XML 28 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Critical Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Critical Accounting Policies  
Critical Accounting Policies

1.     Critical Accounting Policies

 

Wave’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable reserves, valuation of long-lived and intangible assets, software development and share based compensation. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

A detailed description of the accounting policies deemed critical to the understanding of the consolidated financial statements is included in the notes to Wave’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in its Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2011.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Six-Months Ended June 30, 2011

 

Wave receives revenue from licensing its EMBASSY Trust Suite software through distribution arrangements with our OEM partners, software development and other services.  Our distribution arrangements have given rise to separate software license upgrade agreements with the end users of the products distributed by the OEMs.  We apply software revenue recognition guidance to all transactions except those where no software is involved or software is incidental.  Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.  Persuasive evidence is generally a binding purchase order or license agreement. Delivery occurs when product is shipped, for our OEM distribution arrangements, or delivered via a license key, for our license upgrade agreements.

 

We enter into perpetual software license agreements, referred to by us as license upgrade agreements, through direct sales to customers and indirect sales through our OEM partners, distributors and resellers with the end users of the products distributed by the OEMs.  We have defined our two classes of end user customers as large and small based on those with orders in excess of 5,000 licenses and those with less than 5,000 licenses, respectively. These license upgrade agreements, or arrangements, generally include a maintenance component.  For arrangements with multiple elements, including software licenses, maintenance and/or services, revenue is allocated and deferred in amounts equivalent to the vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value for the undelivered elements and the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered elements is recognized as licensing revenue.  VSOE of fair value is based upon the price for which the undelivered element is sold separately.  Through December 31, 2010, the Company lacked sufficient maintenance renewal history to determine VSOE for the maintenance component of the arrangement and as a result, recognized the total arrangement fee over the term of the maintenance performance period.

 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we had sufficient independent maintenance renewals to establish VSOE of fair value of maintenance for our small class of customers.  Through June 30, 2011, we continue to lack sufficient independent maintenance renewals to establish VSOE for our large customer class.  As a result, beginning in the quarter ended March 31, 2011, for the small customer class, we have allocated the arrangement consideration among the elements included in our multi-element arrangements using the residual method. Under the residual method, the VSOE of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee for perpetual licenses is recognized as revenue upon delivery of the software, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

 

When VSOE of fair value for the undelivered elements does not exist, as is still the case for our large customer class, the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the performance period as licensing revenue.  At June 30, 2011, our deferred revenue consists of the unamortized balance of maintenance for sales to our small class of customers during the six-months ended June 30, 2011 and arrangements where VSOE does not exist — all large customer orders and small customer orders received prior to January 1, 2011.