DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE I — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

To minimize the effect of a downturn in oil and gas prices and protect our profitability and the economics of our development plans, we enter into crude oil and natural gas hedge contracts. The terms of contracts depend on various factors, including management’s view of future crude oil and natural gas prices. This price hedging program is designed to moderate the effects of a crude oil and natural gas price downturn while allowing us to participate in some commodity price increases. Management regularly monitors the crude oil and natural gas markets and our financial commitments to determine if, when, and at what level some form of crude oil and/or natural gas hedging and/or basis adjustments or other price protection is appropriate. Currently, our derivatives are in the form of puts and a gas differential swap.  However, we may use a variety of derivative instruments in the future to hedge. The Company has not designated these derivatives as hedges for accounting purposes.

The Company routinely enters into derivative contracts with a variety of counterparties, typically resulting in individual derivative instruments with both fair value asset and liability positions. The Company nets the fair values of derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty pursuant to ISDA master agreements, which mitigate the credit risk of the Company’s derivative instruments by providing for net settlement over the term of the contract and in the event of default or termination of the contract.

The following table summarizes the open financial derivative positions, as of September 30, 2013, related to oil and gas production. The Company will receive prices as noted in the table below and will pay a counterparty market price based on the NYMEX (for natural gas production) or WTI (for oil production) index price, settled monthly.

Product	Type	Contract Period	Volume	Price per Mcf or Bbl
Oil	Brent Swap	01/01/14  12/31/14	800 Bbl/d	$	102.12
Oil	Brent Swap	10/01/13  09/30/14	700 Bbl/d	$	104.30
Gas	Swap	07/01/13  12/31/13	7,000 MMBtu/d	$	3.39
Gas	Swap	01/01/14  12/31/14	7,000 MMBtu/d	$	3.79
Gas	Swap	07/01/13  12/31/14	2,000 MMBtu/d	$	4.18

The tables below summarize the amount of gains (losses) recognized in income from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments under authoritative guidance.

Derivatives not designated as	For the Three Months						For the Nine Months
Hedging Instrument under	Ended September 30,						Ended September 30,
authoritative guidance	2013			2012			2013			2012
(in thousands)
Realized cash settlements on hedges	$	(181	)	$	(688	)	$	(857	)	$	(1,542	)
Unrealized non-cash gain (loss) on hedges	(1,024		)	(2,695		)	1,348			(2,230		)
Total	$	(1,205	)	$	(3,383	)	$	491		$	(3,772	)

The table below reflects the line item in our Consolidated Balance Sheet where the fair value of our net derivatives, are included.

September 30, 2013

	Derivative Assets
	Balance Sheet
(in thousands)	Location	Fair Value
Commodity—Oil	Non-current	135
Commodity—Natural Gas	Non-current	(83		)
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	52

September 30, 2013

	Derivative Liabilities
	Balance Sheet
(in thousands)	Location	Fair Value
Commodity—Oil	current	$	(180	)
Commodity—Natural Gas	current	81
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	(99	)

December 31, 2012

	Derivative Liabilities
(in thousands)	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Commodity—Natural Gas	current	$	(457	)
Commodity—Oil	current	72
Commodity—Oil	Non-current	(567		)
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	(952	)

Derivative’s Credit risk

The Company does not require collateral or other security from counterparties to support derivative instruments. However, the agreements with those counterparties typically contain netting provisions such that if a default occurs, the non-defaulting party can offset the amount payable to the defaulting party under the derivative contract with the amount due from the defaulting party. As a result of the netting provisions the Company’s maximum amount of loss due to credit risk is limited to the net amounts due to and from the counterparties under the derivative contracts.

As of September 30, 2013, the counterparty to the Company’s commodity derivative contracts consisted of two financial institutions. The Company’s counterparty is also a lender under the Company’s Senior Credit Agreement. As a result, the counterparty to the Company’s derivative agreements shares in the collateral supporting the Company’s Senior Credit Agreement. The Company is not generally required to post additional collateral under derivative agreements.

The Company’s derivative agreements contain provisions that require cross defaults and acceleration of those instruments to any material debt. If the Company were to default on any of its material debt agreements, it would be a violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment on derivative instruments that are in a net liability position at that time.