XML 29 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Purchased Intangibles

Changes in purchased intangibles balances are as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
 
2015
 
2014
Beginning balance
 
$
17,771

 
$
19,325

Amortization
 
(1,039
)
 
(1,069
)
Foreign currency impact
 
(368
)
 
(485
)
Ending balance
 
$
16,364

 
$
17,771



Purchased intangible assets are composed of the following:
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
 
2015
 
2014
Indefinite life intangible assets
 
$
11,949

 
$
12,148

Definite life intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $16,758 and $15,975
 
4,415

 
5,623

Total
 
$
16,364

 
$
17,771



Amortization expense for definite life intangible assets was $1.0 million, $1.1 million and $1.1 million for years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Indefinite life intangible assets are composed of trade names and trademarks that have an indefinite life and are therefore individually tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently in certain circumstances where impairment indicators arise, in accordance with FASB ASC 350. Our measurement date for impairment testing is October 1st of each year. When performing our test for impairment of individual indefinite life intangible assets, we use a relief from royalty method to determine the fair market value that is compared to the carrying value of the indefinite life intangible asset. The inputs used for this analysis are considered as Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. See note 15 for further discussion of the fair value hierarchy. Our October 1st review for 2015 and 2014 did not indicate impairment of our indefinite life intangible assets. There were also no indicators of impairment at December 31, 2015.

The remaining definite life intangible assets at December 31, 2015 consist of customer relationships that are amortized over a period ranging from 13 to 20 years. The weighted average remaining life on the definite life intangible assets is 4.3 years at December 31, 2015.

Future estimated amortization expense of definite life intangible assets is as follows (dollars in thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
 
$1,036
$1,036
$1,036
$556
$150
 


Goodwill

Changes in goodwill balances are as follows:
 
 
2015
 
2014
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. & Canada
 
Latin America
 
EMEA
 
Total
 
U.S. & Canada
 
Latin America
 
EMEA
 
Total
Beginning balance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
 
$
43,872

 
$
125,681

 
$
9,434

 
$
178,987

 
$
43,872

 
$
128,948

 
$
9,434

 
$
182,254

Accumulated impairment losses
 
(5,441
)
 

 
(9,434
)
 
(14,875
)
 
(5,441
)
 

 
(9,434
)
 
(14,875
)
Net beginning balance
 
38,431

 
125,681

 

 
164,112

 
38,431

 
128,948

 

 
167,379

Other
 

 

 

 

 

 
(3,267
)
 

 
(3,267
)
Ending balance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
 
43,872

 
125,681

 
9,434

 
178,987

 
43,872

 
125,681

 
9,434

 
178,987

Accumulated impairment losses
 
(5,441
)
 

 
(9,434
)
 
(14,875
)
 
(5,441
)
 

 
(9,434
)
 
(14,875
)
Net ending balance
 
$
38,431

 
$
125,681

 
$

 
$
164,112

 
$
38,431

 
$
125,681

 
$

 
$
164,112



In 2014, we adjusted goodwill to correct property, plant and equipment acquired in connection with the acquisition of Libbey Mexico. As a result of application of the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, in June 2006, the adjustment should have been reflected in our purchase accounting related to this acquisition. As of December 31, 2014, we decreased goodwill by $3.3 million, increased property, plant and equipment by $4.7 million and recorded a corresponding deferred tax liability of $1.4 million to reflect this adjustment.

Goodwill impairment tests are completed for each reporting unit on an annual basis, or more frequently in certain circumstances where impairment indicators arise. The inputs used for this analysis are considered as Level 2 and Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. See note 15 for further discussion of the fair value hierarchy.

When performing our test for impairment in 2015, we measured each reporting unit's fair value using a blended analysis of the present value of future discounted cash flows and the market valuation approach. The discounted cash flow model calculates the fair value of the reporting unit based on a discounted cash flow analysis, incorporating the weighted average cost of capital of a hypothetical third party buyer. Significant estimates in the discounted cash flows model include the following: discount rate, long-term growth rate and profitability of the reporting unit's business, and working capital effects (all Level 3 inputs). The market valuation approach calculates the fair value of the reporting unit based on a comparison of the reporting unit to comparable publicly traded companies. Significant estimates in the market valuation approach model include identifying similar companies with comparable business factors such as size, growth, profitability, risk and return on investment and assessing comparable multiples in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit (Level 2 inputs). When performing our test for impairment in 2014, we measured each reporting unit's fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis, incorporating the weighted average cost of capital of a hypothetical third party buyer.

The fair value is then compared to the carrying value. To the extent that fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment exists. However, to the extent the carrying value exceeds the fair value, we compare the implied fair value of goodwill to its book value to determine if an impairment should be recorded. Our annual review was performed as of October 1st for each year presented, and our review for 2015 and 2014 did not indicate an impairment of goodwill. There were also no indicators of impairment at December 31, 2015.