XML 57 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments And Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Jan. 28, 2012
Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments And Contingencies

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: Leases

     We lease retail store space, office space and various office equipment under operating leases expiring in various years through the fiscal year ending 2023. Certain of the leases provide that we may cancel the lease if our retail sales at that location fall below an established level, and certain leases provide for additional rent payments to be made when sales exceed a base amount.

     Certain operating leases provide for renewal options for periods from three to five years at their fair rental value at the time of renewal. In the normal course of business, operating leases are generally renewed or replaced by other leases.

     Minimum future rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases (including leases with certain minimum sales cancellation clauses described below and exclusive of common area maintenance charges and/or contingent rental payments based on sales) as of January 28, 2012, are approximately as follows:

FISCAL YEAR ENDING:    
February 2, 2013 $ 143,161
February 1, 2014   128,974
January 31, 2015   119,058
January 30, 2016   107,716
January 29, 2017   88,391
Thereafter   157,270
Total minimum lease payments $ 744,570

 

     A majority of our store operating leases contain cancellation clauses that allow the leases to be terminated at our discretion, if certain minimum sales levels are not met within the first few years of the lease term. We have not historically exercised many or met these cancellation clauses and, therefore, have included commitments for the full lease terms of such leases in the above table. For fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, total rent expense under operating leases was approximately $184.5 million, $172.1 million, and $161.6 million, respectively, including common area maintenance charges of approximately $27.5 million, $25.0 million, and $23.7 million, respectively, other rental charges of approximately $25.8 million, $24.5 million, and $23.6 million, respectively, and contingent rental expense, based on sales, of approximately $10.6 million, $8.2 million, and $6.5 million, respectively.

Credit Facility

     On July 27, 2011, we entered into a $70 million senior five-year unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with a syndicate led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as syndication agent. The Credit Facility replaces our previous $55 million secured credit facility with SunTrust Bank.

     The Credit Facility provides a $70 million revolving credit facility that matures on July 27, 2016. The Credit Facility provides for swing advances of up to $5 million and issuance of letters of credit up to $40 million. The Credit Facility also contains a feature that provides the Company the ability, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, to expand the commitments available under the Credit Facility from $70 million up to $125 million. As of January 28, 2012, no borrowings are outstanding under the Credit Facility.

     The Credit Facility contains standard affirmative and negative covenants and other limitations (subject to various carve-outs) regarding the Company. The covenants limit: (a) the making of investments, the payment of dividends and other payments with respect to capital, the disposition of material assets other than in the ordinary course of business, and mergers and acquisitions under certain conditions, (b) transactions with affiliates unless such transactions are completed in the ordinary course of business and upon fair and reasonable terms, (c) the incurrence of liens and indebtedness, and (d) certain substantial changes in the nature of the subsidiaries' business.

     The Credit Facility contains customary financial covenants for unsecured credit facilities, consisting of a maximum total debt leverage ratio that cannot be greater than 3.25 to 1.00 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio that cannot be less than 1.20 to 1.00.

     The Credit Facility contains customary events of default. If a default occurs and is not cured within any applicable cure period or is not waived, the Company's obligations under the Credit Facility may be accelerated or the Credit Facility may be terminated. The Company was in compliance with the applicable ratio requirements and other covenants at January 28, 2012.

Other

     At January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011, we had approximately $351.2 million and $326.7 million, respectively, of open purchase orders for inventory, in the normal course of business, which are cancellable with no or limited recourse available to the vendor until the merchandise shipping date.

     The Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action filed in October 2011 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Diego, Leslie Golba v. White House | Black Market, Inc. The Complaint alleged that the Company, in violation of California law, requested or required customers to provide personal information as a condition of accepting payment by credit card. The Company always believed that the case was without merit. Recently, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her case against us without our providing anything of value to the plaintiff.

     The Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action filed in March 2011 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Eileen Schlim v. Chico's FAS, Inc. The Complaint attempts to allege numerous violations of California law related to wages, meal periods, rest periods, and vacation pay, among other things. The Company denies the material allegations of the Complaint. The Company believes that its policies and procedures for paying its associates comply with all applicable California laws. As a result, the Company does not believe that the case should have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

     Other than as noted above, we are not currently a party to any legal proceedings, other than various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, none of which we believe should have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.