XML 65 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
AFFILIATIONS, DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2020
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
AFFILIATIONS, DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS AFFILIATIONS, DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
AFFILIATIONS — The following affiliated entities are accounted for under the equity method:

PennEast - Midstream has a 20% investment in PennEast. The following events have occurred with respect to PennEast in recent months:

On September 10, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that PennEast does not have eminent domain authority over NJ state-owned lands. A Petition for Rehearing En Banc was denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on November 5, 2019.
On October 8, 2019, the NJDEP denied and closed PennEast’s application for several permits without prejudice, citing the Third Circuit Court decision. On October 11, 2019, PennEast submitted a letter to the NJDEP objecting to its position that the application is administratively incomplete. PennEast's objections were rejected by the NJDEP on November 18, 2019.
In December 2019, PennEast asked the FERC for a two-year extension to construct the pipeline.
On January 30, 2020, the FERC voted to approve PennEast’s petition for a declaratory order and expedited action requesting that the body issue an order interpreting the Natural Gas Act’s eminent domain authority. On the same day, PennEast filed an amendment with FERC to construct PennEast in two phases. Phase one consists of construction of a pipeline in Pennsylvania from the eastern Marcellus Shale region in Luzerne County that would terminate in Northampton County. Phase two includes construction of the remaining original certificated route in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Construction is expected to begin following approval by FERC of the phased approach and receipt of any remaining governmental and regulatory permits.
On February 18, 2020, PennEast filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States ("petition") to review the September 10, 2019 Third Circuit decision.
On February 20, 2020, FERC granted PennEast’s request for a two-year extension to complete the construction of the pipeline.
On April 14, 2020, The US Supreme Court ordered the state of New Jersey to respond to PennEast's petition. The court directed NJ respondents, including state agencies and the NJ Conservation Foundation, to answer the petition by PennEast, with a response due June 2.

PennEast management remains committed to pursuing the project and intends to pursue all available options. SJI, along with the other partners, are intending to contribute to the project.

Our investment in PennEast totaled $85.0 million and $82.7 million as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. At March 31, 2020, the Company evaluated its investment in PennEast for impairment and determined there is not an other-than-temporary impairment, and have not recorded any impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of our investment. Our evaluation considered that the pending legal proceedings are at very early stages, and the intent is to move forward with all potential legal proceedings and other options available. Our evaluation also considered the current economic conditions as a result of COVID-19, noting that the timelines, potential options and legal proceedings have not been impacted. However, to the extent that the legal proceedings have unfavorable outcomes, or if PennEast concludes that the project is not viable or does not go forward as actions progress, our conclusions with respect to other-than-temporary impairment could change and may require that we recognize an impairment charge of up to our recorded investment in the project, net of any cash and working capital. We will continue to monitor and update this analysis as required. Different assumptions could affect the timing and amount of any charge recorded in a period.

Energenic - Marina and a joint venture partner formed Energenic, in which Marina has a 50% equity interest. Energenic developed and operated on-site, self-contained, energy-related projects. Energenic currently does not have any projects that are operational.

Millennium - SJI and a joint venture partner formed Millennium, in which SJI has a 50% equity interest. Millennium reads utility customers’ meters on a monthly basis for a fee.
Potato Creek - SJI and a joint venture partner formed Potato Creek, in which SJI has a 30% equity interest. Potato Creek owns and manages the oil, gas and mineral rights of certain real estate in Pennsylvania.

EnergyMark - SJE has a 33% investment in EnergyMark, an entity that acquires and markets natural gas to retail end users.

SJRG had net sales to EnergyMark of $5.2 million and $13.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

EnerConnex - SJEI has a 25% investment in EnerConnex, which is a retail and wholesale broker and consultant that matches end users with suppliers for the procurement of natural gas and electricity.

During the first three months of both 2020 and 2019, SJI made net investments in unconsolidated affiliates of $2.1 million.  As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the outstanding balance of Notes Receivable – Affiliate was $15.5 million and $18.1 million, respectively. These Notes Receivable-Affiliates balances are broken out as follows:

As of both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, $13.1 million of notes are related to Energenic, which are secured by Energenic's cogeneration assets for energy service projects, accrue interest at 7.5% and are to be repaid through 2025. As of both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, $4.4 million of interest has been accrued and is recorded in Accounts Receivable on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. No payments have been made on this note as of March 31, 2020.
As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the remaining $2.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively, of these notes are unsecured and accrue interest at variable rates.

SJI holds significant variable interests in these entities but is not the primary beneficiary. Consequently, these entities are accounted for under the equity method because SJI does not have both (a) the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. As of March 31, 2020, SJI had a net asset of approximately $90.0 million included in Investment in Affiliates on the condensed consolidated balance sheets related to equity method investees, in addition to Notes Receivable – Affiliate as discussed above. SJI’s maximum exposure to loss from these entities as of March 31, 2020, is limited to its combined investments in these entities and the Notes Receivable-Affiliate in the aggregate amount of $105.5 million.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - Discontinued Operations consist of the environmental remediation activities related to the properties of SJF and the product liability litigation and environmental remediation activities related to the prior business of Morie. SJF is a subsidiary of EMI, an SJI subsidiary, which previously operated a fuel oil business. Morie is the former sand mining and processing subsidiary of EMI. EMI sold the common stock of Morie in 1996.

SJI conducts tests annually to estimate the environmental remediation costs for these properties (see Note 11).

Summarized operating results of the discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, were (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 20202019
Loss before Income Taxes:  
Sand Mining$(19) $(21) 
Fuel Oil(56) (57) 
Income Tax Benefits16  16  
Loss from Discontinued Operations — Net$(59) $(62) 
Earnings Per Common Share from  
Discontinued Operations — Net:  
Basic and Diluted$—  $—  

SJG RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS - There have been no significant changes in the nature of SJG’s related-party transactions since December 31, 2019. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements in Item 8 of SJI's and SJG’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 for a detailed description of the related parties and their associated transactions.
A summary of related-party transactions involving SJG, excluding pass-through items, included in SJG's Operating Revenues were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20202019
Operating Revenues/Affiliates:
SJRG$1,029  $1,284  
Marina60  116  
Other20  20  
Total Operating Revenue/Affiliates$1,109  $1,420  

Related-party transactions involving SJG, excluding pass-through items, included in SJG's Cost of Sales and Operating Expenses were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20202019
Costs of Sales/Affiliates (Excluding depreciation and amortization)
SJRG*$126  $3,427  
Operations Expense/Affiliates:
SJI$5,610  $4,726  
SJIU955  —  
Millennium827  763  
Other443  535  
Total Operations Expense/Affiliates$7,835  $6,024  

*These costs are included in either SJG's Cost of Sales on the condensed statements of income, or Regulatory Assets on the condensed balance sheets. As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of SJI’s and SJG's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, revenues and expenses related to the energy trading activities of the wholesale energy operations at SJRG are presented on a net basis in Operating Revenues – Nonutility on the condensed consolidated income statement.