qsb

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________

FORM 10-QSB
_______________________

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-23266

UROMED CORPORATION
(Exact Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)

Delaware	38-3717938
(State of Incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

115 East 57th Street, Suite 1118, New York, NY	10022
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(ZIP Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (646) 202-9679

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer x

At November 13, 2006, the Registrant had 15,601,262 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item	Description
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.	3
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND PLAN OF OPERATION.	3
ITEM 3.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	4

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.	4
ITEM 2.	CHANGES IN SECURITIES.	4
ITEM 3.	DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.	4
ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.	4
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION.	4
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.	4

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Back to Table of Contents

The Registrant's unaudited interim financial statements are attached hereto. Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND PLAN OF OPERATION Back to Table of Contents

Some of the statements contained in this quarterly report of Uromed Corporation, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as "we", "us", "our", "Company" and the "Registrant") discuss future expectations, contain projections of our plan of operation or financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use of words such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "intend," "plan," "believe," and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. From time to time, we also may provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public.

During 2002, we discontinued our former business operations in connection with our filing for bankruptcy. The Company emerged from bankruptcy in January 2005. The Company's current business objective is to seek a business combination with an operating company. We intend to use the Company's limited personnel and financial resources in connection with such activities. The Company may utilize its capital stock, debt securities or a combination of capital stock and debt securities, in effecting a business combination. It may be expected that entering into a business combination will involve the issuance of restricted shares of capital stock.

The issuance of additional shares of our capital stock:
Ÿ may significantly reduce the equity interest of our current stockholders;
Ÿ will likely cause a change in control if a substantial number of our shares of capital stock are issued, and most likely will also result in the resignation or removal of our present officer and director; and
Ÿ may adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common stock.

Similarly, if we issued debt securities, it could result in:
Ÿ default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after a business combination were insufficient to pay our debt obligations;
Ÿ acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we have made all principal and interest payments when due if the debt security contained covenants that required the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves and any such covenants were breached without a waiver or renegotiations of such covenants;
Ÿ our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security was payable on demand; and
Ÿ our inability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, if the debt security contained covenants restricting our ability to obtain additional financing while such security was outstanding.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At present, the Company has no business operations. We are dependent upon interim funding provided by management or affiliated parties to pay professional fees and expenses. Our management and affiliated parties have agreed to provide funding as may be required to pay for accounting fees and other administrative expenses of the Company. If we require additional financing, we cannot predict whether equity or debt financing will become available at terms acceptable to us, if at all. The Company depends upon services provided by management and affiliated consultants to fulfill its filing obligations under the Exchange Act. At present, the Company has limited financial resources to pay for such services and may be required to issue restricted shares in lieu of cash.

At September 30, 2006, we had no assets and had $11,500 in liabilities.

There are no limitations in the Company's certificate of incorporation on the Company's ability to borrow funds or raise funds through the issuance of restricted common stock to effect a business combination. The Company's limited resources and lack of having cash-generating business operations may make it difficult to borrow funds or raise capital. The Company's limitations to borrow funds or raise funds through the issuance of restricted capital stock required to effect or facilitate a business combination may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and future prospects, including the ability to complete a business combination. To the extent that debt financing ultimately proves to be available, any borrowing will subject us to various risks traditionally associated with indebtedness, including the risks of interest rate fluctuations and insufficiency of cash flow to pay principal and interest, including debt of an acquired business.

ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Back to Table of Contents

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of September 30, 2006, the Company's chief executive officer/chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in internal controls. During the quarterly period covered by this report, no changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Back to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES Back to Table of Contents

On August 17, 2006, the Company issued 400,000 restricted shares to Michael F. Manion in connection with the conversion of $7,500 in debt and 233,547 restricted shares to Ivo Heiden in connection with the conversion of $4,379 in debt. In addition, on August 17, 2006, the Company issued 213,333 restricted shares to Richard Rubin for legal securities compliance services valued at $4,000. The Registrant believes that the issuances of these restricted shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act as privately negotiated, isolated, non-recurring transactions not involving any public solicitation.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES Back to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS Back to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION Back to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K Back to Table of Contents

(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-QSB or incorporated by reference herein.

Exhibit No.	Description
31	Certification of CEO/CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32	Certification of CEO/CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter covered by this report: None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

/s/ Ivo Heiden
Ivo Heiden
CEO, CFO and Chairman
Dated: November 14, 2006

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements for the Nine and Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

Uromed Corporation
Balance Sheets Back to Table of Contents

		September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
		(Unaudited)		(Audited)

Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	0	$	0
Prepaid expenses		0		0
Total current assets		0		0

Other assets		0		0
Total assets	$	0	$	0

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable-trade	$	0	$	0
Advances from related parties		11,500		7,636
Total current liabilities		11,500		7,636

Stockholders' deficiency:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 authorized;
Series A preferred stock, 1,000,000 authorized; 900,000 issued and outstanding		90		90
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
15,601,262 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006; and
7,254,382 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005		1,560		725
Additional paid-in capital		89,229		(815)
Accumulated deficit		(102,379)		(7,636)
Total stockholders' deficiency		(11,500)		(7,636)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency	$	0	$	0

See notes to unaudited interim financial statements.

Uromed Corporation
Statement of Operations

		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
		(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
		2006		2005		2006		2005
Revenue	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

Costs and expenses:
General and administrative		15,500		868		94,743		7,111
Total costs and expenses		15,500		868		94,743		7,111

Net loss	$	(15,500)	$	(868)	$	(94,743)	$	(7,111)

Basic and diluted per shares amounts:
Basic and diluted net loss	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.00)

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted		15,479,030		7,254,382		7,864,271		7,254,382

See Notes to unaudited interim financial statements.

Uromed Corporation
Statements of Cash Flows Back to Table of Contents

		Nine-Month Ended		Nine-Month Ended
		September 30, 2006		September 30, 2005
		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

Cash flows used by operating activities	$	(15,743)	$	(6,643)

Cash flow from investing activities:
Cash used in investing activities		0		0

Cash flows from financing activities:
Advances from related parties		15,743		6,643
Net cash provided by financing activities		15,743		6,643

Change in cash		0		0
Cash - beginning of period		0		0
Cash - end of period	$	0	$	0

See notes to unaudited interim financial statements.

Supplemental information: Shares issued for services in 2006: 7,713,333 valued at $79,000.

UROMED CORPORATION
Notes to the Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
Back to Table of Contents

1. Basis of Presentation

Uromed Corporation, (the "Company"), was incorporated in Massachusetts in October 1990 and changed its domicile to Delaware in January 2005. Prior to filing for bankruptcy under chapter 7, Uromed marketed a portfolio of products utilized for cancer radiation therapy and prostate cancer surgery.

The Financial Statements presented herein have been prepared by us in accordance with the accounting policies described in our December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements which appear in that report.

The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related intangible assets, income taxes, insurance obligations and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other resources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

In the opinion of management, the information furnished in this Form 10-QSB reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and therefore do not include some information and notes necessary to conform with annual reporting requirements.

"Fresh Start" Accounting: On May 15, 2002 all assets were transferred to the chapter 7 trustee in settlement of all outstanding corporate obligations. We adopted "fresh-start" accounting as of May 16, 2002 in accordance with procedures specified by AICPA Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code."

All results for periods subsequent to May 15, 2002 are referred to as those of the "Successor Company".

In accordance with SOP No. 90-7, the reorganized value of the Company was allocated to the Company's assets based on procedures specified by SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". Each liability existing at the plan sale date, other than deferred taxes, was stated at the present value of the amounts to be paid at appropriate market rates. It was determined that the Company's reorganization value computed immediately before May 15, 2002 was $0. We adopted "fresh-start" accounting because holders of existing voting shares immediately before filing and confirmation of the sale received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and its reorganization value is less than its post-petition liabilities and allowed claims.

The accounts of the former subsidiaries were not included in the bankruptcy sale and have not been carried forward.

2. Bankruptcy Proceedings

On May 15, 2002, the Registrant filed a voluntary Chapter 7 petition under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of Massachusetts (case no. 02-13545). On January 19, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court approved an Order confirming the sale of debtor's interest in personal property to Park Avenue Group Inc. The material terms of the transaction confirmed by Bankruptcy Court authorized Park Avenue Group to appoint new members to the Registrant's board of directors and authorized an amendment of the Company’s Article of Incorporation with respect to the capital stock of the Company. On May 20, 2005, pursuant the Bankruptcy Court Order dated January 19, 2005, the board of directors approved and authorized such amendment of the Company’s Article of Incorporation and:

increased the number of authorized shares to 100,000,000 shares;
changed the par value of our common and preferred stock to $0.0001;
designated 1,000,000 series A preferred stock and issue 900,000 of such shares;

Resultant Change in Control: In connection with the Order confirming the sale of debtor's interest in certain intangible personal property to Park Avenue Group Inc. approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of Massachusetts on January 19, 2005, the Court authorized a change in control pursuant to which Ivo Heiden and Michael Manion became our new directors on January 20, 2005 and the new board of directors appointed Ivo Heiden as chief executive officer and Michael F. Manion as chief financial officer on January 20, 2005. The Court order further provided that the sale was free and clear of liens, claims and interests of others and that the sale was free and clear of any and all other real or personal property interests, including any interests in Uromed's subsidiaries. The Bankruptcy Court Order further provided that the existing officers and directors were deemed removed from office and also authorized the appointment of new members to the board of directors.

On May 20, 2005 the board of directors approved and authorized an amendment of our Articles of Incorporation to establish a Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 ("Series A Preferred Stock"). The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to 10 (ten) votes on all matters submitted to a vote of our common stockholders. On May 20, 2005, the board of directors authorized the issuance of 900,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which resulted in a change in control.

3. Earnings/Loss Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) for the period. Diluted earnings per share assume that any dilutive convertible securities outstanding were converted, with related preferred stock dividend requirements and outstanding common shares adjusted accordingly. It also assumes that outstanding common shares were increased by shares issuable upon exercise of those stock options for which market price exceeds the exercise price, less shares which could have been purchased by us with the related proceeds. In periods of losses, diluted loss per share is computed on the same basis as basic loss per share as the inclusion of any other potential shares outstanding would be anti-dilutive.

4. New Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) "Share-Based Payment," or SFAS No. 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R) revises FASB Statement No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, and its related implementation guidance. This Statement eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation using the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period, which is usually the vesting period. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective for companies filing under Regulation SB as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005, which for us will be our first quarter of the year ending December 31, 2006. We anticipate adopting SFAS No. 123(R) beginning in the quarter ending March 31, 2006. Accordingly, the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) will apply to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of the required effective date must be recognized as the requisite service is rendered on or after the required effective date. These new accounting rules will lead to a decrease in reported earnings. Although our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations, we are still evaluating the potential impact from adopting this statement.

In September 2004, the EITF reached a consensus regarding Issue No. 04-1, "Accounting for Preexisting Relationships Between the Parties to a Business Combination" ("EITF 04-1"). EITF 04-1 requires an acquirer in a business combination to evaluate any preexisting relationship with the acquiree to determine if the business combination in effect contains a settlement of the preexisting relationship. A business combination between parties with a preexisting relationship should be viewed as a multiple element transaction. EITF 04-1 is effective for business combinations after October 13, 2004, but requires goodwill resulting from prior business combinations involving parties with a preexisting relationship to be tested for impairment by applying the guidance in the consensus. We will apply EITF 04-1 to acquisitions subsequent to the effective date and in our future goodwill impairment testing.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets—an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29," which is effective for us starting July 1, 2005. In the past, we were frequently required to measure the value of assets exchanged in non-monetary transactions by using the net book value of the asset relinquished. Under SFAS No. 153, we will measure assets exchanged at fair value, as long as the transaction has commercial substance and the fair value of the assets exchanged is determinable within reasonable limits. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not anticipated to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections," which replaces APB Opinion No. 20 "Accounting Changes," and FASB Statement No. 3 "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements," and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This Statement requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This Statement shall be effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after the date this Statement is issued. We do not believe that adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material impact on our financial statements.

5. Recent Issuance of Unregistered Securities