Fair Value Measurements	9 Months Ended
Fair Value Measurements	Sep. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]	(7) Fair Value Measurements – Fair value, as defined by United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”), is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or most advantageous market. US GAAP establishes a hierarchy in determining the fair value of an asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy has three levels of inputs, both observable and unobservable. US GAAP requires the utilization of the lowest possible level of input to determine fair value. Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are market data, other than Level 1 inputs, that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in an inactive market, and other observable information that can be corroborated by market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable and corroborated by little or no market data. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Partnership had no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis that would require disclosure under this pronouncement. The Partnership had the following nonfinancial assets measured on a nonrecurring basis that were recorded at fair value during 2014 and 2013. The Champps restaurant in Utica, Michigan, with a carrying amount of $733,000 at December 31, 2013, was written down to its estimated fair value of $648,000 after completing our long-lived asset valuation analysis. The resulting impairment charge of $85,000 was included in earnings for the fourth quarter of 2013. The fair value of the property was based upon comparable sales of similar properties, which are considered Level 2 inputs in the valuation hierarchy. The property was sold on August 25, 2014. The Royal Buffet restaurant in Colorado Springs, Colorado, with a carrying amount of $642,868 at September 30, 2013, was written down to its estimated fair value of $320,000 after completing our long-lived asset valuation analysis. The resulting impairment charge of $322,868 was included in earnings for the third quarter of 2013. The fair value of the property was based upon comparable sales of similar properties, which are considered Level 2 inputs in the valuation hierarchy. The property was sold on December 20, 2013. The HomeTown Buffet restaurant in Albuquerque, New Mexico, with a carrying amount of $336,002 at December 31, 2013, was written down to its estimated fair value of $275,000 after completing our long-lived asset valuation analysis. The resulting impairment charge of $61,002 was included in earnings for the fourth quarter of 2013. The fair value of the property was based upon comparable sales of similar properties, which are considered Level 2 inputs in the valuation hierarchy.

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References+ Details