Form 10K for YE January 1, 20005 for Darling International

10-K 1 ye04k.htm FORM 10K YE JAN 1 2005 Form 10K for YE January 1, 20005 for Darling International

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2005

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005

/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number
0-24620

DARLING INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	36-2495346
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

251 O'CONNOR RIDGE BLVD.
SUITE 300, IRVING, TEXAS	75038
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (972)717-0300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

	Title of Each Class	Name of Exchange on Which Registered
	Common Stock $0.01 par value per share	American Stock Exchange ("AMEX")

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None:

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such report(s)), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES / X / NO / /

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. / X /

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES / X / NO / /

As of March 10, 2005, the last day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the shares of common stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant was approximately $226,531,000 based upon the closing price of the common stock as reported on the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") on that day. (In determining the market value of the Registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates, shares of common stock beneficially owned by directors, officers and holders of more than 10% of the Registrant's common stock have been excluded. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.)

There were 63,902,866 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding at March 10, 2005.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Selected designated portions of the Registrant's definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Registrant's 2005 Annual Meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report.

Page 1

DARLING INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

		PAGE
Item 1.	BUSINESS	3
Item 2.	PROPERTIES	9
Item 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	10
Item 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	10

PART II

Item 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	11
Item 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	13
Item 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	15
Item 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS	34
Item 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	41
Item 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	74
Item 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	74

PART III

Item 10.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT	75
Item 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	75
Item 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENET AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	75
Item 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	75
Item 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	75

PART IV

Item 15.		EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K		76
		SIGNATURES		80

Page 2

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

Founded by the Swift meat packing interests and the Darling family in 1882, Darling International Inc. ("Darling" or the "Company") was incorporated in Delaware in 1962 under the name "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc." On December 28, 1993, the Company changed its name from "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc." to "Darling International Inc." The address of the Company's principal executive office is 251 O'Connor Ridge Boulevard, Suite 300, Irving, Texas, 75038, and its telephone number at such address is (972) 717-0300.

Darling International Inc. is a leading provider of rendering, recycling and recovery solutions to the nation's food industry. The Company collects and recycles animal by-products and used cooking oil from food service establishments and provides grease trap cleaning services to many of the same establishments. The Company processes such raw materials at 24 facilities located throughout the United States, into finished products such as protein (primarily meat and bone meal, "MBM"), tallow (primarily bleachable fancy tallow, "BFT"), and yellow grease ("YG"). The Company sells these products nationally and internationally, primarily to producers of oleo-chemicals, soaps, pet foods, and livestock feed, for use as ingredients in their products or for further processing. In addition, the Company provides grease trap service to food service establishments under the name TORVAC. Grease trap service includes the scheduled periodic removal of grease and solids from the grease trap to ensure the trap functions as intended, keeping these materials from entering the sewer system. Many cities and municipalities have ordinances and/or regulations that require periodic grease trap service as part of restaurant operations.

Commencing 1998, as part of an overall strategy to better commit financial resources, the Company's operations were organized into two segments. These are: 1) Rendering, the core business of turning inedible food by-products from meat and poultry processors into high quality feed ingredients and fats for other industrial applications; and 2) Restaurant Services, a group focused on growing the grease collection business and grease collection equipment sales while expanding the line of services, which includes grease trap servicing, offered to food service establishments and food processors. For the financial results of the Company's business segments, see Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company's net external sales from continuing operations by operating segment were as follows:

	Fiscal 2004		Fiscal 2003		Fiscal 2002
Continuing operations:
Rendering	$201,138	62.8%	$214,189	66.3%	$176,057	67.4%
Restaurant Services	119,091	37.2%	109,078	33.7%	85,002	32.6%
Total	$320,229	100.0%	$323,267	100.0%	$261,059	100.0%

PROCESSING OPERATIONS

The Company creates finished products primarily through the drying, grinding, separating and blending of its various raw materials. The process starts with the collection of animal processing by-products (fat, bones, feathers, and offal) from meat packers, grocery stores, butcher shops, meat markets, and food service establishments, as well as used cooking oil from food service establishments and grocery stores.

The animal processing by-products are ground and heated to extract water and separate oils from animal tissue as well as to make the material suitable as an ingredient for animal feed. Protein is separated from the cooked material by pressing the material, then grinding and sifting it through screens. The separated tallow is centrifuged and/or refined for purity. The primary finished products derived from the processing of animal by-products are tallow and protein. Other by-products include feather meal and blood meal. Used cooking oil from food service establishments is processed under a separate procedure that involves heat processing and settling, as well as refining, resulting in derived yellow grease, feed-grade animal fat, or oleo-chemical feedstocks.

Page 3

PURCHASE AND COLLECTION OF RAW MATERIALS

The Company operates a fleet of approximately 650 trucks and tractor-trailers to collect raw materials from approximately 83,500 food service establishments, butcher shops, grocery stores, and independent meat and poultry processors. The raw materials collected are manufactured into the finished products sold by the Company. The Company replaces or upgrades its vehicle fleet as needed to maintain efficient operations.

Rendering materials are collected in one of two manners. Certain large suppliers, such as large meat processors and poultry processors are furnished with bulk trailers in which the raw material is loaded. The Company transports these trailers directly to a processing facility. Certain of the Company’s rendering facilities are highly dependent on one or a few suppliers. Should any of these suppliers choose alternate methods of disposal, cease their operations, have their operations interrupted by casualty, or otherwise cease using the Company’s collection services, these operating facilities would be materially and adversely affected. The Company provides the remaining suppliers, primarily grocery stores and butcher shops with containers in which to deposit the raw material. The containers are picked up by or emptied into Company trucks on a periodic basis. The type and frequency of service is determined by individual supplier requirements, the volume of raw material generated by the supplier, supplier location, and weather, among other factors.

Used cooking oil from food service establishments is placed in various sizes and types of containers which are supplied by the Company. In some instances, these containers are loaded directly onto the trucks, while in other instances the oil is pumped through a vacuum hose into the truck. The Company also sells a container for used cooking oil collection to food service establishments called CleanStar®, which is a proprietary self-contained collection system that is housed either inside or outside the establishment, with the used cooking oil pumped directly into collection vehicles via an outside valve. The frequency of all forms of raw material collection is determined by the volume of oil generated by the food service establishment.

The raw materials collected by the Company are transported either directly to a processing plant or to a transfer station, where materials from several collection routes are loaded into trailers and transported to a processing plant. Collections of animal processing by-products generally are made during the day, and materials are delivered to plants for processing within 24 hours of collection to eliminate spoilage. Collection of used cooking oil can be made at any time of the day or night, depending on supplier preference; these materials may be held for longer periods of time before processing. The Company charges a collection fee to offset a portion of the expense incurred in collecting raw material.

During the 2004 fiscal year, the Company’s largest single supplier accounted for approximately 6.5% of the total raw material processed by the Company, and the 10 largest raw materials suppliers accounted for approximately 30.0% of the total raw material processed by the Company. For a discussion of the Company’s competition for raw materials, see “Competition.” Many of the Company’s suppliers supply raw material under long-term supplier agreements. While the Company does not anticipate problems in the availability or supply of raw material in the future, a significant decrease in raw material volume could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

RAW MATERIALS PRICING

The Company has two primary pricing arrangements with its raw materials suppliers. Approximately 55% of the Company’s annual volume of raw materials is acquired on a “formula” basis. Under a formula arrangement, the charge or credit for raw materials is tied to published finished product commodity prices after deducting a fixed service charge. The Company acquires the remaining annual volume of raw material under “non-formula” arrangements whereby suppliers are either paid a fixed price, are not paid, or are charged for the expense of collection, depending on various economic and competitive factors.

Page 4

The credit received or amount charged for raw material under both formula and non-formula arrangements is based on various factors, including the type of raw materials, the expected value of the finished product to be produced, the anticipated yields, the volume of material generated by the supplier, and processing and transportation costs. Competition among processors to procure raw materials also affects the price paid for raw materials. See “Competition.”

Formula prices are generally adjusted on a weekly, monthly or quarterly basis while non-formula prices or charges are adjusted as needed to respond to changes in finished product prices or related operating costs.

FINISHED PRODUCTS

The finished products that result from processing of animal by-products are oils, primarily BFT and YG, and MBM, a protein. Oils are used as ingredients in the production of pet food, animal feed and soaps. Oleo-chemical producers use these oils as feedstocks to produce specialty ingredients used in paint, rubber, paper, concrete, plastics and a variety of other consumer and industrial products. Meals are used primarily as high protein additives in pet food and animal feed.

Predominantly all of the Company’s finished products are commodities which are quoted on established commodity markets or are priced relative to such commodities. While the Company’s finished products are generally sold at prices prevailing at the time of sale, the Company’s ability to deliver large quantities of finished products from multiple locations and to coordinate sales from a central location enables the Company to occasionally receive a premium over the then-prevailing market price.

MARKETING, SALES AND DISTRIBUTION OF FINISHED PRODUCTS

The Company markets its finished products worldwide. Marketing activities are primarily conducted through the Company’s marketing department that is headquartered in Irving, Texas. The Company also maintains a sales office in Los Angeles, California for sales and distribution of selected products. This sales force is in contact with several hundred customers daily and coordinates the sale and assists in the distribution of most finished products produced at the Company’s processing plants. The Company sells its finished products internationally through commodities brokers and through Company agents in various countries.

The Company sells products to numerous foreign markets, including Asia, the Pacific Rim, North Africa, Mexico and South America. The Company has no material foreign operations, but exports a portion of its products to customers in various foreign counties. Total export sales were $78.6 million, $110.6 million and $89.5 million for the years ended January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004, and December 28, 2002, respectively. The level of export sales varies from year to year depending on the relative strength of domestic versus overseas markets. The Company obtains payment protection for most of its foreign sales by requiring payment before shipment or by requiring bank letters of credit or guarantees of payment from U.S. government agencies. The Company ordinarily is paid for its products in U.S. dollars and has not experienced any material currency translation losses or any material foreign exchange control difficulties. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of the Company’s sales by country.

A case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (“BSE”) was diagnosed in a cow in the State of Washington on December 23, 2003. Within days of the initial media reports of the case of BSE, many countries banned imports of U.S.-produced beef and beef products, including MBM and initially BFT, though this initial ban on tallow was relaxed to permit imports of U.S.-produced tallow with less than 0.15% impurities. Despite the MBM market price fluctuations which occurred during late December 2003 and January 2004, the Company does not anticipate the need to make significant changes in its business plan or daily operations at this time. The Company’s management monitors market conditions and prices for its finished products on a daily basis. If market conditions or prices were to significantly change, the Company’s management would evaluate and implement such measures, if any, that it deems necessary to respond to the change in market conditions. On larger formula-based pricing suppliers, the indexing of finished product price to raw material cost effectively fixes the gross margin on finished product sales at a stable level, providing some protection to the Company from price declines.

Page 5

Finished products produced by the Company are distributed primarily by truck and rail from the Company’s plants shortly following production. While there are some temporary inventory accumulations at various port locations for export shipments, inventories rarely exceed three weeks’ production and, therefore, the Company uses limited working capital to carry inventories and reduces its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices. Other factors that influence competition, markets and the prices that the Company receives for its finished products include the quality of the Company’s finished products, consumer health consciousness, worldwide credit conditions and U.S. government foreign aid. From time to time, the Company enters into arrangements with its suppliers of raw materials pursuant to which such suppliers buy back the Company’s finished products.

COMPETITION

Management of the Company believes that the most competitive aspect of the business is the procurement of raw materials rather than the sale of finished products. During the last ten years, pronounced consolidation within the meat packing industry has resulted in bigger and more efficient slaughtering operations, the majority of which utilize “captive” processors (rendering operations integrated with the meat or poultry packing operation). Simultaneously, the number of small meat packers, which have historically been a dependable source of supply for non-captive processors, has decreased significantly. Although the total amount of slaughtering may be flat or only moderately increasing, the availability, quantity and quality of raw materials available to the independent processors from these sources have all decreased. These factors have been offset, in part, however, by increasing environmental consciousness. The need for food service establishments to comply with environmental regulations concerning the proper disposal of used restaurant cooking oil is offering a growth area for this raw material source. The rendering and restaurant services industries are highly fragmented and very competitive. The Company competes with other rendering and restaurant services businesses and alternative methods of disposal of animal processing by-products and used restaurant cooking oil provided by trash haulers and waste management companies, as well as the alternative of illegal disposal. Major competitors for the collection of raw material include: Baker Commodities in the West; National By-Products in the Midwest; and Griffin Industries in Texas and the Southeast. Each of these businesses competes in both the Rendering and Restaurant Service segments.

In marketing its finished products domestically and abroad, the Company faces competition from other processors and from producers of other suitable commodities. Tallows and greases are in certain instances substitutes for soybean oil and palm stearine, while protein is a substitute for soybean meal. Consequently, the prices of tallow, yellow grease, and protein correlate with these substitute commodities. The markets for finished products are impacted mainly by the worldwide supply of and demand for fats, oils, proteins and grains.

SEASONALITY

The amount of raw materials made available to the Company by its suppliers is relatively stable on a weekly basis except for those weeks which include major holidays, during which the availability of raw materials declines because major meat and poultry processors are not operating. Weather is also a factor. Extremely warm weather adversely affects the ability of the Company to make higher quality products because the raw material deteriorates more rapidly than in cooler weather, while extremely cold weather, in certain instances, can hinder the collection of raw materials. Weather can vary significantly from one year to the next and may impact comparability of operating results of the Company between periods.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Company maintains valuable trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade names, trade secrets, proprietary technologies and similar intellectual property. The Company has registered or applied for registration of certain of its intellectual property, including the names “Darling”, “Darling Restaurant Services”, “Torvac” and “CleanStar”, and the tricolor triangle used in the Company’s signage and logos. Company policy generally is to pursue intellectual property protection considered necessary or advisable.

Page 6

EMPLOYEES AND LABOR RELATIONS

As of January 1, 2005, the Company employed approximately 1,150 persons full-time. Approximately 47.4% of the total number of employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements; however, the Company has no national or multi-plant union contracts. Management believes that the Company’s relations with its employees and their representatives are good. There can be no assurance, however, that new agreements will be reached without union action or will be on terms satisfactory to the Company.

REGULATIONS

The Company is subject to the rules and regulations of various federal, state and local governmental agencies. Material rules and regulations and the applicable agencies are as follows:

The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), which regulates food and feed safety. Effective August 1997, the FDA promulgated a rule prohibiting the use of mammalian proteins, with some exceptions, in feeds for cattle, sheep and other ruminant animals (21 CFR 589.2000). The intent of this rule is to prevent further spread of BSE, commonly referred to as “mad cow disease.” Company management believes the Company is in compliance with the provisions of the rule. On January 26, 2004, the FDA announced intentions to modify its feed rule (21 CFR 589.2000) by removing the exemptions for certain products, including blood and blood products, and requiring dedicated processing lines for handling and processing restricted use and exempted proteins. On July 14, 2004, the FDA requested public comment on their intended modifications to the feed rule as well as regulations that would: 1) prohibit material derived from specified risk materials (“SRM”) and dead or non-ambulatory cattle in animal feed; 2) prohibit all animal proteins in feed for ruminant animals; and/or 3) require that only BFT either derived from SRM-free material or containing less than 0.15% impurities be allowed in animal feed. Only questions were posed in this announcement of proposed rulemaking, to which the Company, among others, responded in comments submitted to the FDA. No new regulations affecting animal feed or modifying the feed rule have been issued to date. This situation will likely continue to be fluid into 2005. On January 26, 2004, the FDA announced its intent to ban the use of certain animal tissue derived materials in food and supplements. Subsequently, on July 14, 2004, the FDA published regulations prohibiting: 1) SRM from human food and cosmetics; and 2) SRM and non-ambulatory or dead cattle from cosmetics. BFT that is either derived from SRM-free raw materials or contains less than 0.15% hexane insoluble impurities will be permitted in human food, supplements and cosmetics. Derivatives of BFT (glycerin and fatty acids) are exempt from these regulations. On September 30, 2004, the FDA issued Guidance Document #174, which cited the agency’s statutory authority to consider animal feed and feed ingredients derived from a BSE-positive animal to be adulterated and prohibit the use of such adulterated material in animal feed.

The The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), which regulates collection and production methods. Within the USDA, two agencies exercise direct regulatory oversight of the Company’s activities:
      -    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (“APHIS”) certifies facilities and claims made for exported materials, and
      -   Food Safety Inspection Service (“FSIS”) regulates sanitation and food safety programs.

On December 30, 2003, the Secretary of Agriculture announced new beef slaughter/meat processing regulations to assure consumers of the safety of the meat supply. The regulations prohibit non-ambulatory animals from entering the food chain, require removal of SRM at slaughter, and prohibit carcasses from cattle tested for BSE from entering the food chain until the animals are shown negative for BSE.
The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), which regulates air and water discharge requirements, as well as local and state agencies governing air and water discharge.
State Departments of Agriculture, which regulate animal by-product collection and transportation procedures and animal feed quality.
The United States Department of Transportation (“USDOT”), as well as local and state agencies, which regulate the operation of the Company’s commercial vehicles.
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which regulates securities and information required in annual and quarterly reports filed by publicly traded companies.

Such rules and regulations may influence the Company’s operating results at one or more facilities.

Page 7

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are required to file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s public reference room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room. The SEC maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. We file electronically with the SEC.

The Company makes available, free of charge, through its investor relations web site, its reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The address for the Company’s investor relations web site is http://www.darlingii.com/investors/investors.html.

Page 8

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

The Company’s corporate headquarters are located at 251 O’Connor Ridge Boulevard, Suite 300, Irving, Texas in an office facility, where the Company leases approximately 20,000 square feet.

The Company’s 24 operating facilities consist of 18 full service rendering plants, 4 yellow grease/trap grease plants, 1 blending plant and 1 technical plant. Except for 4 leased facilities, all of these facilities are owned by the Company. In addition, the Company owns or leases 20 transfer stations in the United States that serve as collection points for routing raw material to the processing plants set forth below. Some locations service a single business segment while others service both business segments. The following is a listing of the Company’s operating facilities by business segment:

LOCATION

DESCRIPTION

Combined Rendering and Restaurant Services Business Segments

	Blue Earth, MN	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	Boise, ID	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	Coldwater, MI	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	Collinsville, OK	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	Dallas, TX	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	Detroit, MI	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	Fresno, CA	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	Houston, TX	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	Kansas City, KS	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	Los Angeles, CA	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	Newark, NJ	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	San Francisco, CA *	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	Sioux City, IA	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	St. Louis, MO	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	Tacoma, WA *	Rendering/Yellow Grease/Trap
	Turlock, CA	Rendering/Yellow Grease
	Wahoo, NE	Rendering/Yellow Grease

Rendering Business Segments

	Omaha, NE	Rendering
	Omaha, NE *	Blending
	Omaha, NE	Technical Tallow

Restaurant Services Business Segments

	Chicago, IL	Yellow Grease/Trap
	Ft. Lauderdale, FL *	Yellow Grease/Trap
	No. Las Vegas, NV	Yellow Grease/Trap
	Tampa, FL	Yellow Grease/Trap

* Property is leased. Annual rent expense for these leased properties in the aggregate was $0.6 million in Fiscal 2004.

Substantially all assets of the Company, including real property, are either pledged or mortgaged as collateral for borrowings under the Company’s Senior Credit Agreement.

Page 9

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

LITIGATION

	The Company is a party to several lawsuits, claims and loss contingencies incidental to its business, including assertions by certain regulatory agencies related to air, wastewater, and storm water discharges from the Company’s processing facilities.
	Self Insured Risks
	The Company purchases its workers compensation, auto and general liability insurance on a retrospective basis. The Company estimates and accrues its expected ultimate costs related to claims occurring during each fiscal year and carries this accrual as a reserve until such claims are paid by the Company.
	As a result of the matters discussed above, the Company has established loss reserves for insurance, environmental and litigation matters. At January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, the reserve for insurance, environmental and litigation contingencies reflected on the balance sheet in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities were approximately $13.9 million and $12.4 million, respectively. Management of the Company believes these reserves for contingencies are reasonable and sufficient based upon present governmental regulations and information currently available to management; however, there can be no assurance that final costs related to these matters will not exceed current estimates. The Company believes that any additional liability relative to such lawsuits and claims which may not be covered by insurance would not likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, although it could potentially have a material impact on the results of operations in any one year.
	During the third quarter of Fiscal 2004, the Company concluded a settlement with certain past insurers on certain policies of insurance issued primarily before 1972, whereby the Company received a cash payment of approximately $2.8 million in return for an executed Settlement Agreement and Release in which the Company released the participating insurers from all actual and potential claims and liability under the subject insurance policies. The Company recorded receipt of the payment as a credit (recovery) of claims expense and previous insurance premiums included in cost of sales, within the Corporate segment.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended January 1, 2005.

Page 10

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “DAR”. The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the high and low closing sales prices per share for the common stock as reported on the American Stock Exchange.

	Market Price
Fiscal Quarter	High	Low
2004:
First Quarter	$3.53	$2.56
Second Quarter	$4.50	$3.25
Third Quarter	$4.75	$3.87
Fourth Quarter	$4.39	$3.60
2003:
First Quarter	$2.25	$1.72
Second Quarter	$2.45	$1.72
Third Quarter	$2.98	$2.20
Fourth Quarter	$3.05	$2.51

On March 10, 2005, the closing sales price of our common stock on the American Stock Exchange was $4.15. The Company has been notified by its stock transfer agent that as of March 10, 2005, there were 82 holders of record of the common stock.

The Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock since January 3, 1989. The Company’s current financing arrangements permit the Company to pay cash dividends on its common stock within limitations defined in its credit agreement. Any future determination to pay cash dividends on the Company’s common stock will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will be based upon the Company’s financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, plans for expansion, restrictions imposed by any financing arrangements, and any other factors that the Board of Directors determines are relevant.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets forth certain information as of January 1, 2005 with respect to our equity compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance, aggregated by (i) all compensation plans previously approved by the Company’s security holders, and (ii) all compensation plans not previously approved by the Company’s security holders. The table includes:

the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options;
the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding options; and
the number of securities that remain available for future issuance under the plans.

Page 11

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	1,274,969 (1)	$2.18	221,727
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	-	-	-
Total	1,274,969	$2.18	221,727

(1) Includes shares underlying options that may be issued pursuant to the 1994 Plan and the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, both of which plans have been previously approved by the Company's stockholders.

Page 12

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected consolidated historical financial data for the periods indicated. The selected historical consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the three years ended January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004, and December 28, 2002, and the related notes thereto.

                                              Fiscal 2004    Fiscal 2003   Fiscal 2002    Fiscal 2001    Fiscal 2000
                                              -----------    -----------   -----------    -----------    -----------
                                               Fifty-two     Fifty-three     Fifty-two     Fifty-two      Fifty-two
                                              Weeks Ended    Weeks Ended   Weeks Ended    Weeks Ended    Weeks Ended
                                              January 1,      January 3,   December 28,   December 29,   December 30,
                                                 2005           2004           2002           2001           2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   (dollars in thousands, except ratios and per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
   Net sales ................................  $ 320,229      $ 323,267     $ 261,059      $ 241,350      $ 227,811
                                               ----------     ----------    ----------     ----------     ----------
   Cost of sales and operating expenses (a)      237,925        245,175       193,632        184,230        176,612
   Selling, general and administrative
      expenses  .............................     36,509         35,808        30,169         28,212         26,217
   Depreciation and amortization ............     15,224         15,124        16,415         24,859         26,787
                                               ----------     ----------    ----------     ----------     ----------
   Operating income/(loss) ..................     30,571         27,160        20,843          4,049         (1,805)
   Interest expense .........................      6,759          2,363         6,408         14,160         13,971
   Other (income)/expense, net  (b) .........        299         (3,914)       (2,006)         1,608          1,359
                                               ----------     ----------    ----------     ----------     ----------
   Income/(loss) from continuing operations
      before income taxes ...................     23,513         28,711        16,441        (11,719)       (17,135)
   Income tax expense/(benefit) .............      9,245         10,632         7,151              -              -
                                               ----------     ----------    ----------     ----------     ----------
   Income/(loss) from continuing operations       14,268         18,079         9,290        (11,719)       (17,135)
   Income/(loss) from discontinued operations,
      net of tax    .........................       (376)           112          (327)          (126)        (2,054)
                                               ----------     ----------    ----------     ----------     ----------
   Net Income/(Loss) ........................  $  13,892      $  18,191     $   8,963      $ (11,845)     $ (19,189)
                                               ==========     ==========    ==========     ==========     ==========

   Basic earnings/(loss) per common share ...    $  0.22        $  0.29       $  0.18        $ (0.76)       $ (1.23)
   Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share..    $  0.22        $  0.29       $  0.18        $ (0.76)       $ (1.23)
   Weighted average shares outstanding ......     63,840         62,588        45,003         15,568         15,568
   Diluted weighted average shares
      outstanding  ..........................     64,463         63,188        45,577         15,568         15,568

Other Financial Data:
   Adjusted EBITDA  (c) .....................  $  45,795      $  42,284     $  37,258      $  28,908      $  24,982
   Depreciation .............................     11,345         10,958        12,135         19,603         21,147
   Amortization .............................      3,879          4,166         4,280          5,256          5,640
   Capital expenditures .....................     13,312         11,586        13,433          8,847          7,287

Balance Sheet Data:
   Working capital/(deficiency) .............  $  39,602      $  31,189     $  13,797      $(116,718)     $(106,809)
   Total assets .............................    182,809        174,649       162,912        159,079        174,505
   Current portion of long-term debt ........      5,030          7,489         8,372        120,053        109,528
   Total long-term debt less current portion.     49,528         48,188        60,055              -              -
   Stockholders' equity/(deficit) ...........     67,235         55,282        35,914         (9,654)         2,724

---------------------------------------------

(a)

Included in cost of sales and operating expenses is a settlement with certain past insurers of approximately $2.8 million recorded in Fiscal 2004 as a credit (recovery) of claims expense and previous insurance premiums.

(b)

Included in other (income)/expense is gain on early retirement of debt of $1.3 million in Fiscal 2004, $4.7 million in Fiscal 2003, and $0.8 million in Fiscal 2002. Also included in other (income)/expense is loss on redemption of preferred stock of approximately $1.7 million in Fiscal 2004.

Page 13

(c)

Adjusted EBITDA is presented here not as an alternative to net income, but rather as a measure of the Company’s operating performance and is not intended to be a presentation in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Since EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the presentation in this report may not be comparable to those disclosed by other companies.

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated below and represents, for any relevant period, net income/(loss) plus depreciation and amortization, interest expense, income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, income tax provision/(benefit) and other income/(expense). The Company believes Adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure for investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. In addition, management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is useful in evaluating our operating performance compared to that of other companies in our industry because the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA generally eliminates the effects of financing, income taxes and certain non-cash and other items that may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a result, the Company’s management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a measure to evaluate performance and for other discretionary purposes. However, Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under U.S. GAAP, should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of operating results or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity, and is not intended to be a presentation in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, since Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the presentation in this report may not be comparable to those disclosed by other companies.

In addition to the foregoing, management also uses or will use Adjusted EBITDA to measure compliance with certain financial covenants under our new Senior Credit Agreement. The amounts shown below for Adjusted EBITDA differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our Senior Credit Agreement, as those definitions permit further adjustment to reflect certain other non-cash charges.

Reconciliation of Net Income/(Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA

                                              January 1,    January 3,   December 28,   December 29,   December 30,
            (dollars in thousands)                2005         2004          2002           2001          2000
       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       Net income/(loss) ...................   $ 13,892      $ 18,191      $  8,963      $(11,845)     $(19,189)
       Depreciation and amortization .......     15,224        15,124        16,415        24,859        26,787
       Interest expense ....................      6,759         2,363         6,408        14,160        13,971
       (Income)/loss from discontinued
          operations, net of tax ...........        376          (112)          327           126         2,054
       Income tax expense ..................      9,245        10,632         7,151             -             -
       Other (income)/expense ..............        299        (3,914)       (2,006)        1,608         1,359
                                               ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
       Adjusted EBITDA .....................   $ 45,795      $ 42,284      $ 37,258      $ 28,908      $ 24,982
                                               =========     =========     =========     =========     =========

Page 14

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth in Item 1 of this report, under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 7A of this report, and elsewhere in this report.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 8 of this report. The Company is organized along two operating business segments. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Overview

Major challenges faced by the Company during Fiscal 2004 included reduced raw material supplies, lower finished product margins at the Company’s export locations, high relative prices for diesel fuel and natural gas, and increased administrative costs for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. During Fiscal 2004, anticipated new government regulations pertaining to BSE, were never implemented, which contributed to an environment of uncertainty regarding the impact of those anticipated regulations. Export markets in foreign countries for U.S. produced finished beef products and other cattle by-products were closed throughout Fiscal 2004. The effects of these challenges during Fiscal 2004 are summarized in the sections which follow.

While operating income increased by $3.4 million in Fiscal 2004 compared to Fiscal 2003, these challenges indicate there can be no assurance that operating results achieved by the Company in Fiscal 2004 are indicative of future operating performance of the Company.

Summary of Critical Issues Faced by the Company during Fiscal 2004

Lower raw material volumes were collected from suppliers during Fiscal 2004, as trends noted during the third quarter of Fiscal 2004 continued to decline during the fourth quarter as well. Management believes that weak cattle slaughter margins in the meat processing industry, along with export restrictions on U.S. beef products, contributed to a decline in red meat raw material volumes collected by the Company during Fiscal 2004. Additionally, the Company operated fifty-two weeks during Fiscal 2004, compared to fifty-three weeks of operations in Fiscal 2003, which also contributed to the decline in raw material volume from 2003 to 2004. The financial impact of lower raw material volumes on sales revenue and raw material cost is summarized below in Results of Operations.
The average price of the Company’s finished products was higher during the first, second and third quarters of Fiscal 2004 compared to the same periods in Fiscal 2003, but began to decline in the third quarter and continued to decline during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2004. The average price of the Company’s finished products was lower in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2004, compared to the same period in Fiscal 2003. The average sales price of the Company’s finished goods for the full year in Fiscal 2004 was slightly higher compared to the full year in Fiscal 2003. Management believes that closure of foreign export markets to U.S.-produced beef products resulted in lower commodity price premiums in the Company’s export locations, increased domestic supply of those finished products, primarily MBM, and forced the Company to find new domestic markets for its finished products. In prior years, the Company received a premium to domestic commodity finished goods prices in certain of its export locations. The ban on export markets of U.S.-produced beef products resulted in the loss of that price premium during Fiscal 2004. The financial impact of finished goods prices on sales revenue and raw material cost is summarized below in Results of Operations. Comparative sales price information from the Jacobsen index, an established trading exchange publisher used by management, is listed below in Summary of Key Indicators.

Page 15

High energy prices for both natural gas and diesel fuel persisted throughout Fiscal 2004. Management believes that high prices were due in part to fears of potential natural gas shortages resulting from feared supply and demand imbalances, and from fears of potential crude oil shortages resulting from war in Iraq and ongoing strife in the Middle East. The Company attempts to manage natural gas price risk by entering into forward purchase agreements with all of its natural gas suppliers that permit such contracts, through the use of fixed for float swap agreements, in order to purchase natural gas for future months when prices are relatively low, and has the ability to burn alternate fuels at various plant locations when economically favorable to do so. The Company has limited diesel fuel storage capabilities at its plant locations and regional suppliers have not been willing to enter into forward purchase agreements on terms acceptable to the Company. The financial impact of higher natural gas and diesel fuel prices is summarized below in Results of Operations.
The Company entered a new Senior Credit Agreement with new lenders on April 2, 2004. The refinancing replaces the prior Amended and Restated Credit Agreement executed on May 13, 2002, as discussed elsewhere herein.
During the third quarter of Fiscal 2004, the Company concluded a settlement with certain past insurers on certain policies of insurance issued primarily before 1972, whereby the Company received a cash payment of approximately $2.8 million in return for an executed Settlement Agreement and Release in which the Company released the participating insurers from all actual and potential claims and liability under the subject insurance policies. The Company recorded receipt of the payment as a credit (recovery) of claims expense and previous insurance premiums included in cost of sales and operating expenses, within the corporate segment.
During Fiscal 2004, the Company incurred higher contract labor expense, consulting fees, and audit fees related to the Company’s efforts to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These expenses related to the Company’s documentation and evaluation of its system of internal controls in accordance with the requirements of the Act.

Summary of Critical Issues and Known Trends Faced by the Company in Fiscal 2005 and Thereafter

A case of BSE was diagnosed in a cow in the State of Washington on December 23, 2003. A summary of the impact of this case of BSE follows:
1. Within days of the initial media reports of the case of BSE, many countries banned imports of U.S. produced beef and beef products, including meat and bone meal and initially tallow, though this initial ban on tallow was relaxed to permit imports of U.S. produced tallow with less than 0.15% impurities.
2. U.S. government regulations issued in response to the case of BSE include:
  - On December 30, 2003, the Secretary of Agriculture announced new beef slaughter/meat processing regulations to assure consumers of the safety of the meat supply. The regulations prohibit non-ambulatory animals from entering the food chain, require removal of SRM at slaughter, and prohibit carcasses from cattle tested for BSE from entering the food chain until the animals are shown negative for BSE.
  - On January 26, 2004, the FDA announced intentions to modify its feed rule (21 CFR 589.2000) by removing the exemptions for certain products, including blood and blood products, and requiring dedicated processing lines for handling and processing restricted use and exempted proteins. On July 14, 2004, the FDA requested public comment on their intended modifications to the feed rule as well as regulations that would: 1) prohibit material derived from SRM and dead or non-ambulatory cattle in animal feed; 2) prohibit all animal proteins in feed for ruminant animals; and/or 3) require that only BFT either derived from SRM-free material or containing less than 0.15% impurities be allowed in animal feed. Only questions were posed in this announcement of proposed rulemaking, to which the Company, among others, responded in comments submitted to the FDA. No new regulations affecting animal feed or modifying the feed rule have been issued to date. This situation will likely continue to be fluid into 2005. On January 26, 2004, the FDA announced its intent to ban the use of certain animal tissue derived materials in food and supplements. Subsequently, on July 14, 2004, the FDA published regulations prohibiting: 1) SRM from human food and cosmetics; and 2) SRM and non-ambulatory or dead cattle from cosmetics. BFT that is either derived from SRM-free raw materials or contains less than 0.15% hexane insoluble impurities will be permitted in human food, supplements and cosmetics. Derivatives of BFT (glycerin and fatty acids) are exempt from these regulations. On September 30, 2004, the FDA issued Guidance Document #174, which cited the agency’s statutory authority to consider animal feed and feed ingredients derived from a BSE-positive animal to be adulterated and prohibit the use of such adulterated material in animal feed.
  Page 16
3. As a result of the BSE case, many foreign countries closed their borders to U.S. beef products, including MBM. Despite the MBM market price fluctuations that occurred during late December 2003 and January 2004, management of the Company did not believe it necessary to make significant changes in its Fiscal 2004 business plan or daily operations and management of the Company also considered these factors in developing its Fiscal 2005 business plan. The Company’s management monitors market conditions and prices for its finished products on a daily basis. If market conditions or prices were to significantly change, the Company’s management would evaluate and implement such measures, if any, that it deems necessary to respond to the change in market conditions. On larger formula-based pricing suppliers, the indexing of finished product price to raw material cost effectively fixes the gross margin on finished product sales at a stable level, providing some protection to the Company from finished product price declines. Management of the Company believes raw material volumes collected by the Company will continue to be subject to uncertainties during Fiscal 2005 because of continued weak margins on cattle slaughter experienced by the meat processing industry resulting in reduced cattle slaughter and lower raw material volumes available to the Company from its suppliers in the meat processing industry, and the potential impact of the planned opening of the U.S. beef market to Canadian imports of cattle on March 7, 2005, which was delayed indefinitely by a U.S. federal court injunction issued in early March 2005.
4. On January 4, 2005, APHIS published a final rule, effective March 7, 2005, which amends regulations on the importation of animals and animal products and establishes “Minimal-Risk Regions” for BSE. Canada was classified as a minimal-risk region by this rulemaking, even though the Canadian government confirmed two new cases of BSE on January 2, and January, 11, 2005. APHIS considers Canada to have adequate controls and safeguards in place and on March 7, 2005, planned to allow imports from Canada of live cattle less than 30 months of age for slaughter or as feeder cattle, as well as beef that is free of SRM and derived from cattle under 30 months of age. Imports of other live ruminant animals or meat derived from such animals that meet minimum age requirements were also to be allowed. APHIS banned imports of beef, live cattle, and other ruminant animals from Canada on May 20, 2003, following the discovery of BSE in a Canadian born cow. In early March 2005, the planned opening of the U.S. border to Canadian cattle and beef products was delayed indefinitely by a U.S. federal court injunction.
Energy prices for natural gas and diesel fuel remain high into Fiscal 2005 relative to historical pricing. The Company consumes significant volumes of natural gas to operate boilers in its plants to generate steam to heat raw material. High natural gas prices represent a significant cost of factory operation included in cost of sales. The Company consumes significant volumes of diesel fuel to operate its fleet of tractors and trailers used to collect raw material. High diesel fuel prices represent a significant component of cost of collection expenses included in cost of sales. Though the Company will continue to manage these costs, energy prices remain relatively high into Fiscal 2005 and represent an ongoing challenge to the Company’s operating results for future periods.

These challenges indicate there can be no assurance that operating results of the Company in Fiscal 2004 are indicative of future operating performance of the Company.

Page 17

Results of Operations

Fifty-two Week Fiscal Year Ended January 1, 2005 ("Fiscal 2004") Compared to Fifty-three Week Fiscal Year Ended January 3, 2004 ("Fiscal 2003")

Summary of Key Factors Impacting Fiscal 2004 Results:

Principal factors which contributed to a $3.4 million (12.5%) increase in operating income, which are discussed in greater detail in the following section, were:

Improved margins on the Company’s finished products
Improved recovery of collection expenses
Insurance settlement with certain of the Company’s past insurers

These favorable increases to operating income were partially offset by:

Lower raw material volume
Higher diesel fuel and natural gas expense
Lower hide sales revenue
Increased administrative expense related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Summary of Key Indicators of Fiscal 2004 Performance:

Principal indicators which management routinely monitors and compares to previous periods as an indicator of problems or improvements in operating results include:

Finished product commodity prices quoted on the Jacobsen index
Raw material volume
Production volume and related yield of finished product
Natural gas prices quoted on the NYMEX index
Collection fees and collection operating expense
Factory operating expenses

These indicators and their importance are discussed below in greater detail.

Prices for finished product commodities that the Company produces are quoted each business day on the Jacobsen index, an established trading exchange price publisher. These finished products are MBM, BFT and YG. The prices quoted are for delivery of the finished product at a specified location. These prices are relevant because they provide an indication of a component of revenue and achievement of business plan benchmarks on a daily basis. The Company’s actual sales prices for its finished products may vary from the Jacobsen index because the Company’s finished products are delivered to multiple locations in different geographic regions which utilize different price indexes. Average Jacobsen prices (at the specified delivery point) for Fiscal 2004, compared to average Jacobsen prices for Fiscal 2003 follow:

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2004

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2003

Increase/
(Decrease)

%
Change

MBM (Illinois)

$190.36 /ton

$194.01 /ton

$(3.65) /ton

(1.9%)

BFT (Chicago)

$ 17.95 /cwt

$ 18.26 /cwt

$ (0.31) /cwt

(1.7%)

YG (Illinois)

$ 15.12 /cwt

$ 13.39/cwt

$ 1.73 /cwt

12.9%

Increases in the average prices of the finished products the Company sells have a favorable impact on revenue which is partially offset by a negative impact to the Company’s raw material cost, due to formula pricing arrangements which compute raw material cost based upon the price of finished product. Decreases in the average prices of the finished products the Company sells have a negative impact on revenue which is partially offset by a positive impact to the Company’s raw material cost due to formula pricing.

Page 18

Raw material volume represents the quantity (pounds) of raw material collected from suppliers, including beef, pork, poultry, and used cooking oils. Raw material volumes provide an indication of future production of finished products available for sale and are a component of potential future revenue.

Finished product production volumes are the end result of the Company’s production processes, and directly impact goods available for sale, and thus become an important component of sales revenue. Yield on production is a ratio of production volume (pounds) divided by raw material volume (pounds), and provides an indication of effectiveness of the Company’s production process. Factors impacting yield on production include quality of raw material and warm weather during summer months, which rapidly degrades raw material. Both of these factors impacted the Company’s yield during Fiscal 2004.

Natural gas commodity prices are quoted each day on the NYMEX exchange for future months of delivery of natural gas. The prices are important to the Company because natural gas is a major component of factory operating cost and natural gas prices are an indicator of achievement of the Company’s business plan. Average NYMEX pricing for natural gas for the last two fiscal years are set forth below.

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2004

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2003

Increase

%
Increase

Natural gas

$6.14 /mmbtu

$5.39 /mmbtu

$0.75 /mmbtu

13.9%

The Company charges collection fees which are included in net sales in order to offset a portion of the expense incurred in collecting raw material. Each month the Company monitors both the collection fee charged to suppliers, which is included in net sales, and collection expense, which is included in cost of sales. The importance of monitoring collection fees and collection expense is that they provide an indication of achievement of the Company’s business plan.

The Company incurs factory operating expenses which are included in cost of sales. Each month the Company monitors factory operating expense. The importance of monitoring factory operating expense is that it provides an indication of achievement of the Company’s business plan.

Net Sales. The Company collects and processes animal by-products (fat, bones and offal), and used restaurant cooking oil to produce finished products of tallow, protein, and yellow grease. Sales are significantly affected by finished goods prices, quality of raw material, and volume of raw material. Net sales include the sales of produced finished goods, collection fees, grease trap services, and finished goods purchased for resale.

During Fiscal 2004, net sales decreased by $3.1 million (1.0%) to $320.2 million as compared to $323.3 million during Fiscal 2003. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to the following increases/(decreases) (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Lower raw material volume	$ (8.0)	$ (1.2)	$ -	$ (9.2)
Purchases of finished product for resale	0.9	(3.9)	-	(3.0)
Lower hide sales	(1.6)	-	-	(1.6)
Lower yields on production	(0.6)	(0.9)	-	(1.5)
Other sales decreases	-	(0.4)	-	(0.4)
Higher finished goods prices	2.9	6.2	-	9.1
Improved recovery of collection expenses	1.4	2.1	-	3.5
Product reclassifications	(8.0)	8.0	-	-
	$(13.0)	$9.9	$ -	$(3.1)

Page 19

Cost of Sales and Operating Expenses. Cost of sales and operating expenses includes prices paid to raw material suppliers, the cost of products purchased for resale, and the cost to collect and process raw material. The Company utilizes both fixed and formula pricing methods for the purchase of raw materials. Fixed prices are adjusted where possible for changes in competition and significant changes in finished goods market conditions, while raw materials purchased under formula prices are correlated with specific finished goods prices.

During Fiscal 2004, cost of sales and operating expenses decreased $7.3 million (3.0%) to $237.9 million as compared to $245.2 million during Fiscal 2003. The decrease in cost of sales and operating expenses was primarily due to the following (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Purchases of finished product for resale	$ 0.9	$ (3.9)	$ -	$ (3.0)
Insurance settlement	-	-	(2.8)	(2.8)
Lower raw material volume	(2.4)	(0.2)	-	(2.6)
Sewer and trap disposal	(0.4)	0.2	-	(0.2)
Higher gas, fuel and oil expense	0.8	0.5	-	1.3
Raw material prices	(2.9)	3.8	-	0.9
Higher energy costs, primarily natural gas	0.2	0.1	-	0.3
Higher payroll and related benefits	(2.1)	2.3	-	0.2
Other	(0.7)	(0.7)	-	(1.4)
Product reclassifications	(8.0)	8.0	-	-
	$(14.6)	$10.1	$(2.8)	$(7.3)

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $36.5 million during Fiscal 2004, a $0.7 million increase (2.0%) from $35.8 million during Fiscal 2003, primarily due to the following (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Payroll and related benefits expense	$ (1.8)	$ 2.4	$ 1.0	$ 1.6
Higher audit fees	-	-	0.7	0.7
Higher shareholder relations and board of director expenses	-	-	0.2	0.2
Lower legal and professional fees	-	-	(0.9)	(0.9)
Other expenses	(0.7)	0.3	(0.5)	(0.9)
	$(2.5)	$ 2.7	$ 0.5	$ 0.7

Increased expenses related to the Company's efforts to comply with requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 included higher contract labor (included in payroll expense) and higher audit fees. These expenses related to the Company's documentation and evaluation of its system of internal controls in accordance with the requirements of the Act. Expenses incurred related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance were approximately $1.2 million in Fiscal 2004, compared to expenses of less than $0.1 million in Fiscal 2003, an increase of approximately $1.2 million. The Company anticipates there will be on-going costs of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley in the future.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization charges increased $0.1 million (0.7%) to $15.2 million during Fiscal 2004 as compared to $15.1 million during Fiscal 2003.

Page 20

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $6.8 million during Fiscal 2004 compared to $2.4 million during Fiscal 2003, an increase of $4.4 million (183.3%). A summary of items contributing to the net increase in interest expense follows (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Interest expense on subordinated debt	$ -	$ -	$ 4.2	$ 4.2
Increased interest expense due to reduced amortization of the effect of SFAS 15	-	-	2.5	2.5
Increased interest expense on the new Senior Credit Agreement	-	-	0.8	0.8
Other increases	-	-	0.1	0.1
Decrease in interest expense on the refinanced amount of bank debt	-	-	(3.0)	(3.0)
Decrease in preferred stock dividends and accretion	-	-	(0.2)	(0.2)
	$-	$ -	$ 4.4	$ 4.4

During Fiscal 2004, preferred stock dividends and accretion were charged to interest expense as a result of application of SFAS 150 which was adopted the first day of the third quarter of Fiscal 2003 (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements). The Company’s outstanding preferred stock was redeemed during the second quarter of Fiscal 2004.

Other Income/Expense. Other expense was $0.3 million in Fiscal 2004, a $4.2 million expense increase from other income of $3.9 million in Fiscal 2003. The increase in other expense in Fiscal 2004 is primarily due to the following (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Decrease in gain on extinguishment of bank debt	$ -	$ -	$ 3.4	$ 3.4
Loss on redemption of preferred stock	-	-	1.7	1.7
Increase in gain on disposal of assets	-	-	(0.3)	(0.3)
Increase in interest income	-	-	(0.3)	(0.3)
Decrease in other expense	-	-	(0.3)	(0.3)
	$-	$ -	$ 4.2	$ 4.2

Gain on extinguishment of debt in Fiscal 2004 was $1.3 million, which resulted from retirement of debt with a carrying value of $20.1 million with a cash payment of $18.0 million, due to SFAS 15 accounting, net of related deferred loan costs of $0.8 million also extinguished upon payment of the debt. Included in other income in Fiscal 2003 was a gain on extinguishment of debt of $4.7 million, which resulted from retirement of debt with a carrying value of $43.9 million with a cash payment of $37.2 million due to SFAS 15 accounting net of related deferred loan costs of $2.0 million also extinguished upon payment of the debt.

Income Taxes. The Company recorded income tax expense of $9.2 million for Fiscal 2004, compared to income tax expense of $10.6 million recorded in Fiscal 2003, a decrease of $1.4 million (13.2%), primarily due to the decreased pre-tax earnings of the Company in Fiscal 2004.

Discontinued Operations. The Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations, net of applicable taxes, related to planned closure and sale of the Company’s London, Ontario, Canadian subsidiary of approximately $0.4 million in Fiscal 2004, compared to income from discontinued operations of approximately $0.1 million in Fiscal 2003, a decrease in income of $05 million, primarily due to accrued severance and pension costs accrued as a result of the decision to close the site, as discussed elsewhere herein.

Page 21

Fifty-three Week Fiscal Year Ended January 3, 2004 ("Fiscal 2003") Compared to Fifty-two Week Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2002 ("Fiscal 2002")

Summary of Key Factors Impacting Fiscal 2003 Results:

Principal factors which contributed to a $6.4 million (30.8%) increase in operating income, which are discussed in greater detail in the following section, were:

Higher average finished product sales prices, partially offset by:
Higher raw material prices
Higher energy expense
Higher payroll and related benefit expense

Summary of Key Indicators of Fiscal 2003 Performance:

Principal indicators which management routinely monitors and compares to previous periods as an indicator of problems or improvements in operating results include:

Finished product commodity prices quoted on the Jacobsen index
Raw material volume
Production volume and related yield of finished product
Natural gas prices quoted on the NYMEX index
Collection fees and collection operating expense

These indicators and their importance are discussed below in greater detail.

Prices for finished product commodities that the Company produces are quoted each business day on the Jacobsen index, an established trading exchange price publisher. These finished products are MBM, BFT and YG. The prices quoted are for delivery of the finished product at a specified location. The prices are relevant because they provide an indication of a component of revenue and achievement of business plan benchmarks on a daily basis. The Company’s actual sales prices for its finished products may vary from the Jacobsen prices because the Company’s finished products are delivered to multiple locations in different geographic regions which utilize different indexes. Average Jacobsen prices (at the specified delivery point) for Fiscal 2003, compared to average Jacobsen prices for Fiscal 2002 follow:

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2003

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2002

Increase

%
Increase

MBM (Illinois)

$194.01 /ton

$165.65 /ton

$28.36 /ton

17.1%

BFT (Chicago)

$ 18.26 /cwt

$ 13.47 /cwt

$ 4.79 /cwt

35.6%

YG (Illinois)

$ 13.39 /cwt

$ 9.31 /cwt

$ 4.08 /cwt

43.8%

The increases in average price of the finished products the Company sells had a favorable impact on revenue which was partially offset by a negative impact to the Company’s raw material cost, due to formula pricing arrangements which compute raw material cost, based upon the price of finished product.

Page 22

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2003

Avg. Price
Fiscal 2002

Increase

%
Increase

Natural gas

$5.39 /mmbtu

$3.22 /mmbtu

$2.17 /mmbtu

67.4%

During Fiscal 2003, net sales increased by $62.2 million (23.8%) to $323.3 million as compared to $261.1 million during Fiscal 2002. The increase in net sales was primarily due to the following increases/(decreases) (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Higher finished goods prices	$35.0	$11.3	$ -	$46.3
Increased purchases of finished product for resale	4.9	7.0	-	11.9
Higher raw material volume	1.9	2.9	-	4.8
Improved recovery of collection expenses	0.8	2.4	-	3.2
Increased hides sales	0.4	-	-	0.4
Lower yields on production	(2.4)	(0.8)	-	(3.2)
Other sales decreases	-	(0.5)	-	(0.5)
Product reclassifications	(2.9)	2.9	-	-
Raw material sales	0.4	(0.5)	-	(0.1)
Equipment sales	-	(0.6)	-	(0.6)
	$38.1	$24.1	$ -	$62.2

Cost of Sales and Operating Expenses. Cost of sales and operating expenses includes prices paid to raw material suppliers, the cost of product purchased for resale, and the cost to collect and process the raw material. The Company utilizes both fixed and formula pricing methods for the purchase of raw materials. Fixed prices are adjusted where possible for changes in competition and significant changes in finished goods market conditions, while raw materials purchased under formula prices are correlated with specific finished goods prices.

During Fiscal 2003, cost of sales and operating expenses increased $51.6 million (26.7%) to $245.2 million as compared to $193.6 million during Fiscal 2002. The increase in cost of sales and operating expenses was primarily due to the following (in millions of dollars):

Page 23

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Higher raw material prices	$19.9	$ 3.4	$ -	$23.3
Increased purchases of finished product for resale	4.9	7.0	-	11.9
Higher energy costs, primarily natural gas	6.0	1.3	-	7.3
Higher payroll and related benefits	2.6	1.4	-	4.0
Higher gas, fuel and oil expense	0.9	0.4	-	1.3
Higher insurance expense	0.7	0.5	-	1.2
Higher trap and sewer waste expense	0.5	0.6	-	1.1
Other expense increases	(1.5)	3.0	-	1.5
	$34.0	$17.6	$ -	$51.6

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $35.8 million during Fiscal 2003, a $5.6 million increase (18.5%) from $30.2 million during Fiscal 2002, primarily due to the following (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Higher payroll and related benefits expense	$ 0.6	$ 1.0	$ 1.6	$ 3.2
Higher legal, audit and professional fees	-	-	0.7	0.7
Other expense increases	(0.2)	0.3	1.6	1.7
	$ 0.4	$ 1.3	$ 3.9	$ 5.6

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization charges decreased $1.3 million (7.9%) to $15.1 million during Fiscal 2003 as compared to $16.4 million during Fiscal 2002, primarily due to various property and equipment assets becoming fully depreciated during Fiscal 2003.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $2.4 million during Fiscal 2003 compared to $6.4 million during Fiscal 2002, a decrease of $4.0 million (62.5%), primarily due to changes resulting from the effect of the provisions of SFAS 15 as it applies to the Company’s May 13, 2002, Recapitalization Agreement (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein) which reduced interest expense on bank debt. A summary of items contributing to the net decrease in interest expense follows (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Decrease in interest expense on the contractual amount of bank debt	$ -	$ -	$(2.4)	$(2.4)
Decrease in interest expense due to amortization of the effect of SFAS 15	-	-	(0.8)	(0.8)
Decrease in interest expense from forbearance fees (incurred in Fiscal 2002)	-	-	(1.7)	(1.7)
Increased interest expense due to preferred stock dividends and accretion	-	-	0.5	0.5
Increased interest expense due to higher amortization of deferred loan	-	-	0.3	0.3
Other increases	-	-	0.1	0.1
	$ -	$ -	$(4.0)	$(4.0)

Preferred stock dividends and accretion were charged to interest expense as a result of application of SFAS 150 which was adopted the first day of the third quarter of Fiscal 2003 (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements).

Page 24

Other Income/Expense. Other income was $3.9 million in Fiscal 2003, a $1.9 million increase (95.0%) from other income of $2.0 million in Fiscal 2002. The increase in other income in Fiscal 2003 is primarily due to the following (in millions of dollars):

	Rendering	Restaurant Services	Corporate	Total
Increase in gain on extinguishment of bank debt	$ -	$ -	$ 3.9	$ 3.9
Decrease in gain on disposal of assets	-	-	(1.7)	(1.7)
Decrease in interest income	-	-	(0.2)	(0.2)
Increase in other expense	-	-	(0.1)	(0.1)
	$ -	$ -	$ 1.9	$ 1.9

Gain on extinguishment of debt in Fiscal 2003 was $4.7 million, which resulted from retirement of debt with a carrying value of $43.9 million with a cash payment of $37.2 million, due to SFAS 15 accounting, net of related deferred loan costs of $2.0 million also extinguished upon payment of the debt. Included in other income in Fiscal 2002 was a gain of $1.7 million resulting from insurance proceeds received in excess of the net book value of assets destroyed by fire at the Company’s Norfolk, NE facility; and also included in other income in Fiscal 2002 was a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.8 million, which resulted from retirement of debt with a carrying value of $4.5 million with a cash payment of $3.7 million due to SFAS 15 accounting.

Income Taxes. The Company recorded income tax expense of $10.6 million for Fiscal 2003, compared to income tax expense of $7.2 million recorded in Fiscal 2002, an increase of $3.4 million (47.2%), primarily due to the increased pre-tax earnings of the Company in Fiscal 2003.

Discontinued Operations. The Company recorded income from discontinued operations, net of applicable taxes, of approximately $0.1 million in Fiscal 2003 compared to loss from discontinued operations of approximately $0.3 million in Fiscal 2002, an increase in income from discontinued operations of $0.4 million, as discussed elsewhere herein.

Page 25

FINANCING, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

On April 2, 2004, the Company entered into a new Senior Credit Agreement with new lenders, and entered into a new lender acknowledgement on May 28, 2004 that increased the committed amount as permitted by the Senior Credit Agreement. This refinancing replaces the prior Amended and Restated Credit Agreement executed on May 13, 2002. The principal components of the refinancing consist of the following.

The new Senior Credit Agreement provides for a total of $75.0 million in financing facilities, consisting of a $25.0 million Term Loan Facility and a $50.0 million Revolver Facility, which includes a $25.0 million Letter of Credit subfacility. Availability under the Revolver Facility may vary based on EBITDA, as defined in the new Senior Credit Agreement.
The new Senior Credit Agreement has a term of five years and matures on April 2, 2009.
The new Senior Credit Agreement provides for scheduled amortization payments on the Term Loan Facility of $1.25 million, due each quarter during the five-year term of the agreement.
The new Senior Credit Agreement bears interest at a rate which may be based upon either prime or LIBOR or a combination of both rates, plus a margin which may be adjusted quarterly based upon the leverage ratio of the Company, as defined by the new Senior Credit Agreement.
The refinancing provides increased availability and liquidity, an extended term, lower interest rates, lower banking fees, and more flexible capital investment limitations than the prior Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 13, 2002.
On April 2, 2004, proceeds of the new Term Loan Facility were used to pay off the outstanding balance of the prior Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of approximately $18.0 million. The remaining proceeds and cash on hand were used to redeem the Company’s preferred stock during the second quarter of Fiscal 2004 at face value of $10.0 million and accumulated preferred dividends of approximately $1.2 million, and for other general corporate and working capital purposes.
Restrictive covenants in the Company’s new Senior Credit Agreement permit the +Company, within limitations defined in the new Senior Credit Agreement, to incur additional indebtedness; issue additional capital or preferred stock; pay dividends; redeem common shares as treasury stock; create liens; merge, consolidate, or acquire other businesses; sell and dispose of assets; and make investments; and require the maintenance of certain minimum financial ratios.

On December 31, 2003, the Company issued Senior Subordinated Notes in the amount of $35 million and applied the net proceeds to reduce the outstanding term loan of its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement executed on May 13, 2002. The Senior Subordinated Notes have a term of six years, maturing on December 31, 2009. Beginning June 1, 2006, the Company may prepay the outstanding principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes in whole or in part, plus accrued and unpaid interest, plus a prepayment fee of 5.5%, which declines each year after this date. Interest accrues on the outstanding principal balance of the Senior Subordinated Notes at an annual rate of 12%, payable quarterly in arrears. The Senior Subordinated Notes permit the Company, within limitations defined in the Senior Subordinated Notes, to incur additional indebtedness and to pay cash dividends.

The Company’s new Senior Credit Agreement and Senior Subordinated Notes consist of the following elements at January 1, 2005 (in thousands):

Senior Credit Agreement:
	Term Loan		$ 19,500
	Revolving Credit Facility:
		Maximum availability	$ 50,000
		Borrowings outstanding	-
		Letters of credit issued	13,700
		Availability	$ 36,300
Senior Subordinated Notes Payable			$ 35,000

Page 26

Substantially all assets of the Company are either pledged or mortgaged as collateral for borrowings under the new Senior Credit Agreement. The new Senior Credit Agreement contains certain terms and covenants, which permit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the payment of cash dividends, the retention of certain proceeds from sales of assets, and capital expenditures within limitations defined by the new Senior Credit Agreement, and requires the maintenance of certain minimum financial ratios, including: minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, maximum leverage ratio, and minimum tangible net worth, each as defined in the new Senior Credit Agreement. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the covenants contained in the new Senior Credit Agreement.

The classification of long-term debt in the Company’s January 1, 2005 consolidated balance sheet is based on the contractual repayment terms of the debt issued under the Senior Subordinated Notes and the new Senior Credit Agreement.

On January 1, 2005, the Company had working capital of $39.6 million and its working capital ratio was 1.96 to 1 compared to working capital of $31.2 million and a working capital ratio of 1.76 to 1 on January 3, 2004. At January 1, 2005, the Company had unrestricted cash of $37.2 million and funds available under the revolving credit facility of $36.3 million, compared to unrestricted cash of $24.8 million and funds available under the revolving credit facility of $6.9 million at January 3, 2004. Restricted cash balances were approximately $2.4 million at the end of Fiscal 2004 compared to approximately $0.6 million at the end of Fiscal 2003, an increase of $1.8 million, primarily due to proceeds of the settlement with certain insurers, net of applicable taxes, received during Fiscal 2004. Restrictions on these cash balances relate primarily to state statutory insurance requirements or restrictions from the Company’s credit agreement on uses of these cash balances.

Net cash provided by continuing operating activities was $38.5 million and $27.7 million for the fiscal years ended January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively, an increase of $10.8 million, primarily due to proceeds from accounts receivable and an increase of accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by lower income from continuing operations. Cash used by investing activities was $13.2 million during Fiscal 2004, compared to $11.9 million in Fiscal 2003, an increase of $1.3 million, primarily due to increased capital spending in Fiscal 2004. Net cash used by financing activities was $12.5 million in the year ended January 1, 2005 compared to cash used of $6.5 million in the year ended January 3, 2004, an increase of cash used of $6.0 million, principally due to redemption of preferred stock in Fiscal 2004.

Capital expenditures of $13.3 million were made during Fiscal 2004 as compared to $11.6 million in Fiscal 2003, an increase of $1.7 million (14.7%). During Fiscal 2004, the Company acquired certain assets of a trap grease business in the Los Angeles, California area for a net investment of approximately $0.7 million. Capital expenditures related to compliance with environmental regulations were $1.5 million in Fiscal 2004, $1.9 million in Fiscal 2003, and $1.3 million in Fiscal 2002.

Based upon the underlying terms of the new Senior Credit Agreement, the Company expects approximately $5.0 million in debt, which is included in current liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet at January 1, 2005, will be due during the next twelve months, consisting of scheduled installment payments of $1.25 million due each quarter. The Company made voluntary payments of an additional $3.0 million during Fiscal 2004.

Based upon the annual actuarial estimate, current accruals, and claims paid during Fiscal 2004, the Company has accrued approximately $5.2 million it expects will become due during the next twelve months in order to meet obligations related to the Company’s self insurance reserves and accrued insurance which are included in current accrued expenses at January 1, 2005. The self insurance reserve is composed of estimated liability for claims arising for workers’ compensation, and for auto liability and general liability claims. The self insurance reserve liability is determined annually, based upon a third party actuarial estimate. The actuarial estimate may vary from year to year, due to changes in cost of health care, the pending number of claims, or other factors beyond the control of management of the Company or the administrator of the Company’s self insurance reserve. No assurance can be given that the Company’s funding obligations under its self insurance reserve will not increase in the future.

Based upon current actuarial estimates, the Company expects to pay approximately $1.9 million in order to meet pension funding requirements during Fiscal 2005, which is included in current accrued compensation and benefit expenses at January 1, 2005. The minimum pension funding requirements are determined annually, based upon a third party actuarial estimate. The actuarial estimate may vary from year to year, due to fluctuations in return on investments or other factors beyond the control of management of the Company or the administrator of the Company’s pension funds. No assurance can be given that the minimum pension funding requirements will not increase in the future.

Page 27

The Company’s management believes that cash flows from operating activities at the current level in Fiscal 2004, unrestricted cash, and funds available under the Credit Agreement should be sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital needs and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. The impact on cash flows from operations in Fiscal 2005 of the occurrence of BSE in the United States or elsewhere, lower raw material volumes available to the Company due to weak margins in the meat processing industry, regulations by government agencies, the impact on export markets, and the impact on market prices for the Company’s finished products is not known at this time. These factors, coupled with high prices for natural gas and diesel fuel, among others, could either positively or negatively impact the Company’s results of operations in 2005 and thereafter. The Company cannot provide assurance that the cash flows from operating activities generated in Fiscal 2004 are indicative of the future cash flows from operating activities which will be generated by the Company’s operations. The Company reviews the appropriate use of unrestricted cash periodically. Although no decision has been made as to non-ordinary course cash usages at this time, potential usages could include opportunistic capital expenditures or investments in response to governmental regulations relating to BSE, and/or acquisitions, as well as suitable cash conservation to withstand adverse commodity cycles.

The current economic environment in the Company’s markets has the potential to adversely impact its liquidity in a variety of ways, including through reduced sales, potential inventory buildup, or higher operating costs.

The principal products that the Company sells are commodities, the prices of which are quoted on established commodity markets and are subject to volatile changes. Although the current market prices of these commodities are favorable, a decline in these prices has the potential to adversely impact the Company’s liquidity. A disruption in international sales, a decline in commodities prices, lower raw material volume, or a rise in energy prices resulting from the recent war with Iraq and the subsequent political instability and uncertainty, has the potential to adversely impact the Company’s liquidity. There can be no assurance that a decline in commodities prices, a rise in energy prices, a slowdown in the U.S. or international economy, or other factors, including political instability in the Middle East or elsewhere, and the macroeconomic effects of those events, will not cause the Company to fail to meet management’s expectations, or otherwise result in liquidity concerns.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS

The following table summarizes the Company’s expected material contractual payment obligations, including both on- and off-balance sheet arrangements at January 1, 2005 (in thousands):

	Total	Less than 1 Year	1 - 3 Years	3 - 5 Years	More than 5 Years
Contractual obligations:
Long-term obligations	$ 54,558	$ 5,030	$10,028	$39,500	$ -
Operating lease obligations	27,859	5,745	7,228	4,845	10,041
Estimated accrued interest payable	26,018	5,683	10,429	9,396	510
Purchase commitments	4,811	4,811	-	-	-
Pension funding obligations (a)	1,900	1,900	-	-	-
Other long-term liabilities	520	156	273	91	-
Total	$115,666	$23,325	$27,958	$53,832	$10,551

Pension funding requirements are determined annually, based upon a third party actuarial estimate. The Company is not able to estimate pension funding requirements beyond the next twelve months. The accrued pension benefit liability was approximately $13.6 million at the end of Fiscal 2004.

Page 28

The Company’s off-balance sheet contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of January 1, 2005 relate to operating lease obligations, letters of credit, forward purchase agreements, and employment agreements. The Company has excluded these items from the balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The following table summarizes the Company’s other commercial commitments, including both on- and off-balance sheet arrangements at January 1, 2005.

	Other commercial commitments:
	Standby letters of credit	$13,700
	Total other commercial commitments:	$13,700

OFF BALANCE SHEET OBLIGATIONS

Based upon underlying purchase agreements, the Company has commitments to purchase $4.8 million of finished products and natural gas during Fiscal 2005, which are not included in liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet at January 1, 2005. These purchase agreements are entered in the normal course of the Company’s business and are not subject to derivative accounting. The commitments will be recorded on the balance sheet of the Company when delivery of these commodities occurs and ownership passes to the Company during Fiscal 2005, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Based upon underlying lease agreements, the Company expects to pay approximately $5.7 million in operating lease obligations during Fiscal 2005 which are not included in liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet at January 1, 2005. These lease obligations are included in cost of sales or selling, general, and administrative expense as the underlying lease obligation comes due, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company follows certain significant accounting policies when preparing its consolidated financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.

Certain of the policies require management to make significant and subjective estimates or assumptions which may deviate from actual results. In particular, management makes estimates regarding estimates of bad debt expense, valuation of inventories, estimates of useful life of long-lived assets related to depreciation and amortization expense, estimates regarding fair value of the Company's reporting units and future cash flows with respect to assessing potential impairment of both long-lived assets and goodwill, estimates of liability with respect to medical insurance liability, self-insurance, environmental, and litigation reserves, pension liability, estimates of income tax expense, and estimates of pro-forma expense related to stock options granted. Each of these estimates is discussed in greater detail in the following discussion.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, the Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from customers' non-payment of trade accounts receivable owed to the Company. These trade receivables arise in the ordinary course of business from sales of raw material, finished product or services to the Company's customers. The estimate of allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the Company's bad debt experience, prevailing market conditions, aging of trade accounts receivable, and interest rates, among other factors. If the financial condition of the Company's customers deteriorates, resulting in the customer's inability to pay the Company's receivable as it comes due, additional allowance for doubtful accounts may be required. Accounts receivable was approximately $26.7 million and $29.4 million, and the allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $0.8 million and $0.6 million, at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively.

Page 29

Inventories

The Company's inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Finished product manufacturing cost is calculated using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, based upon the Company's raw material costs, collection and factory production operating expenses, and depreciation expense on collection and factory assets. Market values of inventory are estimated at each plant location, based upon either the backlog of unfilled sales orders at the balance sheet date, or for unsold inventory, upon regional finished product prices quoted in the Jacobsen index at the balance sheet date. Estimates of market value, based upon the backlog of unfilled sales orders or upon the Jacobsen index, assume that the inventory held by the Company at the balance sheet date will be sold at the estimated market finished product sales price, subsequent to the balance sheet date. Actual sales prices received on future sales of inventory held at the end of a period may vary from either the backlog unfilled sales order price or the Jacobsen index quotation at the balance sheet date. Such variances could cause actual sales prices realized on future sales of inventory to be different than the estimate of market value of inventory at the end of the period. Inventories were approximately $6.0 million and $7.8 million at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively.

Long-Lived Assets Depreciation and Amortization Expense and Valuation

The Company's property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost when acquired. Depreciation expense is computed on property, plant and equipment based upon a straight line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is based upon a standard classification of the asset group. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over a useful life of 15 to 30 years, machinery and equipment are depreciated over a useful life of 3 to 10 years, and vehicles are depreciated over a life of 2 to 6 years. These useful life estimates have been developed based upon the Company's historical experience of asset life utility, and whether the asset is new or used when placed in service. The actual life and utility of the asset may vary from this estimated life. Useful lives of the assets may be modified from time to time when the future utility or life of the asset is deemed to change from that originally estimated when the asset was placed in service. Depreciation expense was approximately $11.3 million, $11.0 million, and $12.1 million in Fiscal years ending January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004, and December 28, 2002, respectively.

The Company's intangible assets, including routes, raw material supply agreements and non-compete agreements are recorded at fair value when acquired. Amortization expense is computed on these intangible assets based upon a straight line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is based upon a standard classification of the asset group. Collection routes are amortized over a useful life of 8 to 15 years; raw material supply agreements and non-compete agreements are amortized over a useful life of 3 to 10 years. The actual economic life and utility of the asset may vary from this estimated life. Useful lives of the assets may be modified from time to time when the future utility or life of the asset is deemed to change from that originally estimated when the asset was placed in service. Amortization expense was approximately $3.9 million, $4.2 million, and $4.3 million in Fiscal years ending January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004, and December 28, 2002, respectively.

The Company reviews the carrying value of long lived assets on a regular basis, including at the end of each fiscal year, for indications of impairment. Impairment is indicated whenever the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable or exceeds estimated fair value. For purposes of calculating impairment on long lived operating assets, the Company has defined its reporting units to be each of the Company's plant locations. The Company estimates fair value of its long lived assets at each plant based upon future undiscounted net cash flows from use of those assets. In calculating such estimates, actual historical operating results and anticipated future economic factors, such as future business volume, future finished product prices, and future operating costs and expense are evaluated and estimated as a component of the calculation of future undiscounted cash flows for each operating plant location. The estimates of fair value of the reporting units and of future undiscounted net cash flows from operation of these assets could change if actual volumes, prices, costs or expenses vary from these estimates. A future reduction of earnings in the Company's plants could result in an impairment charge because the estimate of fair value would be negatively impacted by a reduction of earnings.

The Company reviews the carrying value of assets held for sale on a regular basis for indications of impairment. Impairment is indicated whenever the carrying value of the asset exceeds estimated fair value. For purposes of calculating impairment on assets held for sale, the Company utilizes estimated sales value of the assets as an estimate of fair value. The estimates of fair value of the assets held for sale could change if the actual sales value realized, or realizable, varies from the estimated sale value.

The net book value of property, plant and equipment was approximately $75.4 million and $73.3 million at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively. The net book value of intangible assets was approximately $16.0 million and $19.5 million at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively.

Page30

Goodwill Valuation

The Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill on a regular basis, including at the end of each fiscal year, for indications of impairment at each plant location which has recorded goodwill as an asset. Impairment is indicated whenever the carrying value of plant assets exceeds the estimated fair value of plant assets. For purposes of evaluating impairment of goodwill, the Company estimates fair value of plant assets at each plant, based upon future discounted net cash flows from use of those assets. In calculating such estimates, actual historical operating results and anticipated future economic factors, such as future business volume, future finished product prices, and future operating costs and expenses are evaluated and estimated as a component of the calculation of future discounted cash flows for each operating plant location with recorded goodwill. The estimates of fair value of assets at these plant locations and of future discounted net cash flows from operation of these assets could change if actual volumes, prices, costs or expenses vary from these estimates. A future reduction of earnings in the plants with recorded goodwill could result in an impairment charge because the estimate of fair value would be negatively impacted by a reduction of earnings at those plants. Goodwill was approximately $4.4 million at both January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004.

Accrued Medical Claims Liability

The Company provides a self-insured group health plan to its employees, which provides medical benefits to participating employees. The Company has an employer's stop loss insurance policy to cover individual claims in excess of $175,000 per employee per year. The amount charged to medical insurance expense includes claims paid during the year and includes estimates of liabilities for outstanding medical claims under the plan at the balance sheet date, based upon historical claims expense and historical claims submission information, and also includes an accrual for estimated severe illness claims, which is based upon the stop loss limit per employee and the number of employees filing those claims. If actual future medical claims by employees varies significantly from historical spending or if the actual timeliness of submission of those claims by medical care providers changes, the actual medical claims may vary from the estimated liability. The actual cost of providing medical care to severely ill employees and dependents may vary from estimates if the patient either recovers or dies. Accrued medical claims liability included in accrued expenses was approximately $2.3 million and $1.6 million at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively.

Self Insurance, Environmental, and Legal Reserves

The Company purchases its workers compensation, auto and general liability insurance on a retrospective basis. The Company estimates and accrues its expected ultimate costs related to claims occurring during each fiscal year and carries this accrual as a reserve until such claims are paid by the Company. Estimates of self insurance liability are based upon the report of a third party actuarial report, which the Company relies upon in calculating its estimates. The Company has also accrued loss reserves related to environmental and litigation matters, based upon estimated undiscounted future costs. In developing estimates of loss, the Company utilizes its staff, outside consultants, and outside counsel as sources of information and judgment as to the expected undiscounted future costs of the claims. With respect to the Company's self insurance, environmental and litigation reserves, estimates of reserve liability could change if future events are different than those included in the estimates of the actuary, consultants or management of the Company. The reserve for insurance, environmental, and litigation contingencies included in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities were approximately $13.9 million and $12.4 million at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively.

Pension Liability

The Company provides retirement benefits to employees under separate final-pay noncontributory pension plans for salaried and hourly employees (excluding those employees covered by a union-sponsored plan), who meet service and age requirements. Benefits are based principally on length of service and earnings patterns during the five years preceding retirement. Pension expense and pension liability recorded by the Company is based upon an annual actuarial estimate provided by a third party administrator. Factors included in estimates of current year pension expense and pension liability at the balance sheet date include estimated future service period of employees, estimated future pay of employees, estimated future retirement ages of employees, and the projected time period of pension benefit payments. Two of the most significant assumptions used to calculate future pension obligations are the discount rate applied to pension liability and the expected rate of return on pension plan assets. These assumptions and estimates are subject to the risk of change over time, and each factor has inherent uncertainties which neither the actuary nor the Company is able to control, or to predict with certainty.

Page 31

The discount rate applied to the Company's pension liability is the interest rate used to calculate the present value of the pension benefit obligation. The discount rate is based on the yield of long-term corporate fixed income securities at the measurement date of October 1 in the year of calculation. The weighted average discount rate was 6.0% and 6.5% at October 1 in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively.

The expected rate of return on the Company's pension plan assets is the interest rate used to calculate future returns on investment of the plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is a long-term assumption whose accuracy can only be assessed over a long period of time. The weighted average expected return on pension plan assets was 8.75% for both Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003.

The Company has recorded a minimum pension liability of approximately $13.6 million and $9.0 million at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively. The Company's net pension cost was approximately $2.7 million, $2.3 million, and $1.3 million for the Fiscal years ending January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004, and December 28, 2002, respectively.

Income Taxes

In calculating net income, the Company includes estimates in the calculation of tax expense, the resulting tax liability, and in future utilization of deferred tax assets which arise from temporary timing differences between financial statement presentation and tax recognition of revenue and expense. The Company's deferred tax assets include net operating loss carry-forward, which is limited to approximately $0.7 million per year in future utilization due to the change in majority control, resulting from the May 2002 recapitalization of the Company. As a result of these matters, the estimate of future utilization of deferred tax assets relies upon the forecast of future reversal of the Company's deferred tax liabilities, which provide some evidence of the ability of the Company to utilize deferred tax assets in future years. Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets are recorded when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will expire before they are utilized and the tax benefit is realized. Based upon the Company's evaluation of these matters, a significant portion of the Company's net operating loss carry-forwards will expire unused. The valuation allowance established to provide a reserve against these deferred tax assets was approximately $20.3 million and $20.6 million at January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, respectively.

Stock Option Expense

The Company currently discloses the pro forma effects on net income of expense of stock options issued, and the Company will begin recording compensation expense related to stock options granted, beginning in the third quarter of Fiscal 2005, upon adoption of recently issued SFAS 123 R. The calculation of expense of stock options issued utilizes the Black-Scholes mathematical model which estimates the fair value of the option award to the holder and the compensation expense to the Company, based upon estimates of volatility, risk-free rates of return at the date of issue, and projected vesting of the option grants. If actual share price volatility or vesting differs from the projection, the actual expense recorded may vary. The Company's pro forma expense related to stock options granted was approximately $0.6 million, $0.6 million, and $0.1 million in Fiscal years ending January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004, and December 28, 2002.

Page 32

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 150 (“SFAS 150”), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity, on the first day of the third quarter of Fiscal 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 affected accounting for the Company’s 100,000 shares of preferred stock, which was issued in May, 2002, had a carrying amount of $9.2 million including accumulated preferred stock dividends payable of $1.0 million at January 3, 2004, and was redeemed in connection with the Company’s recapitalization in May 2002, discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, and elsewhere, herein. The Company’s preferred stock contained a mandatory redemption feature which would have required redemption of the preferred stock on May 10, 2007, at face value of the preferred stock of $10.0 million, plus accumulated preferred stock dividends payable. SFAS 150 requires that mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, such as the Company’s preferred stock, be reported as a liability rather than as a component of stockholders’ equity. SFAS 150 also requires that preferred stock dividends and accretion related to the preferred stock outstanding shall be included in interest expense, beginning in the third quarter of Fiscal 2003, on a prospective basis. Preferred stock dividends and accretion included in interest expense in Fiscal 2003 were approximately $0.5 million. Preferred stock dividends and accretion included in interest expense in Fiscal 2004 were approximately $0.3 million. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2004, the Company redeemed the preferred stock outstanding at face value of $10.0 million and accumulated preferred dividends of approximately $1.2 million.

In November, 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 151 (“SFAS 151”), Accounting for Inventory Costs, which amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, related to Inventory Pricing. SFAS 151 will require that abnormal freight, handling costs, and amounts of wasted materials be treated as current period costs, and will no longer permit these costs to be capitalized as inventory costs on the balance sheet. SFAS 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred during annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005 (the first day of Fiscal 2006). Adoption of SFAS 151 is not expected to result in a material impact to the Company’s financial statements.

In December, 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R (“SFAS 123R”), Shared Based Payment: an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and No. 95. SFAS 123R will require that companies recognize in the income statement the fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees as of the grant date. SFAS 123R will be effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005 (the first day of the third quarter of Fiscal 2005). Adoption of SFAS 123R is expected to result in additional compensation expense to the Company, net of applicable taxes, of approximately $0.4 million in Fiscal 2005, approximately $0.1 million in Fiscal 2006, and less than $0.1 million each year in Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2008. Future estimates of option-based compensation expense are based upon outstanding options currently held by employees and directors, expected vesting periods, and upon the historic option pricing model used by the Company for valuation of options-based compensation expense, and does not take into account the impact of subsequent issuance of options after January 1, 2005 which may occur.

In December, 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 153 (“SFAS 153”) related to Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets: an Amendment to APB Opinion No. 29, which removes the exceptions for recording exchanges at other than fair value for the exchange of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception only for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange is deemed to have commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of this statement are effective for non-monetary exchanges occurring in the fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Adoption of SFAS 153 is not expected to have a material impact to the Company’s financial statements.

Page 33

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking” statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, including, without limitation, the statements under the section entitled “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Legal Proceedings” and located elsewhere herein regarding industry prospects and the Company’s financial position are forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.

In addition to those factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 7A of this report and elsewhere in this report, and in the Company’s other public filings with the SEC, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations include: the Company’s continued ability to obtain sources of supply for its rendering operations; general economic conditions in the American, European and Asian markets; prices in the competing commodity markets which are volatile and are beyond the Company’s control; and BSE and its impact on finished product prices, export markets, and government regulation are still evolving and are beyond the Company’s control. Among other things, future profitability may be affected by the Company’s ability to grow its business which faces competition from companies which may have substantially greater resources than the Company.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Market risks affecting the Company are exposures to changes in prices of the finished products the Company sells, interest rates on debt, availability of raw material supply, and the price of natural gas used in the Company’s plants. Raw materials available to the Company are impacted by seasonal factors, including holidays, when raw material volume declines; warm weather, which can adversely affect the quality of raw material processed and finished products produced; and cold weather, which can impact the collection of raw material. Predominantly all of the Company’s finished products are commodities which are generally sold at prices prevailing at the time of sale. The Company has used interest rate and natural gas swaps to manage these related risks. The Company is not currently party to any interest rate swap agreements. The Company uses natural gas forward purchase agreements with its suppliers to manage the price risk of natural gas used in its facilities.

As of January 1, 2005, the Company was party to fixed for float swap agreements for the purchase of natural gas. At January 1, 2005, the fair value of the Company’s positions in these swap agreements was a liability of approximately $0.3 million. The Company’s positions in these swap agreements were settled during January and February 2005.

As of January 1, 2005, the Company had forward purchase agreements in place for purchases of approximately $2.5 million of natural gas for the months of January through April 2005. As of January 1, 2005, the Company had forward purchase agreements in place for purchases of approximately $2.3 million of finished product in the month of January 2005.

Page 34

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company's obligations subject to fixed or variable interest rates include (in thousands, except interest rates):

	Total	Less than 1 Year	1 - 3 Years	3 - 5 Years	More than 5 Years
Long-term debt:
Fixed rate	$ 35,058	$ 30	$ 28	$ 35,000	$ -
Average interest rate	12.00%	11.99%	12.00%	12.00%	-
Variable rate	19,500	5,000	10,000	4,500	-
Average interest rate	6.00%	6.00%	6.00%	6.00%	-
Total	$ 54,558	$ 5,030	$ 10,028	$ 39,500	$ -

The Company’s fixed rate debt obligations consist of the Senior Subordinated Notes and various other notes payable that accrue interest at an annual weighted average fixed rate of approximately 12%. This obligation is not affected by changes in interest rates.

The Company has $19.5 million in variable rate debt that represents the balance outstanding under the new Senior Credit Agreement executed on April 2, 2004. This portion of the Company’s debt is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. The Company estimates that a 1% increase in interest rates will increase the Company’s interest expense by approximately $0.2 million in Fiscal 2005.

Risk Factors

Any investment in the Company will be subject to risks inherent to the Company’s business. Before making an investment decision in the Company, you should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the other information included in or incorporated by reference into this report. If any of the events described in the following risk factors actually occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If any of these events occurs, the trading price of the Company’s securities could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

The Company’s results of operations and cash flow may be reduced by decreases in the market price of its products.

The Company’s finished products are commodities, the prices of which are quoted on established commodity markets. Accordingly, the Company’s results of operations will be affected by fluctuations in the prevailing market prices of such finished products. A significant decrease in the market price of the Company’s products would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and cash flow.

The most competitive aspect of the Company’s business is the procurement of raw materials.

The Company’s management believes that the most competitive aspect of the Company’s business is the procurement of raw materials rather than the sale of finished products. During the last ten plus years, pronounced consolidation within the meat packing industry has resulted in bigger and more efficient slaughtering operations, the majority of which utilize “captive” processors. Simultaneously, the number of small meat packers, which have historically been a dependable source of supply for non-captive processors, such as the Company, has decreased significantly. Although the total amount of slaughtering may be flat or only moderately increasing, the availability, quantity and quality of raw materials available to the independent processors from these sources have all decreased. Major competitors include: Baker Commodities in the West; National By-Products in the Midwest; and Griffin Industries in Texas and the Southeast. Each of these businesses compete in both the Rendering and Restaurant Service segments. A significant decrease in raw materials available could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

Page 35

The rendering and restaurant services industry is highly fragmented and very competitive. The Company competes with other rendering and restaurant services businesses and alternative methods of disposal of animal processing by-products and used restaurant cooking oil provided by trash haulers and waste management companies, as well as the alternative of illegal disposal. The Company charges a collection fee to offset a portion of the cost incurred in collecting raw material. In recent years the Company has become highly dependent upon these collection fees. To the extent suppliers of raw materials look to alternate methods of disposal, whether as a result of the Company’s collection fees being deemed too expensive or otherwise, the Company’s raw material supply will decrease and the Company’s collection fee revenues will decrease, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

The Company may incur material costs and liabilities in complying with government regulations.

The Company is subject to the rules and regulations of various federal, state and local governmental agencies. Material rules and regulations and the applicable agencies are:

the FDA, which regulates food and feed safety;
the USDA, including its agencies APHIS and FSIS, which regulates collection and production methods;
the EPA, which regulates air and water discharge requirements, as well as local and state agencies governing air and water discharge;
State Departments of Agriculture, which regulate animal by-product collection and transportation procedures and animal feed quality;
the USDOT, as well as local and state agencies, which regulate the operation of the Company's commercial vehicles; and
the SEC, which regulates securities and information required in annual and quarterly reports filed by publicly traded companies.

Such rules and regulations may influence the Company’s operating results at one or more facilities. There can be no assurance that the Company will not incur material costs and liabilities in connection with such regulations.

The Company is highly dependent on natural gas.

The Company’s operations are highly dependent on the use of natural gas. A material increase in natural gas prices over a sustained period of time could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. See Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis, for a recent history of natural gas pricing.

The Company’s business may be affected by FDA regulations relating to BSE.

Effective August, 1997, the FDA promulgated a rule prohibiting the use of mammalian proteins, with some exceptions, in feeds for cattle, sheep and other ruminant animals. The intent of this rule is to prevent the spread of BSE, commonly referred to as “mad cow disease.” The Company’s management believes that the Company is in compliance with the provisions of the rule.

A case of BSE was diagnosed in a cow in the State of Washington on December 23, 2003. Within days of the media reports of the case of BSE, many countries moved to ban imports of U.S. produced beef and beef products, including meat and bone meal and initially tallow, though this initial ban on tallow was relaxed to permit imports of U.S. produced tallow with less than 0.15% impurities. The U.S. government issued regulations in response to the case of BSE which include:

Page 36

On December 30, 2003, the Secretary of Agriculture announced new beef slaughter/meat processing regulations to assure of the safety of the meat supply. The regulations prohibit non-ambulatory animals from entering the food chain, require removal of SRM at slaughter, and prohibit carcasses from cattle tested for BSE from entering the food chain until the animals are shown negative for BSE.
On January 26, 2004, the FDA announced intentions to modify its feed rule (21 CFR 589.2000) by removing the exemptions for certain products, including blood and blood products, and requiring dedicated processing lines for handling and processing restricted use and exempted proteins. On July 14, 2004, the FDA requested public comment on their intended modifications to the feed rule as well as regulations that would: 1) prohibit material derived from SRM and dead or non-ambulatory cattle in animal feed; 2) prohibit all animal proteins in feed for ruminant animals; and/or 3) require that only BFT either derived from SRM-free material or containing less than 0.15% impurities be allowed in animal feed. Only questions were posed in this announcement of proposed rulemaking, to which the Company, among others, responded in comments submitted to the FDA. No new regulations affecting animal feed or modifying the feed rule have been issued to date. This situation will likely continue to be fluid into Fiscal 2005.
On January 26, 2004, the FDA announced its intent to ban the use of certain animal tissue derived materials in food and supplements. Subsequently, on July 14, 2004, the FDA published regulations prohibiting: 1) SRM from human food and cosmetics; and 2) SRM and non-ambulatory or dead cattle from cosmetics. BFT that is either derived from SRM-free raw materials or contains less than 0.15% hexane insoluble impurities will be permitted in human food, supplements and cosmetics. Derivatives of BFT (glycerin and fatty acids) are exempt from these regulations. On September 30, 2004, the FDA issued Guidance Document #174, which cited the agency’s statutory authority to consider animal feed and feed ingredients derived from a BSE-positive animal to be adulterated and prohibit the use of adulterated material in animal feed.

The occurrence of BSE in the United States may result in additional U.S. government regulations, finished product export restrictions by foreign governments, market price fluctuations for the Company’s finished products, reduced demand for beef and beef products by consumers, or increase the Company’s operating costs. The impact of the occurrence of the case of BSE is not fully known at this time, but may positively or negatively impact the Company’s results of operations in the future.

Certain of the Company’s 24 operating facilities are highly dependent upon a few suppliers.

Certain of the Company’s rendering facilities are highly dependent on one or a few suppliers. Should any of these suppliers choose alternate methods of disposal, cease their operations, have their operations interrupted by casualty, or otherwise cease using the Company’s collection services, such operating facilities may be materially and adversely affected.

The Company’s success is dependent on the Company’s key personnel.

The Company’s success depends to a significant extent upon a number of key employees, including members of senior management. The loss of the services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and prospects. The Company believes that its future success will depend in part on its ability to attract, motivate and retain skilled technical, managerial, marketing and sales personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting, motivating and retaining key personnel. The failure to hire and retain such personnel could materially adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

In certain markets the Company is highly dependent upon the continued and uninterrupted operation of a single operating facility.

In the majority of the Company’s markets, in the event of a casualty or condemnation involving a facility located in such market, the Company would utilize a nearby operating facility to continue to serve its customers in such market. In certain markets, however, the Company does not have alternate operating facilities. In the event of a casualty or condemnation, or an unscheduled shutdown, the Company may experience an interruption in its ability to service its customers and to procure raw materials. This may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations in such markets. In addition, after an operating facility affected by a casualty or condemnation is restored, there could be no assurance that customers who in the interim choose to use alternative disposal services would return to use the Company’s services.

Page 37

Restrictions imposed by the Company’s credit agreements and future debt agreements may limit its ability to finance future operations or capital needs or engage in other business activities that may be in the Company’s interest.

The Company’s credit agreements currently, and future debt agreements may, restrict its ability to:

incur additional indebtedness;
pay dividends and make other distributions;
amend the terms of subordinated debt;
make restricted payments;
create liens;
merge, consolidate or acquire other businesses;
sell and otherwise dispose of assets;
enter into transactions with affiliates;
make investments, loans, and advances;
guarantee indebtedness or other obligations;
enter into operating leases or sale-leaseback, synthetic leases, or similar transactions;
enter into hedge agreements;
make changes to its corporate name, fiscal year, capital structure and constituent documents; and
engage in new lines of business unrelated to the Company’s current businesses.

These terms may impose restrictions on the Company’s ability to finance future operations, implement its business strategy, fund its capital needs or engage in other business activities that may be in its interest. In addition, the Company’s credit agreements require, and future indebtedness may require, the Company to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. Although the Company is currently in compliance with the financial ratios and does not plan on engaging in transactions that may cause the Company to not be in compliance with the ratios, its ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond its control, including the risks described in the other risk factors and elsewhere in this report.

A breach of any of these restrictive covenants or the Company’s inability to comply with the required financial ratios could result in a default under the credit agreements. In the event of a default under the credit agreements, the lenders under the credit agreements may elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable.

The lenders will also have the right in these circumstances to terminate any commitments they have to provide further financing, including under the revolving credit facility.

If the Company is unable to repay these borrowings when due, the lenders under the credit agreements also will have the right to proceed against the collateral, which consists of substantially all of the Company’s assets, including real property and cash. If the indebtedness under the credit agreements were to be accelerated, the Company’s assets may be insufficient to repay this indebtedness in full under those circumstances. Any future credit agreements or other agreement relating to the Company’s indebtedness to which the Company may become a party may include the covenants described above and other restrictive covenants.

The Company has a history of net losses and the Company may incur net losses in the future which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to service its indebtedness.

The Company has a recent history of net losses but has been profitable in each of the past three years. For the years ended December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000, the Company’s net losses were approximately $11.8 million and $19.2 million, respectively. Following the recapitalization of the Company completed in May 2002, the Company reported a net profit for the years ended January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004, and December 28, 2002, of approximately $13.9 million, $18.2 million and $9.0 million, respectively. If, however, the Company incurs net losses in the future, its ability to pay principal and interest on its indebtedness could be adversely affected.

Page 8

In order to establish consistent profitability, the Company must achieve the following:

maintain adequate levels of raw material volumes;
maintain its collection fees at levels sufficient to recover an adequate portion of collection costs;
increase gross margins to the extent of cost increases;
maintain its distribution capability;
maintain competitiveness in pricing;
continue to manage its operating expenses.

There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve these objectives or attain consistent profitability.

The Company’s ability to pay any dividends on its common stock may be limited.

The Company has not declared or paid cash dividends on its common stock since January 3, 1989. The payment of any dividends by the Company on its common stock in the future will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operations, capital requirements, the Company’s general financial condition, the general financial condition of the Company’s subsidiaries and general business conditions.

The Company’s ability to pay any cash or noncash dividends on its common stock is subject to applicable provisions of state law and to the terms of its credit agreements. The Company’s credit agreements permit the Company to pay cash dividends on the Company’s common stock pursuant with the terms and conditions of the Company’s credit agreements. Moreover, under Delaware law, the Company is permitted to pay cash or accumulated dividends on the Company’s capital stock, including the Company’s common stock, only out of surplus, or if there is no surplus, out of the Company’s net profits for the fiscal year in which a dividend is declared or for the immediately preceding fiscal year. Surplus is defined as the excess of a company’s total assets over the sum of its total liabilities plus the par value of its outstanding capital stock. In order to pay dividends, the Company must have surplus or net profits equal to the full amount of the dividends at the time such dividend is declared. In determining the Company’s ability to pay dividends, Delaware law permits the Company’s Board of Directors to revalue the Company’s assets and liabilities from time to time to their fair market values in order to establish the amount of surplus. The Company cannot predict what the value of the Company’s assets or the amount of the Company’s liabilities will be in the future and, accordingly, the Company cannot assure the holders of the Company’s common stock that the Company will be able to pay dividends on the Company’s common stock.

The market price of the Company’s common stock could be volatile.

The market price of the Company’s common stock has been subject to volatility and, in the future, the market price of the Company’s common stock could fluctuate widely in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. These factors include, among other things, actual or anticipated variations in the Company’s operating results, earnings releases by the Company, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, sales of substantial amounts of the Company’s common stock, market conditions in the industry and the general state of the securities markets, governmental legislation or regulation, currency and exchange rate fluctuations, as well as general economic and market conditions, such as recessions.

The Company may issue additional common stock or preferred stock, which could dilute your interests.

The Company’s certificate of incorporation, as amended does not limit the issuance of additional common stock or additional series of preferred stock. As of March 10, 2005, the Company has available for issuance 36,076,134 authorized but unissued shares of common stock and 1,000,000 authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock that may be issued in additional series.

Page 39

As a result of the recapitalization, the Company’s ability to apply federal income tax net operating loss carryforwards will be limited.

As a result of the recapitalization of the Company in May, 2002, the Company’s ability to use federal income tax net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income that may be generated will be limited. In particular, the Company has undergone a change in ownership under Section 382 of the Code as a result of the recapitalization. By virtue of such a change in ownership, an annual limitation (generally equal to the pre-change value of the Company’s stock multiplied by the adjusted federal tax-exempt rate, which is set monthly by the IRS based on prevailing interest rates and equal to 5.01% for May 2002) will be applied to the use of those net operating loss carryforwards against future taxable income.

The Company has debt and interest payment requirements which could adversely affect its ability to operate its business.

The Company has indebtedness which could have important consequences to the holders of the Company’s securities including the risks that:

the Company will be required to use $5.0 million of its cash flow from operations in Fiscal 2005 to pay its indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of its cash flow to fund the implementation of the Company’s business strategy, working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts and other general corporate purposes;
the Company’s interest expense could increase if interest rates in general increase because a portion of the Company’s debt will bear interest based on market rates;
the Company’s level of indebtedness will increase its vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
the Company’s debt service obligations could limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the Company's business;
the Company's level of indebtedness may place it at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt; and
a failure by the Company to comply with financial and other restrictive covenants in the agreements governing the Company’s indebtedness, which could result in an event of default and could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

As of March 10, 2005, the Company had outstanding senior subordinated debt of $35.0 million and senior secured term loans of $18.3 million and had no senior secured revolving loans outstanding under the Company’s credit agreements. As of such date, five letters of credit in the face amounts of $4.1 million, $4.1 million, $2.5 million, $0.8 million and $0.6 million, a total of $12.1 million in letters of credit, were issued and outstanding under the senior credit facility. As of March 10, 2005, the Company is able to incur additional indebtedness in the future, including approximately $37.9 million of additional debt available under the Company’s revolving credit facility. Additional indebtedness will increase the risks described above. All borrowings under the Company’s credit agreement are secured and senior to the Company’s securities. For risks associated with the restrictive covenants in the Company’s debt instruments, see the risk factor entitled “Restrictions imposed by the Company’s credit agreements and future debt agreements may limit its ability to finance future operations or capital needs or engage in other business activities that may be in the Company’s interest.”

Page 40

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Those rules define internal control over financial reporting as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2005. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that, as of January 1, 2005, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

The Company’s independent auditor has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears on page 44 of this report.

Page 41

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		PAGE
	Independent Auditors' Report on Financial Statements	43
	Independent Auditors' Report on Management's Assessment of Internal Controls	44
	Consolidated Balance Sheets - January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004	45
	Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three Years Ended January 1, 2005	46
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - Three Years Ended January 1, 2005	47
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Three Years Ended January 1, 2005	48
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004	49

	Financial Statement Schedule:
	II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Three years ended January 1, 2005	73

All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

Page 42

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Darling International Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Darling International Inc. and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Darling International Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 1, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Darling International Inc's internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

As discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for redeemable preferred stock in 2003.

KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 15, 2005

Page 43

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Darling International Inc.:

We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, on page 41 of this report, that Darling International Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Darling International Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assessment that Darling International Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, Darling International Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of Darling International Inc. and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index, and our report dated March 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 15, 2005

Page 44