Litigation	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Litigation	Litigation In the ordinary course of our business, we are routinely made a defendant in or a party to pending or threatened legal actions or proceedings which, in some cases, seek substantial monetary damages from or other forms of relief against us. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, we believe it unlikely that such actions or proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. City of New York Notice of Determination By “Notice of Determination” dated September 14, 2010 and August 26, 2011, or the 2010 and 2011 Notices, the City of New York notified us of alleged tax deficiencies in the amount of $13.3 million, including interest and penalties, related to our 2006 through 2008 tax years. The deficiencies related to our operation of Fidata Service Corp., or Fidata, and Astoria Federal Mortgage Corp., or AF Mortgage, subsidiaries of Astoria Bank. We disagree with the assertion of the tax deficiencies. Hearings in this matter were held before the New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal, or the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal, in March and April 2013. On October 29, 2014, the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal issued a decision favorable to us canceling the 2010 and 2011 Notices. The City of New York appealed the decision of the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal. The parties are in the process of preparing and submitting briefs to the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal and a hearing date for the appeal will be set after all briefs have been submitted. At this time, management believes it is more likely than not that we will succeed in defending against the City of New York’s appeal. Accordingly, no liability or reserve has been recognized in our consolidated statement of financial condition at March 31, 2015 with respect to this matter. By “Notice of Determination” dated November 19, 2014, or the 2014 Notice, the City of New York notified us of an alleged tax deficiency in the amount of $6.1 million, including interest and penalties, related to our 2009 and 2010 tax years. This deficiency related to our operation of Fidata and AF Mortgage and the basis of the 2014 Notice is substantially the same as that of the 2010 and 2011 Notices. We disagree with the assertion of the tax deficiency and we filed a Petition for Hearing with the City of New York on February 13, 2015 to oppose the 2014 Notice. At this time, management believes it is more likely than not that we will succeed in refuting the City of New York’s position asserted in the 2014 Notice. Accordingly, no liability or reserve has been recognized in our consolidated statement of financial condition at March 31, 2015 with respect to this matter. No assurance can be given as to whether or to what extent we will be required to pay the amount of the tax deficiencies asserted by the City of New York, whether additional tax will be assessed for years subsequent to 2010, that these matters will not be costly to oppose, that these matters will not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations or that, ultimately, any such impact will not be material.

Litigation

In the ordinary course of our business, we are routinely made a defendant in or a party to pending or threatened legal actions or proceedings which, in some cases, seek substantial monetary damages from or other forms of relief against us. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, we believe it unlikely that such actions or proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

City of New York Notice of Determination

By “Notice of Determination” dated September 14, 2010 and August 26, 2011, or the 2010 and 2011 Notices, the City of New York notified us of alleged tax deficiencies in the amount of $13.3 million, including interest and penalties, related to our 2006 through 2008 tax years. The deficiencies related to our operation of Fidata Service Corp., or Fidata, and Astoria Federal Mortgage Corp., or AF Mortgage, subsidiaries of Astoria Bank. We disagree with the assertion of the tax deficiencies. Hearings in this matter were held before the New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal, or the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal, in March and April 2013. On October 29, 2014, the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal issued a decision favorable to us canceling the 2010 and 2011 Notices. The City of New York appealed the decision of the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal. The parties are in the process of preparing and submitting briefs to the NYC Tax Appeals Tribunal and a hearing date for the appeal will be set after all briefs have been submitted. At this time, management believes it is more likely than not that we will succeed in defending against the City of New York’s appeal. Accordingly, no liability or reserve has been recognized in our consolidated statement of financial condition at March 31, 2015 with respect to this matter.

By “Notice of Determination” dated November 19, 2014, or the 2014 Notice, the City of New York notified us of an alleged tax deficiency in the amount of $6.1 million, including interest and penalties, related to our 2009 and 2010 tax years. This deficiency related to our operation of Fidata and AF Mortgage and the basis of the 2014 Notice is substantially the same as that of the 2010 and 2011 Notices. We disagree with the assertion of the tax deficiency and we filed a Petition for Hearing with the City of New York on February 13, 2015 to oppose the 2014 Notice. At this time, management believes it is more likely than not that we will succeed in refuting the City of New York’s position asserted in the 2014 Notice. Accordingly, no liability or reserve has been recognized in our consolidated statement of financial condition at March 31, 2015 with respect to this matter.

No assurance can be given as to whether or to what extent we will be required to pay the amount of the tax deficiencies asserted by the City of New York, whether additional tax will be assessed for years subsequent to 2010, that these matters will not be costly to oppose, that these matters will not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations or that, ultimately, any such impact will not be material.