Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Apr. 04, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Contingencies	CONTINGENCIES On October 23, 2013, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by two California former hourly employees. The complaint sought unspecified damages for alleged violations of the California Labor Code, the California Business and Professions Code and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as well as civil penalties and attorney’s fees under the Labor Code Private Attorney General Act. The complaint alleged that the Company miscalculated and failed to pay overtime for employees off-the-clock work and certain selling incentive bonuses (or "spiffs"), issued inaccurate wage statements, failed to provide adequate rest and meal periods and other labor-related complaints. In January 2015, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement for all remaining class and individual claims, without admission of any wrongdoing, and the District Court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, with the hearing for final approval currently scheduled for May 21, 2015. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $0.4 million in 2014 for the estimated payments, including attorneys’ fees, costs and administrative expenses, in connection with this settlement liability. Such amount had no material impact on the Company's financial statements. Additionally, on October 8, 2014, a putative class action was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, by a California former hourly employee claiming violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and attorney’s fees, alleging the Company's failure to pay overtime to hourly store employees who earned bonus wages or commissions during pay periods in which they worked overtime, and the derivative claims of failure to provide accurate wage statements and all wages owed upon termination of employment. The Company intends to defend this action vigorously and the outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time. The Company is also involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings, claims and litigation and regulatory compliance audits arising in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, material adverse developments, settlements or resolutions may occur and negatively impact our results in the quarter and/or fiscal year in which such developments, settlements or resolutions are reached. Based on the facts currently available, the Company does not believe that the disposition of the remaining class action lawsuit discussed above or any other claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings that are pending or asserted, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. However, an adverse judgment by a court, administrative or regulatory agency, arbitrator or a settlement could adversely impact the Company's results of operations in any given period. For the two class action lawsuits and for any other claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings where the Company has determined that a loss is probable, there is no material difference between the amount accrued and the reasonably possible amount of loss. For any such matters where a loss is reasonably possible, the range of estimated loss is not material individually and in aggregate.

CONTINGENCIES

On October 23, 2013, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by two California former hourly employees. The complaint sought unspecified damages for alleged violations of the California Labor Code, the California Business and Professions Code and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, as well as civil penalties and attorney’s fees under the Labor Code Private Attorney General Act. The complaint alleged that the Company miscalculated and failed to pay overtime for employees off-the-clock work and certain selling incentive bonuses (or "spiffs"), issued inaccurate wage statements, failed to provide adequate rest and meal periods and other labor-related complaints. In January 2015, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement for all remaining class and individual claims, without admission of any wrongdoing, and the District Court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, with the hearing for final approval currently scheduled for May 21, 2015. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $0.4 million in 2014 for the estimated payments, including attorneys’ fees, costs and administrative expenses, in connection with this settlement liability. Such amount had no material impact on the Company's financial statements.

Additionally, on October 8, 2014, a putative class action was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, by a California former hourly employee claiming violations of the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and attorney’s fees, alleging the Company's failure to pay overtime to hourly store employees who earned bonus wages or commissions during pay periods in which they worked overtime, and the derivative claims of failure to provide accurate wage statements and all wages owed upon termination of employment. The Company intends to defend this action vigorously and the outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.

The Company is also involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings, claims and litigation and regulatory compliance audits arising in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, material adverse developments, settlements or resolutions may occur and negatively impact our results in the quarter and/or fiscal year in which such developments, settlements or resolutions are reached.

Based on the facts currently available, the Company does not believe that the disposition of the remaining class action lawsuit discussed above or any other claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings that are pending or asserted, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. However, an adverse judgment by a court, administrative or regulatory agency, arbitrator or a settlement could adversely impact the Company's results of operations in any given period.

For the two class action lawsuits and for any other claims, regulatory compliance audits, legal or administrative proceedings where the Company has determined that a loss is probable, there is no material difference between the amount accrued and the reasonably possible amount of loss. For any such matters where a loss is reasonably possible, the range of estimated loss is not material individually and in aggregate.