Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest

Indicated by check mark if the registrant is a well known seasonal issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a accelerated filer, an non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-accelerated Filer

Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Act.

Limited Partnership Redeemable Units with an aggregate value of $50,979,328 were outstanding and held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of February 29, 2008, 26,290.7251 Limited Partnership Redeemable Units were outstanding.

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

(a) General Development of Business. Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) is a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York on August 13, 1993 to engage in speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests, including futures contracts, options and forwards. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Partnership commenced trading operations on January 12, 1994. A total of 150,000 redeemable units of Limited Partnership Interest in the Partnership (‘‘Redeemable Units’’) were offered to the public. A Registration Statement on Form S-1 relating to the public offering became effective on October 29, 1993 (File No. 033-68074). Between October 29, 1993 and January 11, 1994, 75,615 Redeemable Units were sold to the public at $1,000 per Redeemable Unit. Proceeds of the offering were held in an escrow account and were transferred, along with the general partner’s contribution of $781,000, to the Partnership’s trading account on January 12, 1994 when the Partnership commenced trading. An additional 150,000 Redeemable Units were registered on a Registration Statement on Form S-1 effective February 17, 1994 (File No. 033-75056). Sales of additional Redeemable Units and additional general partner contributions and redemptions of Redeemable Units for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, are reported in the Statement of Changes in Partners’ Capital on page F-10 under ‘‘Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.’’

Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, acts as the general partner (the ‘‘General Partner’’) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. The Partnership’s commodity broker is Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (‘‘CGM’’). CGM is an affiliate of the General Partner. The General Partner is wholly owned by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (‘‘CGMHI’’), which is the sole owner of CGM. CGMHI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. (‘‘Citigroup’’).

The Partnership’s trading of futures, forwards and options contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done on United States of America and foreign commodity exchanges. It engages in such trading through a commodity brokerage account maintained with CGM. As of December 31, 2007, all commodity trading decisions are made for the Partnership by Campbell & Company, Inc. (‘‘Campbell’’), Willowbridge Associates Inc. (‘‘Willowbridge’’), Winton Capital Management Limited (‘‘Winton’’) and Graham Capital Management, L.P. (‘‘Graham’’) (each an ‘‘Advisor’’ and, collectively, the ‘‘Advisors’’). None of the Advisors are affiliated with any other Advisor, the General Partner or CGM. The Advisors are not responsible for the organization or operation of the Partnership.

The General Partner has agreed to make capital contributions, if necessary, so that its general partnership interest will be equal to the greater of (i) an amount to entitle it to 1% of each material item of Partnership income, loss, deduction or credit and (ii) the greater of (a) 1% of the partners’ contributions to the Partnership or (b) $25,000. The Partnership will be liquidated upon the first of the following to occur: December 31, 2013 if the net asset value per Redeemable Unit falls below $400 as of the close of any business day; or under certain circumstances as defined in the limited partnership agreement of the Partnership (the ‘‘Limited Partnership Agreement’’).

On November 1, 2004, the assets allocated to Winton for trading were invested in the CMF Winton Master L.P. (‘‘Winton Master’’), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the state of New York. The Partnership purchased 15,054.1946 units of Winton Master with cash of $14,251,586, and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a value of $802,609. Winton Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Winton to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Winton Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Winton, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Winton Master. The General Partner and Winton believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the investors as a result of the investment in Winton Master are approximately the same, and redemption rights are not affected.

On January 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Campbell for trading were invested in the CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. (‘‘Campbell Master’’), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the

State of New York. The Partnership purchased 19,621.1422 Units of Campbell Master with cash of $19,428,630, and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a fair value of $192,512. Campbell Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Campbell using its Financials, Metals and Energy (‘‘FME’’) Portfolio, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Campbell Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Campbell, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Campbell Master. The General Partner and Campbell believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the investors as a result of the investment in Campbell Master are approximately the same, and redemption rights are not affected.

On July 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Willowbridge Associates for trading were invested in the CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. (‘‘Willowbridge Master’’), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 12,259.3490 Units of Willowbridge Master with cash of $11,118,119, and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a fair value of $1,141,230. Willowbridge Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Willowbridge using its Argo Trading Program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Willowbridge Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Willowbridge, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Willowbridge Master. The General Partner and Willowbridge believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the investors as a result of the investment in Willowbridge Master are approximately the same, and redemption rights are not affected.

On April 1, 2006, the assets allocated to Graham for trading were invested in the CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. (‘‘Graham Master’’), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The partnership purchased 14,741.1555 units of Graham Master with cash of $14,741,156. Graham Master was formed in order to permit accounts managed by Graham using its Multi Trend (‘‘Multi-Trend’’) Program at 125% Leverage, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Graham Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Graham, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of the Graham Master. The General Partner and Graham believe that trading through this structure promotes efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the investors as a result of the investment in Graham Master are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

Campbell Master’s, Willowbridge Master’s, Winton Master’s and Graham Master’s (the ‘‘Funds’’) trading of futures, forwards and options contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on United States of America commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. Each engages in such trading through commodity brokerage accounts maintained with CGM.

A limited partner may withdraw all or part of its capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Funds in multiples of the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest as of the last day of a month after a request for redemption has been made to the General Partner at least 3 days in advance of month-end.

Management and incentive fees are charged at the Partnership level. All exchange, clearing, user, give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association (‘‘NFA’’) fees are borne by the Funds. All other fees, including CGM’s direct brokerage commission are charged at the Partnership level.

At December 31, 2007 the Partnership owned 5.1%, 4.3%, 3.5% and 5.5% of Campbell Master, Willowbridge Master, Winton Master and Graham Master, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, the Partnership owned 4.4%, 6.5%, 5.4% and 5.8% of Campbell Master, Willowbridge Master, Winton Master and Graham Master, respectively. It is Campbell’s, Winton’s, Willowbridge’s and Graham’s intention to continue to invest the assets allocated to each by the Partnership in the Campbell Master, Winton Master, Willowbridge Master and Graham Master, respectively. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of Funds.

Pursuant to the terms of the management agreements with each Advisor (the ‘‘Management Agreements’’), the Partnership pays Campbell, Graham and Willowbridge a monthly management fee

equal to 1/6 of 1% (2% per year) of month-end Net Assets allocated to each Advisor as of the end of each month. Winton receives a monthly management fee equal to 1/12 of 1.50% (1.50% per year), of month-end Net Assets allocated to the Advisor as of the end of each month. Month-end Net Assets for the purpose of calculating management fees are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of redemptions and incentive fees. In addition, the Partnership is obligated to pay each Advisor 20% of the New Trading Profits, as defined in the Management Agreements, earned by each Advisor to the Partnership in each calendar quarter.

The Partnership has entered into a customer agreement with CGM (the ‘‘Customer Agreement’’) which provides that the Partnership pays CGM a monthly brokerage fee equal to 11/24 of 1% (5.5% per year) of month-end Net Assets allocated to the Advisors in lieu of brokerage commissions on a per trade basis. Month-end Net Assets for the purpose of calculating commissions are Net Assets, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement, prior to the reduction of accrued expenses and redemptions payable. Persons investing $1,000,000 or more will pay a reduced brokerage fee of 7/24 of 1% of month-end Net Assets (3.5% per year), receiving the differential between this reduced fee and 5.5% per year in the form of additional Redeemable Units. CGM pays a portion of its brokerage fees to its financial advisors who have sold Redeemable Units and who are registered as associated persons with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ‘‘CFTC’’). The Partnership pays for NFA fees, exchange and clearing fees, give-up and user fees and floor brokerage fees. The Customer Agreement between the Partnership and CGM gives the Partnership the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses. Brokerage fees will be paid for the life of the Partnership, although the rate at which such fees are paid may be changed.

In addition, CGM pays the Partnership interest on 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in its account during each month at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined weekly by CGM based on the average non-competitive yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills maturing in 30 days from the date on which such weekly rate is determined. The Customer Agreement may be terminated upon notice by either party.

(b) Financial Information about Industry Segments. The Partnership’s business consists of only one segment, speculative trading of commodity interests. The Partnership does not engage in the sales of goods or services. The Partnership’s net income (loss) from operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is set forth under ‘‘Item 6. Selected Financial Data’’. The Partnership’s capital as of December 31, 2007 was $47,397,637.

(d) Financial Information about Geographic Areas. The Partnership does not engage in the sales of goods or services, or own any long lived assets, and therefore this item is not applicable.

(e) Available Information. The Partnership does not have an Internet address. The Partnership will provide paper copies of its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports free of charge upon request.

(g) Enforceability of Civil Liabilities Against Foreign Persons. Not applicable.

As a result of leverage, small changes in the price of the Partnership’s positions may result in major losses.

The trading of commodity interests is speculative, volatile and involves a high degree of leverage. A small change in the market price of a commodity interest contract can produce major losses for the Partnership.

Due to the speculative nature of trading commodity interests, an investor could lose all of their investment in the Partnership.

The Partnership will pay substantial fees and expenses regardless of profitability.

Regardless of its trading performance, the Partnership will incur fees and expenses, including brokerage and management fees. Substantial incentive fees may be paid to one or more of the Advisors even if the Partnership experiences a net loss for the full year.

An investor’s ability to redeem units is limited and no market exists for the units.

The Partnership is subject to numerous conflicts of interest including those that arise from the facts that:

Investing in units might not provide the desired diversification of an investor’s overall portfolio.

The Partnership will not provide any benefit of diversification of an investor’s overall portfolio unless it is profitable and produces returns that are independent from stock and bond market returns.

The Advisor’s trading strategies may not perform as they have performed in the past. The Advisors has from time to time incurred substantial losses in trading on behalf of clients.

Investors are taxed on their share of the Partnership’s income, even though the Partnership does not intend to make any distributions.

The General Partner at any time may select and allocate the Partnership’s assets to undisclosed advisors. Investors may not be advised of such changes in advance. Investors must rely on the ability of the General Partner to select advisors and allocate assets among them.

The Partnership does not own or lease any properties. The General Partner operates out of facilities provided by its affiliate, CGM.

This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which CGM or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

CGM is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 388 Greenwich St., New York, New York 10013. CGM is registered as a broker-dealer and futures commission merchant (‘‘FCM’’), and provides futures brokerage and clearing services for institutional and retail participants in the futures markets. CGM and its affiliates also provide investment banking and other financial services for clients worldwide.

There have been no administrative, civil or criminal actions pending, on appeal or concluded against CGM or any of its individual principals within the past five years that management believes may have a material impact on CGM’s ability to act as an FCM and no such actions are currently pending, except as follows.

In April 2002, Citigroup and CGM were named as defendants along with, among others, commercial and/or investment banks, certain current and former Enron officers and directors, lawyers and accountants in a putative consolidated class action complaint that was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking unspecified damages. The action, brought on behalf of individuals who purchased Enron securities (Newby, et al. v. Enron Corp., et al. (‘‘Newby’’)), alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Citigroup’s motion to dismiss the complaint was denied in December 2002, and Citigroup filed an answer in January 2003. In May 2003, plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated class action complaint, and Citigroup filed a motion to dismiss in June 2003, which was denied in April 2004.

On June 10, 2005, CGM (along with Citigroup and certain of its subsidiaries) agreed to a settlement in Newby. Under the terms of the settlement, Citigroup will make a pretax payment of $2.01 billion to the settlement class (consisting of all purchasers of all publicly traded equity and debt securities issued by Enron and certain Enron-related entities between September 9, 1997 and December 2, 2001. The Regents of the University of California (the Newby lead plaintiff) approved the settlement on July 20. The Court gave final approval to the settlement on May 24, 2006. The amount to be paid in settlement of this action is covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

In September 2003, CGM (and Citigroup and various Citigroup-affiliates) were named as defendants in an adversary proceeding, Enron v. Citigroup, et al. (In re Enron Corp., et al.), filed by Enron in its chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings against entities that purchased Enron bankruptcy claims from Citigroup, seeking to disallow or to subordinate those claims. The case is scheduled for trial beginning April 28, 2008. Additionally, in November 2003, Enron filed an additional adversary action against CGM (and Citibank, N.A.) seeking to recover fees paid to CGM in connection with the proposed Enron-Dynegy merger. Discovery is proceeding in that action.

Several additional actions, previously identified, had been consolidated or coordinated with the Newby action and stayed (except with respect to certain discovery) until the Court’s decision on class certification on July 5, 2006.

Certain entities that had previously filed separate lawsuits against CGM (along with other Citigroup entities) did not opt out of the Newby settlement. As a result, the following coordinated/consolidated cases that relate to the purchase of Enron-related securities have been dismissed: California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. Bank of America Securities LLC, et al., Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., et al., and Conseco Annuity Assurance Co. v. Citigroup, Inc.

On February 18, 2005, Judge Harmon granted the motion to dismiss of various financial institution defendants (including CGM) in Washington State Investment Board v. Lay, et al. The action had been brought on behalf of purchasers of Enron’s publicly traded debt and equity securities between September 9, 1997 and October 18, 1998.

On April 19, 2005, CGM (along with Citigroup and certain of its subsidiaries) and various financial institution defendants reached an agreement to settle four state court actions brought by various investment funds that had purchased Enron and/or Enron-linked securities. The four cases are OCM Opportunities Fund III, L.P., et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al.; Pacific Investment Management Co. LLC, et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al.; AUSA Life Insurance v. Citigroup Inc., et al.; and Principal Global Investors v. Citigroup Inc., et al. The amounts paid in settlement of these actions were covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On June 3, 2005, CGM (along with Citigroup) and various financial institution defendants reached an agreement in principle to settle a state court action (subsequently consolidated with Newby), Retirement Systems of Alabama v. Merrill Lynch, et al., brought by an Alabama public corporation comprising various state employee pension funds that had purchased Enron securities from (among others) CGM. The District Court approved the settlement on July 5, 2005. The amount paid in settlement of this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On December 7, 2005, Judge Harmon dismissed City of Montgomery, Alabama Employees’ Retirement System v. Lay, et al. in light of a settlement between plaintiff and CGM (along with Citigroup and certain Credit Suisse First Boston-entities). The action was originally filed in Alabama state court and subsequently coordinated with Newby. The case arose out of plaintiff’s purchase of certain Enron-linked securities allegedly in reliance on CGM and other analyst reports concerning Enron. The amount paid in settlement of this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On November 4, 2005, Sierra Pacific Resources and Nevada Power v. Citigroup, et al., a federal court case (subsequently coordinated with Newby) naming as defendants CGM (along with Citigroup and Citibank, N.A., and various financial institution defendants) was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice by the plaintiffs. The case had been brought by purchasers of electricity from Enron.

On December 14, 2005, Aksamit, et al. v. UBS PaineWebber, et al., a state court action (subsequently coordinated with Newby) naming CGM and various other financial institutions as defendants, was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice by the plaintiff. The case had been brought on behalf of CGM clients who had purchased Enron securities at various times up until the filing of Enron’s bankruptcy, in reliance on CGM and other analyst reports concerning Enron.

On September 29, 2006, CGM (along with Citigroup and a third-party defendant) filed a partial motion to dismiss in Vanguard Balanced Index Fund, et al. v. Citigroup, et al.. The action was filed in Pennsylvania state court in 2003 by certain investment funds, and asserts claims under state securities and common law, arising out of plaintiffs’ purchase of certain Enron-related securities. Vanguard filed opposition papers on November 14, 2006, and the defendants filed their reply on December 1, 2006. The case had been coordinated with Newby until Judge Harmon’s decision on class certification.

On January 2, 2007, Judge Harmon entered final judgment terminating Ravenswood I, L.L.C., et al. v. Citigroup, Inc., et al. in light of a settlement between plaintiffs and Citigroup (including CGM). The action, asserting state statutory and common law claims, had been filed in federal court in Texas on behalf of successors in interest to certain Enron securities owned by Prudential, and subsequently coordinated with Newby. The amount paid in settlement of this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On January 18, 2007, Judge Harmon dismissed American National Insurance Co., et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al. in light of a settlement between plaintiffs and Citigroup (including CGM). The action, asserting state securities and common law claims, had been filed in Texas state court and subsequently coordinated with Newby. The amount paid in settlement of this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On January 23, 2007, Judge Harmon granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint in Silvercreek Management Inc. v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., a federal securities law and fraud action against CGM (and other defendants) on behalf of several funds that allegedly sustained losses arising out of their investments in Enron securities. The case had been coordinated with Newby until Judge Harmon’s decision on class certification, and is currently stayed (along with other actions that implicate the scope of liability of secondary actors under Section 10(b)of the 1934 Act) in light of the Fifth Circuit’s reversal of Judge Harmon’s class certification decision.

On January 25, 2007, Judge Harmon entered final judgment terminating Public Employees Retirement Systems of Ohio v. Fastow, et al. in light of a settlement between plaintiffs and certain financial institution defendants (including CGM). The action, asserting state securities and common law fraud claims, had been filed in Ohio state court on behalf of four Ohio pension funds that purchased Enron securities, and was subsequently coordinated with Newby. The amount paid in settlement of this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On August 15, 2007, CGM (along with other Citigroup entities and various other financial institutions) filed motions to dismiss Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Lay, et al., an action sounding in fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, and arising out of an Enron transaction with a Connecticut state agency. The case had been coordinated with Newby until Judge Harmon’s decision on class certification. Plaintiff filed its opposition on November 9, 2007; Citigroup partially joined a reply submitted by other financial institutions on January 30, 2008, and Citigroup’s individual reply was due on February 29, 2008.

On December 27, 2007, plaintiff moved for leave to amend its complaint in Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington v. Citigroup, et al. The case, originally filed in Washington federal court in 2004, arises out of alleged losses caused by Enron’s electricity overcharges to a public utility. It alleges three causes of action sounding in tort against CGM (along with various Citigroup entities and other financial institutions). The action had been coordinated with Newby until Judge Harmon’s decision on class certification. CGM and other defendants filed an opposition on January 28, 2008.

On January 28, 2008, the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument on plaintiffs’ appeal against Judge Harmon’s dismissal of various third-party petitions filed by certain Enron outside directors and Arthur Andersen against CGM (and various other financial institution defendants). The petitions, collectively referred to as the Fleming Cases, assert fraud and negligence claims; they were filed in Texas state court and subsequently coordinated with Newby.

CGM (along with Citigroup, Citibank N.A., and various J.P. Morgan Chase-entities) has been named in multiple actions brought by certain bank participants in, as well as ‘‘vulture funds’’ who purchased certain banks’ interests in, two revolving Enron credit facilities and a syndicated letter of credit facility. The cases, Avenue Capital Management II, L.P., et al. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., et al., and DK Acquisition, et al. v. J.P. Morgan Chase, et al., had been coordinated with Newby until Judge Harmon’s decision on class certification. The actions were conditionally transferred to the Southern District of New York on December 10, 2007, and were assigned to Judge Rakoff on February 4, 2008. Defendants filed partial summary judgment motions in all three cases on December 6, 2007. A fourth action, Bayerische Landesbank, et al. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, et al., brought by certain bank participants in the Enron facilities and subsequently coordinated with Newby, was settled on July 31, 2007, and the district court approved the settlement on August 22, 2007. The amount paid in settlement was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On March 26, 2008, Citigroup Inc. issued a press release announcing that it has reached settlement agreements resolving the two largest remaining claims against Citigroup arising out of the collapse of Enron in 2001. Both settlements are fully covered by Citigroup’s existing litigation reserves.

Under the terms of one of the settlement agreements, Citigroup will pay $1.66 billion to Enron and withdraw certain claims in the Enron bankruptcy proceeding. Enron will release all of its claims against Citigroup and certain other parties. Enron will also allow specified Citigroup-related claims in the bankruptcy proceeding, including all of the bankruptcy claims of parties holding approximately $2.4 billion of Enron credit-linked notes (‘‘CLNs’’). Citigroup reached a separate settlement agreement resolving all disputes with the holders of the CLNs, including a suit against Citigroup pending in the Federal District Court in Houston.

The settlements provide that Citigroup denies any wrongdoing and has agreed to the settlements solely to eliminate the uncertainties, burden and expense of further protracted litigation. The Enron settlement agreements must be approved by the bankruptcy court.

On December 23, 2003, Citigroup and CGM moved to dismiss several consolidated putative class actions alleging violations of Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, for purportedly issuing research reports without a reasonable basis in fact and allegedly failing to disclose conflicts of interest with companies in connection with CGM’s published investment research regarding AT&T Corp., Winstar Communications, Inc., Rhythms NetConnections, Inc., Level 3 Communications, Inc.,

XO Communications, Inc. and Williams Communications Group, Inc. On December 30, 2003, Citigroup and CGM filed a motion to dismiss similar claims in connection with CGM’s published investment research regarding Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. (‘‘MFN’’).

On January 30, 2004, plaintiffs in the Rhythm NetConnections, Inc. action voluntarily dismissed their complaint with prejudice. In December 2004, Judge Lynch granted in part and denied in part Citigroup’s motions to dismiss the Level 3, XO and Williams Actions. Specifically, he dismissed claims arising out of research published before April 18, 2001, all claims related to Level 3 and XO bondholders, and all claims in the Williams Action on behalf of Guided Portfolio Management accountholders. He denied in part Citigroup’s motion to dismiss the AT&T litigation, although he dismissed claims related to AT&T Wireless, AT&T’s wireless affiliate, in their entirety.

Winstar: On January 5, 2005, the Court dismissed the Winstar action in its entirety with prejudice. Plaintiffs have moved for reconsideration, which motion has been denied. The dismissal with prejudice of the Winstar class action is now final.

Metromedia Fiber Networks: On January 6, 2005, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Citigroup-Related Defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims against it in the MFN action. On June 20, 2006, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On October 6, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit accepted an appeal of the class certification order, which appeal was argued on January 30, 2008, and remains pending. Fact discovery has concluded, and expert discovery has been stayed, by agreement of the parties, pending resolution of the appeal.

AT&T, Level 3 Communications, XO Communications and Williams Communications Group: On January 25, 2005, the Citigroup-Related Defendants renewed their motions to dismiss the remaining portions of the AT&T, XO, Level 3 and Williams cases in light of recent Second Circuit authority on loss causation. On February 24, 2005, the judge stayed all discovery in those cases during the pendency of the motion. On May 24, 2005, Citigroup and CGM reached agreements settling all claims in the Level 3 and XO actions for $10.25 million and $9.125 million respectively; on June 8, 2005, the parties reached an agreement to settle all claims in Williams action for $12.5 million. Finally, on September 27, 2005, the Citigroup-Related Defendants agreed to settle all claims in the AT&T action for $74.75 million. The AT&T settlement was finally approved on August 17, 2006. The XO, Level 3 and Williams settlements were finally approved on September 29, 2006. All of the settlements are final and no longer subject to appeal. The amounts paid in settlement of these actions were covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

Focal Communications Corp.: On July 28, 2004, a putative class action by purchasers of Focal Communications Corporation common stock was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting claims under Section 10 and Section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Citigroup, CGM and Jack Grubman. On March 15, 2005, the plaintiffs in the Focal action filed a consolidated amended class action complaint; we have moved to dismiss the complaint, and that motion to dismiss was fully briefed on August 10, 2005. The parties have reached an agreement to settle all claims in the Focal class action for $14 million. The settlement was finally approved on March 23, 2007, and is no longer subject to appeal. The amounts paid in settlement of this action were covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

Customer Class Actions: In addition, four putative class actions were filed against Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, including CGM, and certain of their current and former directors, officers and employees, along with other parties, on behalf of persons who maintained accounts with CGM. These actions assert, among other things, common law claims, claims under state statutes, and claims under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, for allegedly failing to provide objective and unbiased investment research and investment management, seeking, among other things, return of fees and commissions. These four cases were Norman v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., Rowinski v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., Politzer v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and Disher, et al. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. In Norman, the judge denied our motion to dismiss, class certification was briefed by the parties, and the action was subsequently settled for $50 million, an amount covered by existing litigation reserves. The settlement was finally approved on May 18, 2006, and is no longer subject to appellate review. In Rowinski, the judge granted our motion to dismiss. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which

affirmed the decision. The Politzer case was dismissed by the judge — a decision that was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and that the United States Supreme Court declined to review.

In Disher, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision to remand the case to state court, and directed the district court to dismiss the case as preempted. The United States Supreme Court vacated the Seventh Circuit’s decision, and remanded the case to the Seventh Circuit in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust. On January 22, 2007, the Seventh Circuit dismissed Citigroup’s appeal. On February 1, 2007, plaintiffs secured an order reopening this case in Illinois state court, and on February 16, Citigroup removed the reopened action to federal court. On May 3, 2007, the District Court remanded the action to Illinois state court, and on June 13, 2007, Citigroup moved in state court to dismiss the action. That motion remains pending.

On May 10, 2004, the Company, through its parent, Citigroup, announced that it had agreed to settle all claims against it in In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation, a class action brought on behalf of certain investors in WorldCom Securities. Under the terms of the settlement, Citigroup will make a payment of $2.575 billion to the settlement class. Citigroup reached this settlement agreement without admitting any wrongdoing or liability, and the agreement reflects that Citigroup denies that it or its subsidiaries committed any act or omission giving rise to any liability and/or violation of the law. On November 7, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the class settlement. The settlement became final in March 2006 and settlement funds have been released to the plaintiffs.

Pursuant to an order dated May 28, 2003, more than 110 individual actions asserting claims against Citigroup and/or CGM based on its research and/or underwriting of WorldCom securities have been consolidated with In re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying plaintiffs’ motions to remand to state court a large group of these WorldCom-related actions. On September 13, 2004, plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court seeking review of the Second Circuit’s ruling, which was denied.

Numerous other actions asserting claims against CGM in connection with its research reports about WorldCom and/or its role as an investment banker for WorldCom are pending in other federal and state courts. These actions have been remanded to various state courts, are pending in other federal courts, or have been conditionally transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to be consolidated with the class action. As of December 31, 2007, one WorldCom individual action remains pending, in Texas state court. The balance of the individual actions have been settled or dismissed by court order. The settlements of those actions, some of which are discussed below, are covered by existing litigation reserves. Plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal of one of those actions, which appeal has been fully briefed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

On September 17, 2004, Weinstein, et al. v. Ebbers, et al., a putative class action against CGM and others brought on behalf of holders of WorldCom securities asserting claims based on, among other things, CGM’s research reports concerning WorldCom, was dismissed with prejudice in its entirety by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs noticed an appeal of the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on October 15, 2004. The parties have reached an agreement in principle on the terms of a settlement of this action, and the appeal has been dismissed.

On September 30, 2004, Citigroup and CGM, along with a number of other defendants, settled Retirement Systems of Alabama, et al. v. J.P. Morgan Chase, et al., a WorldCom individual action that had been remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama. On June 22, 2005, Citigroup and CGM, along with other financial institution defendants, entered into a settlement agreement in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Ohio v. Ebbers, et al. Citigroup’s share of the settlement was $40 million. On August 5, 2005, Citigroup and CGM, along with other financial institution defendants, entered into a settlement agreement in one of these actions, New York City Employees’ Retirement System v. Ebbers, et al., Citigroup’s share of the settlement was $35.557 million. The amounts paid in settlement of these actions were covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On October 27, 2005, Citigroup and CGM, along with all other defendants, including financial institution defendants, entered into a settlement agreement resolving all claims against the Citigroup-related defendants in 32 individual actions filed on behalf of 70 institutional plaintiffs that have opted out of the WorldCom class action settlement, all of which were brought by Lerach, Coughlin, Stoia, Geller, Rudman & Robbins LLP. Plaintiffs in these actions asserted claims under federal and state law in connection with the Citigroup-related defendants’ research coverage and underwriting of WorldCom securities. Citigroup’s share of the settlement was $249.9 million. The amount paid in settlement of these actions was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

A FINRA (formerly NASD) arbitration hearing was held in Sturm, et al. v. Citigroup, et al., from September 12 through October 3, 2005. Claimants alleged research analyst conflicts of interest related to SSB research coverage of WorldCom, and brought common law claims, including fraud claims, against Citigroup and CGM. Claimants sought $901 million in compensatory damages, in addition to punitive damages. On November 28, 2005, the arbitration panel denied all of claimants’ claims in their entirety, with prejudice. On February 21, 2006, Claimants filed a motion to vacate the arbitration result. On April 14, 2006, the same Claimants filed another FINRA arbitration proceeding arising out of their investments in Level 3 Communications, Inc. On September 20, 2006, the Citigroup-related Respondents executed an agreement with the Sturms to settle all outstanding matters.

In addition to the court suits, actions asserting claims against CGM relating to its WorldCom research reports are pending in numerous arbitrations around the country. These actions assert claims that are substantially similar to the claims asserted in the class action.

On June 28, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed all claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and certain claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in In Re TARGETS Securities Litigation, a putative class action against Citigroup and CGM and certain former employees, leaving only claims under the 1934 Act for purchases of Targeted Growth Enhanced Terms Securities (‘‘TARGETS’’) with respect to the common stock of MCI WorldCom, Inc. after July 30, 1999. On October 20, 2004, the parties signed a Memorandum of Understanding setting forth the terms of a settlement of all remaining claims in this action. The settlement was preliminarily approved by the Court on January 11, 2005, and finally approved on April 22, 2005. The amount paid in settlement of this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

On or about January 28, 2003, lead plaintiff in a consolidated putative class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (In re Global Crossing Ltd. Securities Litigation) filed a consolidated complaint on behalf of purchasers of the securities of Global Crossing and Asia Global Crossing, which names as defendants, among others, Citigroup, CGM, CGMHI and certain executive officers and current and former employees. The putative class action complaint asserts claims against these Citigroup defendants under (i) Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and Rule 14A-9A promulgated thereunder, in connection with certain offerings in which CGM served as underwriter and in connection with certain transactions in which CGM issued fairness opinions, and (ii) Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated hereunder, alleging that they disseminated misleading research reports concerning Global Crossing and Asia Global Crossing. The Citigroup-related defendants have moved to dismiss these claims. Judge Lynch largely denied the motion to dismiss the Section 11 claims against the underwriters.

In March 2005, while the motion to dismiss was pending, the plaintiffs and the Citigroup-related defendants reached a settlement of all claims against the Citigroup-related defendants, including both research and underwriting claims, and including claims concerning losses in both Global Crossing and Asia Global Crossing, for a total of $75 million. The Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement on March 8, 2005, and on July 8, 2005, granted final approval and rejected all objections to the settlement.

Citigroup has also been named as a defendant in two proceedings brought by the Global Crossing Estate Representative on or about January 27, 2004 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. First the Estate Representative filed an adversary proceeding asserting

claims against, among others, Citigroup, CGM and certain executive officers and current and former employees, asserting claims under federal bankruptcy law and common law in connection with CGM’s research reports about Global Crossing and for its role as an underwriter in Global Crossing offerings. The Citigroup-Related Defendants moved to dismiss the former action on June 26, 2004, and settled it on September 12, 2005 for $27.5 million. The amount paid in settlement of this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves. The Estate Representative also filed an adversary proceeding against Citigroup and several other financial institutions seeking to rescind the payment of a $1 billion loan made to a subsidiary of Global Crossing. The Citigroup-related defendants moved to dismiss the latter on May 28, 2004, which motion is still pending.

On July 6, 2003, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors on behalf of Adelphia Communications Corporation filed an adversary proceeding against certain lenders and investment banks, including CGM, Citibank, N.A., Citicorp USA, Inc. and Citigroup Financial Products, Inc. (together, the Citigroup Parties). The complaint alleges that the Citigroup Parties and numerous other defendants committed acts in violation of the Bank Holding Company Act and the common law. The complaints seek equitable relief and an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. In November 2003, a similar adversary proceeding was filed by the Equity Holders Committee of Adelphia. In June 2004, motions to dismiss were filed with respect to the complaints of the two committees. Those motions were decided by the bankruptcy court, and were granted in part and denied in part. The bankruptcy court’s ruling was, in part, reviewed by the district court. The Adelphia Recovery Trust, which has replaced the committees as the plaintiff in the action, has filed an amended complaint on behalf of the Adelphia Estate, consolidating the two prior complaints; motions to dismiss the amended complaint and answers have been filed.

In addition, CGM was among the underwriters named in civil actions brought by investors in Adelphia debt securities in connection with Adelphia securities offerings between September 1997 and October 2001. Following settlements of the class action (which is pending appeal) and other individual actions, two cases remain outstanding. The Second Circuit is considering whether the plaintiff in one has proper standing to sue. In September 2007, motions to dismiss in the other case were granted in part and denied in part.

On November 3, 2003, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted CGM’s motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint asserting violations of certain federal and state antitrust laws in connection with the allocation of shares in initial public offerings when acting as underwriters. Plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On September 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals vacated the district court’s order dismissing these actions and remanded for further proceedings. On December 7, 2006, the United States Supreme Court granted ceriorari review of the Second Circuit’s opinion. On June 18, 2007, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the securities law precludes application of the antitrust laws to the claims asserted by plaintiffs, effectively terminating the litigation.

In the securities cases, which are pending before Judge Scheindlin of the Southern District, plaintiffs seek damages against numerous underwriters for alleged violations of the Securities and Exchange Acts of 1933 and 1934 in connection with more than 300 initial public offerings. Plaintiffs allege that the underwriters had a practice to allocate shares in IPOs only to those persons or entities that agreed to purchase shares in the aftermarket at increasing prices, which, they claim, led to inflated secondary market pricing. They further make allegations about analyst conflicts of interest and allege that, because of the aforementioned practice, the underwriters received compensation that was not disclosed in the relevant offering memoranda. Judge Scheindlin recently certified a class and discovery on the merits is ongoing. On June 30, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit entered an order agreeing to review the district court’s order granting plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On December 5, 2006, the Second Circuit reversed Judge Scheindlin’s class certification order. The plaintiffs filed a petition for

rehearing in January 2007. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit panel that reversed the district court’s class certification decision denied plaintiff’s petition for rehearing, and on May 18, 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing en banc. On August 14, 2007, plaintiffs filed amended complaints in the six focus cases as well as amended master allegations for all cases in the coordinated proceedings. On September 27, 2007, plaintiffs filed a motion to certify new classes in the six focus cases. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended pleadings in November 2007 and filed an opposition to the new motion for class certification in December 2007.

CGM has been named in several class actions and derivative litigations pending in various Federal District Courts arising out of alleged violations of the federal securities laws, including the Investment Company Act, and common law (including breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment). The claims concern practices in connection with the sale of mutual funds, including allegations involving market timing, revenue sharing, incentive payments for the sale of proprietary funds, undisclosed breakpoint discounts for the sale of certain classes of funds, inappropriate share class recommendations and inappropriate fund investments. The litigations involving market timing have been consolidated under the Multi District rules in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the ‘‘MDL action’’), and the litigations involving revenue sharing, incentive payment and other issues are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs in these litigations generally seek unspecified compensatory damages, recessionary damages, injunctive relief, costs and fees. In the principal cases concerning revenue sharing, incentive payment and other issues, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated and amended complaint on December 15, 2004. Citi moved to dismiss the claims and the motion was granted. An appeal is pending and will be fully briefed by April 15, 2008. Several derivative actions and class actions were also dismissed against Citigroup defendants in the MDL action (and we expect that additional actions will be dismissed on similar grounds).

In May 2007, CGM finalized its settlement agreement with the NYSE and the New Jersey Bureau of Securities on the matter related to its market-timing practices prior to September 2003.

Citigroup, along with numerous others, has also been named as a defendant in several lawsuits by shareholders of entities that originated subprime mortgages, and for which CGM underwrote securities offerings. These actions assert that CGM violated Sections 11, 12, and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, arising out of allegedly false and misleading statements contained in the registration statements and prospectuses issued in connection with those offerings. Specifically, CGM has been named as a defendant in (i) two putative class action lawsuits brought by shareholders of American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; and (ii) three putative class action lawsuits brought by shareholders of Countrywide Financial Corp. and its affiliates, pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Citigroup has not yet responded to the complaints in these actions. A motion to remand to California state court has been filed in one of the Countrywide-related actions.

In the course of its business, CGM, as a major FCM and broker-dealer, is a party to various claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the General Partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of CGM.

There were no matters submitted to the security holders for a vote during the last fiscal year covered by this report.

(a) Market Information. The Partnership has issued no stock. There is no established public market for the Redeemable Units.

(b) Holders. The number of holders of Redeemable Units as of December 31, 2007 was 1,966.

(d) Use of Proceeds. There were no additional sales of Redeemable Units for the 12 months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Proceeds from the sale of additional Redeemable Units are used in the trading of commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts.

Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses), interest income, net income (loss) and increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and total assets at December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:


	2007			2006			2005				2004			2003
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and investment in Partnerships (including clearing fees) of $2,728,526, $3,088,967, $3,461,689, $4,095,297 and $4,367,509 respectively		$	3,318,410		$	2,758,193		$	(4,344,661	)		$	7,186,726		$	13,380,995
Interest income			—			125,292			501,524				640,231			575,911
		$	3,318,410		$	2,883,485		$	(3,843,137	)		$	7,826,957		$	13,956,906
Net income (loss)		$	2,060,383		$	1,669,918		$	(5,366,044	)		$	4,444,283		$	10,180,158

Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Unit		$	79.41		$	51.13		$	(135.01	)		$	109.72		$	218.21

Total assets		$	48,139,797		$	54,342,969		$	59,538,339			$	72,723,250		$	75,961,490

The Partnership, through its investment in other Funds, aims to achieve substantial capital appreciation through speculative trading, directly and indirectly, in U.S. and international markets for currencies, interest rates, stock indices, agricultural and energy products and precious and base metals. The Partnership may employ futures, options on futures, and forward contracts in those markets.

The General Partner manages all business of the Partnership. The General Partner has delegated its responsibility for the investment of the Partnership’s assets to the Advisors. The General Partner employs a team of approximately 20 professionals whose primary emphasis is on attempting to maintain quality control among the advisors to the partnerships operated or managed by the General Partner. A full-time staff of due diligence professionals use state-of-the-art technology and on-site evaluations to monitor new

and existing futures money managers. The accounting and operations staff provide processing of trading activity and reporting to limited partners and regulatory authorities. In selecting the Advisors for the Partnership, the General Partner considered past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements.

In addition, the General Partner prepares the books and records and provides the administrative and compliance services that are required by law or regulation from time to time in connection with operation of the Partnership. These services include the preparation of required books and records and reports to limited partners, government agencies and regulators; computation of net asset value; calculation of fees; effecting subscriptions, redemptions and limited partner communications; and preparation of offering documents and sales literature.

The General Partner seeks the best prices and services available in its commodity futures brokerage transactions. The General Partner reviews at least annually the brokerage rates charged to commodity pools similar to the Partnership to determine whether the brokerage fee the Partnership pays is competitive with other rates.

The programs traded by each Advisor on behalf of the Partnership are: Campbell – Financial, Metal & Energy Large Portfolio (‘‘FME Large’’), Graham Multi-Trend Program at 125% Leverage, Winton – Diversified Program, and Willowbridge – Argo and Vulcan Trading Systems. As of December 31, 2007, the Partnership’s assets were allocated among the Advisors in the following approximate percentages: Campbell, 23%, Graham, 25%, Winton, 33% and Willowbridge, 19%.

No assurance is given that an Advisor’s trading programs will be profitable or that they will not experience losses.

Graham currently trades its Multi Trend Program at 125% Leverage on behalf of the Partnership, which program is described below.

Graham trades the Partnership’s assets allocated to it in accordance with its Multi-Trend Program at 125% Leverage. The Multi-Trend Program combines four individual Graham investment programs into one program. The Multi-Trend Program initially allocates assets equally among other Graham programs. As market conditions or other circumstances change, Graham may alter the weightings of the individual programs and add (or delete) other programs to the Multi-Trend Program, as it deems appropriate.

Graham trades actively in both U.S. and foreign markets, primarily in futures contracts, forward contracts, spot contracts and associated derivative instruments such as options and swaps. Graham engages in exchange for physical transactions, which involve the exchange of a futures position for the underlying physical commodity without making an open competitive trade on an exchange. Graham at times will trade certain instruments, such as forward foreign currency contracts, as a substitute for futures or options traded on futures exchanges.

Graham’s trading systems rely primarily on technical rather than fundamental information as the basis for their trading decisions. Graham’s system is based on the expectation that over time they can successfully anticipate market events using quantitative mathematical models to determine their trading activities, as opposed to attempting properly to forecast price trends using subjective analysis of supply and demand.

Campbell trades its FME Large Portfolio for the Partnership. Campbell’s trading models are designed to detect and exploit medium-term to long-term price changes, while also applying risk management and portfolio management principles.

Campbell believes that utilizing multiple trading models provides an important level of diversification and is most beneficial when multiple contracts of each market are traded. Every trading model may not trade every market. It is possible that one trading model may signal a long position while another trading model signals a short position in the same market. It is Campbell’s intention to offset those signals to reduce unnecessary trading, but if the signals are not simultaneous, both trades will be taken. Since it is unlikely that both positions would prove profitable, in retrospect, one or both trades will appear to have been unnecessary. It is Campbell’s policy to follow trades signaled by each trading model independently of the other models.

Willowbridge trades the Partnership’s assets allocated to it in accordance with its Select Investment Program, whereby the General Partner determined the initial allocation of the Partnership’s assets among one or more of Willowbridge’s strategies and may determine subsequent reallocations (if any). Of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Willowbridge, 0% is currently traded using the Vulcan Trading System (‘‘Vulcan’’) and 100% is currently traded using the Argo Trading System (‘‘Argo’’), each of which is described below.

For each of these systems, risk is managed on a market-by-market level as well as on an overall portfolio level. On the market level, risk is managed primarily by utilizing proprietary volatility filters. When these filters detect a certain excessive level of volatility in the markets traded, they will signal that the systems should no longer be trading in the markets in which the filters have detected excessive volatility. In this way, the systems do not participate in markets in which there are extremes in market action. On the portfolio level, risk is managed by utilizing a proprietary portfolio cutback rule. When cumulative profits have reached a certain level, this rule determines that positions should be halved across the entire portfolio. In this way, risk is reduced while allowing the systems to continue to participate in the markets, albeit at a reduced level. After the portfolio has been traded at half, the portfolio cutback rule will then determine when to increase positions to again trade at the full level.

The Vulcan, which commenced trading in 1988, is a computerized technical trading system. It is not a trend-following system, but does ride a trend when the opportunity arises. Vulcan uses the concepts of pattern recognition, support/resistance levels, and counter-trend liquidations in making trading decisions. In effect, Vulcan is more akin to a systematic technical charting system, as opposed to most computer systems which are based on pure trend-following calculations.

The Vulcan is based on general technical trading principles. It applies these principles to a diversified portfolio of commodities and currencies. Given that the system is based on general principles, the system parameters used are the same for all items in the portfolio and are not optimized. In this manner, the Vulcan System minimizes the problem of data-fitting.

Argo commenced trading in 1988. Argo essentially incorporates Vulcan’s concepts of pattern recognition, support/resistance levels and counter-trend liquidations to trade a portfolio similar to Vulcan. However, Argo has a relatively slower time horizon than Vulcan and attempts to capture longer-term price moves.

Pattern recognition, support/resistance levels and counter-trend liquidations are defined as follows:

Pattern recognition is the ability to identify patterns that appear to have acted as precursors of price advances or declines in the past.

A support level is a previous low—a price level under the current market price at which point buying interest is expected to be sufficiently strong to overcome selling pressure.

A resistance level is a previous high—a price level over the current market price at which point selling pressure is expected to overcome buying pressure and a price advance is expected to be turned back.

A counter-trend liquidation is the closing out of a position after a significant price move on the assumption that the market is due for a correction.

Winton trades its Diversified Program on behalf of the Partnership. The Diversified Program trades approximately 95 futures and forward contracts on U.S. and non-U.S. exchanges and markets.

Winton employs a fully computerized, technical, trend-following trading system developed by its principals. This system tracks the daily price movements from these markets around the world, and carries out certain computations to determine each day how long or short the portfolio should be in an attempt to maximize profit within a certain range of risk. If rising prices in a particular market are anticipated, a long position will be established in that market; if prices in a particular market are expected to fall, a short position in that market will be established.

Technical analysis refers to analysis based on data intrinsic to a market, such as price and volume. In contrast, fundamental analysis relies on factors external to a market, such as supply and demand. The Diversified Program employs no fundamental factors.

A trend-following system is one that attempts to take advantage of the observable tendency of the markets to trend and to tend to make exaggerated movements in both upward and downward directions as a result of such trends. These exaggerated movements are largely explained as a result of the influence of crowd psychology or the ‘‘herd instinct’’ among market participants.

A trend-following system does not anticipate a trend. In fact, trend-following systems are frequently unprofitable for long periods of time in particular markets or market groups, and occasionally they are unprofitable for periods of more than a year. However, the principals believe that such an approach will, in the long term, be profitable.

Trade selection is not subject to intervention by Winton’s principals and therefore is not subject to the influences of individual judgment. As a mechanical trading system, the Winton model embodies all the expert knowledge required to analyze market data and direct trades, thus eliminating the risk of basing a trading program on one indispensable person. Equally as important is the fact that mechanical systems can be tested in simulation for long periods of time, and the model’s empirical characteristics can be measured.

The system’s output is rigorously adhered to in trading the portfolio, and intentionally no importance is given to any external or fundamental factors. While it may be seen as unwise to ignore information of obvious value, such as that pertaining to political or economic developments, Winton believes that the disadvantage of this approach is far outweighed by the advantage of the discipline that rigorous adherence to such a system instills. Winton believes that significant profits may be realized by the Winton system by holding on to positions for much longer than conventional wisdom would dictate. Winton believes that a trader who pays attention to day-to-day events could be distracted from the chance of fully capitalizing on such trends.

The Winton system trades in all liquid U.S. and non-U.S. futures and forward contracts. Forward markets include major currencies and precious and base metals, the latter two categories being traded on the London Metal Exchange. Winton seeks new opportunities to add additional markets to the portfolio, with the goal of increasing the portfolio’s diversification.

Winton believes that taking positions in a variety of unrelated markets will, over time, decrease system volatility. By employing a sophisticated and systematic method for placing orders in a wide array of markets, Winton believes that profits can be realized over time.

The Partnership does not engage in the sales of goods or services. Its only assets are its investments in the Funds and cash. The Funds’ only assets are their equity in their commodity futures trading account, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open futures positions, unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts, its investment in other partnerships and interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading,

relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Funds and therefore to the Partnership. Such substantial losses could lead to a material loss in liquidity.

To minimize the risk relating to low margin deposits, the Partnership/Funds follows certain trading policies, including:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership through its investments in the Funds, is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments include forwards, futures, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specified terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’). Exchange-traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards, swaps and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those relating to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Partnership/Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded.

to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as counterparty to the transactions. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership, through its investments in the Funds, has credit risk and concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Funds’ assets is CGM.

The General Partner monitors and controls the Partnership’s/Funds’ through its investment in the Fund’s, risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Funds are subject. These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions. (See also ‘‘Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data’’ for further information on financial instrument risk included in the Notes to Financial Statements.)

Other than the risks inherent in commodity trading, the Partnership knows of no trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties which will result in or which are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. The Limited Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partner may, in its discretion, cause the Partnership to cease trading operations and liquidate all open positions under certain circumstances, including a decrease in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit to less than $400 as of the close of business on any business day.

(ii) The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by gains or losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any. Gains or losses on trading cannot be predicted. Market moves in commodities are dependent upon fundamental and technical factors which the Advisors may or may not be able to identify, such as changing supply and demand relationships, weather, government, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. Partnership expenses consist of, among other things, brokerage, advisory and administrative fees. The level of these expenses is dependent upon the level of trading and the ability of the Advisors to identify and take advantage of price movements in the commodity markets, in addition to the level of Net Assets maintained. In addition, the amount of interest income payable by CGM is dependent upon interest rates over which the Partnership has no control.

No forecast can be made as to the level of redemptions in any given period. A limited partner may cause all of their Redeemable Units to be redeemed by the Partnership at the Net Asset Value thereof as of the last day of each month on ten days written notice to the General Partner. No fee will be charged for redemptions. For the year ended December 31, 2007, 3,942.7222 Redeemable Units were redeemed totaling $6,617,850, and 965.2622 General Partner Units equivalent were redeemed totaling $1,441,407. For the year ended December 31, 2006, 3,881.5898 Redeemable Units were redeemed totaling $6,282,132. For the year ended December 31, 2005, 3,642.8547 Redeemable Units were redeemed totaling $5,856,089.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit increased 4.8% from $1,662.48 to $1,741.89. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit increased 3.2% from $1,611.35 to $1,662.48. For the year ended December 31, 2005 the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Units decreased 7.7% from $1,746.36 to $1,611.35.

The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the year ended December 31, 2007 of $6,046,936. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, grains, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock and lumber partially offset by losses metals, softs and indices.

During 2007, the Partnership profited from macro-economic developments that stimulated volatility and asset price trends of a favorable duration to the underlying Advisor’s trading strategies. Negative

developments in the U.S. mortgage markets and the increasing probability of recession resonated throughout the capital and commodity markets. A surge in volatility in the global equity markets in February was driven by a tumble in Chinese stock valuations that curbed sentiment for global risk assets and sparked a material sell-off in global stock prices. The year would go on to be highlighted by two additional measurable equity market corrections in the summer and fall. By mid-summer, dislocations in U.S. asset-backed and mortgage-backed credit markets emerged as the central focal point of global capital markets. The ensuing re-pricing of credit risk resulted in a flight-to-quality driven rally in prices of sovereign debt, especially in the U.S. Treasury markets as the Federal Open Market Committee acted rapidly to stem the negative implications for growth. As a result of the series of rate cuts and negative economic data, the U.S. dollar became less attractive and weakened materially against most major currencies during the latter part of the year. Commodity markets continued to signal inflation, further clouding the economic landscape, as global demand for most food and raw materials continued to be robust. Prices moved rather erratically at times.

Profits were realized in fixed income trading as turbulence in asset backed credit markets became a catalyst for significant directional moves in yields and strong bias towards price rallies across Treasury curves. Gains were also generated by substantially rising oil prices, which reached all-time contract highs due to robust global demand, ongoing geopolitical concerns and increased speculative participation in the commodity. The Partnership also benefited from persistent trends in the currency sector, notably in Japanese Yen, New Zealand Dollar and British Pounds.

Trading gains were offset slightly by losses related to trading in metals and soft commodities. Periodic sporadic rallies in the U.S. dollar negatively impacted positions in certain precious metals, which tend to demonstrate inverse price movements. Prices of industrial metals also moved erratically during most of the year, mainly due to fluctuating estimates of Chinese and emerging market economic growth resulting in unfavorable price action for the advisors. Losses were also experienced in trading soft commodities such as coffee and cocoa. Excess exports from growers in Africa and Indonesia in the month of August resulted in a surprising fall in process driven by increased supply.

The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the year ended December 31, 2006 of $5,847,160. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity futures in metals, softs, U.S. interest rates and indices and were partially offset by losses in grains, non-U.S. interest rates, currencies, energy, livestock and lumber.

Trading results for the year 2006 were characterized by a number of major price trend reversals in both financial and commodity markets. Profits were earned early in the year as directional trends emerged. However, these trends did not last and major price corrections occurred in May, most notably in metals and equity indices. The Advisors successfully navigated through a difficult trading environment in the summer, and benefited from the optimistic market conditions toward the end of the year. Gains were primarily attributable to trading in equity indices, metals, and interest rates and were partially offset by losses recognized in the trading in energy, agricultural commodities, and currencies.

The stock index sector was the greatest contributor of profits for the year. The Partnership positioned to capitalize on rising global equity valuations supported by lowered oil prices and increased optimism over economic growth. In metal markets, both precious metals and based metals rallied strongly early on as demand from emerging markets continued to soar. Metals prices reached unsustainable levels in May and tumbled amid concerns that rising interest rates may slow demand. Gains were earned in metals, as the advisors were able to capture the upward trend in prices while minimizing losses during the correction. Profits from trading U.S. short-term rates were sufficient to offset small losses realized in trading global fixed income, providing positive lift to the performance.

Partially offsetting gains were losses in energy, agricultural commodities, and currency. Losses were realized in energy markets as series of unanticipated supply and demand imbalances coupled with geopolitical uncertainties throughout the year produced unfavorable trading ranges and sharp price reversals for the petroleum complex. The Partnership also suffered losses in agricultural markets as alternating meteorological conditions between drought and rainfall contributed to irregular price developments. Currency markets remained difficult as economic data and inflationary concerns perplexed directional trading.

The Partnership experienced a net trading loss of $882,972 before brokerage commissions and related fees in 2005. Losses were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity futures in currencies, grains, U.S. interest rates, livestock and softs and were partially offset by gains in energy, non-U.S. interest rates, metals, indices and lumber.

In the General Partner’s opinion, the Advisors continue to employ trading methods and produce results consistent with the objectives of the Partnership/Funds and expectations for the Advisors’ programs. The General Partner continues to monitor the Advisors’ performance on a daily, weekly, monthly and annual basis to assure these objectives are met.

It should be noted that commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increase the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to identify those price trends correctly. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.

The Partnership, through its investments in the Funds’, is directly exposed to market risk and credit risk, which arise in the normal course of its business activities. Slightly less direct, but of critical importance, are risks pertaining to operational and back office support. This is particularly the case in a rapidly changing and increasingly global environment with increasing transaction volumes and an expansion in the number and complexity of products in the marketplace.

Operational/Settlement Risk — the risk of financial and opportunity loss and legal liability attributable to operational problems, such as inaccurate pricing of transactions, untimely trade execution, clearance and/or settlement, or the inability to process large volumes of transactions. The Partnership/Funds are subject to increased risks with respect to its trading activities in emerging market securities, where clearance, settlement, and custodial risks are often greater than in more established markets.

Technological Risk — the risk of loss attributable to technological limitations or hardware failure that constrain the Partnership’s/Funds’ ability to gather, process, and communicate information efficiently and securely, without interruption, to customers, among Redeemable Units within the Partnership, and in the markets where the Partnership/Funds participate.

Legal/Documentation Risk — the risk of loss attributable to deficiencies in the documentation of transactions (such as trade confirmations) and customer relationships (such as master netting agreements) or errors that result in noncompliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Financial Control Risk — the risk of loss attributable to limitations in financial systems and controls. Strong financial systems and controls ensure that assets are safeguarded, that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization, and that financial information utilized by management and communicated to external parties, including the Partnership’s Redeemable Unit holders, creditors, and regulators, is free of material errors.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

The General Partner believes that the accounting policies that will be most critical to the Partnership’s financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Funds’ positions. The majority of the Partnership’s/Funds’ positions, will be exchange-traded futures contracts, which will be valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges. Swap contracts generally will be valued

by reference to published settlement prices or dealers’ quotes in related markets or other measures of fair value deemed appropriate by the General Partner. The General Partner expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets will be valued by objective measures and without difficulty.

The Fair Value of the Partnership’s investment in the Funds reflects the Partnership’s proportional interest in the Funds. All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) held by the Partnership are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded in the Statements of Financial Condition at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotations are readily available or other measures of fair value deemed appropriate by management of the General Partner for those commodity interests and foreign currencies for which market quotations are not readily available, including dealer quotes for swaps and certain option contracts. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the last business day of the period. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on commodity interests and foreign currencies are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests of the Funds. Realized gains (losses) on withdrawals from the Funds are recognized on a cost recovery basis.

Foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Partnership/Funds agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Partnership’s net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting dates, is included in the Statements of Financial Condition. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

On March 19, 2008, Financial Accounting Standards Board released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 161). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements has not yet been determined.

All of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investments in the Funds. The Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by them are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Funds’ assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Funds’ main line of business.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their capital contributions to the Partnership and their share of Partnership assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a consequence of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under applicable law.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Funds’ open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Funds’ market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market

value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification results among the Funds’ open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which they trade.

The Funds rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Funds’ past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Funds’ speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Funds’ experiences to date (i.e., ‘‘risk of ruin’’). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Funds’ losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Funds’ attempts to manage their market risk.

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Funds’ market risk exposures contain ‘‘forward-looking statements’’ within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’)). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor except for statements of historical fact (such as the terms of particular contracts and the number of market risk sensitive instruments held during or at the end of the reporting period).

The Funds’ risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Funds is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to the Partnership’s mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Funds’ open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings (realized and unrealized).

Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Funds as the measure of their Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%–99% of any one-day intervals. The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component which is not relevant to Value at Risk.

In the case of market sensitive instruments which are not exchange traded (almost exclusively currencies in the case of the Funds), the margin requirements for the equivalent futures positions have been used as Value at Risk. In those rare cases in which a futures-equivalent margin is not available, dealers’ margins have been used.

The fair value of the Funds’ futures and forward positions does not have any optionality component. However, certain of the Advisors trade commodity options. Where this instrument is a futures contract, the futures margin has been used, and where this instrument is a physical commodity, the futures-equivalent maintenance margin has been used. This calculation is conservative in that it assumes that the fair value of an option will decline by the same amount as the fair value of the underlying instrument, whereas, in fact, the fair values of the options traded by the Partnership in almost all cases fluctuate to a lesser extent than those of the underlying instruments.

In quantifying the Partnership’s/Funds’ Value at Risk, 100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have simply been added to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Funds’ positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated have not been reflected.

The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s investment in the Funds by market category as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the highest, lowest and average value at any point during the years. All open position trading risk exposures have been included in calculating the figures set forth below.

At December 31, 2007, Campbell Master’s total capitalization was $216,696,200. The Partnership owned 5.1% of Campbell Master.


Market Sector	Value at Risk			% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk			Low Value at Risk			Average Value at Risk*
Currencies:
— OTC Contracts		$	5,921,755		2.73	%		$	14,912,339		$	1,553,365		$	6,826,964
Energy			699,600		0.32	%			2,742,200			191,400			551,345
Interest Rates U.S.			470,470		0.22	%			4,293,650			18,410			1,562,424
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			2,361,786		1.09	%			10,634,092			902,498			4,943,720
Metals:
— Exchange Traded Contracts			294,000		0.14	%			395,000			2,000			229,983
— OTC Contracts			888,251		0.41	%			2,315,924			283,560			990,318
Indices			5,913,472		2.73	%			14,331,076			1,694,853			6,401,367
Total		$	16,549,334		7.64	%

At December 31, 2007, Willowbridge Master’s total capitalization was $213,055,022. The Partnership owned 4.3% of Willowbridge Master.


Market Sector	Value at Risk			% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk			Low Value at Risk			Average Value at Risk*
Currencies:
— Exchange Traded Contracts		$	779,880		0.37	%		$	5,763,380		$	1,350		$	2,376,229
Energy			2,965,500		1.39	%			11,515,000			40,000			4,139,833
Grains			2,552,700		1.20	%			3,493,200			308,700			1,442,872
Interest Rates U.S.			1,306,500		0.61	%			4,522,500			154,350			1,621,129
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			1,124,496		0.53	%			9,500,376			411,959			3,877,807
Livestock			160,800		0.07	%			240,000			4,500			93,233
Metals:
— Exchange Traded Contracts			1,859,250		0.87	%			5,591,250			760,000			2,412,375
Softs			442,200		0.21	%			1,890,300			89,100			602,875
Total		$	11,191,326		5.25	%

At December 31, 2007, Winton Master’s total capitalization was $457,045,133. The Partnership owned 3.5% of Winton Master.


Market Sector	Value at Risk			% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk			Low Value at Risk			Average Value at Risk*
Currencies:
— Exchange Traded Contracts		$	6,225,479		1.36	%		$	6,540,914		$	2,357,912		$	4,439,048
Energy			2,814,000		0.62	%			3,410,100			572,331			1,918,145
Grains			2,459,480		0.54	%			2,616,997			205,952			1,771,681
Interest Rates U.S.			4,142,550		0.91	%			6,736,650			178,160			3,087,397
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			3,714,529		0.81	%			14,321,882			2,187,980			7,075,549
Livestock			284,700		0.06	%			286,850			16,176			137,838
Lumber			1,100		0.00	%**			3,600			1,100			1,375
Metals:
— Exchange Traded Contracts			2,052,000		0.45	%			2,294,500			292,583			1,005,137
— OTC Contracts			1,133,871		0.25	%			4,430,675			907,662			1,658,683
Softs			918,729		0.20	%			1,110,995			442,701			848,138
Indices			8,515,231		1.86	%			21,980,908			1,166,300			9,732,404
Total		$	32,261,669		7.06	%

At December 31, 2007, Graham Master’s total capitalization was $213,594,387. The Partnership owned 5.5% of Graham Master.


Market Sector	Value at Risk			% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk			Low Value at Risk			Average Value at Risk*
Currencies
— OTC Contracts		$	19,308,901		9.04	%		$	36,315,056		$	5,719,304		$	19,227,674
Energy			375,400		0.18	%			2,440,100			177,900			882,005
Grains			314,550		0.15	%			459,100			4,000			153,243
Interest Rates U.S.			88,133		0.04	%			3,124,000			9,593			724,751
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			705,925		0.33	%			7,772,547			152,548			3,065,189
Livestock			16,000		0.01	%			18,400			3,000			11,870
Metals:
— Exchange Traded Contracts			93,000		0.04	%			190,000			2,000			56,625
— OTC Contracts			515,470		0.24	%			1,024,186			3,586			279,440
Softs			99,312		0.05	%			487,616			44,739			138,689
Indices			751,648		0.35	%			15,267,220			335,292			3,522,397
Total		$	22,268,339		10.43	%

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Funds are typically many times the applicable maintenance margin requirement (margin requirements generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face value) as well as many times the capitalization of the Funds. The magnitude of the Funds’ open positions creates a ‘‘risk of ruin’’ not typically found in most other investment vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions — unusual, but historically recurring from time to time — could cause the Funds and therefore the Partnership, to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The foregoing Value at Risk table — as well as the past performance of the Funds — give no indication of this ‘‘risk of ruin.’’

The Funds has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as any market risk they represent) are immaterial.

Materiality as used in this section, ‘‘Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk,’’ is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, optionality and multiplier features of the Funds’ market-sensitive instruments.

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Partnership/Fund manages its primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The Partnership’s/Funds’ primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by the General Partner and the Advisors for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s/Fund’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the management strategies of the Partnership/Fund. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s/Fund’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short or long term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership/Funds as of December 31, 2007, by market sector.

Interest Rates. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the futures positions held by the Partnership/Funds’ and indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries materially impact the Partnership’s profitability. The Partnership’s, through its investments in the Funds primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United States and other G-8 countries. However, the Partnership/Fund also takes futures positions on the government debt of smaller nations — e.g., Australia.

Currencies. The Partnership’s currency exposure, through its investments in the Funds, is subject to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The General Partner does not anticipate that the risk profile of the Partnership’s/Funds’ currency sector will change significantly in the future. The currency trading Value at Risk figure includes foreign margin amounts converted into U.S. dollars with an incremental adjustment to reflect the exchange rate risk inherent to the U.S. dollar-based Partnership in expressing Value at Risk in a functional currency other than U.S. dollars.

Stock Indices. The Partnership’s primary equity exposure, through its investments in the Funds, is subject to equity price risk in the G-8 countries. The stock index futures traded by the Partnership/Fund are limited to futures on broadly based indices. The Partnership/Fund is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Japanese indices. (Static markets would not cause major market changes but would make it difficult for the Partnership/Fund to avoid being ‘‘whipsawed’’ into numerous small losses.)

Metals. The Partnership’s primary metal market exposure, through its investments in the Funds, is subject to fluctuations in the price of gold, copper and aluminum.

Softs. The Partnership’s primary commodities exposure, through its investments in the Funds is subject to agricultural price movements which are often directly affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions.

Energy. The Partnership’s primary energy market exposure, through its investments in the Funds, is subject to gas and oil price movements, often resulting from political developments in the Middle East. Oil prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.

Grains. The Partnership’s commodities exposure, through its investments in the Funds, is subject to agricultural price movements which are often directly affected by severe unexpected weather conditions.

The following were the only non-trading risk exposures of the Partnership/Funds as of December 31, 2007.

Foreign Currency Balances. The Partnership’s primary foreign currency balances through its investments in the Funds are in Japanese yen, Euro, British pounds and Swiss francs. The Advisor regularly converts foreign currency balances to U.S. dollars in an attempt to control the Partnership’s/Funds’ non-trading risk.

The General Partner monitors and controls the Partnership’s/Fund’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Fund is subject.

The General Partner monitors the Partnership’s/Fund’s performance and the concentration of its open positions and consults with the Advisors concerning the Partnership’s/Fund’s overall risk profile. If the General Partner felt it necessary to do so, the General Partner could require the Advisors to close out individual positions as well as enter into certain positions on behalf of the Partnership/Funds. However, any such intervention would be a highly unusual event. The General Partner primarily relies on the Advisors’ own risk control policies while maintaining a general supervisory overview of the Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk exposures.

Each Advisor applies its own risk management policies to its trading. The Advisors often follow diversification guidelines, margin limits and stop loss points to exit a position. The Advisors’ research of risk management often suggests ongoing modifications to their trading programs.

As part of the General Partner’s risk management, the General Partner periodically meets with the Advisors to discuss their risk management and to look for any material changes to the Advisors’ portfolio balance and trading techniques. The Advisors are required to notify the General Partner of any material changes to their programs.


			Page Number
Oath or Affirmation			F-3
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting			F-4
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-5
Financial Statements:
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2007 and 2006			F-6
Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006			F-7 – F-8
Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-9
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-10
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-11
Notes to Financial Statements			F-12 – F-18
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data			F-19
Financial Statements of the CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.
Oath or Affirmation			F-20
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-21
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2007 and 2006			F-22
Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006			F-23 – F-24
Statements of Income and Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006			F-25
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-26
Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-27
Notes to Financial Statements			F-28 − F-32
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data			F-33


			Page Number
Financial Statements of CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Oath or Affirmation.			F-34
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-35
Financial Statements:
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2007 and 2006.			F-36
Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006.			F-37 – F-38
Statements of Income and Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and for the period July 1, 2005 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2005			F-39
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and for the period July 1, 2005 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2005			F-40
Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and for the period July 1, 2005 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2005			F-41
Notes to Financial Statements			F-42 – F-46
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data.			F-47
Financial Statements of CMF Winton Master L.P.
Oath or Affirmation.			F-48
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-49
Financial Statements:
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2007 and 2006.			F-50
Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006.			F-51 – F-52
Statements of Income and Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-53
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-54
Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005			F-55
Notes to Financial Statements			F-56 – F-60
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data.			F-61
Financial Statements of CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
Oath of Affirmation			F-62
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-63
Financial Statements:
Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2007 and 2006			F-64
Schedules of Investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006			F-65 – F-66
Statements of Income and Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the period April 1, 2006 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2006			F-67
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the Period April 1, 2006 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2006			F-68
Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the Period April 1, 2006 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2006			F-69
Notes to Financial Statements			F-70 – F-74
Selected Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data			F-75

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.

The management of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’), Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Partnership’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management maintains a comprehensive system of controls intended to ensure that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization, assets are safeguarded, and financial records are reliable. Management also takes steps to see that information and communication flows are effective and to monitor performance, including performance of internal control procedures.

The Partnership’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2007, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit a company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’), including the schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income and expenses, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations, changes in partners’ capital, and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006


	2007			2006
Assets:
Investment in Partnerships, at fair value		$	47,978,230		$	54,294,756
Cash			66,383			48,213
Distribution receivable			95,184			—
		$	48,139,797		$	54,342,969
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses:
Brokerage commissions (Note 3c)		$	220,641		$	249,072
Management fees (Note 3b)			73,161			83,980
Incentive fees (Note 3b)			105,828			26,786
Professional fees			35,203			21,199
Other			10,710			9,245
Redemptions payable (Note 6)			296,617			556,176
			742,160			946,458
Partners’ Capital (Notes 1 and 6):
General Partner, 311.4862 and 1,276.7484 Unit equivalents outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively			542,575			2,122,569
Limited Partners, 26,899.0407 and 30,841.7629 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively			46,855,062			51,273,942
			47,397,637			53,396,511
		$	48,139,797		$	54,342,969

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2007

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2006

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Statements of Income and Expenses
for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	2007			2006			2005
Income:
Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed positions and foreign currencies		$	—		$	681,225		$	(5,643,470	)
Change in net unrealized gains on open positions and investment in Partnerships			6,046,936			5,165,935			4,760,498
			6,046,936			5,847,160			(882,972	)
Interest income (Note 3c)			—			125,292			501,524
			6,046,936			5,972,452			(381,448	)
Expenses:
Brokerage commissions including clearing fees of $0, $17,337 and $42,034, respectively (Note 3c)			2,728,526			3,088,967			3,461,689
Management fees (Note 3b)			911,960			1,035,513			1,146,268
Incentive fees (Note 3b)			237,947			65,135			296,368
Professional fees			49,525			81,120			53,824
Other			58,595			31,799			26,447
			3,986,553			4,302,534			4,984,596
Net income (loss)		$	2,060,383		$	1,669,918		$	(5,366,044	)
Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest and General Partner Unit equivalent (Notes 1 and 7)		$	79.41		$	51.13		$	(135.01	)

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital
for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	Limited Partners				General Partner				Total
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2004		$	67,001,196			$	2,229,662			$	69,230,858
Net loss			(5,193,671	)			(172,373	)			(5,366,044	)
Redemption of 3,642.8547 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(5,856,089	)			—				(5,856,089	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2005			55,951,436				2,057,289				58,008,725
Net income			1,604,638				65,280				1,669,918
Redemption of 3,881.5898 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(6,282,132	)			—				(6,282,132	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2006			51,273,942				2,122,569				53,396,511
Net income (loss)			2,198,970				(138,587	)*			2,060,383
Redemption of 3,942.7222 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest and 965.2622 General Partner Unit equivalent			(6,617,850	)			(1,441,407	)			(8,059,257	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2007		$	46,855,062			$	542,575			$	47,397,637

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	2007				2006				2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)		$	2,060,383			$	1,669,918			$	(5,366,044	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash			—				1,000,127				7,097,921
Purchase of investment in Partnerships			—				(14,741,156	)			(30,546,749	)
Proceeds from sale of investment in Partnerships			12,268,278				7,443,223				8,701,947
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investment in Partnerships			(6,046,936	)			(3,441,055	)			(5,569,077	)
(Increase) decrease in net unrealized appreciation on open futures positions			—				—				1,601,032
(Increase) decrease in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			—				672,909				1,577,253
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable			—				36,929				32,902
Increase (decrease) in net unrealized depreciation on open futures positions			—				(30,126	)			30,126
Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			—				(445,992	)			(1,479,342	)
Accrued expenses:
Increase (decrease) in brokerage commissions			(28,431	)			(26,821	)			(53,917	)
Increase (decrease) in management fees			(10,819	)			(9,188	)			(19,298	)
Increase (decrease) in incentive fees			79,042				26,786				(78,926	)
Increase (decrease) in professional fees			14,004				(15,028	)			(7,490	)
Increase (decrease) in other			1,465				(3,149	)			(4,687	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			8,336,986				(7,862,623	)			(24,084,349	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments for redemptions - General Partner			(1,441,407	)			—				—
Payments for redemptions - Limited Partners			(6,877,409	)			(6,361,770	)			(6,205,333	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(8,318,816	)			(6,361,770	)			(6,205,333	)

Net change in cash			18,170				(14,224,393	)			(30,289,682	)
Cash, at beginning of year			48,213				14,272,606				44,562,288
Cash, at end of year		$	66,383			$	48,213			$	14,272,606
Non cash financing activities:
Contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions		$	—			$	—			$	(1,333,742	)
Distribution receivable		$	95,184			$	—			$	—

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) is a limited partnership which was organized on August 13, 1993 under the partnership laws of the state of New York to engage directly or indirectly in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Partnership was authorized to sell 300,000 redeemable units of Limited Partnership Interest (‘‘Redeemable Units’’) during its initial offering period.

The General Partner and each limited partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of partnership interest owned by each except that no limited partner shall be liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of its initial capital contribution and profits, if any, net of distributions.

The Partnership will be liquidated upon the first of the following to occur: December 31, 2013; the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit decreases to less than $400 per Redeemable Unit as of the close of any business day; or under certain other circumstances as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement.

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. The results of the Partnership’s trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Any commodity interests owned by the Partnership are held for trading purposes. The average fair value of such commodity interests during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, based on a monthly calculation, were $0 and $21,395, respectively.

On November 1, 2004, the assets allocated to Winton for trading were invested in CMF Winton Master L.P., a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of New York State (‘‘Winton Master’’). The Partnership purchased 15,054.1946 Units of Winton Master with cash of $14,251,586, and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a value of $802,609. Winton Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Winton using its Diversified Program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of the Winton Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Winton, including the Partnership are permitted to limited partners of the Winton Master. The General Partner and Winton believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the Limited Partners as a result of the investment in Winton Master are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

On January 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Campbell for trading were invested in CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. (‘‘Campbell Master’’), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 19,621.1422 Units of Campbell Master with cash of $19,428,630, and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a value of $192,512. Campbell Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Campbell using its Financials, Metals and Energy ‘‘FME’’ Portfolio, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Campbell Master. Individual and pooled

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

accounts currently managed by Campbell, including the Partnership are permitted to be limited partners of Campbell Master. The General Partner and Campbell believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the Limited Partners as a result of the investment in Campbell Master are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

On July 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Willowbridge for trading were invested in CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. (‘‘Willowbridge Master’’), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 12,259.3490 Units of Willowbridge Master with cash of $11,118,119, and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a fair value of $1,141,230. Willowbridge Master was formed in order to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Willowbridge using its Argo Trading Program to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Willowbridge Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Willowbridge, including the Partnership are permitted to be limited partners of Willowbridge Master. The General Partner and Willowbridge believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the Limited Partners as a result of the investment in Willowbridge Master are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

On April 1, 2006, the assets allocated to Graham for trading were invested in CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. (‘‘Graham Master’’), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The partnership purchased 14,741.1555 Units of Graham Master with cash of $14,741,156. Graham Master was formed in order to permit accounts managed now or in the future by Graham using its Multi Trend Program at 125% Leverage, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of the Graham Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Graham, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of the Graham Master. The General Partner and Graham believe that trading through this structure promotes efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to the Limited Partners as a result of the investment in the Graham Master are approximately the same and redemption rights are not affected.

Winton Master’s, Campbell Master’s, Willowbridge Master’s and Graham Master’s (the ‘‘Funds’’), trading of futures, forwards and options contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on United States of America commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. The Funds engage in such trading through commodity brokerage accounts maintained with CGM.

A Limited Partner may withdraw all or part of its redeemable capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Funds in multiples of the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest as of the last day of a month after a request for redemption has been made to the General Partner at least 3 days in advance of month-end.

Management and incentive fees are charged at the Partnership level. All exchange, clearing, user, give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association fees are borne by the Funds. All other fees including CGM’s direct brokerage commission are charged at the Partnership level.

As of December 31, 2007 the Partnership owned 3.5%, 5.1%, 4.3% and 5.5% of Winton Master, Campbell Master, Willowbridge Master and Graham Master, respectively. As of December 31, 2006 the Partnership owned 5.4%, 4.4%, 6.5% and 5.8%, of Winton Master, Campbell Master, Willowbridge Master and Graham Master, respectively. It is Winton’s, Campbell’s, Willowbridge’s and Graham’s intention to continue to invest the assets allocated to each by the Partnership in Winton Master, Campbell Master, Willowbridge Master and Graham Master. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Funds.

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

Summarized information reflecting the total assets, liabilities and capital for the Funds is shown in the following tables.

Summarized information reflecting the Partnership’s investment in, and the operations of, the Funds as shown in the following tables.


For the year ended December 31, 2007
Funds	% of Partnership’s Net Assets			Fair Value			Income (Loss)				Expenses						Net Income (Loss)				Investment Objective	Redemptions Permitted
Funds	% of Partnership’s Net Assets			Fair Value			Income (Loss)				Commissions			Other			Net Income (Loss)				Investment Objective	Redemptions Permitted
Winton Master		33.64	%		$	15,945,975		$	2,821,801			$	35,523		$	1,414		$	2,784,864		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Campbell Master		23.59	%			11,181,427			(862,739	)			21,296			1,810			(885,845	)	Financials & Metals Portfolio	Monthly
Willowbridge Master		19.46	%			9,223,461			1,838,641				22,896			1,556			1,814,189		Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Graham Master		24.53	%			11,627,367			2,386,845				51,310			1,807			2,333,728		Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Total					$	47,978,230		$	6,184,548			$	131,025		$	6,587		$	6,046,936


For the year ended December 31, 2006
Funds	% of Partnership’s Net Assets			Fair Value			Income (loss)			Expenses						Net Income (Loss)			Investment Objective	Redemptions Permitted
Funds	% of Partnership’s Net Assets			Fair Value			Income (loss)			Commissions			Other			Net Income (Loss)			Investment Objective	Redemptions Permitted
Winton Master		27.66	%		$	14,767,400		$	2,723,334		$	59,897		$	1,208		$	2,662,229	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Campbell Master		26.93	%			14,378,898			1,507,960			13,638			2,256			1,492,066	Financial & Metals Portfolio	Monthly
Willowbridge Master		22.35	%			11,937,682			950,081			47,133			2,361			900,587	Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Graham Master		24.74	%			13,210,776			343,619			32,744			3,031			307,844	Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Total					$	54,294,756		$	5,524,994		$	153,412		$	8,856		$	5,362,726

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

Distributions of profits, if any, will be made at the sole discretion of the General Partner and at such times as the General Partner may decide. A Limited Partner may require the Partnership to redeem its Redeemable Units at their Net Asset Value as of the last day of each month on 10 days notice to the General Partner. No fee will be charged for redemptions.

Changes in the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

The above ratios may vary for individual Limited Partners based on the timing of capital transactions during the year. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the Limited Partner class using the Limited Partners’ share of income, expenses and average net assets.

Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

In the normal course of its business, the Partnership, through its investment in the Funds, is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures and options, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’). Exchange-traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Partnership’s risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the statements of financial condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership has credit risk and concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Funds’ assets is CGM.

The General Partner monitors and controls the Partnership’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership is subject. These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to analyze statistically actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Partnership’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below:


	For the period from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007			For the period from July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007				For the period from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007			For the period from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) and investment in Partnership net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	2,743,953		$	(2,396,542	)		$	8,048,615		$	(5,077,616	)
Net income (loss)		$	2,376,107		$	(2,722,136	)		$	7,741,371		$	(5,334,959	)
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	82.68		$	(92.33	)		$	258.26		$	(169.20	)


	For the period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006			For the period from July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006				For the period from April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006			For the period from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	2,637,253		$	(1,288,245	)		$	1,075,305		$	459,172
Net income (loss)		$	2,328,110		$	(1,571,636	)		$	781,219		$	132,225
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	71.45		$	(45.88	)		$	21.32		$	4.24

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’), including the schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income and expenses, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations, changes in partners’ capital, and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006


	2007			2006
Assets:
Equity in commodity futures trading account:
Cash (restricted $17,299,861 and $44,317,594 in 2007 and 2006, respectively) (Note 3c)		$	219,631,424		$	308,294,750
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures positions			1,316,942			8,775,240
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			5,178,307			20,584,058
Commodity options owned, at fair value (cost $269,832 and $164,395 in 2007 and 2006, respectively)			263,000			210,824
			226,389,673			337,864,872
Interest receivable			435,815			994,130
		$	226,825,488		$	338,859,002

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		$	7,684,822		$	10,679,753
Commodity options written, at fair value (premium $153,329 and $97,503 in 2007 and 2006, respectively)			110,504			83,396
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees			22,189			11,333
Redemption payable (Note 5)			1,875,958			—
Distribution payable (Note 5)			435,815			994,130
			10,129,288			11,768,612

Partners’ Capital:
Limited Partners’ Capital, 197,763.9128 and 268,161.6187 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively			216,696,200			327,090,390
		$	226,825,488		$	338,859,002


	Fair Value				% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Energy		$	504,120			0.23	%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			111,291			0.05
Interest Rates U.S.			380,506			0.18
Indices			698,091			0.32
Metals			215,440			0.10
Total futures contracts purchased			1,909,448			0.88

Futures Contracts Sold

Energy			(391,048	)		(0.18	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			(159,023	)		(0.07	)
Interest Rates U.S.			(3,078	)		(0.00	)*
Indices			(39,357	)		(0.02	)
Total futures contracts sold			(592,506	)		(0.27	)

Unrealized Appreciation on Forward Contracts

Currencies			5,081,872			2.35
Metals			96,435			0.04
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts			5,178,307			2.39

Unrealized Depreciation on Forward Contracts

Currencies			(7,615,465	)		(3.52	)
Metals			(69,357	)		(0.03	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts			(7,684,822	)		(3.55	)

Options Owned

Energy			263,000			0.12

Options Written

Energy			(110,504	)		(0.05	)
Total fair value		$	(1,037,077	)		(0.48	)%


	Fair Value				% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased

Energy		$	(3,080,773	)		(0.94	)%
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			(339,745	)		(0.10	)
Indices			3,819,509			1.17
Total futures contracts purchased			398,991			0.13

Futures Contracts Sold

Energy			72,080			0.02
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			5,660,416			1.73
Interest Rates U.S.			2,734,573			0.84
Metals			(90,820	)		(0.03	)
Total futures contracts sold			8,376,249			2.56

Unrealized Appreciation on Forward Contracts

Currencies			20,233,076			6.19
Metals			350,982			0.11
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts			20,584,058			6.30

Unrealized Depreciation on Forward Contracts

Currencies			(10,161,006	)		(3.11	)
Metals			(518,747	)		(0.16	)
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts			(10,679,753	)		(3.27	)

Options Owned

Energy			210,824			0.06

Options Written

Energy			(83,396	)		(0.03	)

Total fair value		$	18,806,973			5.75	%

CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Income and Expenses
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	2007				2006				2005
Income:
Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed positions and foreign currencies		$	(7,020,650	)		$	(8,703,477	)		$	53,405,733
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on open positions			(19,893,661	)			29,791,293				(13,918,072	)
			(26,914,311	)			21,087,816				39,487,661
Interest income			9,721,573				12,424,375				6,863,937
			(17,192,738	)			33,512,191				46,351,598
Expenses:
Clearing fees			436,254				318,206				485,726
Professional fees			38,051				52,325				54,450
			474,305				370,531				540,176
Net income (loss)		$	(17,667,043	)		$	33,141,660			$	45,811,422
Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest (Notes 1 and 6)		$	(82.98	)		$	123.70			$	163.17

CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	Partners’ Capital
Initial capital contribution from Limited Partners at January 1, 2005 representing 283,959.2998 Units		$	283,959,300
Net income			45,811,422
Sale of 78,580.3523 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			83,741,000
Redemption of 75,937.9320 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(80,257,012	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(6,863,937	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2005			326,390,773
Net income			33,141,660
Sale of 43,164.5073 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			50,450,807
Redemption of 61,604.6087 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(70,468,475	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(12,424,375	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2006			327,090,390
Net loss			(17,667,043	)
Sale of 6,744.0375 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			7,969,328
Redemption of 77,141.7434 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(90,974,902	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(9,721,573	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2007		$	216,696,200
Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest:

CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	2007				2006				2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)		$	(17,667,043	)		$	33,141,660			$	45,811,422
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash			27,017,733				(1,841,401	)			(42,476,193	)
(Increase) decrease in net unrealized appreciation on open futures positions			7,458,298				(8,775,240	)			4,370,478
(Increase) decrease in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			15,405,751				(11,480,970	)			7,141,687
(Increase) decrease in options owned, at fair value			(52,176	)			(210,824	)			—
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable			558,315				(214,364	)			(779,766	)
Increase (decrease) in net unrealized depreciation on open futures positions			—				(607,801	)			607,801
Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			(2,994,931	)			(8,866,746	)			1,798,105
Increase (decrease) in options written, at fair value			27,108				83,396				—
Accrued expenses:
Increase (decrease) in professional fees			10,856				(30,142	)			41,475
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			29,763,911				1,197,568				16,515,009

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from additions – Limited Partners			7,969,328				50,450,807				364,833,441
Payments for redemptions – Limited Partners			(89,098,944	)			(70,468,475	)			(80,257,012	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(10,279,888	)			(12,210,011	)			(6,084,171	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			(91,409,504	)			(32,227,679	)			278,492,258

Net change in unrestricted cash			(61,645,593	)			(31,030,111	)			295,007,267
Unrestricted cash, at beginning of year			263,977,156				295,007,267				—
Unrestricted cash, at end of year		$	202,331,563			$	263,977,156			$	295,007,267
Non cash financing activities:
Contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions		$	—			$	—			$	2,866,859
Redemption		$	1,875,958			$	—			$	—

CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Master’’) is a limited partnership which was organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts. The commodity interests that are traded by the Master are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Master is authorized to sell an unlimited number of redeemable units of Limited Partnership Interest (‘‘Redeemable Units’’).

On January 1, 2005, (date Master commenced trading operations), Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Potomac’’) allocated substantially all its capital and Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Diversified’’), Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II (‘‘Diversified II’’), Smith Barney Global Markets Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Global Markets’’), Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Global Diversified’’) and Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Diversified 2000’’) allocated a portion of their capital to the Master. Potomac purchased 173,788.6446 Units of the Master with cash equal to $172,205,653 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $1,582,922, Diversified purchased 19,621.1422 Units of the Master with cash equal to $19,428,630 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $192,512, Diversified II purchased 18,800.3931 Units of the Master with cash equal to $18,587,905 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $212,488, Global Markets purchased 2,858.0358 Units of the Master with cash equal to $2,759,784 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $98,252 Global Diversified purchased 17,534.8936 Units of the Master with cash equal to $17,341,826 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $193,067 and Diversified 2000 purchased 51,356.1905 Units of the Master with cash equal to $50,768,573 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $587,618. On December 31, 2007, Global Markets redeemed its entire investment of 0.9% in the Master. This amounted to 1,712.0595 units totaling $1,880,624, which includes interest of $4,666 that is included as part of distribution payable in the Statements of Financial Condition. The Master was formed to permit commodity pools managed now and in the future by Campbell and Company Inc. (the ‘‘Advisor’’), using the FME Large Portfolio Program, the Advisor’s Proprietary trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle.

The Master operates under a structure where its investors consist of Potomac, Diversified, Diversified II, Global Diversified and Diversified 2000 (each a ‘‘Feeder’’, collectively the ‘‘Funds’’) with 72.0%, 5.1%, 5.8%, 4.9%, and 12.2% investments in the Master at December 31, 2007, respectively. Potomac, Diversified, Diversified II, Global Markets, Global Diversified and Diversified 2000 owned 74.0%, 4.4%, 5.1%, 0.9%, 4.3%, and 11.3% investments in the Master at December 31, 2006, respectively.

Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, acts as the general partner (the ‘‘General Partner’’) of the Master. The Master’s commodity broker is Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (‘‘CGM’’). CGM is an affiliate of the General Partner. The General Partner is wholly-owned by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (‘‘CGMHI’’), which is the sole owner of CGM. CGMHI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. As of December 31, 2007, all trading decisions for the Master are made by the Advisor.

During the current year, the Partnership adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 ‘‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes’’ (‘‘FIN 48’’). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are ‘‘more-likely-than-not’’ of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions with respect to tax at the partnership level not deemed to meet the ‘‘more-likely-than-not’’ threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The General Partner has concluded that the adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the operations of the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2007 and that no provision for income tax is required in the Partnership’s financial statements.

The Master was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity interests. The results of the Master’s trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Master are held for trading purposes. The average fair value during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, based on a monthly calculation, was $7,515,114 and $3,493,466, respectively.

Distributions of profits, if any, will be made at the sole discretion of the General Partner and at such times as the General Partner may decide. A Limited Partner may require the Partnership to redeem their Redeemable Units at their Net Asset Value as of the end of any day. The General Partner at its sole discretion, may permit redemptions more frequently than monthly, there is no fee charged in connection with redemptions.

Changes in the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:


	2007				2006				2005
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)*		$	(123.87	)		$	81.10			$	139.02
Interest income			41.04				42.78				24.34
Expenses**			(0.15	)			(0.18	)			(0.19	)
Increase (decrease) for the year			(82.98	)			123.70				163.17
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(41.04	)			(42.78	)			(24.34	)
Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest, beginning of year			1,219.75				1,138.83				1,000.00
Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest, end of year		$	1,095.73			$	1,219.75			$	1,138.83

The above ratios may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the Limited Partner class using Limited Partner’s share of income, expense and average net assets.

In the normal course of its business, the Master is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures and options, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’). Exchange traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Master due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Master’s risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Master has credit risk and concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Master’s assets is CGM.

The General Partner monitors and controls the Master’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Master is subject. These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for Campbell Master for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below:


	For the period from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007				For the period from July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007				For the period from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007			For the period from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	(1,543,815	)		$	(42,641,288	)		$	41,745,049		$	(15,188,938	)
Net income (loss)		$	(1,548,757	)		$	(42,653,118	)		$	41,733,260		$	(15,198,428	)
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	(9.68	)		$	(184.66	)		$	171.71		$	(60.35	)


	For the period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006			For the period from July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006				For the period from April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006				For the period from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	34,646,654		$	(6,530,578	)		$	(18,080,991	)		$	23,158,900
Net income (loss)		$	34,612,673		$	(6,536,759	)		$	(18,087,106	)		$	23,152,852
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	127.37		$	(22.81	)		$	(59.66	)		$	78.80

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’), including the schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income and expenses, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007 and for the period July 1, 2005 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations, changes in partners’ capital, and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007 and for the period July 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006


	2007			2006
Assets:
Equity in commodity futures trading account:
Cash (restricted $14,736,861 and $30,767,776 in 2007 and 2006, respectively) (Note 3c)		$	202,920,232		$	172,550,382
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			10,159,667			11,034,683
			213,079,899			183,585,065

Interest receivable			472,310			640,411
		$	213,552,209		$	184,225,476

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees		$	24,877		$	16,935
Distribution payable (Note 5)			472,310			640,411
			497,187			657,346

Partners’ Capital:
Limited Partners’ Capital, 151,669.7533 and 167,708.5349 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively			213,055,022			183,568,130
		$	213,552,209		$	184,225,476

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2007


	Fair Value				% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		$	(660,785	)		(0.31	)%
Energy			3,295,752			1.55
Grains			6,206,586			2.91
Interest Rates U.S.			999,269			0.47
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			309,793			0.14
Metals			63,190			0.03
Softs			359,678			0.17
Total futures contracts purchased			10,573,483			4.96

Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies			(17,588	)		(0.01	)
Energy			(278,590	)		(0.13	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			(170,173	)		(0.08	)
Livestock			79,810			0.04
Metals			(27,275	)		(0.01	)
Total futures contracts sold			(413,816	)		(0.19	)
Total fair value		$	10,159,667			4.77	%

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2006

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Income and Expenses
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the period from July 1, 2005
(commencement of trading operations)
to December 31, 2005


	2007				2006			2005
Income:
Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests:
Net realized gains on closed positions and foreign currencies		$	45,753,249			$	7,356,887		$	13,894,169
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on open positions			(875,016	)			199,393			(5,407,459	)
			44,878,233				7,556,280			8,486,710
Interest income			6,365,854				6,973,475			2,289,314
			51,244,087				14,529,755			10,776,024
Expenses:
Clearing fees			437,674				686,498			340,941
Professional fees			29,863				34,341			30,334
			467,537				720,839			371,275
Net income		$	50,776,550			$	13,808,916		$	10,404,749
Net income per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest (Notes 1 and 6)		$	352.58			$	83.95		$	66.81

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the period from July 1, 2005
(commencement of trading operations)
to December 31, 2005


	Partners’ Capital
Initial capital contribution from Limited Partners at July 1, 2005 representing 159,565.2554 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest		$	159,565,255
Net income			10,404,749
Sale of 17,026.7433 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			18,543,000
Redemption of 15,382.5938 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(16,541,639	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(2,289,314	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2005			169,682,051
Net income			13,808,916
Sale of 28,094.8487 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			30,189,283
Redemption of 21,595.7187 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(23,138,645	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(6,973,475	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2006			183,568,130
Net income			50,776,550
Sale of 27,402.5153 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			30,563,510
Redemption of 43,441.2969 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(45,487,314	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(6,365,854	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2007		$	213,055,022
Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest:

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the period from July 1, 2005
(commencement of trading operations) to
December 31, 2005


	2007				2006				2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	50,776,550			$	13,808,916			$	10,404,749
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash			16,030,915				(8,435,579	)			(22,332,197	)
(Increase) decrease in net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			875,016				(199,393	)			5,407,459
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable			168,101				(195,768	)			(444,643	)
Accrued expenses:
Increase (decrease) in professional fees			7,942				(13,399	)			30,334
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			67,858,524				4,964,777				(6,934,298	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from additions – Limited Partners			30,563,510				30,189,283				161,865,506
Payments for redemptions – Limited Partners			(45,487,314	)			(23,138,645	)			(16,541,639	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(6,533,955	)			(6,777,707	)			(1,844,671	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			(21,457,759	)			272,931				143,479,196

Net change in unrestricted cash			46,400,765				5,237,708				136,544,898
Unrestricted cash, at beginning of period			141,782,606				136,544,898				—
Unrestricted cash, at end of period		$	188,183,371			$	141,782,606			$	136,544,898
Non cash financing activities:
Contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions		$	—			$	—			$	16,242,749

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Master’’) is a limited partnership which was organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests, including futures contracts, options and forward contracts. The commodity interests that are traded by the Master are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Master is authorized to sell an unlimited number of redeemable units (‘‘Redeemable Units’’) of Limited Partnership Interest.

On July 1, 2005, (commencement of trading operations), Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Diversified’’), Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II (‘‘Diversified II’’), Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Orion’’), CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. (‘‘CMF Institutional’’) and Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Citigroup Diversified’’) allocated a portion of their capital to the Master. Diversified purchased 12,259.3490 Redeemable Units of the Master with cash of $11,118,119 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $1,141,230, Diversified II purchased 10,980.9796 Redeemable Units of the Master with cash of $9,895,326 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions of $1,085,654, Orion purchased 33,529.1186 Redeemable Units of the Master with cash of $29,866,194 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $3,662,925, CMF Institutional invested $7,000,000 of its’ initial capital and purchased 7,000.0000 Redeemable Units of the Master with cash of 16,242,748 and Citigroup Diversified purchased 95,795.8082 Redeemable Units of the Master with cash of $85,442,868 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forwards positions with a fair value of $10,352,940. The Master was formed to permit commodity pools managed now and in the future by Willowbridge Associates Inc. (the ‘‘Advisor’’) using the Argo Program, the Advisor’s proprietary trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle.

The Master operates under a structure where its investors consist of Diversified, Diversified II, Orion, Citigroup Diversified and CMF Institutional (each a ‘‘Feeder’’, collectively the ‘‘Funds’’) with 4.3%, 3.9%, 42.5%, 44.3% and 5.0% ownership interest of the Master at December 31, 2007, respectively and with 6.5%, 5.7%, 33.9% 50.2% and 3.7% ownership interest in the Master at December 31, 2006, respectively.

Citigroup Managed Futures LLC acts as the general partner (the ‘‘General Partner’’) of the Master. The Master’s commodity broker is Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (‘‘CGM’’). CGM is an affiliate of the General Partner. The General Partner is wholly owned by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (‘‘CGMHI’’), which is the sole owner of CGM. CGMHI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. All trading decisions for the Master are made by the Advisor.

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

The following are the major tax jurisdictions for the Partnership and the earliest tax year subject to examination: United States - 2004.

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

All of the commodity interests owned by the Master are held for trading purposes. The average monthly fair value for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $11,939,322 and $14,580,745, respectively.

Distributions of profits, if any, will be made at the sole discretion of the General Partner and at such times as the General Partner may decide. A Limited Partner may require the Partnership to redeem their Redeemable Units at their Net Asset Value as of the end of any day. The General Partner at its sole discretion, may permit redemptions more frequently than monthly, there is no fee charged in connection with redemptions.

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

Changes in the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the period July 1, 2005 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2005 were as follows:


	2007				2006				2005
Net realized and change in unrealized gains*		$	310.35			$	42.22			$	52.75
Interest income			42.42				41.94				14.25
Expenses**			(0.19	)			(0.21	)			(0.19	)
Increase for the period			352.58				83.95				66.81
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(42.42	)			(41.94	)			(14.25	)
Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest, beginning of period			1,094.57				1,052.56				1,000.00
Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest, end of period		$	1,404.73			$	1,094.57			$	1,052.56

The above ratios may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period.

CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2007

In the normal course of its business, the Master is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures and options, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’). Exchange-traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain options contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Master’s risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Master has credit risk and concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Master’s assets is CGM.

The General Partner monitors and controls the Master’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Master is subject. These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to analyze statistically actual trading results with risk- adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for Willowbridge Master for the periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below.


	For the period from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007			For the period from July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007				For the period from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007			For the period from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	46,270,390		$	(6,130,894	)		$	40,955,768		$	(30,288,851	)
Net Income (loss)		$	46,266,008		$	(6,138,210	)		$	40,946,666		$	(30,297,914	)
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	310.58		$	(42.99	)		$	280.04		$	(195.05	)


	For the period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006			For the period from July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006				For the period from April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006			For the period from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	4,194,995		$	(4,793,008	)		$	31,207,878		$	(16,766,608	)
Net income (loss)		$	4,186,340		$	(4,801,665	)		$	31,199,317		$	(16,775,076	)
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	24.45		$	(31.09	)		$	194.73		$	(104.14	)

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of CMF Winton Master L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’), including the schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income and expenses, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CMF Winton Master L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations, changes in partners’ capital, and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

CMF Winton Master L.P.
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006


	2007			2006
Assets:
Equity in commodity futures trading account:
Cash (restricted $38,923,845 and $43,178,150 in 2007 and 2006, respectively) (Note 3c)		$	453,943,515		$	262,891,418
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			8,112,545			9,397,524
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			1,858,698			3,304,098
			463,914,758			275,593,040
Interest receivable			1,028,543			997,069
		$	464,943,301		$	276,590,109

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		$	3,380,482		$	2,689,921
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees			23,230			19,961
Distribution payable (Note 5)			1,028,543			997,069
Redemption payable (Note 5)			3,465,913			—
			7,898,168			3,706,951

Partners’ Capital:
Limited Partners’ Capital, 287,763.7942 and 199,559.1109 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively			457,045,133			272,883,158
		$	464,943,301		$	276,590,109


	Fair Value				% of Partners Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		$	(1,346,736	)		(0.29	)%
Energy			2,391,339			0.52
Grains			4,780,769			1.05
Indices			482,992			0.10
Interest Rates U.S.			145,156			0.03
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			1,045,608			0.23
Livestock			(62,428	)		(0.01	)
Metals			1,901,510			0.41
Softs			27,817			0.01
Total futures contracts purchased			9,366,027			2.05


Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies			(151,864	)		(0.03	)
Energy			(326,420	)		(0.07	)
Indices			96,301			0.02
Interest Rates U.S.			(9,475	)		(0.00	)*
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			(183,209	)		(0.04	)
Livestock			159,920			0.03
Lumber			2,805			0.00	*
Metals			1,950			0.00	*
Softs			(843,490	)		(0.18	)
Total futures contracts sold			(1,253,482	)		(0.27	)


Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Metals			1,858,698			0.40
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			1,858,698			0.40


Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Metals			(3,380,482	)		(0.74	)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			(3,380,482	)		(0.74	)
Total fair value		$	6,590,761			1.44	%


	Fair Value				% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		$	473,762			0.17	%
Grains			165,200			0.06
Indices			4,915,493			1.80
Interest Rates U.S.			(1,983,312	)		(0.72	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			(845,957	)		(0.31	)
Livestock			164,530			0.06
Metals			(600,735	)		(0.22	)
Softs			(89,025	)		(0.03	)
Total futures contracts purchased			2,199,956			0.81



Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies			3,411,466			1.25
Energy			3,167,412			1.16
Grains			(639,288	)		(0.23	)
Interest Rates U.S.			55,050			0.02
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			1,284,300			0.47
Livestock			(13,400	)		(0.01	)
Softs			(67,972	)		(0.02	)
Total futures contracts sold			7,197,568			2.64


Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Metals			3,304,098			1.21
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			3,304,098			1.21


Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Metals			(2,689,921	)		(0.99	)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			(2,689,921	)		(0.99	)
Total fair value		$	10,011,701			3.67	%

CMF Winton Master L.P.
Statements of Income and Expenses
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	2007				2006			2005
Income:
Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests:
Net realized gains on closed positions and foreign currencies		$	67,378,983			$	29,047,931		$	13,732,305
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on open positions			(3,420,940	)			5,283,954			3,099,275
			63,958,043				34,331,885			16,831,580
Interest income			14,456,282				10,072,338			4,288,087
			78,414,325				44,404,223			21,119,667
Expenses:
Clearing fees			861,888				950,836			1,166,831
Professional fees			33,468				21,458			56,062
			895,356				972,294			1,222,893
Net income		$	77,518,969			$	43,431,929		$	19,896,774
Net income per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest (Notes 1 and 6)		$	276.81			$	232.02		$	142.03

CMF Winton Master L.P.
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	Partners’ Capital
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2004		$	115,125,329
Net income			19,896,774
Sale of 100,687.9895 Units of Limited Partners’ Interest			114,746,235
Redemption of 57,345.7562 Units of Limited Partners’ Interest			(66,873,662	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(4,288,087	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2005			178,606,589
Net income			43,431,929
Sale of 105,066.7150 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			130,956,345
Redemption of 55,862.7262 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(70,039,367	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(10,072,338	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2006			272,883,158
Net income			77,518,969
Sale of 123,458.3915 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			172,636,530
Redemption of 35,253.7082 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(51,537,242	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(14,456,282	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2007		$	457,045,133
Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest:

CMF Winton Master L.P.
Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005


	2007				2006				2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	77,518,969			$	43,431,929			$	19,896,774
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash			4,254,305				(1,813,897	)			(15,099,667	)
(Increase) decrease in net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			1,284,979				(8,352,716	)			(65,269	)
(Increase) decrease in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			1,445,400				3,355,634				(5,084,256	)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable			(31,474	)			(507,020	)			(323,852	)

Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			690,561				(286,872	)			2,050,250
Accrued expenses:
Increase (decrease) in professional fees			3,269				(37,331	)			45,292
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			85,166,009				35,789,727				1,419,272

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from additions			172,636,530				130,956,345				114,746,235
Payments for redemptions			(48,071,329	)			(70,039,367	)			(66,873,662	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(14,424,808	)			(9,565,318	)			(3,964,235	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			110,140,393				51,351,660				43,908,338

Net change in unrestricted cash			195,306,402				87,141,387				45,327,610
Unrestricted cash, at beginning of year			219,713,268				132,571,881				87,244,271
Unrestricted cash, at end of year		$	415,019,670			$	219,713,268			$	132,571,881
Non-cash financing activities:
Increase in redemption payable		$	3,465,913			$	—			$	—

CMF Winton Master L.P. (the ‘‘Master’’) is a limited partnership which was organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts. The commodity interests that are traded by the Master are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Master is authorized to sell an unlimited number of Redeemable Units (‘‘Redeemable Units’’) of Limited Partnership Interest.

On November 1, 2004 (date Master commenced trading), CMF Winton Feeder I L.P. (‘‘Winton Feeder’’) allocated substantially all of its capital and Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Diversified’’) and Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Orion’’) allocated a portion of their capital to the Master. Winton Feeder purchased 2,000.0000 Units of the Master with cash equal to $2,000,000. Orion purchased 35,389.8399 Units of the Master with cash equal to $33,594,083 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a fair value of $1,795,757. Diversified purchased 15,054.1946 Units of the Master with cash equal to $14,251,586 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward positions with a fair value of $802,609. On December 1, 2004, Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Citigroup Diversified’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 52,981.2908 Units with cash equal to $57,471,493. On July 1, 2005 CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. (‘‘CMF Institutional’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 5,741.8230 Units of the Master with cash equal to $7,000,000. On May 1, 2006 Alera Portfolios SPC. (‘‘Alera SPC’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 3,711.7321 Units of the Master with cash equal to $4,909,537. On June 1, 2006 Legion Strategies LLC (‘‘Winton Legion’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 2,355.4605 Units of the Master with cash equal to $3,000,000. On February 1, 2007 Citigroup Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Abingdon’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 9,017.0917 Units of the Master with cash equal to $12,945,000. On March 1, 2007 Citigroup Global Futures L.L.C. (‘‘Global Futures’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 1,875.7046 Units of the Master with cash equal to $2,500,000. On March 31, 2007, Alera SPC redeemed its entire investment in the Master. This amounted to 1,446.6172 units with a fair value of $1,850,255, which includes interest income of $7,907. On December 31, 2007, Winton Legion redeemed its entire investment in the Master. This amounted to 2,182.2006 units with a fair value of $3,474,547, which includes interest income of $8,634 that is included as part of distribution payable in the Statements of Financial Condition. The Master was formed to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Winton Capital Management Limited (the ‘‘Advisor’’) using the Diversified Program, the Advisor’s proprietary trading program, to invest together in one vehicle.

The Master’s investors consist of Diversified, Orion, Winton Feeder, Citigroup Diversified, CMF Institutional, Abingdon, and Global Futures (each a ‘‘Feeder’’, collectively the ‘‘Funds’’) with 3.5%, 38.4%, 6.7%, 26.3%, 2.8%, 20.2%, and 2.1% investments in the Master at December 31, 2007, respectively. Diversified, Orion, Winton Feeder, Citigroup Diversified, CMF Institutional, Alera SPC, and Winton Legion had 5.5%, 42.3%, 5.0%, 42.0%, 3.3%, 0.7%, and 1.2% investments in the Master at December 31, 2006, respectively.

Citigroup Managed Futures LLC acts as the general partner (the ‘‘General Partner’’) of the Master. The Master’s commodity broker is Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (‘‘CGM’’). CGM is an affiliate of the General Partner. The General Partner is wholly-owned by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (‘‘CGMHI’’), which is the sole owner of CGM. CGMHI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. As of December 31, 2007, all trading decisions for the Master are made by the Advisor.

The following are the major tax jurisdictions for the Partnership and the earliest tax year subject to examination: United States – 2004.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Master are held for trading purposes. The average fair value during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 based on a monthly calculation, was $13,531,584 and $8,889,539, respectively.

Distributions of profits, if any, will be made at the sole discretion of the General Partner and at such times as the General Partner may decide. A Limited Partner may require the Partnership to redeem their Redeemable Units at their Net Asset Value as of the end of any day. The General Partner at its sole discretion, may permit redemptions more frequently than monthly. There is no fee charged in connection with redemptions.

Changes in the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Partnership Interest for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

The above ratios may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the year. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the Limited Partner class using the Limited Partners’ share of income, expense and average net assets.

In the normal course of its business, the Master is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures and options, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’). Exchange traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain options contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the Winton Master for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below:


	For the period from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007			For the period from July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007			For the period from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007			For the period from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	26,421,519		$	22,636,219		$	47,121,703		$	(18,627,004	)
Net income (loss)		$	26,421,271		$	22,624,252		$	47,111,076		$	(18,637,630	)
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	93.17		$	78.00		$	184.25		$	(78.61	)


	For the period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006			For the period from July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006			For the period from April 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006			For the period from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Net realized and unrealized trading gains net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	19,949,441		$	8,524,313		$	3,562,025		$	11,417,608
Net income		$	19,931,011		$	8,522,826		$	3,562,025		$	11,416,067
Increase in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	100.22		$	43.33		$	20.69		$	67.78

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’), including the schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income and expenses, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the period April 1, 2006 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations, changes in partners’ capital, and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the period April 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006


	2007			2006
Assets:
Equity in commodity futures trading account:
Cash (restricted $24,672,137 and $50,059,681 in 2007 and 2006, respectively) (Note 3c)		$	215,782,212		$	219,754,941
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			278,888			3,678,200
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			6,792,116			5,812,534
			222,853,216			229,245,675
Interest receivable			424,676			736,340
		$	223,277,892		$	229,982,015

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts		$	7,439,350		$	2,555,481
Accrued expenses:
Professional fees			24,122			16,678
Distribution payable (Note 5)			424,676			736,340
Redemptions Payable (Note 5)			1,795,357			—
			9,683,505			3,308,499

Partners’ Capital:
Limited Partners’ Capital, 186,334.8221 and 227,674.0725 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest outstanding in 2007 and 2006, respectively			213,594,387			226,673,516
		$	223,277,892		$	229,982,015


	Fair Value				% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Energy		$	184,162			0.09	%
Grains			219,977			0.10
Indices			8,906			0.00	*
Interest Rates U.S.			(2,712	)		(0.00	)*
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			98,371			0.05
Metals			68,690			0.03
Softs			(18,009	)		(0.01	)
Total futures contracts purchased			559,385			0.26
Futures Contracts Sold
Energy			(76,360	)		(0.04	)
Indices			31,940			0.02
Interest Rates U.S.			(67,681	)		(0.03	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			(163,383	)		(0.08	)
Livestock			11,482			0.01
Softs			(16,495	)		(0.01	)
Total futures contracts sold			(280,497	)		(0.13	)
Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies			6,327,560			2.96
Metals			464,556			0.22
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			6,792,116			3.18
Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies			(6,976,160	)		(3.26	)
Metals			(463,190	)		(0.22	)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			(7,439,350	)		(3.48	)
Total fair value		$	(368,346	)		(0.17	)%


	Fair Value				% of Partners’ Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Grains		$	34,445			0.02	%
Indices			1,926,352			0.85
Interest Rates U.S.			(722,446	)		(0.32	)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			(372,521	)		(0.16	)
Metals			8,100			0.00	*
Softs			91,256			0.04
Total futures contracts purchased			965,186			0.43
Futures Contracts Sold
Energy			584,478			0.26
Indices			(368,680	)		(0.16	)
Interest Rates U.S.			9,990			0.00	*
Interest Rates Non-U.S.			2,686,771			1.19
Softs			(199,545	)		(0.09	)
Total futures contracts sold			2,713,014			1.20
Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies			5,782,021			2.55
Metals			30,513			0.01
Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			5,812,534			2.56
Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts
Currencies			(2,422,725	)		(1.07	)
Metals			(132,756	)		(0.06	)
Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			(2,555,481	)		(1.13	)
Total fair value		$	6,935,253			3.06	%

CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Income and Expenses
for the year ended December 31, 2007
and for the period from April 1, 2006
(commencement of trading operations)
to December 31, 2006


	2007				2006
Income:
Net gains (loss) on trading of commodity interests:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed positions and foreign currencies		$	37,612,230			$	(10,694,864	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on open positions			(7,303,599	)			6,935,253
			30,308,631				(3,759,611	)
Interest income			7,463,020				5,820,992
			37,771,651				2,061,381
Expenses:
Clearing fees			857,460				473,603
Professional fees			29,466				39,606
			886,926				513,209
Net income		$	36,884,725			$	1,548,172
Net income per Redeemable Unit of Limited Partnership Interest (Notes 1 and 6)		$	187.22			$	24.48

CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital
for the year ended December 31, 2007
and for the period from April 1, 2006
(commencement of trading operations)
to December 31, 2006


	Limited Partners’ Capital
Initial capital contribution from Limited Partners at April 1, 2006 representing 70,241.9393 Units of Limited Partnership Interest		$	70,241,939
Net income			1,548,172
Sale of 196,199.4379 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			198,904,711
Redemption of 38,767.3047 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(38,200,314	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(5,820,992	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2006			226,673,516
Net income			36,884,725
Sale of 20,875.4865 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			21,067,811
Redemption of 62,214.7369 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest			(63,568,645	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(7,463,020	)
Partners’ Capital at December 31, 2007		$	213,594,387

CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
Statements of Cash Flows
for the year ended December 31, 2007
and for the period from April 1, 2006
(commencement of trading operations) to
December 31, 2006


	2007				2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	36,884,725			$	1,548,172
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash			25,387,544				(50,059,681	)
(Increase) decrease in net unrealized appreciation on open futures positions			3,399,312				(3,678,200	)
(Increase) decrease in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts			(979,582	)			(5,812,534	)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable			311,664				(736,340	)
Increase (decrease) in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts			4,883,869				2,555,481
Accrued expenses:
Increase (decrease) in professional fees			7,444				16,678
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			69,894,976				(56,166,424	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from additions			21,067,811				269,146,650
Payments for redemptions			(61,773,288	)			(38,200,314	)
Distribution of interest income to feeder funds			(7,774,684	)			(5,084,652	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			(48,480,161	)			225,861,684
Net change in unrestricted cash			21,414,815				169,695,260
Unrestricted cash, at beginning of period			169,695,260				—
Unrestricted cash, at end of period		$	191,110,075			$	169,695,260
Non-cash financing activities:
Increase in redemption payable		$	1,795,357			$	—

CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Master’’) is a limited partnership which was organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts. The commodity interests that are traded by the Master are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The Master is authorized to sell an unlimited number of redeemable units (‘‘Units’’) of Limited Partnership Interest (‘‘Redeemable Units’’).

On April 1, 2006 (commencement of trading operations), Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Diversified 2000’’), Smith Barney Global Markets Futures Fund (‘‘Global Markets’’), Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Diversified I’’) and Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II (‘‘Diversified II’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master. Diversified 2000 purchased 41,952.2380 Units of the Master with cash equal to $41,952,238. Global Markets purchased 2,355.5550 Units of the Master with cash equal to $2,355,555. Diversified I purchased 14,741.1555 Units of the Master with cash equal to $14,741,156. Diversified II purchased 11,192.9908 Units of the Master with cash equal to $11,192,991. On May 1, 2006, Alera Portfolios SPC. (‘‘Alera SPC’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master and purchased 4,592.0784 Units with cash equal to $4,801,938. On June 1, 2006, Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II (‘‘Fairfield II’’) allocated substantially all of its capital and Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (‘‘Citigroup Diversified’’) allocated a portion of its capital to the Master. Fairfield II purchased 74,569.3761 Units of the Master with cash equal to $75,688,021. Citigroup Diversified purchased 101,486.0491 Units of the Master with cash equal to $103,008,482. As of March 31, 2007, Alera SPC fully redeemed its investment of 1,805.5482 Units of the Master with a fair value of $1,661,443, which includes interest income of $7,289. As of December 31, 2007, Global Markets fully redeemed its investment of 1,566.2278 Units of the Master with a fair value of $1,799,772, which includes interest income of $4,415 that is included as part of distribution payable in the Statements of Financial Condition. The Master was formed to permit commodity pools managed now or in the future by Graham Capital Management, L.P. (the ‘‘Advisor’’) using the Multi-Trend Program at 125% Leverage, the Advisor’s proprietary trading program, to invest together in one vehicle.

The Master operates under a structure where its investors consist of Diversified 2000, Diversified I, Diversified II, Fairfield II and Citigroup Diversified (each a ‘‘Feeder’’, collectively the ‘‘Funds’’) with 14.2%, 5.5%, 5.3%, 32.5% and 42.5% investments in the Master at December 31, 2007, respectively. Diversified 2000, Global Markets, Diversified I, Diversified II, Alera SPC, Fairfield II and Citigroup Diversified owned 15.6%, 1.0%, 5.8%, 4.6%, 0.8%, 30.1% and 42.1% investments in the Master at December 31, 2006, respectively.

Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, acts as the general partner (the ‘‘General Partner’’) of the Master. The Master’s commodity broker is Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (‘‘CGM’’). CGM is an affiliate of the General Partner. The General Partner is wholly-owned by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (‘‘CGMHI’’), which is the sole owner of CGM. CGMHI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. As of December 31, 2007, all trading decisions for the Master are made by the Advisor.

The following are the major tax jurisdictions for the Partnership and the earliest tax year subject to examination: United States – 2004.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Master are held for trading purposes. The average fair value during the year or period ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 based on a monthly calculation, was $4,235,297 and $1,197,907, respectively.

Distributions of profits, if any, will be made at the sole discretion of the General Partner and at such times as the General Partner may decide. A Limited Partner may require the Master to redeem its Redeemable Units at their Net Asset Value as of the end of any day. The General Partner at its sole discretion, may permit redemptions more frequently than monthly. There is no fee charged in connection with redemptions.

Changes in the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit of Partnership Interest for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the period from April 1, 2006 (commencement of trading operations) to December 31, 2006 were as follows:

The above ratios may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period.

to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Master’s risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Master has credit risk and concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Master’s assets is CGM.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for Graham Master the period ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is summarized below:


	For the period from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007			For the period from July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007				For the period from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007			For the period from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	9,324,937		$	(2,413,943	)		$	45,168,613		$	(15,165,416	)
Net income (loss)		$	9,325,295		$	(2,423,727	)		$	45,158,828		$	(15,175,671	)
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	45.83		$	(11.73	)		$	222.94		$	(69.82	)


	For the period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006			For the period from July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006				For the period from April 1, 2006 (commencement of trading operations) to June 30, 2006
Net realized and unrealized trading gains (losses) net of brokerage commissions and clearing fees including interest income		$	9,467,372		$	(6,121,081	)		$	(1,758,513	)
Net income (loss)		$	9,450,069		$	(6,135,884	)		$	(1,766,013	)
Increase (decrease) in Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit		$	40.74		$	(24.96	)		$	8.70

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.

Management is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.

The General Partner’s CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2007 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s CEO and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These controls include policies and procedures that:

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to an attestation by the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities Exchange Commission that permit the Partnership to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on internal control over reporting is included in the Partnership’s annual financial statements under ‘‘Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data’’.

The Partnership has no officers or directors and its affairs are managed by its General Partner, Citigroup Managed Futures LLC. At December 31, 2007 investment decisions were made by Campbell & Company, Inc., Winton Capital Management, Graham Limited Capital Management L.P., and Willowbridge Associates, Inc.

The Partnership has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to officers because it has no officers.

The Partnership has no directors or officers. Its affairs are managed by the General Partner. CGM, an affiliate of the General Partner, is the commodity broker for the Partnership and receives brokerage commissions for such services, as described under ‘‘Item 1. Business.’’ Brokerage commissions and clearing fees of $2,728,526 were earned by CGM for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management fees and incentive fees of $911,960 and $237,947, respectively, were earned by the Advisors for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

(a) Security ownership of certain beneficial owners. As of March 1, 2008, the Partnership knows of no person who beneficially owns more than 5% of the Redeemable Units outstanding.

(b) Security ownership of management. Under the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership’s affairs are managed by the General Partner. The General Partner owns Units of general partnership interest equivalent to 311.4862 Unit equivalents (1.1%) as of December 31, 2007.

Principal who own Redeemable Units of the Partnership:
*Steve Ciampi 2.0482 Redeemable Units

Item 13. Certain Relationship and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

CGM and the General Partner would be considered promoters for purposes of item 404 (d) of Regulation S-K. The nature and the amounts of compensation each promoter will receive from the Partnership are set forth under ‘‘Item 1. Business,’’ ‘‘Item 11. Executive Compensation,’’ and ‘‘Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.’’

(1) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audit of the Partnership’s annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in the Partnership’s Forms 10-Q and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filings or engagements are as follows:

(3) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for tax compliance and tax advice given in the preparation of the Partnership’s Schedule K1s, the preparation of the Partnership’s Form 1065 and preparation of all State Tax Returns are as follows:

Supplemental Information To Be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant To Section 15(d) Of The Act By Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant To Section 12 Of The Act.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this annual report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York and State of New York on the 31st day of March 2008.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this annual report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated.


SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New York			13-3729162
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
c/o Citigroup Managed Futures LLC 731 Lexington Ave. – 25th New York, New York 10022
(Address and Zip Code of principal executive offices)
(212) 559-2011
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


2005:			$1,138.83
2006:			$1,219.75
2007:			$1,095.73


2005:			$1,052.56
2006:			$1,094.57
2007:			$1,404.73


2.	Each of the Advisors, the commodity broker and their principals and affiliates may trade in commodity interests for their own accounts; and


3.	Smith Barney financial advisors will receive ongoing compensation for providing services to an investor’s account.


Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.


Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


(i)	The Partnership invests its assets in other Funds that invest the assets only in commodity interests that an Advisor believes are traded in sufficient volume to permit ease of taking and liquidating positions. Sufficient volume, in this context, refers to a level of liquidity that the Advisor believes will permit it to enter and exit trades without noticeably moving the market.


(ii)	No Advisor will initiate additional positions in any commodity interest if these positions would result in aggregate positions requiring a margin of more than 66 2/3% of the Partnership’s net assets allocated to that Advisor.


(iii)	The Partnership/Funds may occasionally accept delivery of a commodity. Unless such delivery is disposed of promptly by retendering the warehouse receipt representing the delivery to the appropriate clearinghouse, the physical commodity position is fully hedged.


(iv)	The Partnership/Funds will not employ the trading technique commonly known as ‘‘pyramiding’’, in which the speculator uses unrealized profits on existing positions as margin for the purchases or sale of additional positions in the same or related commodities.


(v)	The Partnership/Funds will not utilize borrowings, except short-term borrowings, if the Partnership/Funds takes delivery of any cash commodities.


(vii)	The Partnership/Funds will not permit the churning of its commodity trading account. The term ‘‘churning’’ refers to the practice of entering and exiting trades with a frequency unwarranted by legitimate efforts to profit from the trades, driven by the desire to generate commission income.


•	due diligence examinations of the Advisors;


•	selection, appointment and termination of the Advisors;


•	negotiation of the management agreements; and


(i)	The Partnership has made no material commitments for capital expenditures.


Investment In Partnerships	Fair Value			% of Partners’ Capital
CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P.		$	11,181,427		23.59	%
CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.			9,223,461		19.46
CMF Winton Master L.P.			15,945,975		33.64
CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.			11,627,367		24.53
Total fair value		$	47,978,230		101.22	%


*	The net loss associated with the General Partner’s allocation at December 31, 2007 is due to the timing of the redemption of the General Partners Unit equivalents.


c.	Income taxes have not been provided as each Partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Partnership’s income and expenses.


	The Limited Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partner shall manage the business of the Partnership and may make all trading decisions for the Partnership.


	In addition, the Partnership is obligated to pay each Advisor an incentive fee, payable quarterly, equal to 20% of the New Trading Profits, as defined in the Management Agreements.


	December 31, 2007
	Total Assets			Total Liabilities			Total Capital
Winton Master		$	464,943,301		$	7,898,167		$	457,045,134
Campbell Master			226,825,488			10,129,288			216,696,200
Willowbridge Master			213,552,209			497,187			213,055,022
Graham Master			223,277,892			9,683,505			213,594,387
Total		$	1,128,598,890		$	28,208,147		$	1,100,390,743


	December 31, 2006
	Total Assets			Total Liabilities			Total Capital
Winton Master		$	276,590,109		$	3,706,951		$	272,883,158
Campbell Master			338,859,002			11,768,612			327,090,390
Willowbridge Master			184,225,476			657,346			183,568,130
Graham Master			229,982,015			3,308,499			226,673,516
Total		$	1,029,656,602		$	19,441,408		$	1,010,215,194


b.	All of the income and expenses and unrealized gains and losses on trading of commodity interests are determined on each valuation day and are allocated pro rata among the Funds at the time of such determination.


	The General Partner administers the business and affairs of the Master including selecting one or more advisors to make trading decisions for the Master.


	The General Partner, on behalf of the Master, has entered into a Management Agreement with the Advisor, a registered commodity trading advisor. The Advisor is not affiliated with the


	General Partner or CGM and is not responsible for the organization or operation of the Partnership. The Management Agreement provides that the Advisor has sole discretion in determining the investment of the assets of the Master. All management fees in connection with the Management Agreement are borne by the Funds.


Ratios to average net assets:
Net investment income***	3.3	%	3.6	%	2.2	%
Operating expenses	0.2	%	0.1	%	0.2	%
Total return	(6.8	)%	10.9	%	16.3	%


	The Master has entered into a customer agreement (the ‘‘Customer Agreement’’) with CGM whereby CGM provides services which include, among other things, the execution of transactions


Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Net investment income****	3.5	%	3.6	%	2.0	%***
Operating expenses	0.3	%	0.4	%	0.4	%***
Total return	32.2	%	8.0	%	6.7	%


a.	All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date


Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Net investment income***	3.0	%	3.8	%****
Operating expenses	0.4	%	0.4	%****
Total return	18.8	%	2.4	%


	•	pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;


	•	provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and


	•	provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.