XML 19 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
10. Fair Value Measurements
The Company classifies fair value based measurements on a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows: Level 1, quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, observable inputs other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 such as quoted market prices for markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and Level 3, unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
The Company’s financial instruments at April 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011 consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, customer accounts receivable, investments in the Company’s irrevocable grantor’s trust (“Rabbi Trust”) that holds assets intended to fund benefit obligations under the Company’s Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan, accounts payable and its revolving credit facility. The Company believes the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, customer accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their fair values due to their short-term nature. The money market investments in the Rabbi Trust are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 measurements) and are not significant to the total value of the Rabbi Trust. The investments in life insurance policies held in the Rabbi Trust are recorded at their cash surrender values, which is consistent with settlement value and is not a fair value measurement. The Company believes that the carrying value of its revolving credit facility approximated fair value at April 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, as the interest rates are market-based variable rates and were re-set with the third party lenders during the third quarter of 2010.
The Company monitors the performance and productivity of its store portfolio and closes stores when appropriate. When it is determined that a store is underperforming or is to be closed, the Company reassesses the recoverability of the store’s long-lived assets, which in some cases results in an impairment charge. In the thirteen weeks ended April 30, 2011, the Company performed impairment analyses on the assets of certain stores, primarily triggered by the Company’s accelerated store rationalization plan.
The following table summarizes the non-financial assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in performing these analyses for the thirteen weeks ended April 30, 2011:
                                         
            Fair Value Measurements Using        
            Quoted                    
            Market Prices     Observable             Impairment of  
    Net Carrying     in Active     Inputs Other     Significant     Store Assets,  
    Value at     Markets for     than Quoted     Unobservable     Thirteen Weeks  
    April 30,     Identical     Market     Inputs     Ended  
    2011     Assets (Level 1)     Prices (Level 2)     (Level 3)     April 30, 2011  
                    (In thousands)                  
Long-lived assets held and used
  $ 884     $     $     $ 884     $ 1,217  
Total
  $ 884     $     $     $ 884     $ 1,217  
 
                             
The Company estimates the fair value of these store assets using an income approach which is based on estimates of future operating cash flows at the store level. These estimates, which include estimates of future net store sales, direct store expenses and non-cash store adjustments, are based on the experience of management, including historical store operating results and management’s knowledge and expectations. These estimates are affected by factors that can be difficult to predict, such as future operating results, customer activity and future economic conditions. Insignificant store impairments were recorded in the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2010.