XML 24 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Long-Term Debt, Capital Lease Obligations and Hedging Arrangements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Long-Term Debt, Capital Lease Obligations and Hedging Arrangements [Abstract]  
Long-Term Debt, Capital Lease Obligations and Hedging Arrangements
Long-Term Debt, Capital Lease Obligations and Hedging Arrangements

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consisted of the following as of the periods indicated (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
Revolving loans
$

 
$

Mortgage note payable due monthly through 2014, interest at
 

 
 

at a rate of 8.5%, collateralized by real property with
 

 
 

carrying values totaling $1.7 million
1,695

 
2,076

Term loans
87,328

 
87,389

Capital leases
186

 
320

Total long-term obligations
89,209

 
89,785

Less amounts due within one year
(967
)
 
(1,017
)
Long-term obligations, net of current portion
$
88,242

 
$
88,768



The scheduled or expected maturities of long-term obligations as of June 30, 2012, were as follows (in thousands):
For the twelve months ending June 30:
2013
$
967

2014
914

2015

2016

2017
87,328

 
$
89,209



We manage interest expense using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt, and, to help manage borrowing costs, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements. Under these arrangements, we agree to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount.   We also may enter into interest rate cap agreements that effectively limit the maximum interest rate that we pay on an agreed to notional principal amount.  We use interest rate hedges to manage interest rate risk related to borrowings.  Our intent is to only enter into such arrangements that qualify for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with GAAP.  Accordingly, we designate all such arrangements as cash-flow hedges and perform initial and quarterly effectiveness testing using the hypothetical derivative method.  To the extent that such arrangements are effective hedges, changes in fair value are recognized through other comprehensive income.  Ineffectiveness, if any, would be recognized in earnings.

Our credit agreement requires that at least 50% of our term loans be subject to at least a three-year hedging agreement. To satisfy this requirement, we executed two hedging instruments on January 18, 2011: a two-year interest rate cap and a two-year “forward starting” interest rate swap.  The two-year interest rate cap limits our exposure to increases in interest rates for $82.5 million of debt through December 31, 2012.  This cap is effective when LIBOR rises above 1.75%, effectively fixing the interest rate on $82.5 million of our term loans at 8.75% through December 31, 2012.  The fee for this interest rate cap arrangement was $0.3 million, which will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the arrangement.  The two-year “forward starting” interest rate swap effectively converts the interest rate on $82.5 million of our term loans to a fixed rate from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014.  LIBOR is fixed at 3.185%, making the all-in rate effectively a fixed 10.185% for this portion of the term loans.  There was no fee for this swap agreement.  Both arrangements qualify for hedge accounting treatment.

The fair values of our hedging agreements as presented in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):
 
Derivatives
 
June 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Other Long-Term
 
 
 
Other Long-Term
 
 
Interest rate hedging agreements
Liabilities
 
$
2,299

 
Liabilities
 
$
2,049



The effect of the interest rate swap agreements on our consolidated comprehensive income, net of related taxes, for the three months ended June 30 is as follows (in thousands):
 
Amount of Loss in
Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Gain Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
to Income (ineffective portion)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate hedging agreements
$
(79
)
 
$
(651
)
 
$

 
$



The effect of the interest rate swap agreements on our consolidated comprehensive income, net of related taxes, for the six months ended June 30 is as follows (in thousands):
 
Amount of (Loss)/Gain in
Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income
 
Gain Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
to Income (ineffective portion)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate hedging agreements
$
(761
)
 
$
402

 
$

 
$