XML 110 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CERTAIN HEDGING ACTIVITIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Financial Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities
7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CERTAIN HEDGING ACTIVITIES
 
Foreign Currency Derivative and Hedging Activities
Currency forward contracts
We periodically enter into currency forward contracts primarily to hedge currency fluctuations of transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the respective entity. At December 31, 2013, the principal transactions hedged involved accounts receivable and accounts payable. When hedging currency exposures, our practice is to economically hedge such exposures with forward contracts denominated in the same currency and with similar critical terms as the underlying exposure, and therefore, the instruments are effective at generating offsetting changes in the fair value, cash flows or future earnings of the hedged item or transaction. The fair values of forward contracts are calculated each period. These forward contracts are not defined as hedging instruments and therefore, all changes in fair values are reported in Other (expense) income, net.
At December 31, 2013, net contractual amounts of forward contracts outstanding translated into USD totals $262.6. Of this total, $186.5 was attributed to the exposure in forward selling/purchase of USD, and $76.1 was attributable to the exposure in forward selling/purchase of Euros, translated into USD equivalent amounts. The net favorable fair values of currency contracts, based on forward exchange rates at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $1.4 and $1.7, respectively.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the currency and net notional amounts of forward contracts outstanding translated into USD equivalent amounts were as follows:
December 31, 2013
 
Buy
Sell
 
U.S.
Dollar
 
Euro
 
Chilean
Peso
 
Mexican
Peso
 
Pound
Sterling
 
Norwegian
Krone
 
Malaysian
Ringgit
 
Thai
Baht
 
Japanese Yen
 
Colombian Peso
U.S. Dollar
 

 
$
100.8

 
$
18.2

 
$
17.0

 
$
4.0

 
$
2.8

 
$
2.7

 
$
1.5

 
$
1.4

 
$
1.4

Pound Sterling
 

 
$
68.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Yuan
 
$
17.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canadian Dollar
 
$
9.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brazilian Real
 
$
6.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Australian Dollar
 
$
4.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thai Baht
 

 
$
6.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japanese Yen
 

 
$
1.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
December 31, 2012
 
Buy
Sell
 
U.S.
Dollar
 
Euro
 
Canadian
Dollar
 
Australian
Dollar
 
Thai
Baht
 
Chilean
Peso
 
Mexican
Peso
 
Malaysian
Ringgit
 
Colombian
Peso
 
Pound
Sterling
 
Norwegian
Krone
U.S. Dollar
 

 
$
73.3

 
$
66.9

 

 
$
8.7

 
$
20.2

 
$
17.3

 
$
3.0

 
$
1.0

 
$
0.1

 

Euro
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
$
1.6

Pound Sterling
 

 
$
152.9

 

 
$
46.6

 
$
15.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chinese Yuan
 
$
20.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brazilian Real
 
$
3.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japanese Yen
 
$
0.3

 
$
7.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Cross currency swaps
We have used cross currency swaps to hedge the changes in the cash flows of certain Euro denominated intercompany loans receivable held by U.S. entities and, until the sale of our Coating Resins business, to hedge a portion of our net investment in Cytec Surface Specialties SA/NV (formerly, our largest Euro functional currency subsidiary).
As of September 2010, all our swaps were designated as a net investment hedge of the value of one of our U.S. subsidiaries’ net investment in our Belgium-based subsidiary, Cytec Surface Specialties SA/NV, against the risk of adverse foreign exchange movements in the USD value of the Euro. These swaps were highly effective in offsetting the changes in the value of the net investment attributable to the change in USD value of the Euro.
In July 2012, we terminated all of our outstanding cross currency swaps to take advantage of the declining value of the Euro and to prepare for the anticipated divestiture of Coating Resins. The final payment of approximately $1.8 to settle the swaps was based on the fair value of the swaps at the time of termination.
Prior to the termination of the swaps, the fair value of our swaps was calculated each period with changes in fair value reported in foreign currency translation adjustments within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. Such amounts reclassified to translation adjustments remained in other comprehensive income (loss) until the divestiture of Coating Resins, which included our investment in Cytec Surface Specialties SA/NV, on April 3, 2013. Until then, we monitored the counterparty credit risk and the continued probability of the hedged cash flows as to amount and timing. See Note 16, “Comprehensive Income,” for further details on the amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income as related to the divestiture of Coating Resins.
Credit Risk
At December 31, 2013, we did not have derivative instruments that contained credit-related-risk contingent features or provisions that would trigger immediate settlement or require us to post collateral to our counterparties. Also as of December 31, 2013, we did not have any significant concentration of credit risk arising from our derivative instruments.
The following tables summarize the impact of derivative instruments on our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income: 
  
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
  
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
Foreign currency forwards
Other current assets
 
$
2.3

 
Other current assets
 
$
3.2

 
Accrued expenses
 
$
0.9

 
Accrued expenses
 
$
1.5


The following tables summarize the amounts and locations of our hedging derivatives’ gains or (losses) recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012: 
  
 
Amount of
Gain or
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
(Effective
Portion)
 
Location of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
(Effective
Portion)
 
Amount of
Gain or
(Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion)
 
Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
Derivatives in net
investment hedging
relationships:
 
Year ended
December 31,
 
 
 
Year ended
December 31,
 
 
 
Year ended
December 31,
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
Cross currency swaps
 
$

 
$
7.8

 
 
 
$

 
$

 
 
 
$

 
$


The following table summarizes the amount and location of gains or (losses) recognized in income for our derivatives not designated as hedges for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012: 
 
 
Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 
Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on Derivative
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Year ended
December 31,
 
 
 
 
2013
 
2012
Foreign currency forwards
 
Other (expense) income, net
 
$
9.3

 
$
0.2


Fair Value Measurements
We have certain assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements, for which we determine the appropriate level in the fair value hierarchy for each fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs, which refer broadly to assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, into three levels. It gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, interest rates, exchange rates, and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
All of our derivatives are valued based on Level 2 inputs. Our currency forwards are valued based on readily available published indices for currency exchange rates.
A summary of the fair value measurements for each major category of derivatives at December 31, 2013 is outlined in the table below:
 
Description
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
Currency forwards
$
1.4


As of December 31, 2013, we did not have any non-financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements for which a fair value measurement was required for the year ended December 31, 2013.