EX-99 2 iss-presentation.htm POWERPOINT iss-presentation.htm
Protecting Value
Building Momentum
September 1, 2009
RiskMetrics Group, Inc.
1
 
 

 
Information Concerning Forward Looking
Statements and Certain Other Information
Certain statements in this presentation may be considered forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements
regarding the Company’s financial turnaround, profitability, operations and performance,
statements regarding the Company’s 2006 - 2009 financial results, and the Company’s audits for
2006 - 2009. Although Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. believes the expectations reflected in
such forward-looking statements to be based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no
assurance that its expectations will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
include industry and market conditions; changes in the Company’s financial position; regulatory
actions; and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports, including its
Annual Reports on Form 20-F. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which
they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update, change, or revise any forward
-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, additional or subsequent
developments or otherwise.
The Company cautions that the financial information presented herein does not constitute
complete financial information, has not been reviewed by its independent auditors and is subject
to possible change. However, subject to the preceding caveats, the Company believes that the
information presented herein represents the best information currently available to Taro
management.
2
 
 

 
Today’s Agenda
  Taro’s Financial Turnaround
  Good Corporate Governance
  Sun’s Hostile Takeover Attempt
  Status of the Audit
  Conclusion
3
 
 

 
 
Taro’s Financial Turnaround
4
 
 

 
Impressive Financial Turnaround
Strong Platform for Profitable Growth
 Ten consecutive quarters of profitability, significant financial
 and operational improvements
 Across the board improvements in key drivers, including Net
 Sales, Gross Profit, Net Income, Debt Reduction and Cash
 In a difficult economic environment impacting companies
 around the world, Taro’s performance is exceptional
5
 
 

 
Impressive Financial Turnaround
Strong Platform for Profitable Growth
 * The financial information presented here is unaudited and subject to further review, however it
 represents the best information currently available to management.
6
Net Sales, Gross Profit and Net Income (Loss) for full years 2006, 2007 and 2008
49.6%
57.5%
56.3%
 
 

 
Impressive Financial Turnaround
Strong Platform for Profitable Growth
7
*  The financial information presented here is unaudited and subject to further review, however it
 represents the best information currently available to management.
Net Sales, Gross Profit and Net Income for first half of 2007, 2008 and 2009
54.9%
54.8%
57.1%
 
 

 
Impressive Financial Turnaround
Strong Platform for Profitable Growth
Earnings per Share for first half of 2007, 2008 and 2009
8
*  The financial information presented here is unaudited and subject to further review, however it
 represents the best information currently available to management.
 
 

 
Impressive Financial Turnaround
Strong Balance Sheet - Cash
Prudent cash management has resulted in a marked improvement in the
Company’s cash position
The Company’s cash position at year-end 2007 includes cash received as a result of the private
placement sale of securities to Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (“Sun”) in May and July 2007.
The Company’s cash position as of December 31, 2008 and August 29, 2009 includes $6.25
million in restricted cash deposits.
9
 
 

 
Impressive Financial Turnaround
Cash Increased, Debt Reduced
The increase in cash combined with a reduction in our total debt is the strongest
confirmation of our growing sales, profitability and effective cash management
Net debt is defined as total debt offset by the value of hedging instruments, less cash and cash equivalents. The reduction in net
debt from March 2007 to June 2007 was primarily attributable to net cash generated by financing activities - in particular, the
private placement sale of securities in the net amount of approximately $56.4 million to Sun.
10
 
 

 
New Products - Investing in R&D and
Regulatory Approvals
Over the past 50 years Taro has built a strong record of operational achievements:
Approval of 124 Abbreviated and New Drug Applications in the U.S. alone since 1984
Effective R&D platform; strong product pipeline; patents for new treatments of diseases where
no effective treatments are available
Vertical integration of key product lines
Leadership in generic and proprietary niche topical dermatologic products
 
 

 
Taro Share Price Outperforms the S&P 500
12
S&P 500 vs. Taro
September 2007 - August 2009
 
 

 
 
Good Corporate Governance
13
 
 

 
Good Corporate Governance
 Statutory External Directors
 Audit Committee’s Role
 Indemnification of Non-Executive Directors
 Candidates for Statutory External Director
14
 
 

 
Statutory External Directors
U
nder Israeli Law
 Taro is a foreign private issuer, incorporated under the
 laws of the State of Israel
 At least two Statutory External Directors are required for all
 public companies under Israeli law
 Election requires a majority vote
 Majority must include at least 1/3 of the non-controlling
 shareholders
 Elected for a three-year term
15
 
 

 
Statutory External Directors
U
nder Israeli Law
 Independent of the Company
  No prior affiliation with the Company for at least two years
 Financial and accounting expertise and professional
 competence
 Both must serve on Audit Committee; at least one must serve
 on certain other Board Committees
 
16
 
 

 
Audit Committee Role
 Approval of interested party transactions*
 Approval of compensation to directors*
 Taro’s corporate governance requires Audit Committee approval of officer
 compensation (VP and above)
 Duty to address problematic issues in the management of the Company’s
 business, inter alia, with the Company’s internal and outside auditors and
 to propose solutions to the board*
 Oversight of auditors**
  Review and recommend approval of audit fees and related expenses
 Review financial statements**
 SOX compliance**
* Under Israeli Law
** Under U.S. Law
17
 
 

 
Indemnification of Directors
RiskMetrics Group/ISS Governance Services
Guidelines
 RiskMetrics Group/ISS Governance Services
 International Proxy Voting Guidelines
  Director Indemnification and Liability Provisions
  Vote proposals seeking indemnification and liability protection for
 directors on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.
18
 
 

 
Indemnification of Directors
Under Israeli Law
 Under Israeli law, indemnification may not be provided
 in the following instances:
  For reckless or intentional violations of a director’s duty of care
 (indemnification being permissible for negligent conduct)
  For breach of a director’s duty of loyalty to the company (unless
 in good faith and with reasonable grounds to assume that the
 action in question would not harm the best interests of the
 company)
  For a fine or forfeiture imposed on the director
  For an act performed with the intention to obtain a personal
 profit unlawfully
19
 
 

 
Why is Indemnification Important ?
A standard of good governance in public companies in the U.S.
and Israel
Allows directors to exercise their duty of care without fear of
personal liability
Insulates directors from threats and intimidation
20
 
 

 
Indemnification of Directors
 Taro’s Articles of Association include a provision allowing the
 Company to indemnify directors and officers
 Directors’ indemnification must be approved by Audit Committee,
 Board of Directors and Shareholders
 Indemnification arrangements currently in place fulfill
 requirements and were approved by the Shareholders repeatedly
 Indemnification is limited to the sums, and advance indemnification
 for monetary liability imposed is limited to the events, in each case
 as detailed in Appendix A of the Indemnification Agreement (see
 proxy statement)
21
 
 

 
Indemnification of Directors
 Sun lawsuit questions the validity of existing indemnification
 arrangements
 From an abundance of caution, Shareholders are being asked to
 ratify the existing arrangements and approve the update of the list
 of events for which the Company may agree in advance to
 indemnify against monetary obligations imposed (see Exhibits 1 - 3
 of the proxy statement)
 Certainty regarding indemnification is essential for recruiting new
 Statutory External Directors
 Ratification of indemnification for non-executive directors only
22
 
 

 
Candidates for Statutory External Directors
Our Board has carefully considered the background and
qualifications of the two highly qualified candidates
shareholders are being asked to elect:
  Irith Hausner, an experienced attorney and businesswoman, served
 as a Taro Statutory External Director for six years prior to 2003. She
 has an in-depth knowledge of the insurance industry, which is
 important to the operation of our business.
  Yaron Saporta, is a prominent and experienced accountant with
 expertise in both internal and external audit. Mr. Saporta works with
 many private and public companies in Israel. He brings to our Board a
 fresh perspective on accounting and financial
matters.
23
 
 

 
 
Sun’s Hostile Takeover Attempt
24
 
 

 
Sun’s Hostile Takeover Attempt*
 May 2007 - Proposed Sun/Taro merger announced at $7.75 per share
 June 2007 - Major shareholders, as well as ISS and Glass Lewis, announced
 opposition to the merger
 July 2007 - Sun requested postponement of shareholder meeting
 May 2008 - Taro’s Board terminated the merger agreement and filed special
 tender offer litigation in Israeli court
 June 2008 - Sun sued the Company and directors in NY and launched an
 unsolicited $7.75 tender offer knowing that Taro’s Board had already rejected
 an earlier $10.25 per share offer
 May 2009 - Sun sued Taro and its directors for delay in publication of financial
 statements and questioned validity of the indemnification arrangements
* See Company’s 14D-9 filing, as amended, for a detailed description of the facts surrounding
 the merger and Sun’s tender offer
25
 
 

 
 
Status of the Audit
26
 
 

 
Status of the Audit
 December 2007 - Taro announced review of
 chargebacks and other sales deductions for 2006 and
 prior years
  Expects no impact on cash
  Expects no material change in income statements
 for 2004-2006 in the aggregate
 May 2009 - Taro announced intention to restate
 financial results for 2004 and 2005
 August 2009 - Shareholders meetings announced
27
 
 

 
Status of the Audit
 Substantial progress is being made in resolving the few
 remaining issues with respect to the accounting for the
 restated years
 The Company continues to work diligently with its external
 auditors to resolve these outstanding issues and complete the
 financial statements and the audit for the year 2006 and the
 restated prior periods
 After finalization of the 2006 financial statements, the
 Company will focus on filing its 2007 and 2008 financial
 statements
 An update will be provided at a shareholders meeting in
 September
28
 
 

 
Conclusion
 Good corporate governance requires election of
 Statutory External Directors and approval of
 directors’ indemnification
 In order to protect shareholder value, we ask that you
 recommend shareholders vote “For” the items listed
 in the proxy for the upcoming September
 shareholders meeting
29