Legal Proceedings

6 Months Ended

Jul. 30, 2011

Legal Proceedings

14. Legal Proceedings

On February 3, 2011, a purported Talbots shareholder filed a putative class action captioned Washtenaw County Employees’ Retirement System v. The Talbots, Inc. et al., Case No. 1:11-cv-10186-NMG, in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against Talbots and certain of its officers. The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of Talbots common stock from December 8, 2009 through and including January 11, 2011, asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and sought, among other things, damages and costs and expenses. On July 27, 2011, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint which continues to assert claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) alleging certain false and misleading statements and alleged omissions related to Talbots’ financial condition, inventory management and business prospects. The amended complaint alleges that these actions artificially inflated the market price of Talbots common stock during the class period, thus purportedly harming investors. The Company believes that these claims are without merit and intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings or an estimate of damages, if any.

On February 24, 2011, a putative Talbots shareholder filed a derivative action in Massachusetts Superior Court, captioned Greco v. Sullivan, et al., Case No. 11-0728 BLS, against certain of Talbots’ officers and directors. The complaint, which purports to be brought on behalf of Talbots, asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duties, insider trading, abuse of control, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment, and seeks, among other things, damages, equitable relief and costs and expenses. The complaint alleges that the defendants either caused or neglected to prevent, through mismanagement or failure to provide effective oversight, the issuance of false and misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company’s financial condition. The complaint alleges that the defendants’ actions injured the Company insofar as they (a) caused Talbots to waste corporate assets through incentive-based bonuses for senior management, (b) subjected the Company to significant potential civil liability and legal costs and (c) damaged the Company through a loss of market capitalization as well as goodwill and other intangible benefits. The Company believes that these claims are without merit and, with the other defendants, intends to defend against them vigorously. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these proceedings.