XML 23 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Note 8 – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

In June 2011, the Company entered into a $200 million notional swap to hedge the variable cash flows associated with forecasted issuance of debt. (See Note 14 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q for information about the Term Loan related to the $200 million notional swap.) No gain or loss was recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations related to hedge ineffectiveness or to amounts excluded from effectiveness testing on the Company’s cash flow hedge during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $1.6 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.

Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands).

 

     As of June 30, 2011      As of December 31, 2010  
     Balance Sheet
Location
   Fair Value      Balance Sheet
Location
   Fair Value  

Interest Rate Swap

   Accrued payroll and other
operating expenses
   $ 336       Accrued payroll and other
operating expenses
   $ —     
     

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2011, the fair value of the derivative in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest, but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to this derivative agreement was $0.3 million. The Company determined no adjustment was necessary for nonperformance risk on its derivative obligation. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has not posted any collateral related to this agreement. If the Company had breached any of its provisions at June 30, 2011, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the derivative agreement at the termination value of $0.3 million.