XML 47 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
GOODWILL
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
GOODWILL  
GOODWILL

15.   GOODWILL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gas

 

Green

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pipelines

 

Power

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liquids

 

Gas

 

and

 

and

 

Energy

 

Eliminations

 

 

 

 

 

Pipelines

 

Distribution

 

Processing

 

Transmission

 

Services

 

and Other

 

Consolidated

 

(millions of Canadian dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2015

 

55

 

-

 

428

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

483

 

Foreign exchange and other

 

5

 

-

 

30

 

-

 

2

 

-

 

37

 

Impairment

 

-

 

-

 

(440

)

-

 

-

 

-

 

(440

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

60

 

-

 

18

 

-

 

2

 

-

 

80

 

Foreign exchange and other

 

(1

)

-

 

(1

)

-

 

-

 

-

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

59

 

-

 

17

 

-

 

2

 

-

 

78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMPAIRMENT

The Company did not recognize any goodwill impairment for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Gas Pipelines And Processing

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $440 million ($167 million after-tax attributable to Enbridge) related to EEP’s natural gas and NGL businesses, which EEP holds directly and indirectly through its partially-owned subsidiary, MEP. Due to a prolonged decline in commodity prices, reduction in producers’ expected drilling programs negatively impacted forecasted cash flows from EEP’s natural gas and NGL systems. This change in circumstance led to the completion of an impairment test, resulting in a full impairment of goodwill on EEP’s natural gas and NGL businesses.

 

In performing the impairment assessment, EEP measured the fair value of its reporting units primarily by using a discounted cash flow analysis and it also considered overall market capitalization of its business, cash flow measurement data and other factors. EEP’s estimate of fair value required it to use significant unobservable inputs representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement, including assumptions related to the future performance of its reporting units.