XML 25 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Derivative Liabilities
3 Months Ended
Feb. 29, 2016
Notes to Financial Statements  
Derivative Liabilities

Note 10 - Derivative Liabilities

 

The Company evaluated its convertible note agreements pursuant to ASC 815 and for those notes in which there was no minimum or fixed conversion price resulting in an indeterminate number of shares to be issued in the future, the Company determined an embedded derivative existed and ASC 815 applied for its convertible notes. The Company valued the embedded derivatives using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  

  

Convertible debt with a variable conversion feature

 

In 2016, we estimated the fair value of the derivatives using the Black-Scholes valuation method with assumptions including: (1) term of 0 years; (2) a computed volatility rate of 357%; (3) a discount rate of 1%; and (4) zero dividends. Upon settlement the valuation of this embedded derivative was recorded as gain/loss on derivative liability.

 

In 2015, the Company estimated the fair value of the derivatives using the Black-Scholes valuation method with assumptions including: (1) term of 0 to 0.84 years; (2) a computed volatility rate of 787%; (3) a discount rate of 1%; and (4) zero dividends. Upon settlement the valuation of this embedded derivative was recorded as gain/loss on derivative liability.

 

Redeemable convertible preferred stock 

In 2016, we estimated the fair value of the derivatives using the Black-Scholes valuation method with assumptions including: (1) term reflecting the immediate exercisability; (2) a computed volatility rate of 357% (3) a discount rate of 1% and (4) zero dividends.  No preferred stock derivatives existed in fiscal 2015.  

Tainted conventional convertible debt

 

In 2016, the Company estimated the fair value of the derivative using the Black-Scholes valuation method with assumptions including: (1) term of .0 to .08 years; (2) a computed volatility rate of 357%; (3) a discount rate of 1%; and (4) zero dividends. The valuation of this embedded derivative was recorded with an offsetting gain/loss on derivative liability.

 

In 2015, the Company estimated the fair value of the derivative using the Black-Scholes valuation method with assumptions including: (1) term of .32 to .84 years; (2) a computed volatility rate of 775%; (3) a discount rate of 1%; and (4) zero dividends.  The valuation of this embedded derivative was recorded with an offsetting gain/loss on derivative liability.

 

Tainted warrants

 

The Company also evaluated all outstanding warrants to determine whether these instruments may be tainted. All warrants outstanding were considered tainted as a result of the tainted equity environment and potential inability of the Company to settle the instruments with shares of the Company’s stock as the number of shares issuable cannot be estimated and could exceed the amount of authorized shares available to be issued by the Company. The Company valued the embedded derivatives within the warrants using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  

 

In 2016, the Company estimated the fair value of the derivative using the Black-Scholes valuation method with assumptions including: (1) term of 1.77 to 7.33 years; (2) a computed volatility rate of 357%; (3) a discount rate of 1%; and (4) zero dividends. The valuation of this embedded derivative was recorded with an offsetting gain/loss on derivative liability.

 

In 2015, the Company estimated the fair value of the derivative using the Black-Scholes valuation method with assumptions including: (1) term of .96 to 8.33 years; (2) a computed volatility rate of 775%; (3) a discount rate of 1%; and (4) zero dividends.  The valuation of this embedded derivative was recorded with an offsetting gain/loss on derivative liability.

  

 

Activity for embedded derivative instruments during the three months ended February 29, 2016 was as follows:

          Change in      
    Balance at     fair value of      Balance at
    November 30,     derivative     February 29,
    2015     liabilities     2016
Variable convertible debt   $ 166,494       $ (54,193     $ 112,301  
Redeemable convertible preferred stock     412,500         (400,121 )       12,379  
Tainted convertible debt     95,018         (93,616       1,402  
Tainted warrants     18,200         (10,989       7,211  
    $ 692,212       $ (558,919     $ 133,293  
                             

 

 

  

Activity for embedded derivative instruments during the three months ended February 28, 2015 was as follows:

 

        Initial valuation            
        of derivative            
        liabilities upon   Change in        
    Balance at   issuance of new   fair value of   Conversion   Balance at
    November 30,   securities during   derivative   of debt to   February 28,
    2014   the period   liabilities   equity   2015
Variable convertible debt   $ 527,781     $ 74,990     $ 2,049,033     $ (115,953 )   $ 2,535,852  
Tainted convertible debt     106,246       —         106,082       —         212,328  
Tainted warrants     5,312       2,000       14,625       —         21,937  
    $ 639,339     $ 76,990     $ 2,169,741     $ (115,953 )   $ 2,770,117