XML 47 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Regulatory Matters
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Regulatory Matters [Abstract]  
Regulatory Matters
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Note N - Regulatory Matters
 
   Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Management believes that as of December 31, 2011, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.
 
The prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications, including well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and plans for capital restoration are required. At year-end 2011 and 2010, the Bank’s capital met the requirements for the Bank to be deemed well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.  There have been no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's category.
 
        At year-end, consolidated actual capital levels and minimum required levels for the Company and the Bank were:
 
               
Minimum Required
 
               
To Be Well
 
         
Minimum Required
  
Capitalized Under
 
         
For Capital
  
Prompt Corrective
 
   
Actual
   Actual  
Adequacy Purposes
  
Action Regulations
 
   
Amount
  
Ratio
  
Amount
  
Ratio
  
Amount
  
Ratio
 
2011
                  
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
                  
   Consolidated
 $90,288   15.6 % $46,174   8.0 % $57,718   N/A 
   Bank
  81,991   14.4   45,544   8.0   56,930   10.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
                        
   Consolidated
  83,072   14.4   23,087   4.0   34,631   N/A 
   Bank
  74,975   13.2   22,772   4.0   34,158   6.0 
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
                        
   Consolidated
  83,072   10.3   32,414   4.0   40,517   N/A 
   Bank
  74,975   9.4   31,969   4.0   39,962   5.0 
                          
2010
                        
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
                        
   Consolidated
 $87,660   14.5 % $48,235   8.0 % $60,294   N/A 
   Bank
  79,893   13.4   47,663   8.0   59,578   10.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
                        
   Consolidated
  80,101   13.3   24,117   4.0   36,176   N/A 
   Bank
  72,426   12.2   23,831   4.0   35,747   6.0 
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
                        
   Consolidated
  80,101   9.3   34,326   4.0   42,908   N/A 
   Bank
  72,426   8.5   33,902   4.0   42,377   5.0 
   
   Dividends paid by the subsidiaries are the primary source of funds available to Ohio Valley for payment of dividends to shareholders and for other working capital needs. The payment of dividends by the subsidiaries to Ohio Valley is subject to restrictions by regulatory authorities. These restrictions generally limit dividends to the current and prior two years retained earnings. At January 1, 2012 approximately $4,795 of the subsidiaries’ retained earnings were available for dividends under these guidelines. In addition to these restrictions, dividend payments cannot reduce regulatory capital levels below minimum regulatory guidelines. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System also has a policy requiring Ohio Valley to provide notice to the FRB in advance of the payment of a dividend to Ohio Valley's shareholders under certain circumstances, and the FRB may disapprove of such dividend payment if the FRB determines the payment would be an unsafe or unsound practice.