XML 47 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company’s population of financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements as of
 
 
 
December 31, 2016
 
Fair Value as of December 31, 2016
 
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Noncontrolling interest put
$
15.2

 
$

 
$
15.2

 
$

Interest rate swap
14.6

 

 
14.6

 

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies
53.6

 

 
53.6

 

Deferred compensation liability
54.2

 

 
54.2

 

Contingent consideration
16.8

 

 

 
16.8

 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements as of
 
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
 
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Noncontrolling interest put
$
14.9

 
$

 
$
14.9

 
$

Interest rate swap
21.6

 

 
21.6

 

Cash surrender value of life insurance policies
45.5

 

 
45.5

 

Deferred compensation liability
46.8

 

 
46.8

 


The noncontrolling interest put is valued at its contractually determined value, which approximates fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest put increased by $0.4 consisting of a $0.1 increase in the contractually determined value and a $0.3 increase for foreign currency translation.
The Company offers certain employees the opportunity to participate in a DCP. A participant's deferrals are allocated by the participant to one or more of 16 measurement funds, which are indexed to externally managed funds. From time to time, to offset the cost of the growth in the participant's investment accounts, the Company purchases life insurance policies, with the Company named as beneficiary of the policies. Changes in the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies are based upon earnings and changes in the value of the underlying investments, which are typically invested in a similar manner to the participants' allocations. Changes in the fair value of the DCP obligation are derived using quoted prices in active markets based on the market price per unit multiplied by the number of units. The cash surrender value and the DCP obligations are classified within Level 2 because their inputs are derived principally from observable market data by correlation to the hypothetical investments.
Contingent accrued earn-out business acquisition consideration liabilities for which fair values are measured as Level 3 instruments. These contingent consideration liabilities were recorded at fair value on the acquisition date and are remeasured quarterly based on the then assessed fair value and adjusted if necessary. The increases or decreases in the fair value of contingent consideration payable can result from changes in anticipated revenue levels and changes in assumed discount periods and rates. As the fair value measure is based on significant inputs that are not observable in the market, they are categorized as Level 3.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, income taxes receivable, and accounts payable are considered to be representative of their respective fair values due to their short-term nature. The fair market value of the zero-coupon subordinated notes, based on market pricing, was approximately $79.3 and $177.1 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The fair market value of the senior notes, based on market pricing, was approximately $5,254.5 and $5,457.4 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company's note and debt instruments are considered level 2 instruments, as the fair market values of these instruments are determined using other observable inputs.