XML 64 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Taxes
Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate differs from the United States statutory tax rate primarily due to valuation allowances, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in accruals related to uncertain tax positions and tax planning structures. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of gross unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties.

FASB ASC 740-20, "Income Taxes - Intraperiod Tax Allocation," requires that the provision for income taxes be allocated between continuing operations and other categories of earnings (such as discontinued operations or other comprehensive income) for each tax jurisdiction. In periods in which there is a year-to-date pre-tax loss from continuing operations and pre-tax income in other categories of earnings, the tax provision is first allocated to the other categories of earnings. A related tax benefit is then recorded in continuing operations. A tax benefit of $4.2 million was recorded in our income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. There was no similar tax benefit recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2012 or the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Depending upon the level of our future earnings and losses and their impact on other comprehensive income, it is possible that a tax benefit may be recorded, changed, or reversed in future periods.

Further, our current and future provision for income taxes for 2012 is significantly impacted by valuation allowances. In the United States, China, the Netherlands and Portugal we have recorded valuation allowances against our deferred income tax assets. We did not release any valuation allowance for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2012, or the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011. In assessing the need for recording a valuation allowance, we weigh all available positive and negative evidence. Examples of the evidence we consider are cumulative losses in recent years, losses expected in early future years, a history of potential tax benefits expiring unused, and whether there was an unusual, infrequent or extraordinary item to be considered. Based on our analysis of all available evidence, we intend to maintain these allowances until it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized; however, based upon management's assessment, a release of the valuation allowance in China could occur.

Income tax payments consisted of the following:
 
Three months ended September 30,
 
Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Total income tax payments, net of refunds
$
1,366

 
$
1,843

 
$
3,981

 
$
13,029

Less: credits or offsets
491

 
842

 
1,915

 
4,340

Cash paid, net
$
875

 
$
1,001

 
$
2,066

 
$
8,689