Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Oct. 03, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Contingencies	CONTINGENCIES In October 2014, a putative class action was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, by a California former hourly employee claiming violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. The complaint sought unspecified damages and attorney’s fees, alleging the Company's failure to pay overtime to hourly California store employees who earned bonus wages or commissions during pay periods in which they worked overtime, and the derivative claims of failure to provide accurate wage statements and all wages owed upon termination of employment. Although the Company continued to vigorously defend the claims underlying the lawsuit, on October 16, 2015, the parties agreed in principle to settle this matter on an individual and class-wide basis to avoid the uncertainty and costs associated with protracted litigation. The Company’s estimated aggregate obligation, including settlement funds, plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs and settlement administration costs had no material impact on the Company's financial statements. This settlement is subject to the court’s preliminary and final approval and the parties expect to file a motion seeking preliminary approval in November 2015. The Company also is involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings, claims and litigation and regulatory compliance audits arising in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, material adverse developments, settlements or resolutions may occur and negatively impact our results in the quarter and/or fiscal year in which such developments, settlements or resolutions are reached. Based on the facts currently available, the Company does not believe that the disposition of any claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings that are pending or asserted, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. However, an adverse judgment by a court, administrative or regulatory agency, arbitrator or a settlement could adversely impact the Company's results of operations in any given period. For the class action lawsuit and for any other claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings where the Company has determined that a loss is probable, there is no material difference between the amount accrued and the reasonably possible amount of loss. For any such matters where a loss is reasonably possible, the range of estimated loss is not material individually and in aggregate.

Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Oct. 03, 2015

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

CONTINGENCIES

In October 2014, a putative class action was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, by a California former hourly employee claiming violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. The complaint sought unspecified damages and attorney’s fees, alleging the Company's failure to pay overtime to hourly California store employees who earned bonus wages or commissions during pay periods in which they worked overtime, and the derivative claims of failure to provide accurate wage statements and all wages owed upon termination of employment. Although the Company continued to vigorously defend the claims underlying the lawsuit, on October 16, 2015, the parties agreed in principle to settle this matter on an individual and class-wide basis to avoid the uncertainty and costs associated with protracted litigation. The Company’s estimated aggregate obligation, including settlement funds, plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs and settlement administration costs had no material impact on the Company's financial statements. This settlement is subject to the court’s preliminary and final approval and the parties expect to file a motion seeking preliminary approval in November 2015.

The Company also is involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings, claims and litigation and regulatory compliance audits arising in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, material adverse developments, settlements or resolutions may occur and negatively impact our results in the quarter and/or fiscal year in which such developments, settlements or resolutions are reached.

Based on the facts currently available, the Company does not believe that the disposition of any claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings that are pending or asserted, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. However, an adverse judgment by a court, administrative or regulatory agency, arbitrator or a settlement could adversely impact the Company's results of operations in any given period.

For the class action lawsuit and for any other claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings where the Company has determined that a loss is probable, there is no material difference between the amount accrued and the reasonably possible amount of loss. For any such matters where a loss is reasonably possible, the range of estimated loss is not material individually and in aggregate.