10-Q, like the Q1 10-Q, does not comply with the requirements of Regulation S-X, the Company’s Audit Committee and management believe that the interim financial information presented in this Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial position of the Company as of June 27, 2015, and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 27, 2015, and June 28, 2014, and cash flows for the six months ended June 27, 2015, and June 28, 2014. Except for the absence, for the reasons discussed above, of a review by an independent registered public accounting firm of the second quarter unaudited interim financial information, the Company believes that this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of the Exchange Act. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company believe, to the best of their knowledge, that the unaudited interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q and this Form 10-Q accurately portrays the financial condition of the Company for the applicable quarters. To that end, they provided the certifications under SOX Section 302. The SOX Section 906 certification by the officers, however was withdrawn from the Q1 10-Q and has been omitted from this Form 10-Q only as a result of GT’s independence violation as described above. The unaudited interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q was not, and the information presented in this Form 10-Q has not been, reviewed by an independent registered public accountant under PCAOB AU 722, Interim Financial Information ("PCAOB AU 722"). The Company believes that the Q1 10-Q and this Form 10-Q otherwise meet all of the qualifications of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder governing the preparation and filing of periodic reports as referenced in the applicable certifications. Before the Company’s officers can make a SOX Section 906 certification, the Company’s new independent accounting firm must complete its reviews of the unaudited interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q and this Form 10-Q under PCAOB AU 722, as required by SEC rules. Once that firm completes its PCAOB AU 722 reviews of this unaudited interim financial information for the first two quarters of 2015, the Company will file amendments to such filings with the SOX Section 906 certifications as soon as practicable.

Subsequent Event

As previously disclosed, on July 21, 2015, the Company dismissed Grant Thornton LLP ("GT") as the Company’s registered public accounting firm, effective immediately, due to GT’s determination that it was not independent of the Company with respect to the first two quarters of 2015, and not for any reason related to the Company’s financial reporting or accounting operations, policies or practices. GT concluded that it was not independent solely as a result of inadvertent "scope creep" by an employee of GT in its work for the Company regarding a non-material tax matter. In particular, the GT employee appeared on behalf of the Company at an administrative hearing on the matter, took action on the matter without required authorization from the Company and otherwise acted in excess of actual authorization, thus impairing GT’s independence.

The decision to dismiss GT was approved by the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee"). The Audit Committee determined that GT was not independent of the Company with respect to the first two quarters of 2015, but only after the filing of the Company’s 2014 Form 10-K, which remains unaffected by the subsequent independence violation.

The Audit Committee has commenced the process of selecting a new independent accounting firm. The Company expects that the new firm will be engaged to complete a re-review of the first quarter of 2015. The Company will devote all necessary resources to facilitate the new firm’s completion of its work on an expedited basis. There can be no assurance that the new firm will reach the same conclusions as GT regarding the application of accounting standards, management estimates or other factors affecting the Company’s financial statements.

GT has confirmed that its impaired independence is unrelated to the Company’s financial statements, its accounting practices, the integrity of the Company’s management or for any other matter relating to the Company. As a result of GT’s impaired independence, the unaudited interim financial information as presented in the Company’s Q1 10-Q has not been reviewed by an outside independent registered public accounting firm as required by the rules of the SEC. As a result, the Q1 10-Q is considered deficient and the Company continues not to be timely or current in its filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

While the Q1 10-Q does not comply with the requirements of Regulation S-X and should not be interpreted to be a substitute for the review that would normally occur by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Company’s Audit Committee and management believe that the interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the end of and for the applicable quarter. Except for the absence of this review of the unaudited interim financial information discussed above, the Company believes that the Q1 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

As with the Q1 10-Q as described above, the unaudited interim financial information presented in this Form 10-Q has not been reviewed by an outside independent registered public accounting firm as required by SEC rules.

While this Form 10-Q, like the Q1 10-Q, does not comply with the requirements of Regulation S-X, the Company’s Audit Committee and management believe that the interim financial information presented in this Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial position of the Company as of June 27, 2015, and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 27, 2015, and June 28, 2014, and cash flows for the six months ended June 27, 2015, and June 28, 2014. Except for the absence, for the reasons discussed above, of a review by an independent registered public accounting firm of the second quarter unaudited interim financial information, the Company believes that this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company believe, to the best of their knowledge, that the unaudited interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q and this Form 10-Q accurately portrays the financial condition of the Company for the applicable quarters. To that end, they provided the certifications under SOX Section 302. The SOX Section 906 certification by the officers, however was withdrawn from the Q1 10-Q and has been omitted from this Form 10-Q only as a result of GT’s independence violation as described above. The unaudited interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q was not, and the information presented in this Form 10-Q has not been, reviewed by an independent registered public accountant under PCAOB AU 722, Interim Financial Information ("PCAOB AU 722"). The Company believes that the Q1 10-Q and this Form 10-Q otherwise meet all of the qualifications of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder governing the preparation and filing of periodic reports as referenced in the applicable certifications. Before the Company’s officers can make a SOX Section 906 certification, the Company’s new independent accounting firm must complete its reviews of the unaudited interim financial information presented in the Q1 10-Q and this Form 10-Q under PCAOB AU 722, as required by SEC rules. Once that firm completes its PCAOB AU 722 reviews of this unaudited interim financial information for the first two quarters of 2015, the Company will file amendments to such filings with the SOX Section 906 certifications as soon as practicable.