XML 45 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are required to be grouped in one of three levels. The levels prioritize the inputs used to measure the fair value of the assets or liabilities. These levels are:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The following table presents by level within the fair value hierarchy, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2020: 
TotalQuoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash equivalents$7 $7 $ $ 
Derivative financial instruments1,014  1,014  
Equity investment562 562   
$1,583 $569 $1,014 $ 
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments6,405  6,405  
Total$6,405 $ $6,405 $ 
The following table presents by level within the fair value hierarchy, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2019:
TotalQuoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash equivalents$44 $44 $ $ 
Derivative financial instruments626  626  
Equity investment621 621   
$1,291 $665 $626 $ 
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments103  103  
Total$103 $ $103 $ 

The equity investment consists of the Company’s less than 1% investment in Yeo Hiap Seng Limited, a food and beverage manufacturer and distributor based in Singapore. Fair value is measured using the market approach based on quoted prices.  The Company utilizes the income approach to measure fair value for its foreign currency forward contracts.  The income approach uses pricing models that rely on market observable inputs such as yield curves, currency exchange rates and forward prices.

The Company estimates the original fair value of the contingent consideration as the present value of the expected contingent payments, determined using the weighted probabilities of the possible payments. The Company reassesses the fair value of contingent payments on a periodic basis. Although the Company believes its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions, including those regarding the operating results of the respective businesses, or changes in the future may result in different estimated amounts.

In connection with the acquisition of Clarks during fiscal 2018, payment of a portion of the purchase price was contingent upon the achievement of certain operating results. Contingent consideration of up to a maximum of £1,500 was payable based on the achievement of specified operating results over an 18-month period following completion of the acquisition; no contingent consideration amounts were paid, and the arrangement expired during fiscal 2019.

The following table summarizes the Level 3 activity:
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
20202019
Balance at beginning of year$ $1,909 
Fair value of initial contingent consideration  
Contingent consideration adjustment(1)
 (1,870)
Translation adjustment (39)
Balance at end of year$ $ 

(1) The change in the fair value of contingent consideration is included in Productivity and transformation costs in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, the Company recorded a net benefit $1,870, with no corresponding amount in fiscal 2020. The net benefit in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 was due to a decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration related to Clarks. The decrease in the period was due to lower probability of achievement of specified operating results.

There were no transfers of financial instruments between the three levels of fair value hierarchy during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net, accounts payable and certain accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. The Company’s debt approximates fair value due to the debt bearing fluctuating market interest rates (See Note 12, Debt and Borrowings).
Derivative Instruments

The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk and cross-currency swaps and foreign currency exchange contracts to manage its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both the Company’s nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. The Company has determined that the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments made to its derivative contracts, which determination was based on the fair value of each individual contract, was not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, all of the derivatives held as of June 30, 2020 and 2019 were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value estimates presented in the fair value hierarchy tables above are based on information available to management as of June 30, 2020 and 2019. These estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could ultimately realize.