-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, D8q6E+rxTbKn62WwokJPNJdB1vEpMhVuSSJFw80OrGUCaUfbjCFGrmz1Fy0RH2l3 5bDtmbP8rmM1E7UnZm+/vw== 0001193125-05-100802.txt : 20050509 0001193125-05-100802.hdr.sgml : 20050509 20050509155724 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-05-100802 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 7 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20050331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20050509 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20050509 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ORTHOVITA INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000913756 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS [3841] IRS NUMBER: 232694857 FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-24517 FILM NUMBER: 05811739 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 45 GREAT VALLEY PKWY CITY: MALVERN STATE: PA ZIP: 19355 BUSINESS PHONE: 2156401775 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 45 GREAT VALLEY PKWY CITY: MALVERN STATE: PA ZIP: 19355 10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005.

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the Transition Period from                      to                     .

 

Commission File Number 0-24517.

 

ORTHOVITA, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Pennsylvania   23-2694857.
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
45 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA   19355.
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code (610) 640-1775.

 

Not Applicable.

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days x Yes ¨ No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). x Yes ¨ No

 

Applicable only to corporate issuers:

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

 

Outstanding as of May 6, 2005

 

Common Stock, par value $.01

47,863,757 Shares

 



Table of Contents

 

ORTHOVITA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

INDEX

 

          Page
Number


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    

Item 1.

   Financial Statements (Unaudited)     
     Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004    3
     Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004    4
     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004    5
     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements    6

Item 2.

   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    15

Item 3.

   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    23

Item 4.

   Controls and Procedures    24

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

    

Item 6.

   Exhibits    24
     Signatures    25
     Certifications     

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM I. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

ORTHOVITA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

     March 31, 2005

    December 31, 2004

 
     (Unaudited)        
ASSETS                 

CURRENT ASSETS:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 5,190,717     $ 9,831,544  

Short-term investments

     16,559,539       15,833,552  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $80,000 and $75,681, respectively

     4,719,088       4,498,049  

Inventories

     11,244,104       8,998,361  

Prepaid revenue interest expense

     1,360,570       262,154  

Other current assets

     467,138       535,348  
    


 


Total current assets

     39,541,156       39,959,008  

Property and equipment, net

     4,741,276       4,606,287  

Long-term investments

     3,533,663       3,039,485  

Other assets

     358,785       407,181  
    


 


     $ 48,174,880     $ 48,011,961  
    


 


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

                

Current portion of notes payable

   $ 389,129     $ 456,024  

Current portion of capital lease obligations

     29,476       28,648  

Accounts payable

     5,469,528       1,939,459  

Accrued compensation and related expenses

     795,337       1,240,825  

Other accrued expenses

     2,073,055       1,997,843  
    


 


Total current liabilities

     8,756,525       5,662,799  
    


 


LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:

                

Other long-term liabilities

     173,490       165,704  

Notes payable

     383,699       459,783  

Capital lease obligation

     24,406       32,093  

Revenue interest obligation

     7,167,700       7,167,700  
    


 


Total long-term liabilities

     7,749,295       7,825,280  
    


 


COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

                

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

                

Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, designated as: Series A 6% Adjustable Cumulative Convertible Voting Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 2,000 shares authorized, 117 and 117 shares issued and outstanding

     1       1  

Common Stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 47,173,367 and 47,146,232 shares issued and outstanding

     471,734       471,462  

Additional paid-in capital

     138,946,594       138,797,392  

Accumulated deficit

     (108,100,330 )     (105,210,794 )

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     351,061       465,821  
    


 


Total shareholders’ equity

     31,669,060       34,523,882  
    


 


     $ 48,174,880     $ 48,011,961  
    


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

 

ORTHOVITA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    

Three Months Ended

March 31


 
     2005

    2004

 
     (Unaudited)  

PRODUCT SALES

   $ 7,885,737     $ 5,102,518  

COST OF SALES

     2,496,883       929,112  
    


 


GROSS PROFIT

     5,388,854       4,173,406  
    


 


OPERATING EXPENSES:

                

General and administrative

     1,716,317       1,146,369  

Selling and marketing

     5,086,394       4,268,087  

Research and development

     1,379,425       1,211,022  
    


 


Total operating expenses

     8,182,136       6,625,478  
    


 


OPERATING LOSS

     (2,793,282 )     (2,452,072 )

INTEREST EXPENSE

     (113,083 )     (22,593 )

REVENUE INTEREST EXPENSE

     (239,430 )     (192,751 )

INTEREST INCOME

     256,259       44,080  
    


 


NET LOSS

   $ (2,889,536 )   $ (2,623,336 )
    


 


NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED

   $ (.06 )   $ (.06 )
    


 


SHARES USED IN COMPUTING BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

     47,837,038       41,723,972  
    


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

 

ORTHOVITA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    

Three Months Ended

March 31


 
     2005

    2004

 
     (Unaudited)  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

        

Net loss

   $ (2,889,536 )   $ (2,623,336 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities -
Depreciation and amortization

     405,806       283,369  

Common stock issued for services rendered

     19,868       —    

Common Stock options issued for services rendered

     67,865       114,477  

Provision for doubtful accounts

     19,104       —    

(Increase) decrease in -

                

Accounts receivable

     (240,143 )     (637,436 )

Inventories

     (2,245,743 )     (2,101,814 )

Prepaid revenue interest expense

     (1,098,416 )     (550,099 )

Other current assets

     68,210       (38,873 )

Other assets

     48,396       (7,431 )

Increase (decrease) in -

                

Accounts payable

     3,530,069       557,413  

Accrued compensation and related expenses

     (445,488 )     (459,447 )

Other accrued expenses

     75,212       105,257  

Other long-term liabilities

     7,786       —    
    


 


Net cash used in operating activities

     (2,677,010 )     (5,357,920 )
    


 


INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

                

Purchases of investments

     (4,532,895 )     —    

Proceeds from sale of investments

     3,200,000       —    

Purchases of property and equipment

     (445,243 )     (268,997 )
    


 


Net cash used in investing activities

     (1,778,138 )     (268,997 )
    


 


FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

                

Repayment of notes payable

     (142,979 )     (81,479 )

Repayments of capital lease obligations

     (6,859 )     (32,895 )

Costs associated with sale of Common Stock

     —         (10,767 )

Proceeds from exercise of Common Stock options and Common Stock purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan

     61,741       94,430  
    


 


Net cash used in financing activities

     (88,097 )     (30,711 )
    


 


EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     (97,582 )     12,158  
    


 


NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     (4,640,827 )     (5,645,470 )

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

     9,831,544       20,464,350  
    


 


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

   $ 5,190,717     $ 14,818,880  
    


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

 

ORTHOVITA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

1. THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

 

We are a biomaterials company with proprietary technologies for the development and commercialization of synthetic, biologically active, tissue engineering products for orthopedic and neurosurgical applications. We develop and market synthetic-based biomaterial products for use in spine surgery, the repair of osteoporotic fractures, and a broad range of clinical needs in the trauma, joint reconstruction, revision and extremities markets. We also distribute products, which compliment our biomaterials platforms. Our products are used in the regeneration of bone and soft-tissue.

 

Our near-term commercial business is based on our VITOSS® Bone Graft Substitute technology platforms, which are designed to address the non-structural bone graft market and VITAGEL, which is a matrix for soft-tissue healing. Our longer-term U.S. clinical program is focused on our internally developed CORTOSS® Synthetic Cortical Bone technology platform, which is primarily designed for injections in osteoporotic spines to treat vertebral compression fractures. In addition, we employ in-house research and development to create new biomaterial technology platforms. We work jointly with Kensey Nash Corporation (“Kensey”) and Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Angiotech”) (a shareholder of the Company) to develop and/or market novel synthetic-based biomaterial products and continue to pursue similar relationships with other leaders in biomaterials.

 

We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments of $25,283,919 as of March 31, 2005, will be sufficient to meet our currently estimated operating and investing requirements through at least 2006.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The preparation of the consolidated interim financial statements requires us to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated interim financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to accounts receivable and inventories. We use authoritative pronouncements, historical experience and other assumptions as the basis for making estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited and, in our opinion, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of results for these interim periods. The consolidated interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which includes consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. The results of our operations for any interim period are not

 

6


Table of Contents

necessarily indicative of the results of our operations for any other interim period or for a full year.

 

Basis of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Orthovita, Inc., our European branch operations, and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have eliminated all inter-company balances in consolidation.

 

Net Loss Per Common Share

 

We have presented net loss per common share pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic net loss per share excludes potentially dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per common share data is computed assuming the conversion or exercise of all dilutive securities such as Preferred Stock and Common Stock options and warrants. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, 117 and 204 shares, respectively, of outstanding Preferred Stock were assumed converted into 685,817 and 1,195,781 shares of Common Stock, respectively, for the basic and diluted net loss per common share calculation as these shares will automatically convert to Common Stock when the beneficial ownership limitation lapses (see Note 6). However, 7,834,127 and 5,982,290 Common Stock options and warrants were excluded from our computation of diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, since they were anti-dilutive due to our losses.

 

Accounting for Stock Options Issued to Employees and Non-employees

 

We apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (“APB No. 25”) and related interpretations to account for our stock option plans. Under this method, compensation expense is computed and recorded on the date of grant for the intrinsic value related to stock options granted, reflected by the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the date of grant. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS No. 123”) established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. Under SFAS No. 123, compensation cost for the fair-value related to stock options is computed based on the value of the stock options at the date of grant using an option valuation methodology, typically the Black-Scholes model. As required by SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” we apply the SFAS No. 123 fair-value method of accounting to non-employee stock option grants. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recorded $67,865 and $114,477, respectively, of expense related to SFAS No. 123 for our non-employee stock option grants. For options granted to employees, SFAS No. 123 allows a company to either record the Black-Scholes model value of the stock options in its statement of operations or continue to record the APB No. 25 intrinsic value in its statement of operations and disclose the SFAS No. 123 fair value in the financial statement footnotes. For options granted to employees, we apply the intrinsic value based method of accounting under APB No. 25 and disclose the SFAS No. 123 fair value.

 

7


Table of Contents

The following table illustrates the effect on net loss if the fair value method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested stock option grants in each period.

 

     Three months ended March 31

 
     2005

    2004

 

Net loss:

                

As reported

   $ (2,889,536 )   $ (2,623,336 )

Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value-based method for all stock options

     (733,622 )     (598,160 )
    


 


Pro forma

   $ (3,623,158 )   $ (3,221,496 )
    


 


Basic and diluted net loss per share:

                

As reported

   $ (.06 )   $ (.06 )

Pro forma

   $ (.08 )   $ (.08 )

 

Pro forma financial information required by SFAS No. 123 has been determined as if we had accounted for all outstanding and unvested stock option grants using the Black-Scholes fair value option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

 

     Three months ended March 31

 
     2005

    2004

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted

   $ 3.83     $ 3.54  

Risk-free interest rate

     3.59 %     2.13 %

Volatility

     81 %     86 %

Dividend yield

     0 %     0 %

Expected life

     6 years       6 years  

 

The resulting pro forma compensation charge presented may not be representative of that to be expected in the future years to the extent that additional stock options are granted and the fair value of the common stock increases or decreases (See “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” for information regarding SFAS No. 123R).

 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we granted options for the purchase of 22,500 and 38,500 shares of Common Stock with various exercise prices to certain vendors in consideration for services valued at $67,865 and $114,477, respectively.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we issued 5,042 shares of Common Stock valued at $19,868 pursuant to a clinical assessment agreement.

 

Cash paid for interest expense and revenue interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $113,083 and $239,430, respectively. During the first quarter of 2004, cash paid for interest expense and revenue interest expense was $22,593 and $192,751, respectively.

 

8


Table of Contents

Comprehensive Loss

 

We apply SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” which requires companies to classify items of other comprehensive income (loss) separately in the shareholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, comprehensive loss was:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31

 
     2005

    2004

 

Net loss

   $ (2,889,536 )   $ (2,623,336 )

Foreign currency translation

     (97,582 )     12,158  
    


 


Comprehensive loss

   $ (2,987,118 )   $ (2,611,178 )
    


 


 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” This statement revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar awards. In April 2005, the SEC deferred implementation of SFAS 123R for certain registrants to no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year after June 15, 2005. Historically, we have elected to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for our employee stock options. Accordingly, because the exercise price of our employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we will be required to expense stock options in our Consolidated Statements of Operations over the vesting period based upon the fair value on the grant date. We estimate that the effect on net loss and loss per share in the periods following adoption of SFAS No. 123R will be consistent with our proforma disclosure under SFAS No. 123, except that estimated forfeitures will be considered in the calculation of compensation expense under SFAS No. 123R. However, the actual effect on net loss and loss per share will vary depending upon the number of grants of options during 2005 and in subsequent periods as compared to prior years. Further, we have not yet determined the actual model we will use to calculate fair value.

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”, which clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Under SFAS No. 151, such items will be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for the Company for inventory costs incurred on or after January 1, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain amounts from prior years have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation.

 

9


Table of Contents

2. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS:

 

We invest excess cash in highly liquid investment-grade marketable securities including corporate commercial paper and U.S. government agency bonds. For financial reporting purposes, we consider all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments are considered available-for-sale and, accordingly, unrealized gains and losses are included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, cash, cash equivalents and investments consisted of the following:

 

     Original Cost

   Gross
Unrealized
Gains


   Gross
Unrealized
Losses


    Fair Market
Value


As of March 31, 2005:

                            

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 5,190,717    $ —      $ —       $ 5,190,717

Short-term investments:

                            

corporate commercial paper

     16,596,744      —        (37,205 )     16,559,539

Long-term investments:

                            

corporate bonds

     3,558,419      —        (24,756 )     3,533,663
    

  

  


 

     $ 25,345,880    $ —      $ (61,961 )   $ 25,283,919
    

  

  


 

As of December 31, 2004:

                            

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 9,831,544    $ —      $ —       $ 9,831,544

Short-term investments

     15,857,774      834      (25,056 )     15,833,552

Long-term investments

     3,045,763      27      (6,305 )     3,039,485
    

  

  


 

     $ 28,735,081    $ 861    $ (31,361 )   $ 28,704,581
    

  

  


 

 

Amortization expense related to investments was $95,552 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

 

3. INVENTORIES:

 

As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2003, inventories consisted of the following:

 

     March 31, 2005

   December 31, 2004

Raw materials

   $ 354,911    $ 504,217

Work-in-process

     3,829,264      3,414,068

Finished goods

     7,059,929      5,080,076
    

  

     $ 11,244,104    $ 8,998,361
    

  

 

The increase in inventories for the three months ended March 31, 2005 has primarily been a result of production of inventory to support the multiple commercial launches of new product configurations under our VITOSS FOAM product platform and the production of CORTOSS to support product sales in Europe. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004, inventories include a provision of $234,654 and $1,590,856, respectively, to write down inventory to its net realizable value.

 

10


Table of Contents

4. REVENUE INTEREST OBLIGATION:

 

During October 2001, we completed a $10,000,000 product development and equity financing with Paul Capital Royalty Acquisition Fund, L.P. (“Paul Royalty”) that provided for the payment of revenue interest to Paul Royalty in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issues No. 88-18, “Sales of Future Revenues” (EITF 88-18”).

 

The revenue interest provides for Paul Royalty to receive 3.5% on the first $100,000,000 of annual sales, reducing to 1.75% of annual sales in excess of $100,000,000 of certain of our products, including VITOSS, CORTOSS and RHAKOSS, in North America and Europe through 2016, subject to certain adjustments. This revenue interest percentage is subject to increase to a maximum of 4.375% if we fail to meet contractually specified levels of annual net sales of products for which Paul Royalty is entitled to receive its revenue interest. As a result of this provision, during 2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2005, Paul Royalty received 4.375% on that portion of product sales that specifically related to VITOSS and CORTOSS.

 

The products that are subject to the revenue interest have been approved and marketed for approximately four years or are still under development. For these reasons, as of March 31, 2005 and for the foreseeable future, we cannot currently make a reasonable estimate of future revenues and payments that may become due to Paul Royalty under this financing. Therefore, it is premature to estimate the expected impact of this financing on our results of operations, liquidity and financial position. Given these uncertainties, we have fully charged and, for the foreseeable future, we will continue to fully charge revenue interest expense for the revenue interest due to Paul Royalty as revenues subject to the revenue interest obligation are recognized. Revenue interest expense of $239,430 and $192,751 has been recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The revenue interest under this agreement is treated as interest expense in accordance with EITF 88-18, “Sales of Future Revenues.”

 

Throughout the term of the Paul Royalty revenue interest agreement, we are required to make advance payments on the revenue interest obligation at the beginning of each year. In January 2004, the revenue interest assignment agreement with Paul Royalty was amended by mutual agreement to reduce the advance payment for 2004 from $2,000,000 to $1,100,000, which was paid to Paul Royalty during February 2004, net of the $357,150 balance in prepaid revenue interest expense outstanding as of December 31, 2003. In January 2005, the revenue interest assignment agreement with Paul Royalty was amended by mutual agreement to reduce the advance payment for 2005 from $3,000,000 to $1,600,000, which was paid to Paul Royalty during January 2005. Paul Royalty paid to us the $262,154 balance in prepaid revenue interest expense outstanding as of December 31, 2004. The amount of the advance payment shall be $3,000,000 in each of the years 2006 through 2016. While we believe that we will have sufficient cash to make the required 2006 and 2007 advance payments to Paul Royalty, we cannot be certain that we will have sufficient cash to meet our advance payment obligations for the years 2008 through 2016. Advance payments impact cash flow when made, and they affect earnings only as the advance payments are credited within each period against the revenue interest actually earned by Paul Royalty during that year, with any excess advance payments refunded to us shortly after the end of the year.

 

As of March 31, 2005, we were in compliance with all financial covenants. However, if we fail to maintain certain specified balances and shareholders’ equity, Paul Royalty can demand that we repurchase its revenue interest. We may not have sufficient cash funds to repurchase the revenue interest upon a repurchase event. The exact amount of the

 

11


Table of Contents

repurchase price is dependent upon certain factors, including when the repurchase event occurs. If a repurchase event had been triggered and Paul Royalty exercised its right to require us to repurchase its revenue interest as of March 31, 2005, we would have owed Paul Royalty $20,800,513. We do not expect to be out of compliance with the financial covenants of the revenue interest obligation in the foreseeable future.

 

5. OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES:

 

As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, other accrued expenses consisted of the following:

 

     March 31,
2005


   December 31,
2004


Commissions payable

   $ 622,903    $ 613,660

Accrued professional fees

     661,768      580,050

Royalties payable

     247,662      206,246

Other

     540,722      597,887
    

  

     $ 2,073,055    $ 1,997,843
    

  

 

6. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

 

The table below summarizes the changes in the shares of Common Stock outstanding and in total shareholders’ equity for the period from December 31, 2004 through March 31, 2005.

 

     Shares

   Total Shareholders’
Equity


 

Balance, December 31, 2004

   47,146,232    $ 34,523,882  

Issuance of Common Stock for services rendered

   5,042      19,868  

Issuance of Common Stock options for services rendered

   —        67,865  

Exercise of Common Stock options and Common Stock purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan

   22,093      61,741  

Unrealized loss on investments

   —        (17,178 )

Currency translation adjustment

   —        (97,582 )

Net loss

   —        (2,889,536 )
    
  


     47,173,367    $ 31,669,060  
    
  


 

Common Stock

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we issued 5,042 shares of Common Stock valued at $19,868 pursuant to a clinical assessment agreement, which was included in research and development expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

12


Table of Contents

Common Stock Options

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, stock options to purchase 15,500 and 27,664 shares of Common Stock were exercised for proceeds of $43,550 and $74,454, respectively.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we granted options for the purchase of 22,500 shares and 38,500 shares of Common Stock, respectively, with various exercise prices to certain consultants in consideration for services. The stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were valued at $67,865 and $114,477, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model and was included in selling and marketing expenses on the consolidated statements of operations during the applicable periods. The stock options were for services rendered and were fully vested on the date of grant.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, 6,593 and 7,680 shares of Common Stock were purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan for proceeds of $18,191 and $19,976, respectively.

 

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

 

Summary Common Stock warrant information as of March 31, 2005 is as follows:

 

Expiration


   Number of Warrant
Shares
Outstanding


   Exercise Price Range

2005

   113,559    $ 5.26 - $5.90

2007

   10,000    $ 1.75

2008

   104,000    $ 2.80

2008

   1,004,540    $ 2.90 - $4.00
    
  

Total

   1,232,099    $ 1.75 - $5.90
    
  

 

7. PRODUCT SALES:

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, product sales by geographic market were as follows:

 

     For the three months ended
March 31


     2005

   2004

PRODUCT SALES:

             

United States

   $ 7,363,670    $ 4,692,920

Outside the United States

     522,067      409,598
    

  

Total product sales

   $ 7,885,737    $ 5,102,518
    

  

 

Approximately 57% of our product sales during the three months ended March 31, 2005 were from products based upon our VITOSS FOAM platform co-developed with Kensey (see Note 8).

 

13


Table of Contents

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

 

Revenue Interest Obligation (see Note 4)

 

Agreement with Kensey Nash Corporation (“Kensey”)

 

In March 2003, we entered into an agreement with Kensey to jointly develop and commercialize new biomaterials-based products based upon our VITOSS platform. Kensey has the exclusive right to manufacture any jointly developed approved product for seven years from first commercial sale of the first jointly developed product and we will market and sell the product worldwide. Following the regulatory clearance of a new product under the agreement, we have obligations to pay Kensey for manufacturing the product, to achieve minimum sales levels in the first two years for such approved product and make royalty payments to Kensey based on the net sales of such product. In December 2003, we received FDA 510(k) clearance for the first jointly developed product platform, VITOSS FOAM, and we commenced sales of the first of several product configurations under the VITOSS FOAM product platform during February 2004.

 

On February 28, 2005, we expanded our existing relationship with Kensey and agreed to pursue co-development of soft tissue repair products for orthopedics. Similar to the terms of the original agreement signed in March 2003, Kensey will manufacture the new co-developed soft tissue products and we will market and sell the products worldwide, with Kensey receiving a royalty on the net sales. The new products are expected to be available for launch in 2006 pending receipt of required regulatory clearances. In addition, the first agreement, under which the VITOSS FOAM products have been commercialized, has been extended until 2014.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we purchased $2,229,488 and $1,248,720, respectively, of product inventory manufactured by Kensey on our behalf. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we owed Kensey $3,656,652 and $1,511,862, respectively, for manufactured product inventory and royalties, which are included in accounts payable and other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet. All product royalty expense payable to Kensey is included in cost of sales on the consolidated statements of operations as we recognize product sales revenue from our customers.

 

Since the initial launch of VITOSS Bone Graft Substitute in 2000, we have been obligated to pay to one of the product’s co-inventors a royalty up to an aggregate payment of $5,000,000 on VITOSS Bone Graft Substitute product sales. In July 2004, Kensey purchased this royalty right effective April 1, 2004 from the co-inventor. We will now pay these royalties to Kensey.

 

Agreement with Cohesion Technologies, Inc., an affiliate of Angiotech Pharmaceutical, Inc. (a shareholder of the Company)

 

In June 2004, we entered into an agreement with Cohesion Technologies, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Angiotech, to distribute, market and sell CoStasis® (re-branded as VITAGEL), a composite liquid hemostat, and the CELLPAKER® plasma collection system, used together with VITAGEL, to surgical customers throughout North America, with an option to expand the territory to include the European Union and the rest of the world. Under the agreement, we have obligations to purchase the products and make royalty payments to Angiotech based on the net sales of such products and have begun the process to allow us to assume full responsibility for the oversight and management of the manufacturing of such products by early 2006. The gross margin percentage for

 

14


Table of Contents

VITAGEL and the CELLPAKER system is expected to be lower than that for our current VITOSS Bone Graft Substitute product line. All product royalty expense payable to Angiotech is included in cost of sales on the consolidated statements of operations, as we recognize product sales revenue from our customers. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we purchased $411,127 of product inventory from Angiotech, and as of March 31, 2005, we owed Angiotech $172,261 for manufactured product inventory, which is included in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

9. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Agreement with Cohesion Technologies, Inc. (see Note 8).

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Forward-looking statements give our current expectations, forecasts of future events or goals. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to present or anticipated products and markets, future revenues, capital expenditures, future financing and liquidity, adding direct sales representatives, the adequacy of available resources, sales growth, uses of cash, adequacy and valuation of inventory, and other statements regarding matters that are not historical facts or statements of current condition. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make, or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future results may vary materially. There are important factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements including, without limitation, demand and market acceptance of our products, and the other risk factors addressed in ITEM 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Certain Risks Related to Our Business” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, our performance and financial results could differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to general financial, economic, regulatory and political conditions affecting the biotechnology, orthopedic and medical device industries. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our filings with the SEC. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

 

OVERVIEW AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF OUR BUSINESS

 

We are a biomaterials company with proprietary technologies for the development and commercialization of synthetic, biologically active, tissue engineering products for orthopedic and neurosurgical applications. We develop and market synthetic-based biomaterial products for use in spine surgery, the repair of osteoporotic fractures, and a broad range of clinical needs in the trauma, joint reconstruction, revision and extremities markets. We also distribute products, which compliment our biomaterials platforms. Our products are used in the regeneration of bone and soft-tissue.

 

Our near-term commercial business is based on our VITOSS® Bone Graft Substitute technology platforms, which are designed to address the non-structural bone graft market and VITAGEL, which is a matrix for soft-tissue healing. Our longer-term U.S. clinical program is focused on our internally developed CORTOSS® Synthetic Cortical

 

15


Table of Contents

Bone technology platform, which is primarily designed for injections in osteoporotic spines to treat vertebral compression fractures. In addition, we employ in-house research and development to create new biomaterial technology platforms. We work jointly with Kensey Nash Corporation (“Kensey”) and Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Angiotech”) (a shareholder of the Company) to develop and/or market novel synthetic-based biomaterial products and continue to pursue similar relationships with other leaders in biomaterials.

 

We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments of $25,283,919 as of March 31, 2005, will be sufficient to meet our currently estimated operating and investing requirements through at least 2006.

 

Product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased 55% over product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2004. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, 93% of product sales were in the U.S., primarily from sales of VITOSS, VITAGEL and IMBIBE. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, 92% of product sales were in the U.S., primarily from sales of VITOSS and IMBIBE. The remaining sales, during both periods in 2005 and 2004, were a result of VITOSS, CORTOSS and ALIQUOT® sales outside the U.S., primarily in Europe.

 

In March 2003, we entered into an agreement with Kensey to jointly develop and commercialize new biomaterials-based products based upon our VITOSS platform. The new products to be developed under this agreement will be based on our internally developed proprietary VITOSS bone void filler material in combination with proprietary resorbable Kensey biomaterials. Following the regulatory clearance of a new product under the agreement, we have obligations to pay Kensey for manufacturing the product, to achieve minimum sales levels in the first two years for such approved product and make royalty payments to Kensey based on the net sales of such product. In December 2003, we received FDA 510(k) clearance for the first jointly developed product platform, VITOSS FOAM, and we commenced sales of the first of several product configuration under the VITOSS FOAM product platform during February 2004. On February 28, 2005, we expanded our existing relationship with Kensey and agreed to pursue co-development of soft tissue repair products for orthopedics. Similar to the terms of the original agreement, which was signed in March 2003, Kensey will manufacture the new co-developed soft tissue products and we will market and sell the products worldwide, with Kensey receiving a royalty on the net sales. The new products are expected to be available for launch in 2006 pending receipt of required regulatory clearances. In addition, the first agreement, under which the VITOSS FOAM products have been commercialized, has been extended until 2014.

 

Additionally, in June 2004, we entered into an agreement with Cohesion Technologies, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Angiotech, to distribute, market and sell CoStasis® (re-branded as VITAGEL), a composite liquid hemostat, and the CELLPAKER® collection system, used together with VITAGEL to surgical customers throughout North America, with an option to expand the territory to include the European Union and the rest of the world. Under the agreement, we have obligations to purchase the products and make royalty payments to Angiotech based on the net sales of such products and have begun the process to allow us to assume full responsibility for the oversight and management of the manufacturing of such products by early 2006. The gross margin percentage for VITAGEL and the CELLPAKER system is expected to be lower than that for our current VITOSS product line.

 

16


Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The preparation of the consolidated interim financial statements requires us to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the interim financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to accounts receivable and inventories. We use authoritative pronouncements, historical experience and other assumptions as the basis for making estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated interim financial statements. The consolidated interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which includes consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. We believe the following critical accounting policies, which have been reviewed with the Audit Committee, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated interim financial statements.

 

Revenue Interest Obligation

 

During October 2001, we completed a $10,000,000 product development and equity financing with Paul Capital Royalty Acquisition Fund, L.P. (“Paul Royalty”) that provided for the payment of revenue interest to Paul Royalty in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issues No. 88-18, “Sales of Future Revenues” (EITF 88-18”). The products that are subject to the revenue interest have been approved and marketed for approximately four years or are still under development. For these reasons, as of March 31, 2005 and for the foreseeable future, we cannot currently make a reasonable estimate of future revenues and payments that may become due to Paul Royalty under this financing. Therefore, it is premature to estimate the expected impact of this financing on our results of operations, liquidity and financial position. Given these uncertainties, we have fully charged and, for the foreseeable future, we will continue to fully charge revenue interest expense for the revenue interest due to Paul Royalty as revenues subject to the revenue interest obligation are recognized. Revenue interest expense of $239,430 and $192,751 has been recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The revenue interest under this agreement is treated as interest expense in accordance with EITF 88-18, “Sales of Future Revenues.”

 

Accounting for Stock Options Issued to Employees and Non-employees

 

We apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (“APB No. 25”) and related interpretations to account for our stock option plans. Under this method, compensation expense is computed and recorded on the date of grant for the intrinsic value related to stock options granted, reflected by the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the date of grant. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS No. 123”) established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. Under SFAS No. 123, compensation cost for the fair-value related to stock options is computed based on

 

17


Table of Contents

the value of the stock options at the date of grant using an option valuation methodology, typically the Black-Scholes model. As required by SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” we apply the SFAS No. 123 fair-value method of accounting to non-employee stock option grants. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recorded $67,865 and $114,477, respectively, of expense related to SFAS No. 123 for our non-employee stock option grants. For options granted to employees, SFAS No. 123 allows a company to either record the Black-Scholes model value of the stock options in its statement of operations or continue to record the APB No. 25 intrinsic value in its statement of operations and disclose the SFAS No. 123 fair value in the financial statement footnotes. For options granted to employees, we apply the intrinsic value based method of accounting under APB No. 25 and disclose the SFAS No. 123 fair value.

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123R (revised 2005), “Share-Based Payment.” This statement revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options and similar awards. The effective date of this standard is annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We estimate that the effect on net loss and loss per share in the periods following adoption of SFAS No. 123R will be consistent with our proforma disclosure under SFAS No. 123. However, the actual effect on net loss and loss per share will vary depending upon the number of grants of options in 2005 compared to prior years. Further, we have not yet determined the actual model we will use to calculate fair value.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We have experienced negative operating cash flows since our inception, and we have funded our operations primarily from the proceeds received from sales of our stock. Cash and cash equivalents were $5,190,717 and $9,831,544 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. In addition, we had $16,559,539 and $3,533,663 at March 31, 2005 and $15,833,552 and $3,039,485 at December 31, 2004 in short-term and long-term investments, respectively.

 

The following is a summary of selected cash flow information:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31

 
     2005

    2004

 

Net loss

   $ (2,889,536 )   $ (2,623,336 )

Increase in inventories

     (2,245,743 )     (2,101,814 )

Increase in prepaid revenue interest expense

     (1,098,416 )     (550,099 )

Increase in accounts payable

     3,530,068       557,413  

Other net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     26,617       (640,084 )
    


 


Net cash used in operating activities

   $ (2,677,010 )   $ (5,357,920 )
    


 


Net cash used in investing activities

     (1,778,138 )     (268,997 )
    


 


Net cash used in financing activities

     (88,097 )     (30,711 )
    


 


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     (97,582 )     12,158  
    


 


 

18


Table of Contents

Net cash used in operating activities

 

Operating Cash Inflows –

 

Operating cash inflows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 have been derived primarily from VITOSS, VITAGEL (2005 only) and IMBIBE product sales in the U.S. and from VITOSS, CORTOSS, and ALIQUOT product sales outside the U.S. We have also received cash inflows from interest income on cash equivalents and short-term investments.

 

Operating Cash Outflows –

 

Our operating cash outflows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 have primarily been used for (i) payment of sales commissions on growing product sales, and (ii) payment of the contractually required advance payment of $1,600,000 to Paul Royalty. During the first quarter of 2005, the increase in inventories was primarily funded through an increase in accounts payable.

 

Our operating cash outflows for the three months ended March 31, 2004 have primarily been used for the production of inventory, including inventory to support the commercial launch of new product configurations under our VITOSS product platform, payment of sales commissions on growing product sales and headcount additions as we invested in our distribution network through the expansion of our direct sales team in support of growing U.S. product sales related to VITOSS and IMBIBE. In addition, funds have been used for development and pre-clinical and clinical activities in preparation for regulatory filings of our products in development. Additionally for the three months ended March 31, 2004, we paid a contractually required advance payment of $1,100,000, less the $357,150 prepaid revenue interest expense as of December 31, 2003, to Paul Royalty.

 

Operating Cash Flow Requirements Outlook –

 

We expect to focus our efforts on sales growth under our VITOSS product line for 2005 through additional extensions of our VITOSS FOAM product line configurations and the launch of VITAGEL, on the collection and publication of VITOSS post-clinical data for marketing and sales purposes, and on continual improvements to our distribution channels. We expect to continue to use cash to build inventories for new product launches and to support the launch of VITAGEL. As a result, there may be future quarterly fluctuations in spending. Prior to the launch of each new product line configuration, significant inventory levels must be manufactured. The inventory may be manufactured in anticipation of the receipt of regulatory clearance and may be initially built with one-year shelf life, so as to accelerate the commercial launch of the product, once cleared, to our field sales network of independent sales agencies and direct sales representatives. If the inventory is built in the reporting periods prior to the receipt of the required regulatory clearance, the cost of the inventory manufactured will be expensed in accordance with SFAS No. 2 “Accounting for Research and Development Costs.”

 

Additionally, we expect to continue to use cash and cash equivalents during 2005 in operating activities associated with clinical trials in the U.S. for CORTOSS, research and development and product development for our VITOSS product line, and the associated marketing and sales activities with VITOSS, IMBIBE and VITAGEL in the U.S. and VITOSS, CORTOSS and ALIQUOT outside the U.S. We expect to incur approximately $4,500,000 in external costs over the next two to three years in the execution of the

 

19


Table of Contents

CORTOSS pivotal clinical study in the U.S. The timing of such expense is largely dependent upon the rate of patient enrollment in the study.

 

Our operating cash flow requirements are heavily dependent upon the timing of receipt of FDA 510(k) clearance for new product line configurations, the timing of inventory builds to support product launches and related inventory valuations, the timing of subsequent launches and acceptance of our new product line configurations, such as VITAGEL and VITOSS FOAM Pack, the rate at which we add new direct sales representatives and the rate at which our field sales network generates sales in their respective territories. Accordingly, for 2005, our operating cash flow requirements may still be subjected to quarterly volatility, up or down. If the FDA does not clear additional new product line configurations under the 510(k) regulatory process, we do not expect sales to generate cash flow in excess of operating expenses for at least the next two years, if at all. Until such sales levels are achieved, if ever, we expect to continue to use cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments to fund operating activities.

 

Agreement with Kensey Nash Corporation Approximately 57% of our product sales during the three months ended March 31, 2005 were from products based upon our VITOSS platform, which are co-developed with Kensey. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we owed Kensey $3,656,652 and $1,511,862, respectively, for manufactured product inventory and royalties, which are included in accounts payable and other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. We expect the amount of product inventory to be manufactured by Kensey on our behalf during the remainder of 2005 to be approximately $2,800,000, which reflects a greater portion of inventory replenishment rather than launch quantity production.

 

Agreement with Cohesion Technologies, Inc. We expect to spend approximately $1,600,000 during 2005 to complete the transfer of manufacturing responsibilities, most of which is expected to be capitalized. The gross margin percentage for VITAGEL and CELLPAKER is expected to be lower than that for our current VITOSS Bone Graft Substitute product line.

 

Revenue Interest The revenue interest provides for Paul Royalty to receive 3.5% on the first $100,000,000 of annual sales, reducing to 1.75% of annual sales in excess of $100,000,000 of certain of our products, including VITOSS, CORTOSS and RHAKOSS, in North America and Europe through 2016, subject to certain adjustments. This revenue interest percentage is subject to increase to a maximum rate of 4.375% on that portion of product sales that specifically relates to VITOSS and CORTOSS, if we fail to meet contractually specified levels of annual net sales of products for which Paul Royalty is entitled to receive its revenue interest.

 

During the remaining term of the Paul Royalty revenue interest agreement, we are required to make advance payments on the revenue interest obligation at the beginning of each year. In January 2005, Paul Royalty paid to us $262,154 which represents the balance of the prepaid revenue interest expense outstanding as of December 31, 2004. In January 2005, the revenue interest assignment agreement with Paul Royalty was amended by mutual agreement to reduce the advance payment for 2005 from $3,000,000 to $1,600,000, which was paid to Paul Royalty during January 2005. The amount of the advance payment shall be $3,000,000 in each of the years 2006 through 2016. While we believe that we will have sufficient cash to make the required 2006 and 2007 advance payments to Paul Royalty, we cannot be certain that we will have sufficient cash to meet our advance payment obligations for the years 2008 through 2016. Advance payments affect cash flow when made, but they affect reported earnings only as the advance payments are credited within each period against the revenue

 

20


Table of Contents

interest actually earned by Paul Royalty during that period, with any excess advance payments to be refunded to us shortly after the end of the year.

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

We have invested $445,243 and $268,997 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily for the purchase of equipment, leasehold improvements and research and development equipment in order to further expand our product development and manufacturing capabilities relating to VITOSS and VITAGEL.

 

Net cash used for the purchase of investments was $1,332,895 during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

 

Investing Cash Outlook -

 

We expect the rate at which we invest funds in 2005 related to the purchase of leasehold improvements and capital equipment to increase by approximately $1,000,000 as compared to 2004. The anticipated investments in additional manufacturing equipment primarily relate to our assumption in 2005 of full manufacturing responsibilities related to VITAGEL by early 2006 and to our VITOSS Bone Graft Substitute product line extensions. We will seek to finance new capital investments through notes payable or capital leases under an equipment line of credit.

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

Financing Cash Inflows -

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we received $61,741 and $94,430, respectively, from stock option exercises and purchases of Common Stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 

Financing Cash Outflows –

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, $149,838 and $114,374, respectively, were used to repay capital lease obligations and notes payable.

 

Financing Requirements Outlook

 

The extent and timing of proceeds from future stock option and warrant exercises, if any, are primarily dependent upon our Common Stock’s market price, as it relates to the exercise prices and expiration dates of the stock options and warrants.

 

We do not expect sales to generate cash flow in excess of cash needed for operating activities for at least the next two years, if ever. Until such sales levels are achieved, we expect to continue to use cash, cash equivalents, and investments to fund operating and investing activities. We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, and investments of $25,283,919 as of March 31, 2005, will be sufficient to meet our currently estimated operating and investing requirements through at least 2006. We will seek to finance a portion of our capital equipment needs through indebtedness secured by notes payable.

 

Contractual Obligation and Commercial Commitments

 

Our commitments and contingencies are detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. There have not been any significant changes to matters discussed except as disclosed herein.

 

21


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

 

This section should be read in conjunction with the more detailed discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” As described therein, we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses in the future as we continue our product development efforts.

 

Product Sales. Product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased 55% to $7,885,737 from $5,102,518 for the same period in 2004. Sales growth was primarily attributable to the expansion of our existing product portfolio and improved market penetration in the U.S., reflecting the increased size of the U.S. field sales network, which resulted in improved market coverage. Approximately 57% of our product sales during the three months ended March 31, 2005 were from new VITOSS FOAM products launched since the first quarter of 2004. In addition, newly launched VITAGEL contributed approximately 6% of product sales for the first quarter of 2005. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, 93% of product sales were in the U.S., primarily from sales of VITOSS, VITAGEL and IMBIBE. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, 92% of product sales were in the U.S., primarily from sales of VITOSS and IMBIBE. The remaining sales, during both periods in 2005 and 2004, were a result of VITOSS, CORTOSS and ALIQUOT® sales outside the U.S., primarily in Europe.

 

Gross Profit. Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $5,388,854 and $4,173,406, respectively. As a percentage of sales, gross profit was 68% for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to 82% for the same period in 2004. The lower gross profit percentage for 2005 primarily reflected the shift in product mix primarily toward the VITOSS FOAM product platform, which has a lower gross profit percentage on a higher average selling price per unit as compared to our other products, as well as the effect of VITAGEL product sales, which also has a lower gross profit.

 

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were $8,182,136 and $6,625,478, respectively, which represents a 23% increase as compared to a 55% increase in product sales for the periods.

 

General & administrative expenses represented 22% of product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. General & administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased to $1,716,317 from $1,146,369 for the same period in 2004 primarily due to consulting costs incurred during 2005 associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance initiatives for the 2004 audit, additional headcount, and legal expenses, including patent-related legal costs in connection with additional filings associated with our new products.

 

Selling & marketing expenses decreased to 65% of product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to 84% of product sales for the same period in 2004. Selling & marketing expenses were $5,086,394 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, a 19% increase from $4,268,087 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Selling and marketing expenses increased primarily due to higher costs incurred by increasing the size of our sales management team and expanding our field sales team of direct sales representatives to support the growth of U.S product sales. The remainder of the increase in selling and marketing expenses was due to higher commissions paid in the U.S. as a result of increased product sales in 2005.

 

Research & development expenses decreased to 17% of product sales for the first three months of 2005 as compared to 24% of product sales for the 2004 period. Research & development expenses increased $168,403 to $1,379,425 for the three months ended

 

22


Table of Contents

March 31, 2005 from $1,211,022 for the first quarter 2004. The 14% increase is primarily due to costs associated with the enrollment of patients in our CORTOSS clinical trial in the U.S.

 

Net other expense. Net other expense includes interest income, interest expense and revenue interest expense. We recorded $96,254 and $171,264 of net other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease in net other expense between 2005 and 2004 is primarily attributed to higher interest income, as a result of higher average cash, cash equivalent and investment balances, partially offset by increased revenue interest expense under the arrangement with Paul Royalty incurred as a result of higher product sales.

 

CERTAIN RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

 

Risks related to our business are detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Foreign Currency Risk

 

The functional currency for our European branch operation is the Euro. Accordingly, in accordance with SFAS No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation,” all assets and liabilities related to this operation are translated at the current exchange rates at the end of each period. The resulting translation adjustments are accumulated in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the period with foreign currency transaction gains and losses, if any, included in results of operations.

 

As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our total exposure to foreign currency risk in U.S. dollar terms was approximately $1,787,000, or 3.7% of our total assets, and $1,907,000, or 4.0% of our total assets, respectively. The potential impact of a hypothetical 10% decline in the Euro foreign exchange rate would result in a total decline in the fair value of our assets of approximately $179,000 at March 31, 2005 and $191,000 at December 31, 2004.

 

Market Risk

 

We may be exposed to market risk through changes in market interest rates that could affect the value of our short-term and long-term investments; however, we do not believe the fair value of our investment portfolio or related income would be significantly affected by changes in interest rates due mainly to the relatively short-term nature of the majority of our investment portfolio.

 

As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our investments consisted of highly liquid investment-grade marketable securities including corporate commercial paper and U.S. government agency bonds. The impact on our future interest income and future changes in investment yields will depend on the gross amount of our investments and various external economic factors.

 

23


Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

 

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

(a) Exhibits.

 

Exhibit 10.1    Amendment to the Development and Distribution Agreement dated February 28, 2005 between Kensey Nash Corporation and Orthovita, Inc.
Exhibit 10.2    Amendment to the Revenue Interests Assignment Agreement dated January 21, 2005 between Paul Royalty Fund, L.P. and Vita Special Purpose Corp.
Exhibit 31.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) and Rule 15d – 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act, as amended
Exhibit 31.2    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) and Rule 15d – 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act, as amended
Exhibit 32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

24


Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

       

ORTHOVITA, INC.

(Registrant)

May 6, 2005

     

By:

 

/s/ ANTONY KOBLISH

               

Antony Koblish

Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal executive officer)

May 6, 2005

     

By:

 

/s/ JOSEPH M. PAIVA

               

Joseph M. Paiva

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial and accounting officer)

 

25

EX-10.1 2 dex101.htm AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT Amendment to the Developement and Distribution Agreement

EXHIBIT 10.1

 

** CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND WILL BE FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST UNDER 17 C.F.R. SECTIONS 200.80(B)(4) AND 230.406.

 

AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT,

MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment to Development, Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “Amendment”), dated as of February 28, 2005 between Kensey Nash Corporation, a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business at 55 East Uwchlan Avenue, Exton, PA 19341 (hereinafter referred to as “KNC”) and Orthovita, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, having its principal place of business at 45 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355 (hereinafter referred to as “Orthovita”).

 

WHEREAS, KNC and Orthovita are parties to a certain DEVELOPMENT, MANUFACTURING, AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT, dated March 25, 2003 (the “Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, KNC and Orthovita have benefited and continue to benefit from products developed jointly by the parties;

 

WHEREAS, KNC and Orthovita wish to extend the term of the Agreement and make certain other modifications to same regarding the development, manufacturing, marketing and sale of medical devices for orthopedic applications; and

 

WHEREAS, KNC and Orthovita wish to rely on this Amendment for business planning and other related reasons.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants and agreements provided herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

 

1. The Parties hereto agree that the enumerated sections of the Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:

 

  “2.1 This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and, unless earlier terminated as provided herein, continue for ten (10) years from the date of the First Commercial Sale (the “Initial Term”). The Initial Term shall be automatically extended for one additional three (3) year term (the “Successive Term”), unless written notice is provided by either party at least six months prior to the expiration of the Initial Term (the Initial Term and the Successive Term are collectively referred to as the “Term”).”; and

 


  “12.1   Neither party may assign or transfer this Agreement, in whole or in part, to a third party without the prior written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, either party to this Agreement may, upon prior written notice to the other party, assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement, without the other party’s consent, to a third party (the “Acquiring Party”) with whom such party to this Agreement consolidates or merges or to whom such party to this Agreement sells all or substantially all of its stock or assets (the “Transaction”). Furthermore, any party hereto undergoing a Transaction shall inform any such third party of this Agreement, and any amendments hereto.”

 

2. **

 

3. It is agreed that the following new section 15.5 shall be added by this Amendment:

 

  “15.5   Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, following any Transaction, (a) the provisions of Section 15.1 or 15.2, as appropriate, shall extend and be deemed to apply to Losses suffered or incurred by either party hereto, and (b) the limitations contained in Section 15.4 shall not apply to any claim of either party against the other party, but only to the extent that the Loss arises out of a failure to supply by KNC, or a failure to purchase by Orthovita, under the Agreement.”

 

4. **

 

4. Amendment and Waiver. This Amendment may be amended, and any provision of this Amendment may be waived, provided that any such amendment or waiver will be binding on each party only if same is set forth in a writing executed by such parties. Waiver of a breach of the Amendment shall not constitute a waiver of any other subsequent breach of the Amendment. The waiver of any provision of this Amendment shall not constitute a continuing waiver of that provision or a waiver of any other provision of this Amendment.

 

5. Notices. All notices, demands and other communications to be given or delivered under or by reason of the provisions of this Amendment shall be done so in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement.

 

6. Severability. Whenever possible, each provision of this Amendment will be interpreted in such a manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Amendment is held to be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision will be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Amendment.

 


** Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and will be filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) and 230.406.

 

2


7. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

8. Governing Law. The law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania will govern, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof, all questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this Amendment and the performance of the obligations imposed by this Amendment.

 

9. Headings. Section headings used in this Amendment are for convenience only and form no part or in any way modify or define the text of meaning or any provision of this Amendment.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment through their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.

 

ORTHOVITA, INC       KENSEY NASH CORPORATION
By:   Antony Koblish       By:   Joseph W. Kaufman
    Antony Koblish           Joseph W. Kaufmann

 

3

EX-10.2 3 dex102.htm AMENDMENT TO THE REVENUE INTERESTS AGREEMENT Amendment to the Revenue Interests Agreement

Exhibit 10.2

 

THIRD AMENDMENT

TO

REVENUE INTERESTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT

 

This THIRD AMENDMENT TO REVENUE INTERESTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is dated as of January     , 2005, and is entered into by and among ORTHOVITA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Orthovita”), VITA SPECIAL PURPOSE CORP., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Orthovita (“Assignor”), and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY DELAWARE, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee of Royalty Securitization Trust I (“Assignee”).

 

RECITALS

 

A. Orthovita, Assignor and Paul Royalty Fund I (“PRF”) entered into the Revenue Interests Assignment Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2001, and as amended by the Amendment to Revenue Interests Assignment Agreement and Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2002 and the Second Amendment to Revenue Interests Assignment Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2004 (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Assignment Agreement”).

 

B. PRF and Royalty Financial Company LLC (“RFC”), an entity in which PRF is the sole equity holder, entered into the Sale and Contribution Agreement and the Assignment Agreement (Originator), dated as of December 9, 2004 pursuant to which PRF sold, transferred, conveyed and assigned to RFC all of its right, title and interest in and to the Assignment Agreement;

 

C. RFC and Assignee entered into the Assignment Agreement (Transferor), dated as of December 9, 2004, pursuant to which RFC sold, transferred, conveyed and assigned to Assignee (the sole beneficial owner of which is RFC) all of its right, title and interest in and to the Assignment Agreement.

 

B. The parties hereto desire to amend the Assignment Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions of this Amendment.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements and provisions herein contained and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:

 

Section 1. Definitions. Any capitalized term used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Assignment Agreement.


Section 2. Amendments to the Assignment Agreement Section 1.01. Section 1.01 of the Assignment Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of the date this Amendment becomes effective in accordance with Section 3 hereof, by deleting the definition of “Advance Payments” in its entirety and inserting the following new definition of “Advance Payments” in replacement thereof:

 

Advance Payments” shall mean for the calendar year ending December 31, 2003, the first $1.0 million received by Orthovita in the Fiscal Year 2003 in respect of annual Net Sales for Fiscal Year 2003 (including payments under License Agreements and Distribution Agreements); for the calendar year ending December 31, 2004, the first $1.1 million received by Orthovita in the Fiscal Year 2004 in respect of annual Net Sales for Fiscal Year 2004 (including payments under any License Agreements or Distribution Agreements); for the calendar year ending December 31, 2005, the first $1.6 million received by Orthovita in the Fiscal Year 2005 in respect of annual Net Sales for Fiscal Year 2005 (including payments under any License Agreements or Distribution Agreements); and for each subsequent calendar year thereafter through the year ending December 31, 2016, the first $3.0 million received by Orthovita in respect of annual Net Sales during the applicable Fiscal Year (including payments under License Agreements or Distribution Agreements).

 

Section 3. Condition Precedent. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment (the “Effective Date”) upon the satisfaction in full of the following condition precedent: each party hereto shall have executed an original counterpart of this Amendment and shall have delivered (including by way of facsimile transmission) the same to the other parties hereto.

 

Section 4. General Confirmations.

 

4.01 Continuing Effect. Except as specifically provided herein, the Assignment Agreement and the other Transaction Documents shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms and are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.

 

2


4.02 No Waiver. This Amendment is limited as specified and the execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not operate as a modification, acceptance or waiver of any provision of the Assignment Agreement and the other Transaction Documents, except as specifically set forth herein.

 

4.03 References. From and after the Effective Date, (i) all references in the Assignment Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereto”, “hereof”, “hereunder” or words of like import referring to the Assignment Agreement shall mean the Assignment Agreement as amended hereby and (ii) all references in the Assignment Agreement, the other Transaction Documents or any other agreement, instrument or document executed and delivered in connection therewith to “Revenue Interests Assignment Agreement”, “thereto”, “thereof”, “thereunder” or words of like import referring to the Assignment Agreement shall mean the Assignment Agreement as amended hereby.

 

Section 5. Miscellaneous.

 

5.01 Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without giving effect to its conflict of laws provisions.

 

5.02 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless be given full force and effect.

 

5.03 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

 

5.04 Headings. Section headings in this Amendment are included herein for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Amendment for any other purpose.

 

5.05 Amendments. No provision of this Amendment may be amended, modified, supplemented or waived except in accordance with Section 8.10(a) of the Assignment Agreement.

 

5.06 Binding Effect; Assignment. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each party hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns, subject to the provisions of Section 8.05 of the Assignment Agreement.

 

[Signature page follows]

 

3


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.

 

ASSIGNOR:       VITA SPECIAL PURPOSE CORP.
            By:   Joseph M. Paiva
                Name:   Joseph M. Paiva
            Title:   Vice President
ORTHOVITA:       ORTHOVITA, INC.
            By:   Antony Koblish
                Name:   Antony Koblish
            Title:   President
ASSIGNEE:       ROYALTY SECURITIZATION TRUST I
        By:   Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee
                By:   Louis Bodi
                    Name: Louis Bodi
                Title:   Vice President

 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND CONSENTED TO:
AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
BY:  

Brian Feit

NAME: Brian Feit
TITLE: First Vice President

 

ACKNOWLEDGED:
PAUL ROYALTY FUND, L.P.
    By:   PAUL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC Its General Partner
        By:   Paul Capital Advisors, L.L.C.
Its Manager
            BY:   Lionel Leventhal
            NAME: Lionel Leventhal
            TITLE:  Manager

 

D-2

EX-31.1 4 dex311.htm CERTIFICATION Certification

Exhibit 31.1

 

ORTHOVITA, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Antony Koblish, Chief Executive Officer and President of Orthovita, Inc., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orthovita, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

 

  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting, and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ ANTONY KOBLISH

Antony Koblish

President and Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2005

 

EX-31.2 5 dex312.htm CERTIFICATION Certification

Exhibit 31.2

 

ORTHOVITA, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Joseph M. Paiva, Chief Financial Officer of Orthovita, Inc., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orthovita, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

 

  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting, and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ JOSEPH M. PAIVA

Joseph M. Paiva

Chief Financial Officer

May 6, 2005

 

EX-32.1 6 dex321.htm CERTIFICATION Certification

Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Antony Koblish, President and Chief Executive Officer of Orthovita, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ ANTONY KOBLISH

Antony Koblish

President and Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2005

 

EX-32.2 7 dex322.htm CERTIFICATION Certification

Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Joseph M. Paiva, Chief Financial Officer, of Orthovita, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ JOSEPH M. PAIVA

Joseph M. Paiva

Chief Financial Officer

May 6, 2005

 

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----