XML 55 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Derivative Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedges, Assets [Abstract]  
Derivative Financial Instruments Text Block
Derivative Financial Instruments:
     
Commodity Derivative Instruments
     
We utilize derivative strategies that consist of either a single derivative instrument or a combination of instruments to manage the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sale of our future domestic oil and natural gas production. While the use of derivative instruments limits the downside risk of adverse commodity price movements, their use also may limit future income from favorable commodity price movements.

In addition to the derivative strategies outlined in our annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, we also utilize swaptions from time to time. A swaption is an option to exercise a swap where the buyer (counterparty) of the swaption purchases the right from the seller (Newfield), but not the obligation, to enter into a fixed-price swap with the seller on a predetermined date (expiration date). The swap price is a fixed price determined at the time of the swaption contract. If the swaption is exercised, the contract will become a swap treated consistent with our other fixed-price swaps.     
Our oil and gas derivative contracts are settled based upon reported prices on the NYMEX. The estimated fair value of these contracts is based upon various factors, including closing exchange prices on the NYMEX, over-the-counter quotations, estimated volatility, non-performance risk adjustments using credit default swaps and time to maturity. The calculation of the fair value of options requires the use of an option-pricing model. See Note 8, “Fair Value Measurements.”

At September 30, 2014, we had outstanding derivative positions as set forth in the tables below.

Natural Gas
 
 
 
 
NYMEX Contract Price Per MMBtu
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collars
 
Estimated Fair Value Asset (Liability)
Period and Type of Instrument
 
Volume in MMMBtus
 
Swaps (Weighted Average)
 
Sold Puts (Weighted Average)
 
Floors (Weighted Average)
 
Ceilings (Weighted Average)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In millions)
2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
  Fixed-price swaps
 
20,400

 
$
3.97

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(2
)
  Collars
 
5,980

 

 

 
3.75

 
4.62

 

2015:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  Fixed-price swaps
 
49,275

 
4.28

 

 

 

 
14

  Collars
 
38,325

 

 

 
3.93

 
4.74

 
7

Total
 
$
19


Crude Oil
 
 
 
 
NYMEX Contract Price Per Bbl
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Collars
 
Estimated Fair Value
Asset (Liability)
Period and Type of Instrument
 
Volume in MBbls
 
Swaps
(Weighted Average)
 
Sold Puts
(Weighted Average)
 
Floors
(Weighted Average)
 
Ceilings
(Weighted Average)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In millions)
2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Fixed-price swaps
 
2,116

 
$
89.94

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(1
)
  Fixed-price swaps with sold puts
 
1,472

 
95.16

 
75.00

 

 

 
7

  Collars with sold puts
 
552

 

 
75.83

 
90.83

 
102.93

 
1

2015:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  Fixed-price swaps
 
8,845

 
90.42

 

 

 

 
23

  Fixed-price swaps with sold puts
 
7,354

 
90.22

 
69.75

 

 

 
11

  Collars with sold puts
 
730

 

 
75.00

 
90.00

 
104.00

 
3

2016:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

  Fixed-price swaps with sold puts
 
7,864


90.89


74.59






14

  Collars with sold puts
 
6,220



 
75.00

 
90.00

 
96.15

 
19

  Swaptions (1)
 

 
91.00

 

 

 

 
(1
)
2017:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Fixed-price swaps with sold puts
 
1,180

 
90.63

 
75.00

 

 

 
2

  Collars with sold puts
 
2,080

 

 
75.00

 
90.00

 
95.59

 
6

Total
 
$
84


________
(1)
During the third quarter of 2014, we sold crude oil swaption contracts that, if exercised on their expiration date in the first quarter of 2015, would hedge 732 MBbls of calendar-year 2016 production. These contracts give the counterparties the option to enter into swap contracts with us at $91.00/Bbl for calendar-year 2016.

Additional Disclosures about Derivative Financial Instruments

We had derivative financial instruments recorded in our consolidated balance sheet as assets (liabilities) at their respective estimated fair value, as set forth below.
 
 
Derivative Assets
 
Derivative Liabilities
 
 
Gross Fair Value
 
Offset in Balance Sheet
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Gross Fair Value
 
Offset in Balance Sheet
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
 
 
 
Current
 
Noncurrent
 
 
 
Current
 
Noncurrent
 
 
(In millions)
 
(In millions)
September 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural gas positions
 
$
23

 
$
(3
)
 
$
15

 
$
5

 
$
(4
)
 
$
3

 
$
(1
)
 
$

Oil positions
 
141

 
(57
)
 
33

 
51

 
(57
)
 
57

 

 

Total
 
$
164

 
$
(60
)
 
$
48

 
$
56

 
$
(61
)
 
$
60

 
$
(1
)
 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Natural gas positions
 
$
11

 
$
(2
)
 
$

 
$
9

 
$
(22
)
 
$
2

 
$
(20
)
 
$

Oil positions
 
26

 
(9
)
 

 
17

 
(51
)
 
9

 
(42
)
 

Total
 
$
37

 
$
(11
)
 
$

 
$
26

 
$
(73
)
 
$
11

 
$
(62
)
 
$


 


The amount of gain (loss) recognized in “Commodity derivative income (expense)” in our consolidated statement of operations related to our derivative financial instruments follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(In millions)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized gain (loss) on natural gas positions
 
$
(2
)
 
$
19

 
$
(36
)
 
$
51

Realized gain (loss) on oil positions
 
(18
)
 
(12
)
 
(70
)
 
(9
)
Total realized gain (loss)
 
(20
)
 
7

 
(106
)
 
42

Unrealized gain (loss) on natural gas positions
 
38

 
(6
)
 
30

 
(24
)
Unrealized gain (loss) on oil positions
 
285

 
(100
)
 
109

 
(84
)
Total unrealized gain (loss)
 
323

 
(106
)
 
139

 
(108
)
Total
 
$
303

 
$
(99
)
 
$
33

 
$
(66
)

The use of derivative transactions involves the risk that the counterparties will be unable to meet the financial terms of such transactions. Our derivative contracts are with multiple counterparties to minimize our exposure to any individual counterparty, and we have netting arrangements with all of our counterparties that provide for offsetting payables against receivables from separate derivative instruments with that counterparty. At September 30, 2014, 10 of our 16 counterparties accounted for approximately 85% of our contracted volumes, with no single counterparty accounting for more than 15%.

A portion of our derivative instruments are with lenders under our credit facility. Our credit facility, senior notes, senior subordinated notes and substantially all of our derivative instruments contain provisions that provide for cross defaults and acceleration of those debt and derivative instruments in certain situations.