XML 104 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Pension
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]  
Pension
Pension
We have pension plans covering the majority of our employees. Benefits generally are based on compensation and service for salaried employees and job grade and length of service for hourly employees. Our policy is to fund pension plans such that sufficient assets will be available to meet future benefit requirements. In addition, we have an unfunded supplemental employee retirement plan (SERP) that covers salaried U.S.-based employees of Libbey hired before January 1, 2006. The U.S. pension plans cover the salaried U.S.-based employees of Libbey hired before January 1, 2006 and most hourly U.S.-based employees (excluding employees hired at Shreveport after 2008 and at Toledo after September 30, 2010). Effective January 1, 2013, we are ceasing annual company contribution credits to the cash balance accounts in our Libbey U.S. Salaried Pension Plan and SERP. The non-U.S. pension plans cover the employees of our wholly owned subsidiaries in the Netherlands and Mexico. The plan in Mexico is not funded.

Effect on Operations
The components of our net pension expense, including the SERP, are as follows:
Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
Total
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Service cost (benefits earned during the period)
 
$
5,957

 
$
5,491

 
$
5,341

 
$
1,749

 
$
1,553

 
$
1,603

 
$
7,706

 
$
7,044

 
$
6,944

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
 
15,398

 
16,057

 
15,896

 
4,954

 
4,981

 
4,557

 
20,352

 
21,038

 
20,453

Expected return on plan assets
 
(18,514
)
 
(17,173
)
 
(16,683
)
 
(2,382
)
 
(2,299
)
 
(2,463
)
 
(20,896
)
 
(19,472
)
 
(19,146
)
Amortization of unrecognized:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service cost
 
2,050

 
2,163

 
2,328

 
159

 
172

 
2

 
2,209

 
2,335

 
2,330

Actuarial loss
 
6,429

 
4,661

 
3,621

 
533

 
493

 
417

 
6,962

 
5,154

 
4,038

Transition obligations
 

 

 

 
102

 
125

 
122

 
102

 
125

 
122

Settlement charge
 
3,931

 

 

 
200

 
58

 
47

 
4,131

 
58

 
47

Curtailment charge
 
375

 

 

 

 

 

 
375

 

 

Pension expense
 
$
15,626

 
$
11,199

 
$
10,503

 
$
5,315

 
$
5,083

 
$
4,285

 
$
20,941

 
$
16,282

 
$
14,788



In 2012, we incurred pension settlement charges of $4.1 million. The pension settlement charges were triggered by excess lump sum distributions taken by employees, which required us to record unrecognized gains and losses in our pension plan accounts.

In 2012, we incurred curtailment charges of $0.4 million as a result of the third quarter announcement that, as of January 1, 2013, we are ceasing annual company contribution credits to the cash balance accounts in our Libbey U.S. Salaried Pension Plan and SERP. As a result, these plans were remeasured as of July 31, 2012. At that time the discount rate was reduced from 5.00 percent to 3.87 percent. In May 2012, we used a portion of the proceeds of our debt refinancing to contribute $79.7 million to our U.S. pension plans to fully fund our target obligations under ERISA. During the second quarter of 2012, the pension expense calculation was not adjusted as a result of this discretionary contribution as it was not contemplated in the assumption set used for the expense determination for the year. As a result of the U.S. salaried plan re-measurement on July 31, 2012, the portion of this contribution related to this plan did affect the pension expense calculation.

Actuarial Assumptions

The assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations were as follows:
 
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Discount rate
 
3.98%
to
4.22%
 
5.00%
to
5.22%
 
3.70%
to
7.00%
 
5.80%
to
8.25%
Rate of compensation increase
 
—%
to
—%
 
2.25%
to
4.50%
 
2.00%
to
4.30%
 
2.00%
to
4.30%

The assumptions used to determine net periodic pension costs were as follows:

 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Discount rate
3.87
%
to
5.22
%
 
5.50
%
to
5.76
%
 
5.62
%
to
5.96
%
 
5.80
%
to
8.25
%
 
5.40
%
to
8.25
%
 
5.50
%
to
8.50
%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
7.75%
 
8.00%
 
8.00%
 
5.10%
 
4.80%
 
5.75%
Rate of compensation increase
2.25
%
to
4.50
%
 
2.25
%
to
4.50
%
 
2.25
%
to
4.50
%
 
2.00
%
to
4.30
%
 
2.00
%
to
4.30
%
 
2.00
%
to
4.30
%


The discount rate enables us to estimate the present value of expected future cash flows on the measurement date. The rate used reflects a rate of return on high-quality fixed income investments that match the duration of expected benefit payments at our December 31 measurement date. The discount rate at December 31 is used to measure the year-end benefit obligations and the earnings effects for the subsequent year. A higher discount rate decreases the present value of benefit obligations and decreases pension expense.

To determine the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for our funded plans, we consider the current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets at December 31st is used to measure the earnings effects for the subsequent year. The assumed long-term rate of return on assets is applied to a calculated value of plan assets that recognizes gains and losses in the fair value of plan assets compared to expected returns over the next five years. This produces the expected return on plan assets that is included in pension expense. The difference between the expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred and amortized over five years. The net deferral of past asset gains (losses) affects the calculated value of plan assets and, ultimately, future pension expense (income).

Future benefits are assumed to increase in a manner consistent with past experience of the plans except for the Libbey U.S. Salaried Pension Plan and SERP as discussed above, which, to the extent benefits are based on compensation, includes assumed compensation increases as presented above. Amortization included in net pension expense is based on the average remaining service of employees.

We account for our defined benefit pension plans on an expense basis that reflects actuarial funding methods. The actuarial valuations require significant estimates and assumptions to be made by management, primarily with respect to the discount rate and expected long-term return on plan assets. These assumptions are all susceptible to changes in market conditions. The discount rate is based on a selected settlement portfolio from a universe of high quality bonds. In determining the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, we consider historical market and portfolio rates of return, asset allocations and expectations of future rates of return. We evaluate these critical assumptions on our annual measurement date of December 31st. Other assumptions involving demographic factors such as retirement age, mortality and turnover are evaluated periodically and are updated to reflect our experience. Actual results in any given year often will differ from actuarial assumptions because of demographic, economic and other factors.

Considering 2012 results, the disclosure below provides a sensitivity analysis of the impact that changes in the significant assumptions would have on 2012 and 2013 pension expense:
Assumption
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
Estimated Effect on Annual Expense
 
Percentage Point Change
 
2012
 
2013
Discount rate
 
1.0%
 
$
4,000

 
$
4,100

Long-term rate of return on assets
 
1.0%
 
$
2,400

 
$
3,400



Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) and Fair Value of Assets

The changes in the projected benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets are as follows:
Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
Total
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Change in projected benefit obligation:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year
 
$
315,689

 
$
289,725

 
$
68,990

 
$
73,328

 
$
384,679

 
$
363,053

Service Cost
 
5,957

 
5,491

 
1,749

 
1,553

 
7,706

 
7,044

Interest cost
 
15,398

 
16,057

 
4,954

 
4,981

 
20,352

 
21,038

Exchange rate fluctuations
 

 

 
3,727

 
(5,044
)
 
3,727

 
(5,044
)
Actuarial (gain) loss
 
34,426

 
18,499

 
20,223

 
(2,499
)
 
54,649

 
16,000

Plan participants' contributions
 

 

 
1,087

 
1,184

 
1,087

 
1,184

Plan amendments
 

 

 

 
(499
)
 

 
(499
)
Curtailment charge
 
(5,711
)
 

 

 

 
(5,711
)
 

Settlement charge
 
(275
)
 

 

 

 
(275
)
 

Benefits paid
 
(27,351
)
 
(14,083
)
 
(5,271
)
 
(4,014
)
 
(32,622
)
 
(18,097
)
Projected benefit obligation, end of year
 
$
338,133

 
$
315,689

 
$
95,459

 
$
68,990

 
$
433,592

 
$
384,679

Change in fair value of plan assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year
 
$
221,025

 
$
206,087

 
$
53,004

 
$
51,882

 
$
274,029

 
$
257,969

Actual return on plan assets
 
30,348

 
7,041

 
5,922

 
358

 
36,270

 
7,399

Exchange rate fluctuations
 

 

 
1,323

 
(1,361
)
 
1,323

 
(1,361
)
Employer contributions
 
92,804

 
21,980

 
9,375

 
4,955

 
102,179

 
26,935

Plan participants' contributions
 

 

 
1,087

 
1,184

 
1,087

 
1,184

Settlements paid
 
(12,552
)
 

 
(692
)
 
(728
)
 
(13,244
)
 
(728
)
Benefits paid
 
(14,799
)
 
(14,083
)
 
(4,579
)
 
(3,286
)
 
(19,378
)
 
(17,369
)
Fair value of plan assets, end of year
 
$
316,826

 
$
221,025

 
$
65,440

 
$
53,004

 
$
382,266

 
$
274,029

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded ratio
 
93.7
%
 
70.0
%
 
68.6
%
 
76.8
%
 
88.2
%
 
71.2
%
Funded status and net accrued pension benefit cost
 
$
(21,307
)
 
$
(94,664
)
 
$
(30,019
)
 
$
(15,986
)
 
$
(51,326
)
 
$
(110,650
)


The current portion of the pension liability reflects the amount of expected benefit payments that are greater than the plan assets on a plan-by-plan basis. The net accrued pension benefit liability at December 31 of the respective year-ends were included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
 
2012
 
2011
Non-current asset
 
$
10,196

 
$
17,485

Current liability
 
(613
)
 
(5,990
)
Long-term liability
 
(60,909
)
 
(122,145
)
Net accrued pension liability
 
$
(51,326
)
 
$
(110,650
)


The pre-tax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, are as follows:
Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
Total
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Net actuarial loss
 
$
117,573

 
$
111,328

 
$
23,576

 
$
6,721

 
$
141,149

 
$
118,049

Prior service cost
 
3,148

 
5,572

 
1,194

 
1,325

 
4,342

 
6,897

Transition obligation
 

 

 
143

 
229

 
143

 
229

Total cost
 
$
120,721

 
$
116,900

 
$
24,913

 
$
8,275

 
$
145,634

 
$
125,175



The pre-tax amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2012, that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during 2013 are as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
Total
Net actuarial loss
 
$
8,346

 
$
902

 
$
9,248

Prior service cost
 
1,172

 
163

 
1,335

Transition obligation
 

 
82

 
82

Total cost
 
$
9,518

 
$
1,147

 
$
10,665



Estimated contributions for 2013, as well as, contributions made in 2012 and 2011 to the pension plans are as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
Total
Estimated contributions in 2013
 
$
74

 
$
3,329

 
$
3,403

Contributions made in 2012
 
$
92,804

 
$
9,375

 
$
102,179

Contributions made in 2011
 
$
21,980

 
$
4,955

 
$
26,935



It is difficult to estimate future cash contributions to the pension plans, as such amounts are a function of actual investment returns, withdrawals from the plans, changes in interest rates and other factors uncertain at this time. It is possible that greater cash contributions may be required in 2013 than the amounts in the above table. Although a decline in market conditions, changes in current pension law and uncertainties regarding significant assumptions used in the actuarial valuations may have a material impact in future required contributions to our pension plans, we currently do not expect funding requirements to have a material adverse impact on current or future liquidity.

Pension benefit payment amounts are anticipated to be paid from the plans (including the SERP) as follows:
Year
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
Total
2013
 
$
19,131

 
$
3,780

 
$
22,911

2014
 
$
19,488

 
$
2,617

 
$
22,105

2015
 
$
20,091

 
$
2,931

 
$
23,022

2016
 
$
20,408

 
$
3,458

 
$
23,866

2017
 
$
20,739

 
$
3,909

 
$
24,648

2018-2022
 
$
110,430

 
$
23,945

 
$
134,375



Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
 
U.S. Plans
 
Non-U.S. Plans
 
Total
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Projected benefit obligation
 
$
338,133

 
$
315,689

 
$
43,190

 
$
33,471

 
$
381,323

 
$
349,160

Accumulated benefit obligation
 
$
338,133

 
$
310,920

 
$
38,387

 
$
29,424

 
$
376,520

 
$
340,344

Fair value of plan assets
 
$
316,826

 
$
221,025

 
$
2,974

 
$

 
$
319,800

 
$
221,025



Plan Asset Allocation

The asset allocation for our U.S. pension plans at the end of 2012 and 2011 and the target allocation for 2013, by asset category, are as follows:
 
 
Target Allocation
 
Percent of Plan Assets at Year End
U.S. Plans Asset Category
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Equity securities
 
45
%
 
44
%
 
47
%
Debt securities
 
35
%
 
37
%
 
33
%
Real estate
 
5
%
 
5
%
 
5
%
Other
 
15
%
 
14
%
 
15
%
Total
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%

The asset allocation for our Libbey Holland pension plan at the end of 2012 and 2011 and the target allocation for 2013, by asset category, are as follows:
 
 
Target Allocation
 
Percent of Plan Assets at Year End
Non-U.S. Plan Asset Category
 
2013
 
2012
 
2011
Equity securities
 
18
%
 
17
%
 
19
%
Debt securities
 
68
%
 
68
%
 
64
%
Real estate
 
9
%
 
10
%
 
11
%
Other
 
5
%
 
5
%
 
6
%
Total
 
100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%


Our investment strategy is to control and manage investment risk through diversification across asset classes and investment styles, within established target asset allocation ranges. The investment risk of the assets is limited by appropriate diversification both within and between asset classes. Assets will be diversified among a mix of traditional investments in equity and fixed income instruments, as well as alternative investments including real estate and hedge funds. It would be anticipated that a modest allocation to cash would exist within the plans, since each investment manager is likely to hold some cash in the portfolio with the goal of ensuring that sufficient liquidity will be available to meet expected cash flow requirements.

Our investment valuation policy is to value the investments at fair value. All investments are valued at their respective net asset values as calculated by the Trustee. Underlying equity securities, for which market quotations are readily available, are valued at the last reported readily available sales price on their principal exchange on the valuation date or official close for certain markets. Fixed income investments are valued on a basis of valuations furnished by a trustee-approved pricing service, which determines valuations for normal institutional-size trading units of such securities which are generally recognized at fair value as determined in good faith by the Trustee. Short-term investments, if any, are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The fair value of investments in real estate funds is based on valuation of the fund as determined by periodic appraisals of the underlying investments owned by the respective fund. The fair value of hedge funds is based on the net asset values provided by the fund manager. Investments in registered investment companies or collective pooled funds, if any, are valued at their respective net asset value.

The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy established by FASB ASC Topic 820, our pension plan assets at fair value (see note 15 for further discussion of the fair value hierarchy) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level One
 
Level Two
 
Level Three
 
Total
Cash & cash equivalents
 
$

 
$
781

 
$

 
$
781

Real estate
 

 
15,613

 
6,305

 
21,918

Equity securities
 

 
149,902

 

 
149,902

Debt securities
 

 
162,114

 

 
162,114

Hedge funds
 

 

 
47,551

 
47,551

Total
 
$

 
$
328,410

 
$
53,856

 
$
382,266


December 31, 2011
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level One
 
Level Two
 
Level Three
 
Total
Cash & cash equivalents
 
$

 
$
3,550

 
$

 
$
3,550

Real estate
 

 
11,163

 
5,982

 
17,145

Equity securities
 

 
113,400

 

 
113,400

Debt securities
 

 
106,955

 

 
106,955

Hedge funds
 

 

 
32,979

 
32,979

Total
 
$

 
$
235,068

 
$
38,961

 
$
274,029



The change in fair value of Level 3 pension plan assets due to actual return on those assets was immaterial in 2012 and 2011. The following is a reconciliation for which Level three inputs were used in determining fair value:
Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
 
2012
 
2011
Assets classified as Level 3 at the beginning of the year
 
$
38,961

 
$
35,989

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
 
2,743

 
(1,621
)
Net purchases
 
12,152

 
4,593

Assets classified as Level 3 at the end of the year
 
$
53,856

 
$
38,961