XML 37 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue recognition and Promotional allowances
Gaming revenue is the net difference between gaming wagers and payouts for prizes from VGMs, non-subsidized free play and accruals related to the anticipated payout of progressive jackpots. Progressive jackpots contain base jackpots that increase at a progressive rate based on the credits played and are charged to revenue as the amount of the jackpots increase. The Company recognizes gaming revenues before deductions of such related expenses as NYSGC’s share of VGM revenue and the Monticello Harness Horsemen’s Association (the “MHHA”) and Agriculture and New York State Horse Breeding Development Fund’s contractually required percentages.
Food, beverage, racing and other revenue, includes food and beverage sales, racing revenue earned from pari-mutuel wagering on live harness racing and simulcast signals to and from other tracks and miscellaneous income. The Company recognizes racing revenues before deductions of such related expenses as purses, stakes and awards. Some elements of the racing revenues from Off-Track Betting Corporations (“OTBs”) are recognized as collected, due to uncertainty of receipt of and timing of payments.
Net revenues are recognized net of certain sales incentives in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Certification (“ASC”) 605-50, “Revenue Recognition—Customer Payments and Incentives”.
The retail value of complimentary food, beverages and other items provided to the Company’s guests is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances. The estimated cost of providing such food, beverage and other items as promotional allowances is included in food, beverage, racing and other expense. In addition, promotional allowances include non-subsidized free play offered to the Company’s guests based on their relative gaming worth and prizes included in certain promotional marketing programs.
The retail value amounts included in promotional allowances for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2014
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Food and beverage
$
1,656

$
1,835

 
$
1,605

Non-subsidized free play
2,476

3,106

 
1,459

Players club awards
156

516

 
585

Total retail value of promotional allowances
$
4,288

$
5,457

 
$
3,649



The estimated cost of providing complimentary food, beverages and other items for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2014
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
Food and beverage
$
2,206

$
2,154

 
$
1,605

Non-subsidized free play
1,461

1,832

 
861

Players club awards
156

516

 
585

Total cost of promotional allowances
$
3,823

$
4,502

 
$
3,051


Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include Empire’s accounts and their wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on account, demand deposits and certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less at acquisition. The Company maintains significant cash balances with financial institutions, which are not covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company has not incurred any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.
Restricted cash
The Company has four types of restricted cash accounts.
Approximately $904,000 of cash is held in reserve in accordance with NYSGC regulations as of December 31, 2014 as listed below. The Company granted the NYSGC a security interest in the segregated cash account used to deposit NYSGC’s share of net win in accordance with the NYSGC Rules and Regulations.
Under New York State Racing, Pari-Mutual Wagering and Breeding Law, MRMI is obliged to withhold a certain percentage of certain types of racing and pari-mutuel wagers towards the establishment of a pool of money, the use of which is restricted to the funding of approved capital improvements. Periodically during the year, MRMI petitions the NYSGC to certify that the noted expenditures are eligible for reimbursement from the capital improvement fund. The balance in this account was approximately $49,000 and $42,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.In April 2005, the New York law governing VGM operations was modified to provide an increase in the revenues retained by the VGM operator. A portion of that increase was designated as a reimbursement of marketing expenses incurred by the VGM operator. The amount of revenues directed toward this reimbursement is deposited in a bank account under the control of the NYL (now NYSGC) and the VGM operator. The funds are transferred from this account to the VGM operator upon the approval by NYSGC officials of the reimbursement requests submitted by the VGM operator. The balance in this account was approximately $405,000 and $399,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In connection with the Company’s VGM operations, it agreed to maintain a restricted bank account. The balance in this account was $450,000 and $400,000, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The NYSGC can make withdrawals directly from this account if they have not received their share of net win when due. For the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no withdrawals made from this account.
In addition to the NYSGC restricted cash balances listed above, the Company established an account to segregate amounts collected and payable to Monticello Harness Horsemen’s Association (the “MHHA”) and pursuant to its contract. The balance in this account was approximately $806,000 and $229,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable, net of allowances, are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect. When required, an allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on information on the collectability of specific accounts. Accounts are considered past due or delinquent based on contractual terms, how recently payments have been received and the Company’s judgment of collectability. In the normal course of business, the Company settles wagers for other racetracks and is exposed to credit risk. These wagers are included in accounts receivable. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $161,000 and $166,000, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company provides for depreciation on property and equipment used by applying the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Assets
Estimated
Useful
Lives
Vehicles
5-10 years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
5-10 years
Land improvements
20 years
Building improvements
40 years
Buildings
40 years

Deferred financing costs
Deferred financing costs are amortized on the straight-line method over the term of the related debt.
Project Development Costs
    
Prior to the enactment of the Gaming Act (defined below) in 2013 and the subsequent referendum approving a constitutional amendment in November 2013 to permit Gaming Facilities in New York, we capitalized our development costs for the Casino Project as a VGM facility because we would have transferred our current VGM license to the Casino Project as a VGM facility. However, subsequent to the enactment of the Gaming Act, Montreign submitted an application to the Siting Board for a Gaming Facility License to operate the Casino Project in a competitive environment. Because of the uncertainty of the awarding of a Gaming Facility License in such a competitive environment, we are not capitalizing the expenditures relating to the Casino Project. Therefore, during the fourth quarter of 2013, we expensed approximately $16.0 million of previously capitalized costs relating to the Casino Project, and, since that time, all costs incurred for the Casino Project as part of the proposed Gaming Facility will be expensed until we are awarded a Gaming Facility License. Although we were selected on December 17, 2014 by the Siting Board to apply to the NYSGC for a Gaming Facility License, it is not certain that we will obtain a Gaming Facility License necessary for the Casino Project.

In fiscal year 2014, total Casino Project development costs incurred were approximately $12.2 million and consisted of $5.1 million in legal, construction manager costs, consultants and other professional services, $3.1 million of non-refundable payments pertaining to the Option Agreement with EPR, $2.1 million in architectural fees, $1.0 million in payment for the RFA application fee, and a $900,000 payment to Kien Huat for a commitment fee pursuant to the Commitment Let

In fiscal year 2013, total Project and Casino Project development costs expensed were approximately $18.0 million and consisted of $10.4 million in architectural fees, $1.9 million for shared development expenses with EPR, $2.3 million in legal, $1.0 million in construction manager costs, $900,000 in consultants and other professional services, and $1.5 million of non-refundable payments pertaining to the Option Agreement with EPR.
Impairment of long-lived assets
The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets in relation to historical results, as well as management’s best estimate of future trends, events and overall business climate. If such reviews indicate an issue as to whether that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable, the Company will then estimate the future cash flows generated by such assets (undiscounted and without interest charges). If such future cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the assets, then impairment is triggered and the carrying value of any impaired assets would then be reduced to fair value.
Loss contingencies
There are times when non-recurring events may occur that require management to consider whether an accrual for a loss contingency is appropriate. Accruals for loss contingencies typically relate to certain legal proceedings, customer and other claims and litigation. As required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”), the Company determines whether an accrual for a loss contingency is appropriate by assessing whether a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company analyzes its legal proceedings and other claims based on available information to assess potential liability. The Company develops its views on estimated losses in consultation with outside counsel handling its defense in these matters, which involves an analysis of potential results assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. No liability was accrued for loss contingencies at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Earnings (loss) per common share
The Company computes basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common shares by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution of earnings that could occur if securities or contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings (loss) of the entity. Since the effect of common stock equivalents is anti-dilutive with respect to losses, these common stock equivalents have been excluded from the Company’s computation of loss per common share. Therefore, basic and diluted loss per common share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were the same.
The following table shows the approximate number of common stock equivalents outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013 that could potentially dilute basic loss per share in the future, but were not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
 
Outstanding at December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Options
781,000

 
1,890,000

Warrants
1,083,000

 
1,083,000

Option Matching Rights
901,000

 
999,000

Restricted stock
185,000

 
163,000

Shares to be issued upon conversion of long-term loan, related party
6,575,000

 
6,575,000

Total
9,525,000

 
10,710,000


Fair value
The Company follows the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement,” issued by the FASB for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value, requires certain disclosures and discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The Company chose not to elect the fair value option as prescribed by FASB, for its financial assets and liabilities that had not been previously carried at fair value. The Company’s financial instruments are comprised of current assets, current liabilities and a long-term loan. Current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s management was unable to estimate reasonably the fair value of the long-term loan due to the inability to obtain quotes for similar credit facilities.
Advertising
The Company records as current operating expense the costs of general advertising, promotion and marketing programs at the time those costs are incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $977,000, $885,000 and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Stock-based compensation
The cost of all share-based awards to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock, is recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value of the awards at grant date. The fair value of stock option awards is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model on the date of grant. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the market price of Empire’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of share-based awards is recognized as stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2014, there was approximately $617,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s equity compensation plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 2.00 years. This expected cost does not include the impact of any future stock-based compensation awards.
Income taxes
The Company applies the asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts, based on enacted tax laws and rates for the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from estimates.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance, which will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve the core principle, the new guidance implements a five-step process for customer contract revenue recognition. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, and early adoption is prohibited. Entities can transition to the new guidance either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management assessed the impact the new revenue recognition guidance had on the consolidated financial statements and does not believe it will have a significant impact.
Reclassifications
In our prior year financial statements, the Company included development expenses in selling, general, and administrative expenses on the statement of operations and disclosed the amount of development expenses in the notes to the financial statements. In the current year, the Company has presented development costs as a separate line on the statement of operations; accordingly, the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to this presentation.