XML 37 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 9 - Fair Value Measurement of Instruments
3 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF INSTRUMENTS


The Company adopted ASC 820 on October 1, 2008. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair vale measurements under ASC 820 is as follows:


Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.


Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.


Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.


Interest Rate Swap


On March 30, 2012, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that fixes the interest rate on its term loan in order to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates. This interest rate derivative instrument has been designated as a cash flow hedge of our expected interest payments under the FASB’s ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” This instrument effectively converts variable interest payments on the term loan into fixed payments. In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the hedging derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the hedged item affects earnings. The change in fair value of any ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings. The fair value of the interest rate swap is determined using an internal valuation model which relies on the expected LIBOR yield curve as the most significant input. Additionally included in the model are estimates of counterparty and the Company’s non-performance risk as the most significant inputs. Because each of these inputs are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, we have categorized the interest rate swap as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.   


The fair value of the swap as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, was as follows (amounts in thousands):


Description

 

Total

   

Level 1

   

Level 2

   

Level 3

 
                                 

Interest Rate Swap

                               

As of December 31, 2013

  $ 62       -     $ 62       -  

As of September 30, 2013

    122       -       122       -  

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

 

Change in Unrealized Gain

 
         

Interest Rate Swap

       
         

Three months ended December 31, 2013

  $ 60  

Three months ended December 31, 2012

    26  

We did not record any ineffectiveness in earnings related to the interest rate swap for the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. As of December 31, 2013, no deferred gains or losses are expected to be reclassified into earnings as interest expense related to the interest rate swap over the next twelve months as we expect the hedging relationship will remain unchanged.