XML 39 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.0.1
Fair Value Measurements And Derivative Instruments Reporting
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Fair Value Measurements And Derivative Instruments Reporting [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements And Derivative Instruments Reporting 14.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS REPORTING Fair Value MeasurementsThe Company follows fair value measurement authoritative accounting guidance for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value. That authoritative accounting guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Market or observable inputs are the preferred sources of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. The fair value hierarchy for grouping these assets and liabilities is based on the significance level of the following inputs: Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilitiesLevel 2 – quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observableLevel 3 – significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The Company reflects transfers between the three levels at the beginning of the reporting period in which the availability of observable inputs no longer justifies classification in the original level. There were no transfers between the three levels for the year ended December 31, 2021. Recurring Fair Value MeasurementsThe Company determined the fair value of its interest rate swap agreements based on the notional amount of the swaps and the forward rate CAD-CDOR curve provided by Bloomberg and zero-coupon Canadian spot rates as of the valuation date. The Company classified these instruments as Level 2 because the inputs into the valuation model could be corroborated utilizing observable benchmark market rates at commonly quoted intervals. The interest rate swap agreements ended in December 2019 when the Company’s BMO Credit Agreement was repaid. Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements The Company applies the provisions of the fair value measurement standard to its non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value. During 2020, the Company wrote-down goodwill and intangible assets at certain properties based on forecasted losses and cash flows at these reporting units resulting from the triggering events caused by COVID-19 and, as a result, charged $34.1 million to impairment – intangible and tangible assets on its consolidated statement of earnings (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2020. Management’s assessments were designated as Level 3 measurements based on the unobservable nature of the inputs used to evaluate the goodwill and intangible assets. In addition, the Company impaired its MCE investment based on evaluations of the investment resulting from the triggering events caused by COVID-19. The Company made assessments about MCE’s ability to continue as a going concern and future cash flows of MCE. Management’s assessments were designated as Level 3 measurements based on the unobservable nature of the inputs used to evaluate the investment. The Company used an income approach and cost approach and weighted both equally. The resulting fair value was insignificant, and consequently the investment was fully impaired resulting in $1.0 million expense recorded as impairment – intangible and tangible assets on the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2020. During 2019, the Company wrote down the casino license, leasehold improvements and other assets at CCB based on the losses incurred by the casino since operations began and future forecasts of continued losses due to the current regulatory environment for casinos in England and, as a result, charged $16.5 million to impairment – intangible and tangible assets on its consolidated statement of earnings (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company classified these impairments as Level 3 because inputs into the valuation model were based on unobservable market information. Long-Term Debt – The carrying value of the Macquarie Credit Agreement, the UniCredit Term Loans and CPL credit agreements approximate fair value based on variable interest paid on the obligations. The carrying values of the UniCredit Term Loan 2 and CPL short-term lines of credit approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the agreements and recently negotiated terms. The estimated fair values of the outstanding balances under the Macquarie Credit Agreement, CPL credit agreements and UniCredit Term Loan 1 are designated as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy based on quoted prices in active markets for similar liabilities. The carrying values of the Company’s finance lease obligations approximate fair value based on the similar terms and conditions currently available to the Company in the marketplace for similar financings. Other Estimated Fair Value Measurements – The estimated fair values of other assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, have been determined to approximate carrying value based on the short-term nature of those financial instruments. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had no cash equivalents. Derivative Instruments ReportingIn April 2016, the Company began using interest rate swaps to mitigate the risk of variable interest rates under its BMO Credit Agreement. The interest rate swaps were repaid in December 2019 when the BMO Credit Agreement was repaid. The interest rate swaps were not designated as accounting hedges. These interest rate swaps reset monthly, and the difference to be paid or received under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements was accrued as interest rates changed and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense for the related debt. The Company recognized $0.7 million in interest expense related to its interest rate swaps on its consolidated statement of earnings (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2019. ‎