XML 135 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]  
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following utility, nonutility, and nonregulated assets at December 31:
(Millions)
 
2013
 
2012
Electric utility
 
$
3,558.9

 
$
3,095.8

Natural gas utility
 
5,428.5

 
5,050.8

Total utility plant
 
8,987.4

 
8,146.6

Less: Accumulated depreciation
 
3,160.9

 
3,006.1

Net
 
5,826.5

 
5,140.5

Construction work in progress
 
353.3

 
203.1

Plant to be retired, net *
 
14.4

 

Net utility plant
 
6,194.2

 
5,343.6

 
 
 
 
 
Nonutility plant
 
142.3

 
120.2

Less: Accumulated depreciation
 
81.6

 
72.3

Net
 
60.7

 
47.9

Construction work in progress
 
38.0

 
19.6

Net nonutility plant
 
98.7

 
67.5

 
 
 
 
 
Integrys Energy Services energy assets
 
109.8

 
92.0

Integrys Energy Services other
 
19.7

 
17.9

Other nonregulated
 
26.2

 
14.0

Total nonregulated property, plant, and equipment
 
155.7

 
123.9

Less: Accumulated depreciation
 
46.4

 
36.3

Net
 
109.3

 
87.6

Construction work in progress
 
8.3

 
3.2

Net nonregulated property, plant, and equipment
 
117.6

 
90.8

 
 
 
 
 
Total property, plant, and equipment
 
$
6,410.5

 
$
5,501.9


*
In connection with the WPS Consent Decree with the EPA, early retirement of the Weston 1, Pulliam 5, and Pulliam 6 generating units was probable at December 31, 2013. These units are currently included in rate base, and WPS continues to depreciate them on a straight-line basis using the composite depreciation rates approved by the PSCW. The amount presented above is net of accumulated depreciation. See Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information regarding the Consent Decree.

We evaluate property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. During 2011, Integrys Energy Services recorded a pre-tax noncash impairment loss of $4.6 million related to its Winnebago Energy Center, a landfill-gas-to-electric facility. The impairment charge resulted from lower estimated future cash flows and was primarily driven by forward energy and capacity prices. The impairment charge was reported as part of operating and maintenance expense in the income statement. The fair value of the facility was determined primarily using the income approach, which was based on discounted cash flows that were derived from internal forecasts. These forecasts considered externally supplied forward energy and capacity pricing curves as well as renewable energy credits. Other assumptions included forecasted operating expenses, forecasted capital additions, anticipated working capital requirements, and the discount rate. The 7.5% discount rate used represented the estimated cost of capital for the facility and was also based upon the cash flow period used for the fair value assessment.

See Note 4, Discontinued Operations for additional impairment losses recorded in discontinued operations at Integrys Energy Services during 2012. The impairments were recorded on property and equipment either sold during 2012 or presented on the balance sheet as assets held for sale.