2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.1

Accounting principles

The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 of Enel Américas, which were approved for issuance by the Company’s Board of Directors at its meeting held on April 30, 2020 and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

These consolidated financial statements reflect faithfully the financial position of Enel Américas and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the results of their operations, changes in their equity and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and corresponding notes.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared under going concern assumptions on a historical cost basis except when, in accordance with IFRS, those assets and liabilities that are measured at a fair value.

2.2

New accounting pronouncements

The following accounting pronouncements have been adopted by the Group effective as of January 1, 2019:

i. New Standards and Interpretations


New Standards and Interpretations		Mandatory Effective date:
IFRS 16: Leases		Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019
IFRIC 23: Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments		Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019

IFRS 16 Leases

In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 which establishes recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure principles for lease agreements. IFRS 16 supersedes IAS 17 Leases and its interpretations: IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease, SIC-15 Operating Leases—Incentives and SIC-27 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease. The standard became effective on January 1, 2019.

IFRS 16 is based on the concept of control in determining whether a contract is or contains a lease. In relation to the accounting treatment for a lessee and a lessor, the new standard states the following:

Lessee accounting: IFRS 16 requires lessees to account for all leases under a single model, similar to accounting for finance leases under IAS 17. As a result, at the date of commencement of a lease, the lessee recognizes on the statement of financial position a right-to-use asset and a lease liability for the related lease liability. Subsequent to initial recognition it will recognize in the statement of profit or loss the depreciation expense of the asset separately from the interest related to the liability. The standard provides two voluntary recognition exceptions for low-value asset leases and short-term leases.

ii)

Lessor accounting: does not change substantially from the model that stablished IAS 17. The lessor must classify leases as operating or financial under the same principles of the previous standard.

The implementation of IFRS 16 by the Group required the application of judgment and assumptions, which are summarized as follows:

Analysis of the lease contracts executed by the Group’s companies in order to identify if they are within the scope of the standard. This analysis included not only the contracts in which the Group’s companies act as a lessee, but also the contracts for the rendering of services and the contracts in which the Group companies act as a lessor.

Estimate of the lease terms. This is based on the non-cancellable period and the periods covered by the renewal options, the exercise of which is in the power of Enel Américas and is considered reasonably certain.

Estimate of the discount rate to calculate the present value of the lease payments. This is equal to the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate when the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be easily determined. For the transition, in the calculation of the effects as of January 1, 2019, the Group used the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate, defined as the interest rate that the Group would have to pay to borrow over a similar term, and with a similar security, the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a value similar to the right-of-use asset in a similar economic environment.

The Group decided to apply certain exemptions permitted under the standard, relating to contracts with a maturity of less than 12 months or that have underlying assets of low individual value, such as the lease of certain office equipment (personal computers, printers and photocopiers). See Notes 3.f and 18.d.

For the transition of the new standard, the Group has applied the following practical expedients:

Not to re-evaluate if a contract is, or contains, a lease. Instead, it applied the standard to contracts that were previously identified as leases by applying IAS 17 and IFRIC 4. Therefore, the Group did not apply the standard to contracts that were not previously identified as containing a lease.

Apply the standard retrospectively with the cumulative effect of the initial application recorded against opening retained earnings at January 1, 2019. This means not restating comparative periods and presenting the cumulative effect of the initial application of the standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2019.

Recognize right-of-use assets on the initial date of application, for an amount equal to the lease liabilities, adjusted by the amount of any advance or accumulated lease payments recognized in the statement of financial position immediately before the initial date of application.

The new standard has an impact on all Group entities that have lease contracts. The main issues that arise are those related to the lease of land, buildings and automobiles. As a result of the change in the accounting model for lessees, the Group recorded an increase in current and non-current liabilities for a total of ThUS$71,826 as of January 1, 2019, for the recognition of lease liabilities, and an increase in non-current assets for the same amount, as a result of the recognition of the right-of-use assets in such contracts. It should be noted that the application of the standard did not result in any effect being recognized in the opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2019. For further information see Notes 18.c and 20.

The weighted average of the incremental borrowing rate used to record lease liabilities as of January 1, 2019, was 9.7%.

The reconciliation between the total amount of the minimum future payments under operating lease agreements according to IAS 17 and the finance lease liability recorded as of January 1, 2019, is as follows:


	MUS$
Minimum future payments of operating leases as of 12-31-2018	97,657
Effect of the discount at the incremental borrowing rate	(20,853)
Minimum payments for short-term leases, at the transition date	(4,978)
Lease liabilities	71,826

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Group recognized an increase of ThUS$8,962 in financial expenses associated with the new lease liabilities and an increase of ThUS$30,056 in depreciation associated with the right-of-use assets.

IFRIC 23 “Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments”

In June 2017, the IASB issued IFRIC 23 to clarify the application of recognition and measurement requirements in IAS 12, Income Taxes, when there is uncertainty over income tax treatments. The Interpretation specifically addresses the following: whether an entity considers uncertain tax treatments separately; the assumptions an entity makes about the examination of tax treatments by taxation authorities; how an entity determines taxable profit (loss), tax basis, unused tax losses, unused tax credits and tax rates; and how an entity considers changes in facts and circumstances.

Uncertainty over income tax treatments can affect both current and deferred taxes. Recognizing the effects of uncertainty depends on whether the tax authority is likely or not to accept an uncertain tax treatment, assuming that the tax authority will examine the amounts that it is entitled to examine and has full knowledge of all the related information.

This interpretation became effective on January 1, 2019. The application of IFRIC 23 did not have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

ii.

Amendments and Improvements

Amendments and Improvements			Mandatory Effective Date:
Amendment to IAS 9: Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation			Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019
Amendment to IAS 28: Long-term interests in Associates and Joint Ventures			Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019
Annual Improvements to IFRS: 2015 - 2017 Cycle (IFRS 3, IFRS 11, IAS 12 and IAS 23)			Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019
Amendment to IAS 19: Plan Amendment, Curtailment or Settlement			Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019

Amendments to IFRS 9 Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation

This amendment was issued on October 12, 2017, and amends the existing requirements in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments regarding termination rights in order to allow measurement of financial assets at amortized cost (or, depending on the business model, at fair value through other comprehensive income) even in the case of negative compensation prepayments.

Under IFRS 9, a debt instrument can be measured at amortized cost or at fair value through profit or loss in other comprehensive income, provided that the contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest on the outstanding principal and the instrument is carried out within the business model for that classification. The amendments to IFRS 9 are intended to clarify that a financial asset meets the criterion of “solely payments of principal and interest”, regardless of the event or circumstance that causes the early termination of the contract or of which party pays or receives reasonable compensation for the early termination of the contract.

The amendments to IFRS 9 should be applied when the prepayment is close to the unpaid amounts of principal and interest in such a way that it reflects the change in the benchmark interest rate. This implies that prepayments at fair value or for an amount that includes the fair value of the cost to terminate an associated hedging instrument will normally meet the criterion of solely payments of principal and interest, only if other elements of the change in fair value, such as the effects of credit risk or liquidity, are not minimal.

The application of this amendment, as of January 1, 2019, did not have an impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

Amendments to IAS 28 Long-term interests in Associates and Joint Ventures

These amendments clarify that IFRS 9 Financial Instruments is applicable to an entity's long-term interests in an associate or joint venture to which the equity method is not applied. This clarification is relevant because it implies that the expected credit loss model, described in IFRS 9, applies to these long-term interests.

The application of this amendment, as of January 1, 2019, did not have an impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

Annual improvements to IFRS 2015 - 2017 Cycle (IFRS 3, IFRS 11, IAS 12 and IAS 23).

IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements it clarifies the accounting for increases in ownership interest in a joint operation that meets the definition of a business. If a party maintains (or obtains) joint control, the previously held ownership interest is not remeasured. If a party obtains control, the transaction is a business combination achieved in stages and the acquiring party remeasures the previously held ownership interest in the assets and liabilities of a joint operation, at fair value.

The IAS 12 Income Taxes amendment: it clarifies that the income tax on dividends is linked more directly to past transactions or events that generated distributable profits than to distributions to shareholders. Therefore, an entity recognizes income tax on dividends in profit or loss, other comprehensive income or equity according to where the entity originally recognized those past transactions or events.

IAS 23 Borrowing Costs: it clarifies that loans that were specifically intended to finance qualifying assets part of the entity's general loan pool for the purpose of calculating the capitalization rate, , when substantially all of the activities necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are complete.

The application of these improvements, as of January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

Amendment to IAS 19 Plan Amendment, Curtailment or Settlement

The amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits, issued in February 2018, addresses the accounting when a plan amendment, curtailment or settlement occurs during a reporting period. The amendment specifies that an entity is required to determine the current service cost and net interest for the remainder of the annual period using the actuarial assumptions used to remeasure the defined benefit liability (asset) and plan assets after the plan amendment, curtailment or settlement.

The amendments to IAS 19 also clarifies that an entity first determines any past service cost, or a gain or loss on settlement, without considering the effect of the asset ceiling. This amount is recognized in profit or loss. An entity then determines the effect of the asset ceiling after the plan amendment, curtailment or settlement. Any change in that effect, excluding amounts included in net interest, is recognized in other comprehensive income.

This clarification provides that entities might have to recognize a past service cost, or a gain or loss on settlement, that reduces a surplus that was not recognized before. Changes in the effect of the asset ceiling are not netted against such amounts.

The amendments to IAS 19 apply to a plan amendment, curtailment or settlement that occur from January 1, 2019.

Accounting pronouncements with application effective as of January 1, 2020 and thereafter:

As of the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements, the following accounting pronouncements had been issued by the IASB, but their application is not mandatorily effective:

New Standards and Interpretations		Mandatory Effective Date:
Conceptual Framework (Revised)		Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020
Amendments to IFRS 3: Definition of a Business		Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020
Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8: Definition of Material or with Relative Importance		Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020
Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 and IFRS 7: Reform of the reference interest rates		Annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020

Conceptual Framework (Revised).

The IASB issued the Conceptual Framework (Revised) in March 2018. It incorporates some new concepts, provides updated definitions and recognition criteria for assets and liabilities and clarifies some important matters. Revisions to the Conceptual Framework may affect the application of IFRS when no standard applies to a particular transaction or event.

The IASB has also issued a separate accompanying document, "Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards," which establishes amendments to affected IFRSs in order to update references to the new Conceptual Framework.

The revised Conceptual Framework and the Amendments to the References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards take effect on January 1, 2020. Early application is allowed if all the changes made are adopted at the same time. Management estimates that the application of the revised Conceptual Framework will not generate significant impacts on the Group's consolidated financial statements

Amendments to IFRS 3 Definition of a Business

IFRS 3 Business Combinations was amended by the IASB in October 2018, to clarify the definition of business, in order to help entities to determine whether a transaction should be accounted for as a business combination or as the acquisition of an asset. To be considered as a business, an acquired integrated set of activities and assets must include, at least, an input and a substantive process that together contribute significantly to the ability to create output.

The amendment also adds guidance and illustrative examples to assess whether a substantial process has been acquired and introduces an optional fair value concentration test.

The amendment is applicable prospectively to business combinations and acquisitions of assets, the acquisition date of which is from January 1, 2020. Earlier application is permitted.

Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8 Definition of Material

In October 2018, the IASB amended IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, to improve the definition of material and the explanations accompanying the definition. The amendments ensure that the definition of material is consistent in all IFRS.

Information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to influence the decisions that the primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements, which provide financial information about a specific reporting entity.

The amendments will be applicable prospectively for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020. Earlier application is permitted.

Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39 and IFRS 7 – Interest rate benchmark reform.

On September 26, 2019, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, in response to the reform that gradually eliminates benchmark interest rates, such as interbank offer rates (IBORs). The amendments provide temporary reliefs which enable hedge accounting to continue during the period of uncertainty before the replacement of an existing interest rate benchmark with an alternative nearly risk-free interest rate (an RFR).

The amendments to IFRS 9:

The amendments include a number of reliefs, which apply to all hedging relationships that are directly affected by the interest rate benchmark reform. A hedging relationship is affected if the reform gives rise to uncertainties about the timing and/or amount of benchmark-based cash flows of the hedged item or the hedging instrument. Application of the reliefs is mandatory. The first three reliefs provide for:

The assessment of whether a forecast transaction (or component thereof) is highly probable

Assessing when to reclassify the amount in the cash flow hedge reserve to profit and loss

The assessment of the economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument

For each of these reliefs, it is assumed that the benchmark on which the hedged cash flows are based (whether or not contractually specified) and/or, for relief three, the benchmark on which the cash flows of the hedging instrument are based, are not altered as a result of IBOR reform.

A fourth relief provides that, for a benchmark component of interest rate risk that is affected by IBOR reform, the requirement that the risk component is separately identifiable need be met only at the inception of the hedging relationship. Where hedging instruments and hedged items may be added to or removed from an open portfolio in a continuous hedging strategy, the separately identifiable requirement need only be met when hedged items are initially designated within the hedging relationship.

The reliefs continue indefinitely in the absence of any of the events described in the amendments. When an entity designates a group of items as the hedged item, the requirements for when the reliefs cease are applied separately to each individual item within the designated group of items.

The amendments also introduce specific disclosure requirements for hedging relationships to which the reliefs are applied.

The amendments are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2020. Earlier application is permitted. Management is evaluating the potential impact of the application of these amendments on the consolidated financial statements of the Group.

2.3

Responsibility for the information, judgments and estimates provided

The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the information contained in these consolidated financial statements and expressly states that all IFRS principles and standards have been fully implemented.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, certain judgments and estimates made by the Group’s Management have been used to quantify some of the assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and commitments recognized.

The most important areas where critical judgment was required are:

In a service concession agreement, determination of whether a grantor controls or regulates what services the operator must provide, to whom and at what price, are critical factors for the application of IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements (see Note 3.d.1).

The identification of Cash Generating Units (CGU) for impairment testing (see Note 3.e).

The hierarchy of information used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value (see Note 3.h).

The determination of the Group’s functional currency (see Note 3.v).

Application of the revenue recognition model in accordance with IFRS 15 (see Note 3.q).

The estimates refer basically to:

The valuations performed to determine the existence of impairment losses in assets and goodwill (see Note 3.e).

The assumptions used to calculate the actuarial liabilities and obligations with employees, such as discount rates, mortality tables, salary increases, etc. (see Notes 3.m.1 and 25).

The useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (see Notes 3.a and 3.d).

The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments (see Notes 3.h and 22).

The energy supplied to customer whose meters have not yet been read (see Note 3.q).

Certain assumptions inherent in the electricity system affecting transactions with other companies, such as production, customer billings, energy consumption, that allow for estimation of electricity system settlements that occur on the corresponding final settlement dates, but that are pending as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements and could affect the balances of assets, liabilities, income and expenses recognized in the financial statements (see Appendix 2.2).

The probability that uncertain or contingent liabilities will be incurred and their related amounts (see Note 3.m).

Future disbursements for closure of facilities and restoration of land, as well as associated discount rates to be used (see Note 3.a).

The tax results of the various subsidiaries of the Group that will be reported to the respective tax authorities in the future, and other estimates have been used as a basis for recording the various income tax related balances in these consolidated financial statements (see Note 3.p).

The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and any pre-existing interest in an entity acquired in a business combination.

Determination of expected credit losses on financial assets (see Note 3.g.3).

Determination of the lease term of contracts with renewal options, as well as the rates to be used to discount lease payments (see Note 3.f).

Estimation of the company's incremental borrowing rate (IBR), to measure lease liabilities, if the interest rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined. The Group estimates the IBR using observable inputs (such as market interest rates) when available and is required to make certain entity-specific estimates (such as for subsidiaries that do not enter into financing transactions) or when they need to be adjusted to reflect the terms and conditions of the lease (for example, when leases are not in the subsidiary’s functional currency (see Note 3.f).

Although these judgments and estimates have been based on the best available information as of the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements, future events may occur that would require a change (increase or decrease) to these judgments and estimates in subsequent periods. This change would be made prospectively, recognizing the effects of this change in judgment and estimation in the corresponding future consolidated financial statements.

2.4

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are defined as those entities controlled either, directly or indirectly by Enel Américas. Control is exercised if and only if the following conditions are met: the Company has i) power over the subsidiary; ii) exposure, or rights to variable returns from these entities; and iii) the ability to use its power to influence the amount of these returns.

Enel Américas has power over its subsidiaries when it holds the majority of the substantive voting rights or, should that not be the case, when it has rights granting the practical ability to direct the entities’ relevant activities, that is, the activities that significantly affect the subsidiary’s results.

The Group will reassess whether or not it controls a subsidiary if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the elements of control listed above.

Subsidiaries are consolidated as described in Note 2.7.

The following are the entities in which the Group has the ability to exercise control and are therefore included in these consolidated financial statements:


			Functional	% Ownership as of 12-31-2019			% Ownership as of 12-31-2018
Taxpayer ID No.	Company	Country	Currency	Direct	Indirect	Total		Direct	Indirect	Total

Foreign	Enel Distribución Río S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	99.73%	99.73%		—	99.73%	99.73%
Foreign	EGP Cachoeira Dourada S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	99.75%	99.75%		—	99.75%	99.75%
Foreign	Enel Generación Fortaleza S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Enel Cien S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Enel Distribución Ceará S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	74.05%	74.05%		—	74.05%	74.05%
Foreign	Enel Brasil S.A.	Brazil	Real	100.00%	—	100.00%		100.00%	—	100.00%
Foreign	Enel X Brasil S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Enel Distribución Goias S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	99.93%	99.93%		—	99.93%	99.93%
Foreign	Enel Distribución Sao Paulo S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	95.88%	95.88%
Foreign	Enel Green Power Proyectos I (Volta Grande)	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Ingendesa do Brasil Ltda.	Brazil	Real	—	—	—		1.00%	—	1.00%
Foreign	Enel Brasil Investimento Sudeste S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	—	—		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Central Generadora Fotovoltaica Sao Francisco Ltda.	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Enel Tecnología de Redes S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	—	—
Foreign	Enel Trading Brasil S.A.	Brazil	Real	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	—	—
Foreign	Nuxer Trading S.A.	Uruguay	American Dollar	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Central Dock Sud S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	—	70.24%	70.24%		—	70.24%	70.24%
Foreign	Compañía de Transmisión del Mercosur S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Distrilec Inversora S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	51.50%	—	51.50%		51.50%	—	51.50%
Foreign	Empresa Distribuidora Sur S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	—	99.45%	99.45%		—	99.45%	99.45%
Foreign	Enel Argentina S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	99.92%	—	99.92%		99.92%	—	99.92%
Foreign	Enel Trading Argentina S.R.L.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	55.00%	45.00%	100.00%		55.00%	45.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Enel Generación Costanera S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	—	75.68%	75.68%		—	75.68%	75.68%
Foreign	Enel Generación El Chocón S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	—	67.67%	67.67%		—	67.67%	67.67%
Foreign	Hidroinvest S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	41.94%	54.76%	96.70%		41.94%	54.76%	96.70%
Foreign	Inversora Dock Sud S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	57.14%	—	57.14%		57.14%	—	57.14%
Foreign	Transportadora de Energía S.A.	Argentina	Argentine Peso	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Compañía Distribuidora y Comercializadora de Energía S.A.	Colombia	Colombian Peso	48.30%	—	48.30%		48.30%	—	48.30%
Foreign	Emgesa S.A. E.S.P.	Colombia	Colombian Peso	48.48%	—	48.48%		48.48%	—	48.48%
Foreign	Inversora Codensa S.A.S.	Colombia	Colombian Peso	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Sociedad Portuaria Central Cartagena S.A.	Colombia	Colombian Peso	—	99.99%	99.99%		—	99.85%	99.85%
Foreign	Enel X Colombia S.A.S	Colombia	Colombian Peso	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%
Foreign	Enel Perú S.A.C.	Perú	Peruvian Soles	100.00%	—	100.00%		100.00%	—	100.00%
Foreign	Chinango S.A.C.	Perú	Peruvian Soles	—	80.00%	80.00%		—	80.00%	80.00%
Foreign	Enel Generación Perú S.A.	Perú	Peruvian Soles	—	83.60%	83.60%		—	83.60%	83.60%
Foreign	Enel Distribución Perú S.A.	Perú	Peruvian Soles	—	83.15%	83.15%		—	83.15%	83.15%
Foreign	Enel Generación Piura S.A.	Perú	Peruvian Soles	—	96.50%	96.50%		—	96.50%	96.50%
Foreign	Enel X Perú S.A.C.	Perú	Peruvian Soles	—	99.99%	99.99%		—	—	—
Foreign	Compañía Energética Veracruz S.A.C.	Perú	Peruvian Soles	—	100.00%	100.00%		—	100.00%	100.00%

2.4.1

Changes in the scope of consolidation

On June 7, 2018, our subsidiary Enel Brasil S.A. through its own subsidiary (100%) Enel Brasil Investimentos Sudeste S.A. (Enel Sudeste) successfully completed the acquisition, by means of a voluntary tender offer ("OPA" or "Tender Offer"), for the Brazilian energy distributor Enel Distribución Sao Paulo (formerly known as Eletropaulo Metropolitana de Eletricidade de Sao Paulo S.A.). For further information related to this acquisition, see Note 6.2.

During the last quarter of 2018, Enel Brasil S.A. acquired an Uruguayan company called Nuxer Trading S.A. and Central Geradora Fotovoltaica Sao Francisco Ltda. Both companies were acquired in order to develop the business lines of Enel X Brasil in Uruguay and Brazil, respectively.

The subsidiary Enel X Perú S.A.C was incorporated in the first quarter of 2019. The corporate purpose of this subsidiary, among others, is to develop, implement and sell products and services related to energy that incorporate innovation, state-of-the-art technology and trends of the future, other than the electricity distribution under concession and the related services.

The company Enel Tecnología de Redes S.A. was incorporated in September 2019. This company is 100%-owned by Enel Brasil S.A., and its corporate purpose is the planning, development and execution of energy generation, distribution, transmission and/or commercialization, as well as the marketing of equipment intended for energy distribution, measurement and control.

In October of 2019, the company Enel Trading Brasil S.A. was included in the Group's consolidation. This company is 100%-owned by Enel Brasil S.A., and its corporate purpose is the performance of wholesale and retail activities involving energy and other unspecified products, importation and exportation, management activities, such as those associated with products and related services, as well as holding ownership interests in other companies.

On November 6, 2019, Enel Brasil Investimento Sudeste S.A. was taken over by Enel Distribución Sao Paulo S.A., with the latter becoming the legal successor.

On November 27, 2019, within the framework of the public stock offering for the acquisition of shares in the subsidiary Enel Distribución Sao Paulo S.A., the market was informed that our subsidiary Enel Brasil acquired 2,959,302 shares, equivalent to 1.5% of the total shares in this company, for BRL146.2 million (approximately US$ 35.2 million). Later, on December 5, 2019, Enel Distribución Sao Paulo S.A. redeemed the remaining 5,174,050 shares, representing 2.62% of the total shares, by paying BRL256 million (approximately US $ 62 million). Through these operations, Enel Brasil S.A. excercises control over 100% of the shares in Enel Distribución Sao Paulo S.A .

2.4.2

Consolidated companies with an economic equity interest of less than 50%

Although the Group holds a 48.3% equity interest in Codensa S.A. E.S.P. and a 48.48% equity interest in Emgesa S.A. E.S.P., they are considered as subsidiaries since the Company exercises control over these entities through contracts or agreements with shareholders, or as a consequence of their structure, composition and shareholder classes. The Group holds 57.15% and 56.43% of the voting shares of Codensa S.A. E.S.P and Emgesa S.A. E.S.P, respectively.

2.5

Investments in associates

Associates are those entities over which Enel Américas, either directly or indirectly, exercises significant influence.

Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operational policy decisions of the associate but is not control or joint control over those policies. In assessing significant influence, the Group takes into account the existence and effect of currently exercisable voting rights or convertible rights at the end of each reporting period, including currently exercisable voting rights held by the Company or other entities. In general, significant influence is presumed to be those cases in which the Group has more than 20% of the voting power of the investee.

Associates are accounted for under equity method as described in Note 3.i.

The detail of the companies that qualify as associates is the following:


		Functional	% Ownership as of 12-31-2019			% Ownership as of 12-31-2018
Taxpayer ID No.	Company	Currency	Direct	Indirect	Total	Direct	Indirect	Total
Foreign	Sacme S.A.	Argentine peso	—	50.00%	50.00%	—	50.00%	50.00%
Foreign	Yacylec S.A.	Argentine peso	33.33%	—	33.33%	22.22%	—	22.22%
Foreign	Central Termica Manuel Belgrano	Argentine peso	—	25.60%	25.60%	—	25.60%	25.60%
Foreign	Central Térmica San Martin	Argentine peso	—	25.60%	25.60%	—	25.60%	25.60%
Foreign	Central Vuelta Obligado S.A.	Argentine peso	—	40.90%	40.90%	—	40.90%	40.90%

2.6

Joint arrangements

Joint arrangements are defined as those entities in which the Group exercises control under an agreement with other shareholders and jointly with them, in other words, when decisions on the entities’ relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.

Depending on the rights and obligations of the participants, joint agreements are classified as:

Joint venture: an agreement whereby the parties exercising joint control have rights to the entity’s net assets. Joint ventures are included in to the consolidated financial statements using the equity method, as described in Note 3.i.

Joint operation: an agreement whereby the parties exercising joint control have rights to the assets and obligations with respect to the liabilities relating to the arrangement. Joint operations are included in to the consolidated financial statements recognizing the interest in the contractually named assets and liabilities in the joint operation.

In determining the type of joint arrangement in which it is involved, the management of the Group assesses its rights and obligations arising from the arrangement by considering the structure and legal form of the arrangement, the terms agreed by the parties in the contractual arrangement and, when relevant, other facts and circumstances. If facts and circumstances change, the Group reassesses whether the type of joint arrangement in which it is involved has changed.

Currently, the Company is not involved in any joint arrangement that qualifies as a joint operation.

2.7

Basis of consolidation and business combinations

The subsidiaries are consolidated and all their assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash flows are included in the consolidated financial statements once the adjustments and eliminations from intra-group transactions have been made.

The comprehensive income from subsidiaries are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income from the date when the parent company obtains control of the subsidiary until the date on which it loses control of the subsidiary.

The operations of the parent company and its subsidiaries have been consolidated under the following basic principles:

At the date the parent obtains control, the subsidiary’s assets acquired and its liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value, except for certain assets and liabilities that are recorded using valuation principles established in other IFRS standards. If the fair value of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any non-controlling interests exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired, this difference is recorded as goodwill. In the case of a bargain purchase, the resulting gain is recognized in profit or loss after reassessing whether all of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed have been properly identified and following a review of the procedures used to measure the fair value of these amounts.

For each business combination, IFRS allow valuation of the non-controlling interests in the acquiree on the date of acquisition: i) at fair value; or ii) for the proportional ownership of the identifiable net assets of the acquiree, with the later being the methodology that the Group has systematically applied to its business combinations.

If the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date has not been completed, the Group reports the provisional values accounted for in the business combination. During the measurement period, which shall not exceed one year from the acquisition date, the provisional values recognized will be adjusted retrospectively as if the accounting for the business combination had been completed at the acquisition date, and also additional assets or liabilities will be recognized to reflect new information obtained about events and circumstances that existed on the acquisition date, but which were unknown to the management at that time. Comparative information for prior periods presented in the financial statements is revised as needed, including making any change in depreciation, amortization or other income effects recognized in completing the initial accounting.

For business combinations achieved in stages, the Company measures at fair value the participation previously held in the equity of the acquired company on the date of acquisition and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognized in profit or loss of the period.

Non-controlling interests in equity and in the comprehensive income of the consolidated subsidiaries are presented, respectively, under the line items “Total Equity: Non-controlling interests” in the consolidated statement of financial position and “Net income attributable to non-controlling interests” and “Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests” in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

The financial statements of the Group companies operating in non-hyper-inflationary economies, with functional currencies other than the US dollar are translated as follows:

For assets and liabilities, the prevailing exchange rate on the closing date of the financial statements is used.

For items of the comprehensive income, the average exchange rate for the period is used (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the exchange rates in effect on the dates of the transactions, in which case the exchange rate in effect on the date of each transaction is used).

For equity accounts, the historical exchange rate from the date of acquisition or contribution is used, and retained earnings are translated at the average exchange rate at the date of origination.

Exchange differences arising in translation of financial statements are recognized in the item “Foreign currency translation gains (losses”) within the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in other comprehensive income (see Note 26.2).

The financial statements of the subsidiaries whose functional currency comes from hyper-inflationary economies, as is the case of the Argentine economy (see Note 7), are first adjusted for the inflation effect, and any gain or loss in the net monetary position is recognized in profit or loss; then all the items (assets, liabilities, equity items, expenses and revenue) are translated using the closing exchange rate corresponding to the closing date of the most recent statement of financial position.

Balances and transactions between consolidated companies have been fully eliminated in the consolidation process.

Changes in the ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in the Group obtaining or losing control are recognized as equity transactions. The carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests are adjusted to reflect the changes in their relative interests in the subsidiaries. Any difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received is recognized directly in equity attributable to shareholders of the Parent.

Business combinations under common control are accounted for using, as a reference, the ‘pooling of interest’ method. Under this method, the assets and liabilities involved in the transaction remain reflected at the same carrying amounts at which they were recognized in the ultimate controlling company, although subsequent accounting adjustments may need to be made to align the accounting policies of the companies involved.

Any difference between assets and liabilities contributed to the consolidation and the consideration paid is recorded directly in Net equity, as a charge or credit to “Other reserves”. The Group does not restate comparative periods in its financial statements for business combinations under common control.