EX-99.1 2 d549621dex991.htm EX-99.1 EX-99.1

EXHIBIT 99.1

FILED

 

 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

  

JUN 03 2013

 

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 

MHC FINANCING LIMITED

   No. 07-15982

PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois limited

  

partnership; GRAPELAND VISTAS

   D.C. No. CV-04-03325-VRW

INC., a California corporation,

  

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

   ORDER

v.

  

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, a municipal

corporation; CONTEMPO MARIN

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a

California corporation,

 

Defendants - Appellees.

  

 

MHC FINANCING LIMITED

   No. 09-16447

PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited

  

partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC.,

   D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW

an Illinois corporation,

 

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 

v.

 

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,

 

Defendant - Appellant,

 

And

 

CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS

  


ASSOCIATION,

 

  

Defendant-intervenor.

  

 

MHC FINANCING LIMITED

   No. 09-16451

PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited

  

partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC.,

   D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW

an Illinois corporation,

 

  

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 

v.

 

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,

 

Defendant - Appellant,

 

CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

 

Defendant-intervenor -

Appellee.

  

 

MHC FINANCING LIMITED

   No. 09-16612

PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited

  

partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC.,

   D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW

an Illinois corporation,

  

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

  

v.

  

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,

  

 

2


Defendant,

 

And

 

CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

 

Defendant - intervenor -

Appellant.

  

 

MHC FINANCING LIMITED

   No. 09-16613

PARTNERSHTIP, an Illinois limited

  

partnership; GRAPELAND VISTA, INC.,

   D.C. No. 3:00-cv-03785-VRW

an Illinois corporation,

 

  

Plaintiffs - Appellees Cross-

Appellants,

 

v.

 

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,

 

Defendant - Appellant Cross-

Appellee,

 

CONTEMPO MARIN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

 

Defendant - intervenor -

Appellant Cross-Appellee.

  

Before: FARRIS, THOMAS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

 

3


Plaintiffs-Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehearing the matter. Plaintiffs-Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Defendant-Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.

Defendants-Appellants’ emergency motion for stay of injunction or immediate issuance of mandate is DE NIED as moot.

 

4