XML 68 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The following schedule presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill associated with the Safend reporting unit during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Balance as of December 31, 2012
$
4,038,000

Impairment loss
(2,590,000
)
Balance as of December 31, 2013
1,448,000

Impairment loss

Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
1,448,000


Wave tests goodwill for impairment annually on September 30 and during interim periods whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Wave uses a fair value approach in testing goodwill for impairment in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we must perform the second step of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss. In the second step, the reporting unit's fair value is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, in a hypothetical analysis that calculates the implied fair value of goodwill in the same manner as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is less than the carrying value, the difference is recorded as an impairment loss. The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2014 which resulted in no impairment of goodwill.
During the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013, the Company determined that sufficient indicators of potential impairment existed to require an interim goodwill impairment analysis for the Safend reporting unit. These indicators included, among others, significantly lower than expected revenue, identification of increased competition for transactions involving Safend products, inability of the combined sales force to close large transactions and downward revisions to management's short-term and long-term forecast for Safend. The revised forecast reflected changes related to revenue growth rates, current market trends, expected deal synergies and other expectations impacting the anticipated short-term and long-term operating results of Safend. Due to the aforementioned indicators, the Company concluded that there were qualitative factors for the Safend unit that indicated it is more likely than not that the fair value of the Safend reporting unit was less than its carrying amount.
The Company estimates the fair value of the Safend reporting units using the income approach. Under the income approach, the Company calculates the fair value of the Safend reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Cash flow projections are based on management's estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rate used is based on the weighted-average cost of capital adjusted for the relevant risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the business's ability to execute on the projected cash flows. The inputs used for the income approach are significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3 inputs, as described in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement.
When indicators of impairment are present, such as those noted above, the Company tests long-lived assets (other than goodwill) for recoverability by comparing the carrying value of an asset group to its undiscounted cash flows. The Company completed its annual long-lived asset impairment test as of September 30, 2014 which resulted in no impairment of the assets. Based on the results of the recoverability test during the first quarter of 2013 and fourth quarter of 2012, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Safend asset group exceeded its undiscounted cash flows and was therefore not recoverable. The Company estimated the fair value of the intangible assets under an income approach as described above. Based on the analysis, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1,600,000 and $5,300,000 on intangible assets during the first quarter of 2013 and fourth quarter of 2012, respectively. The decline in the fair value of the Safend intangible assets is attributable to the same factors as discussed above for the fair value of the Safend reporting unit.
After adjusting the carrying value of the reporting unit for the impairment of the intangibles noted above in the first quarter of 2013 and the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company completed the two step goodwill impairment test for the Safend reporting unit. This test resulted in an implied fair value of goodwill substantially below the carrying value of the goodwill. As a result, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $2.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2012, which resulted in a $4,038,000 remaining carrying value of Safend goodwill as of December 31, 2012 and an additional goodwill impairment charge of $2,600,000 during the first quarter of 2013, which resulted in a $1,448,000 remaining carrying value of Safend goodwill as of December 31, 2013. The goodwill impairment charge totaling approximately $2,600,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the impairment charge totaling approximately $4,100,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 which consists of the goodwill impairment of approximately $2,200,000 and an additional $1,900,000 of impairment on the customer relationship and in-process technology intangible assets, are included in the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets line item in the consolidated statements of operations. The developed technology impairment charge of approximately $1,600,000 and $3,400,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are included in the licensing and maintenance—cost of net revenues line item in the consolidated statements of operations.
Intangible Assets
The following schedule presents the change in the carrying value of intangible assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
December 31, 2014
Intangible Asset
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Accumulated
Impairment
Loss
 
Net
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Useful Life
(in years)
Developed Technology
$
6,426,000

 
$
(1,292,297
)
 
$
(5,038,100
)
 
$
95,603

 
3.8
Customer Relationships
3,972,000

 
(889,327
)
 
(1,786,673
)
 
1,296,000

 
6.8
Internal-use software
726,000

 
(182,710
)
 

 
543,290

 
3.8
Acquired Patents
1,100,000

 
(1,026,666
)
 

 
73,334

 
0.4
 
$
12,224,000

 
$
(3,391,000
)
 
$
(6,824,773
)
 
$
2,008,227

 
 
December 31, 2013
Intangible Asset
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Accumulated
Impairment
Loss
 
Net
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Useful Life
(in years)
Developed Technology
$
6,426,000

 
$
(1,266,803
)
 
$
(5,038,100
)
 
$
121,097

 
4.8
Customer Relationships
3,972,000

 
(697,327
)
 
(1,786,673
)
 
1,488,000

 
7.8
Internal-use software
726,000

 
(37,510
)
 

 
688,490

 
4.8
Acquired Patents
1,100,000

 
(806,667
)
 

 
293,333

 
1.4
 
$
12,224,000

 
$
(2,808,307
)
 
$
(6,824,773
)
 
$
2,590,920

 
 

Amortization expense associated with intangible assets was approximately $583,000, $548,000 and $1,597,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 respectively. The estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
Period
Estimated
Amortization
Expense
2015
$
436,028

2016
362,694

2017
362,694

2018
318,811

2019
192,000

Thereafter
336,000

Total
$
2,008,227