XML 112 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 9 - Reinsurance
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Reinsurance Disclosures [Abstract]  
Reinsurance [Text Block]
Reinsurance
In our mortgage insurance business, we use reinsurance as a risk management tool to reduce our net risk in force, in order to strengthen our regulatory risk-to-capital ratio, and to comply with the insurance regulations of states that require us to limit our coverage percentage of any single risk to 25%. We have primarily used reinsurance in our financial guaranty business to the extent necessary in specific transactions to comply with applicable single risk limits. Although the use of reinsurance does not discharge an insurer from its primary liability to the insured, the reinsuring company assumes the related liability under these arrangements. Included in other assets are unearned premiums on risk that we have ceded of $0.8 million and $1.0 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The effect of reinsurance on net premiums written and earned is as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
(In thousands)
2011
 
2010
2009
 
Net premiums written-insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct
$
755,758

 
$
788,321

  
$
790,052

 
Assumed
(11,162
)
 
(6,585
)
 
(207,074
)
(1) 
Ceded
(37,349
)
 
(89,855
)
 
(139,130
)
 
Net premiums written-insurance
$
707,247

 
$
691,881

  
$
443,848

 
Net premiums earned-insurance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct
$
762,428

 
$
891,167

  
$
919,778

 
Assumed
32,337

 
29,063

  
45,749

 
Ceded
(38,740
)
 
(94,497
)
 
(139,626
)
 
Net premiums earned-insurance
$
756,025

 
$
825,733

  
$
825,901

 

_____________
(1)
This amount includes a $185.6 million reduction related to the commutation of $9.8 billion in net par outstanding.

We and other companies in the mortgage insurance industry have participated in reinsurance arrangements with mortgage lenders commonly referred to as “captive reinsurance arrangements.” Under captive reinsurance arrangements, a mortgage lender typically establishes a reinsurance company that assumes part of the risk associated with the portfolio of that lender’s mortgages insured by us on a flow basis (as compared to mortgages insured in structured transactions, which typically are not eligible for captive reinsurance arrangements). In return for the reinsurance company’s assumption of a portion of the risk, we cede a portion of the mortgage insurance premiums paid to us to the reinsurance company. The captive reinsurers are typically required to maintain minimum capitalization equal to 10% of the risk assumed. We have concluded that all of our captive reinsurance arrangements transfer risk to the captive reinsurer. We have also offered, on a limited basis, “quota share” captive reinsurance agreements under which the captive reinsurance company assumes a pro rata share of all losses in return for a pro rata share of the premiums collected.
In most cases, the risk assumed by the reinsurance company is an excess layer of aggregate losses that would be penetrated only in a situation of adverse loss development. However, during the recent housing and related credit market downturn in which losses have increased significantly, many captive reinsurance arrangements have attached, requiring our captive reinsurers to make payments to us. In all cases, the captive reinsurer establishes a trust to secure our potential cash recoveries. We generally are the sole beneficiary under these trusts, and therefore have the ability to initiate disbursements under the trusts in accordance with the terms of our captive reinsurance agreements.

We have protected against losses in excess of our expectations on some of the risk associated with non-prime and riskier products by reinsuring this business through Smart Home reinsurance transactions. In 2004, we developed Smart Home as a way to effectively transfer risk from our portfolio to investors in the capital markets. Smart Home mitigates our risk against losses, concentrated positions and riskier products. Since 2004, we have completed four Smart Home reinsurance transactions. In 2011, we exercised our option to terminate two of these transactions, with RIF of approximately $41 million. The two remaining transactions will mature within the next 18 months (one in November 2012 and one in June 2013), and the ultimate recoverable amounts from these transactions will be dependent upon the amount and timing of paid losses in these transactions through their respective maturity dates, or the dates on which they are otherwise terminated. Approximately 2.7% and 3.2% of our primary mortgage risk in force was ceded through Smart Home reinsurance transactions at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In these transactions, we reinsure the middle layer risk positions, while retaining a significant portion of the total risk comprising the first-loss and most remote risk positions.
All of our existing captive reinsurance arrangements are operating on a run-off basis, meaning that no new business is being placed in these captives. In 2010, we terminated many of our remaining captive reinsurance arrangements on a “cut-off” basis, meaning that the terminated captive arrangements were dissolved and all outstanding liabilities to us were settled. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we terminated two large captive reinsurance arrangements representing $6.0 billion of risk in force. In connection with these terminations, we received $321 million of cash and investments from the captive trust account, which are accounted for as claims recoveries. Since inception, we have received total cash reinsurance recoveries (including recoveries from terminations) from Smart Home and captive reinsurance arrangements of approximately $673.2 million. In some instances, we anticipate that the ultimate recoveries from the captive reinsurers will be greater than the assets currently held by the segregated trusts established for each captive reinsurer. Recorded recoverables, however, are limited to the current trust balances. We expect that most of the actual cash recoveries from those captives that have not yet been terminated will be received over the next few years.
The reinsurance recoverable amounts on paid losses are considered to be financing receivables in accordance with the accounting standard regarding accounts receivable, which includes disclosure requirements regarding the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. We do not record an allowance for credit losses on reinsurance recoverables, as the reinsurance recoverable amounts for both paid and unpaid losses are fully collateralized in the segregated trusts. Therefore, credit exposure is limited to the credit quality of investments held by the trust. Trust assets related to our captive and Smart Home arrangements are required to be invested in investment-grade securities. As of December 31, 2011, the trust assets for these trust accounts consist primarily of cash equivalents, money market investments and investment-grade securities.
The following tables present information related to our captive and Smart Home transactions as of the dates indicated:
 
Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)
2011
 
2010
Risk in force ceded under captive reinsurance arrangements
$
340.8

 
$
420.6

Ceded losses recoverable related to captives
90.1

 
151.7

Ceded losses recoverable related to Smart Home
67.9

 
93.2


Approximately 25.6% of our total ceded losses recoverable at December 31, 2011, were related to two captive reinsurers.
 
Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)
2011
 
2010
 
2009
Ceded premiums written related to captives
$
28.6

 
$
80.1

 
$
128.3

Ceded premiums earned related to captives
28.8

 
83.4

 
129.8

Ceded premiums written related to Smart Home
8.8

 
9.8

 
10.9

Ceded premiums earned related to Smart Home
8.8

 
9.8

 
10.9

Ceded recoveries, excluding amounts received upon terminations of captive reinsurance transactions
84.5

 
134.7

 
31.3


Historically, Radian Asset Assurance has ceded only an immaterial amount of its directly insured portfolio. However, in January 2012, Radian Asset Assurance ceded approximately $1.8 billion of its direct public finance net par outstanding and entered into an administrative services agreement with such ceding company for surveillance, risk management, claims administration and claims payment services in connection with the policies ceded. See Note 1 and 21 for additional information regarding this transaction.