XML 40 R47.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 17 - Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Abstract]  
Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]
The calculation of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share was as follows:
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Net income (loss)—basic
$
153,590

 
$
(12,682
)
 
$
531,182

 
$
(233,354
)
Adjustment for dilutive Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 (1)
5,552

 

 
16,510

 

Net income (loss)—diluted
$
159,142

 
$
(12,682
)
 
$
547,692

 
$
(233,354
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average common shares outstanding—basic
191,050

 
171,830

 
182,357

 
162,828

Dilutive effect of Convertible Senior Notes due 2017
6,342

 

 
7,665

 

Dilutive effect of Convertible Senior Notes due 2019
37,736

 

 
37,736

 

Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation arrangements (2)
2,939

 

 
2,904

 

Adjusted average common shares outstanding—diluted
238,067


171,830

 
230,662

 
162,828

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) per share—basic
$
0.80

 
$
(0.07
)
 
$
2.91

 
$
(1.43
)
Net income (loss) per share—diluted
$
0.67

 
$
(0.07
)
 
$
2.37

 
$
(1.43
)
________________
(1)
As applicable, includes coupon interest, amortization of discount and fees, and other changes in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion.
(2)
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, 557,240 shares of our common stock equivalents issued under our stock-based compensation arrangements were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share as of such date because they were anti-dilutive. As a result of our net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, 43,289,967 shares of our common stock equivalents issued under our stock-based compensation arrangements and convertible debt were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share as of such date because they were anti-dilutive.