XML 124 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Leases
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Leases [Abstract]  
Leases
NOTE 7. LEASES
Lessor Arrangements
The Company is a lessor in the equipment finance business where it has executed direct financing leases (“lease finance receivables”). The Company produces lease finance receivables through a specialty finance subsidiary that is staffed by a group of industry veterans with expertise in originating and underwriting senior secur
ed
 debt and equipment loans and leases. The subsidiary participates in syndicated loans that are brought to them, and equipment loans and leases that are assigned to them, by a select group of nationally recognized sources, and are generally made to large corporate obligors, many of which are publicly traded, carry investment grade or near-investment grade ratings, and participate in stable industries nationwide. Lease finance receivables are carried at the aggregate of lease payments receivable plus the estimated residual value of the leased assets and any initial direct costs incurred to originate these leases, less unearned income, which is accreted to interest income over the lease term using the interest method.
The standard leases are typically repayable on a level monthly basis with terms ranging from 24 to 120 months. At the end of the lease term, the lessee usually has the option to return the equipment, to renew the lease or purchase the equipment at the then fair market value (“FMV”) price. For leases with a FMV renewal/purchase option, the relevant residual value assumptions are based on the estimated value of the leased asset at the end of lease term, including evaluation of key factors, such as, the estimated remaining useful life of the leased asset, its historical secondary market value including history of the lessee executing the FMV option, overall credit evaluation and return provisions. The Company acquires the leased asset at fair market value and provide
s
funding to the respective lessee at acquisition cost, less any volume or trade discounts, as applicable. Therefore, there is generally no selling profit or loss to recognize or defer at inception of a lease.
The residual value component of a lease financing receivable represents the estimated fair value of the leased equipment at the end of the lease term. In establishing residual value estimates, the Company may rely on industry data, historical experience, and independent appraisals and, where appropriate, information regarding product life cycle, product upgrades and competing products. Upon expiration of a lease, residual assets are remarketed, resulting in an extension of the lease by the lessee, a lease to a new customer or purchase of the residual asset by
the lessee or
another party. Impairment of residual values arises if the expected fair value is less than the carrying amount. The Company assesses its net investment in lease financing receivables (including residual values) for impairment on an annual basis with any impairment losses recognized in accordance with the impairment guidance for financial instruments. As such, net investment in lease financing receivables may be reduced by an allowance for credit losses with changes recognized as provision expense. On certain lease financings, the Company obtains residual value insurance from third parties to manage and reduce the risk associated with the residual value of the leased assets. The carrying value of residual assets with third-party residual value insurance for at least a portion of the asset value was $70.1 million.
The Company uses the interest rate implicit in the lease to determine the present value of its lease financing receivables.
The components of lease income were as follows:
(in thousands)
 
For the Twelve
Months Ended
December 31, 2019
 
Interest income on lease financing
(1)
 
$
38,087
 
(1)
Included in Interest Income – Mortgage and other loans and leases in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
At December 31, 2019, the carrying value of net investment in leases was $1.4 billion. The components of net investment in direct financing leases, including the carrying amount of the lease receivables, as well as the unguaranteed residual asset were as follows:
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2019
 
Net investment in the lease- lease payments receivable
 
$
1,302,760
 
Net investment in the lease- unguaranteed residual assets
   
74,064
 
         
Total lease payments
 
$
1,376,824
 
         
The following table presents the remaining maturity analysis of the undiscounted lease receivables as of December 31, 2019, as well as the reconciliation to the total amount of receivables recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Condition:
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2019
 
2019
 
$
13
 
2020
   
47,422
 
2021
   
135,430
 
2022
   
200,785
 
2023
   
79,105
 
Thereafter
   
914,069
 
         
Total lease payments
   
1,376,824
 
Plus: deferred origination costs
   
21,561
 
Less: unearned income
   
(104,826
)
         
Total lease finance receivables, net
 
$
1,293,559
 
         
Lessee Arrangements
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease
right-of-use
assets and operating lease liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most leases do not provide an implicit rate, the incremental borrowing rate (FHLB borrowing rate) is used based on the information available at adoption date in determining the present value of lease payments. The implicit rate is used when readily determinable. The operating lease ROU asset is measured at cost, which includes the initial measurement of the lease liability, prepaid rent and initial direct costs incurred by the Company, less incentives received. The lease terms include options to extend the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. For the vast majority of the Company’s leases, we are reasonably certain we will exercise our options to renew to the end of all renewal option periods. As such, substantially all of our future options to extend the leases have been included in the lease liability and ROU assets.
Variable costs such as the proportionate share of actual costs for utilities, common area maintenance, property taxes and insurance are not included in the lease liability and are recognized in the period in which they are incurred. Amortization of the ROU assets was $38.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. Included in the twelve month period amount is $11.7 million that was due to the closing of certain locations.
The Company has operating leases for corporate offices, branch locations
,
and certain equipment. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of one year to approximately 25 years, the vast majority of which include one or more options to extend the leases for up to five years resulting in lease terms up to 40 years.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a sale-lease back transaction with an unrelated third party with a lease term of 20 years (including renewal options). The sale of the branch property in Florida resulted in a gain of $7.9 million, which is included in “Other income” in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.
The components of lease expense were as follows:
(in thousands)
 
For the Twelve
Months Ended
December 31,
2019
 
Components of
l
ease
e
xpense:
   
 
Operating lease cost
 
$
28,695
 
Sublease income
   
(105
)
         
Total lease cost
 
$
28,590
 
         
Supplemental cash flow information related to the leases for the following period:
(in thousands)
 
For the Twelve
Months Ended
December 31,
2019
 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
   
 
Operating cash flows from operating leases
 
$
28,695
 
         
Supplemental balance sheet information related to the leases for the following period:
(in thousands, except lease term and discount rate)
 
December 31, 2019
 
Operating Leases:
   
 
Operating lease
right-of-use
assets
 
$
286,194
 
Operating lease liabilities
   
285,991
 
Weighted average remaining lease term
   
17 years
 
Weighted average discount rate
   
3.23
%
Maturities of lease liabilities
:
(in thousands)
 
December 31, 2019
 
2020
 
$
27,304
 
2021
   
26,350
 
2022
   
25,515
 
2023
   
25,078
 
2024
   
24,414
 
Thereafter
   
255,547
 
         
Total lease payments
   
384,208
 
Less: imputed interest
   
(98,217
)
         
Total present value of lease liabilities
 
$
285,991
 
         
As previously disclosed in the Company’s 2018 Form
10-K,
under the prior guidance of ASC 840, at December 31, 2018, the Company was obligated under various
non-cancelable
operating lease and license agreements with renewal options on properties used primarily for branch operations. The agreements contain periodic escalation clauses that provide for increases in the annual rents, commencing at various times during the lives of the agreements, which are primarily based on increases in real estate taxes and
cost-of-living
indices. The remaining projected minimum annual rental commitments under these agreements, exclusive of taxes and other charges, are summarized as follows:
         
(in thousands)
 
2019
  $
30,322
 
2020
   
23,399
 
2021
   
19,736
 
2022
   
16,552
 
2023 and thereafter
   
55,525
 
         
Total minimum future rentals
  $
145,534
 
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The 
expense
under these leases, which is included in “Occupancy and equipment expense” in the Consolidated Statements of
Income
and Comprehensive Income, amounted to $28.7 million
 and
 $33.6 million
,
 
respectively, in the years ended December 31, 201
9
 and
201
8
. Rental income on Company-owned properties, netted in occupancy and equipment expense, was approximately $9.5 million
 and
 $9.9 million, in the corresponding periods.