XML 54 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Fair Values of Financial Instruments  
Fair Values of Financial Instruments

(9)                                 Fair Values of Financial Instruments

 

Our financial instruments, which are recorded at fair value, consist primarily of foreign currency contracts and marketable equity securities. We assess the inputs used to measure fair value using the following three-tier hierarchy, which indicates the extent to which inputs used are observable in the market.

 

Level 1                                Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

 

Level 2                                Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity rates and yield curves, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

 

Level 3                                Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions include management’s own judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

 

We value our foreign currency contracts using internal and third-party models with observable inputs, including currency forward and spot prices, volatility factors, and net present value factors. Estimated fair value has been determined as the difference between the current forward or option rate and the contract rate, multiplied by the notional amount of the contract, or upon the estimated fair value of purchased option contracts.

 

The following table presents information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we utilized. We classify these assets and liabilities as either short term or long term based on maturity or anticipated realization dates.

 

 

 

March 31,
2013

 

December 31,
2012

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Trading securities - Level 1

 

$

2,277

 

$

1,952

 

Foreign currency contracts - Level 2

 

1,323

 

779

 

 

 

$

3,600

 

$

2,731

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency contracts - Level 2

 

$

6

 

$

122

 

 

Our trading securities pertain to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and are held in a Rabbi Trust. We record a corresponding liability for the same amount in our financial statements, which represents our obligation to SERP participants. Our foreign currency contracts pertain to obligations or potential obligations to purchase or sell euros, pounds, U.S. dollars, and yen under various forward and option contracts.

 

We base the estimated fair value of our debt on institutional quotes currently available to us. The cost-based net carrying value and estimated fair value are as follows:

 

 

 

March 31, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Net Carrying
Value

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Net Carrying
Value

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt

 

$

67,978

 

$

69,137

 

$

68,007

 

$

68,631

 

 

The carrying values of accounts, notes and other receivables, and accounts payable approximate fair value. Certain assets, including long-lived assets held and used, trademarks associated with our online music business, and assets held for sale, with the exception of our building on West 57th Street in New York City, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. There were no fair value measurement losses recognized for such assets in the first quarter of 2013.