XML 38 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as follows:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities.
Level 3 - Inputs that are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The Company's derivatives are valued using various pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporate observable market data, such as interest rate yield curves, currency rates and implied volatility. In addition, the Company received fair value estimates from contract counterparties to verify the reasonableness of the Company's estimates. These derivatives are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
The following table presents the fair values and classification of our financial assets (liabilities) measured on a recurring basis, all of which are classified as Level 2 as of December 31, (in thousands):
 
Classification
 
2016
 
2015
Foreign currency exchange options
Other current assets
 
$

 
$
1,792

 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency exchange forwards
Accrued expenses
 
$

 
$
14


At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company's long-term debt financial instrument had a carrying value that differed from its fair value. The fair value of outstanding debt gross of unamortized debt issuance costs was $219,898,000 and $217,925,000, respectively, compared to its carrying value of $209,637,000 and $209,282,000, respectively. The fair value of the Company's Senior Subordinated 6.25% Notes is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and was estimated based on quoted market prices.
The Company’s other financial instruments primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes receivable, and accounts payable.  The carrying values for our financial instruments approximate fair value. The Company did not have any other material assets or liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Other non-recurring fair value measurements
Long-lived assets
The Company also recognized the impairment of certain property, plant, and equipment during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The impairment charges were calculated by determining the fair value of the property, plant, and equipment using unobservable inputs which primarily include replacement cost less depreciation or market data for transactions involving similar assets. These inputs are classified as Level 3 inputs. See Note 15 of the consolidated financial statements for more disclosure regarding the impairment of certain property, plant, and equipment.
During 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company also recognized impairments to intangible assets. The impairment charges were calculated by determining the fair value of these assets. The fair value measurements were calculated using discounted cash flow analyses which rely primarily upon unobservable inputs classified as Level 3 inputs. See Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements for more disclosure regarding the impairment of intangible assets.
The Company also applied fair value principles during the goodwill impairment tests performed during 2016, 2015, and 2014. The fair value for the Company’s reporting units cannot be determined using readily available quoted Level 1 or Level 2 inputs that are observable or available from active markets. Therefore, the Company used two valuation models to estimate the fair values of its reporting units, both of which primarily use Level 3 inputs. To estimate the fair values of reporting units, the Company uses significant estimates and judgmental factors. The key estimates and factors used in the valuation models include revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value, WACC, and earnings multiples. See Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements for the results of the Company’s goodwill impairment tests.
Acquisitions
As described in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Nexus on October 11, 2016 and all of the outstanding stock of RBI on June 9, 2015. The estimated fair values allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed relied upon fair value measurements based in part on Level 3 inputs. The valuation techniques used to assign fair values to inventory, property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets included the cost approach, market approach, relief-from-royalty approach, and other income approaches. The valuation techniques relied on a number of inputs that included the cost and condition of the property, plant and equipment, forecasted net sales and incomes, and royalty rates.