XML 77 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE I — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

To minimize the effect of a downturn in oil and gas prices and protect our profitability and the economics of our development plans, we enter into crude oil and natural gas hedge contracts. The terms of contracts depend on various factors, including management’s view of future crude oil and natural gas prices. This price hedging program is designed to moderate the effects of a crude oil and natural gas price downturn while allowing us to participate in some commodity price increases. Management regularly monitors the crude oil and natural gas markets and our financial commitments to determine if, when, and at what level some form of crude oil and/or natural gas hedging and/or basis adjustments or other price protection is appropriate. Currently, our derivatives are in the form of puts and a gas differential swap.  However, we may use a variety of derivative instruments in the future to hedge. The Company has not designated these derivatives as hedges for accounting purposes.

 

The following table summarizes the open financial derivative positions as of June 30, 2013, related to oil and gas production. The Company will receive prices as noted in the table below and will pay a counterparty market price based on the NYMEX (for natural gas production) or WTI (for oil production) index price, settled monthly.

 

Product

 

Type

 

Contract Period

 

Volume

 

Price per
Mcf or Bbl

 

Oil

 

Brent Put

 

04/01/13  09/30/13

 

1,375 Bbl/d

 

$

70.00

 

Oil

 

Brent Swap

 

10/01/13  09/30/14

 

700 Bbl/d

 

$

104.30

 

Gas

 

Swap

 

04/01/13  12/31/13

 

7,000 MMBtu/d

 

$

3.39

 

Gas

 

Swap

 

01/01/14  12/31/14

 

7,000 MMBtu/d

 

$

3.79

 

Gas

 

Swap

 

05/01/13  12/31/14

 

2,000 MMBtu/d

 

$

4.18

 

 

The tables below summarize the amount of gains (losses) recognized in income from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments under authoritative guidance.

 

Derivatives not designated as

 

For the Three Months

 

For the Six Months

 

Hedging Instrument under

 

Ended June 30,

 

Ended June 30,

 

authoritative guidance

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized cash settlements on hedges

 

$

(509

)

$

(474

)

$

(677

)

$

(854

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on hedges

 

3,769

 

963

 

2,372

 

465

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

3,260

 

$

489

 

$

1,695

 

$

(389

)

 

The table below reflects the line item in our Consolidated Balance Sheet where the fair value of our net derivatives, are included.

 

June 30, 2013

 

 

 

Derivative Assets

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance Sheet
Location

 

Fair Value

 

Commodity—Oil

 

current

 

$

961

 

Commodity—Natural Gas

 

current

 

(66

)

Commodity—Oil

 

Non-current

 

457

 

Commodity—Natural Gas

 

Non-current

 

(147

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

$

1,205

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance Sheet
Location

 

Fair Value

 

Commodity—Natural Gas

 

current

 

$

(457

)

Commodity—Oil

 

current

 

72

 

Commodity—Oil

 

Non-current

 

(567

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

$

(952

)

 

Derivative’s Credit risk

 

The Company does not require collateral or other security from counterparties to support derivative instruments. However, the agreements with those counterparties typically contain netting provisions such that if a default occurs, the non-defaulting party can offset the amount payable to the defaulting party under the derivative contract with the amount due from the defaulting party. As a result of the netting provisions the Company’s maximum amount of loss due to credit risk is limited to the net amounts due to and from the counterparties under the derivative contracts.

 

As of June 30, 2013, the counterparty to the Company’s commodity derivative contracts consisted of one financial institution. The Company’s counterparty is also a lender under the Company’s Senior Credit Agreement. As a result, the counterparty to the Company’s derivative agreements shares in the collateral supporting the Company’s Senior Credit Agreement. The Company is not generally required to post additional collateral under derivative agreements.

 

The Company’s derivative agreements contain provisions that require cross defaults and acceleration of those instruments to any material debt. If the Company were to default on any of its material debt agreements, it would be a violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment on derivative instruments that are in a net liability position at that time.