XML 35 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurements And Derivative Instruments Reporting
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Fair Value Measurements And Derivative Instruments Reporting [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements And Derivative Instruments Reporting

12.     FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS REPORTING



Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows fair value measurement authoritative accounting guidance for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value. That authoritative accounting guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Market or observable inputs are the preferred sources of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. The fair value hierarchy for grouping these assets and liabilities is based on the significance level of the following inputs:



·

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

·

Level 2 – quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable

·

Level 3 – significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable



A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The Company reflects transfers between the three levels at the beginning of the reporting period in which the availability of observable inputs no longer justifies classification in the original level. 



Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The estimated fair value and basis of valuation of the Company’s financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts in thousands

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2016



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Interest rate swap asset (1)

 

$

 

$

275 

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

Interest rate swap liability (1)

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(129)

 

$



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) See “Derivative Instruments Reporting” below for detailed information regarding the Company's interest rate swap agreements.



The Company determines the fair value of its interest rate swap agreements based on the notional amount of the swaps and the forward rate CAD-CDOR curve provided by Bloomberg and zero-coupon Canadian spot rates as of the valuation date. The Company classifies these instruments as Level 2 because the inputs into the valuation model can be corroborated utilizing observable benchmark market rates at commonly quoted intervals.



Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

The Company applies the provisions of the fair value measurement standard to its non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value. During 2017, the Company transferred the LIM Center casino license at Casinos Poland to the Hilton Warsaw Hotel and, as a result, charged $0.1 million related to LIM Center leasehold improvements to operating costs and expenses during the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2016, the Company determined that the fair value of the Katowice leasehold improvements was zero based on the expiration of the license for that casino. As a result, $0.4 million was charged to operating costs and expenses during the year ended December 31, 2016.



Long-Term Debt – The carrying value of the Company’s BMO Credit Agreement approximates fair value based on the variable interest paid on the obligation. The carrying value of the Company’s SCCL credit agreement approximates fair value based on the completion of the financing arrangement in September 2017 and the variable interest paid on the obligation. The estimated fair values of the outstanding balances under the BMO Credit Agreement and SCCL credit agreement are designated as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy based on quoted prices in active markets for similar liabilities. The fair values of the Company’s capital lease obligations approximate fair value based on the similar terms and conditions currently available to the Company in the marketplace for similar financings. The fair value of CDR’s land lease was CAD 28.6 million ($22.8 million based on the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2017) as of December 31, 2017. The estimated fair values of the outstanding balances related to the Company’s capital lease obligations and CDR’s land lease are designated as Level 3 measurements based on the unobservable nature of the inputs used to evaluate such liabilities.



Other Estimated Fair Value Measurements – The estimated fair values of other assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventory, accrued payroll and accounts payable, have been determined to approximate carrying value based on the short-term nature of those financial instruments. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no cash equivalents.



Derivative Instruments Reporting



In April 2016, the Company began using interest rate swaps to mitigate the risk of variable interest rates under its BMO Credit Agreement. The interest rate swaps were not designated as accounting hedges. These interest rate swaps reset monthly, and the difference to be paid or received under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements is accrued as interest rates change and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense for the related debt. See Note 7 for details of the Company’s three interest rate swap agreements.



Changes in the variable interest rates to be paid or received pursuant to the terms of the interest rate swap agreements are recognized in interest expense on the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings. The location and effects of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of earnings were as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts in thousands

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

For the year

Derivatives not designated as

 

Income Statement

 

ended December 31,

ASC 815 hedges

 

Classification

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Interest Rate Swaps

 

Interest Expense

 

$

476 

 

$

500 

 

$

651 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The location and fair value amounts of the Company’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts in thousands

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2017

 

As of December 31, 2016

Derivatives not designated as ASC 815 hedges

 

Balance Sheet Classification

 

Gross Recognized Assets (Liabilities)

 

Gross Amounts Offset

 

Net Recognized Fair Value Assets (Liabilities)

 

Gross Recognized Assets (Liabilities)

 

Gross Amounts Offset

 

Net Recognized Fair Value Assets (Liabilities)

Derivative assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps - current

 

Other current assets

 

$

77 

 

$

 

$

77 

 

$

 

$

 

$

Interest rate swaps - non-current

 

Deposits and other

 

 

198 

 

 

 

 

198 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivative assets

 

 

 

$

275 

 

$

 

$

275 

 

$

 

$

 

$

Derivative liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps - current

 

Accrued liabilities

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(55)

 

$

 

$

(55)

Interest rate swaps - non-current

 

Taxes payable and other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(74)

 

 

 

 

(74)

Total derivative liabilities

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(129)

 

$

 

$

(129)