10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2012

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 000-21574

DYNACQ HEALTHCARE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	76-0375477
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4301 Vista Road Pasadena, Texas	77504
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(713) 378-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes   x      No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

     Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (Check One):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

     Yes   ¨     No   x

As of July 13, 2012, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.001 per share, was 14,543,626.

Table of Contents

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		3
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION		4
Item 1. Financial Statements		4
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011		4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011		6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011		7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		34
PART II–OTHER INFORMATION		34
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		34
Item 1A. Risk Factors		34
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		34
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		34
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		34
Item 5. Other Information		35
Item 6. Exhibits		35
Signatures		36
Index of Exhibits		37

2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To: The Stockholders and Board of Directors

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Houston, Texas

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”), as of May 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three-month and nine-month periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., as of August 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended not presented herein, and in our report dated November 16, 2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 2011, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ KWCO, P.C.

KWCO, P.C.

Houston, Texas

July 13, 2012

3

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM I—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	May 31, 2012		August 31, 2011
	(Reviewed)		(Audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12,758,429	$	24,315,160
Accounts receivable, net of contractual allowances of approximately $188,615,000 and $188,513,000 at May 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011, respectively		455,778		1,192,279
Inventories		413,132		550,441
Trading securities		1,272,541		1,471,644
Interest receivable		232,417		192,366
Prepaid expenses		194,947		272,414
Income tax receivable		2,363,724		2,363,724
Assets of discontinued operations		6,580,101		6,909,527
Total current assets		24,271,069		37,267,555
Investments available-for-sale		15,501,936		18,722,274
Investment in real estate, net		1,902,306		1,941,041
Property and equipment, net		6,892,718		7,168,864
Income tax receivable		868,249		868,249
Deferred tax asset		1,529,856		—
Other assets		256,684		255,517
Total assets	$	51,222,818	$	66,223,500

See accompanying notes.

4

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)

	May 31, 2012		August 31, 2011
	(Reviewed)		(Audited)
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,861,632	$	2,346,720
Accrued liabilities		13,723,607		18,430,553
Current portion of notes payable		113,646		97,918
Current portion of capital lease obligations		99,726		94,044
Liabilities of discontinued operations		615,598		604,302
Total current liabilities		16,414,209		21,573,537
Non-current liabilities:
Long-term portion of notes payable		1,100,173		1,093,961
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations		113,640		189,161
Total liabilities		17,628,022		22,856,659
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Dynacq stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 14,543,626 and 14,426,960 shares issued at May 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011		14,544		14,427
Additional paid-in capital		10,093,456		9,780,837
Accumulated other comprehensive income		4,622,133		7,453,676
Retained earnings		18,784,332		26,054,284
Total Dynacq stockholders’ equity		33,514,465		43,303,224
Non-controlling interest		80,331		63,617
Total equity		33,594,796		43,366,841
Total liabilities and equity	$	51,222,818	$	66,223,500

See accompanying notes.

5

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Reviewed)

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net patient service revenue	$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		2,300,193			1,754,926			5,996,874			5,358,769
Medical services and supplies		460,642			366,479			1,027,268			1,150,499
Other operating expenses		1,109,737			1,677,564			3,781,862			5,031,752
Depreciation and amortization		160,317			37,456			470,415			128,410
Total costs and expenses		4,030,889			3,836,425			11,276,419			11,669,430
Operating loss		(3,110,227	)		(12,308,597	)		(7,544,068	)		(16,002,974	)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income (expense)		(286,070	)		335,539			974,372			1,312,805
Interest income		349,032			377,314			955,235			1,117,767
Interest expense		(144,134	)		(1,631,414	)		(438,723	)		(1,651,714	)
Total other income (expense), net		(81,172	)		(918,561	)		1,490,884			778,858
Loss before income taxes from continuing operations		(3,191,399	)		(13,227,158	)		(6,053,184	)		(15,224,116	)
Benefit for income taxes		—			4,601,332			—			5,268,011
Loss from continuing operations		(3,191,399	)		(8,625,826	)		(6,053,184	)		(9,956,105	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(388,641	)		(1,400,360	)		(1,120,854	)		(2,785,269	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			(229,201	)		(121,577	)
Net loss		(3,580,040	)		(10,026,186	)		(7,403,239	)		(12,862,951	)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		49,767			1,531			133,287			4,294
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(3,530,273	)	$	(10,024,655	)	$	(7,269,952	)	$	(12,858,657	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.61	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.70	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(0.03	)		(0.10	)		(0.08	)		(0.20	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			(0.02	)		(0.01	)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.71	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.91	)
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding		14,543,626			14,176,960			14,473,626			14,176,960
Amounts attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(3,141,632	)	$	(8,624,295	)	$	(5,919,897	)	$	(9,951,811	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(388,641	)		(1,400,360	)		(1,120,854	)		(2,785,269	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			(229,201	)		(121,577	)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(3,530,273	)	$	(10,024,655	)	$	(7,269,952	)	$	(12,858,657	)

See accompanying notes.

6

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Reviewed)

	Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(7,269,952	)	$	(12,858,657	)
Less loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		1,350,055			2,906,846
Net loss before discontinued operations		(5,919,897	)		(9,951,811	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss before discontinued operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		470,415			128,410
Loss (gain) on trading securities		206,726			(33,504	)
Deferred income taxes		(1,655,662	)		(4,416,605	)
Noncontrolling interest		(133,287	)		(4,294	)
Charge for stock options to employees		196,070			82,620
Charge for non-controlling interest sale and issuance of stock awards		166,666			—
Foreign currency exchange losses (gains)		309,759			(243,389	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		736,501			1,271,784
Interest receivable		(40,051	)		(22,955	)
Inventories		137,309			92,400
Prepaid expenses		77,467			113,353
Income taxes receivable		—			1,663,059
Other assets		(1,671	)		12,721
Accounts payable		(485,088	)		75,620
Accrued liabilities		(4,731,433	)		11,841,880
Cash provided by (used in) continuing activities		(10,666,176	)		609,289
Cash used in discontinued activities		(1,032,418	)		(2,171,929	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(11,698,594	)		(1,562,640	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of trading securities		—			(5,330,795	)
Sales proceeds of trading securities		—			4,064,743
Purchase of equipment		(159,919	)		(42,124	)
Cash used in continuing activities		(159,919	)		(1,308,176	)
Cash provided by (used in) discontinued activities		14,000			(67,059	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(145,919	)		(1,375,235	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from notes payable		116,339			65,000
Principal payments on notes payable		(94,400	)		(68,490	)
Payments on capital lease		(69,839	)		(29,994	)
Contributions from, and distributions to, noncontrolling interest, net		100,000			—
Cash provided by (used in) continuing activities		52,100			(33,484	)
Cash used in discontinued activities		—			(69,687	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		52,100			(103,171	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		235,682			679,088
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(11,556,731	)		(2,361,958	)
Cash at beginning of period		24,315,160			27,665,945
Cash at end of period	$	12,758,429		$	25,303,987

Continued.

7

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

(Reviewed)

	Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	737,816		$	32,974
Income taxes	$	0		$	0
Non cash investing and financing activities:
Investments available-for-sale	$	(2,902,956	)	$	2,819,914
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,886,921			(1,832,944	)
Deferred tax liabilities		1,016,035			(986,970	)
Equipment from capital lease (discontinued operations)		—			34,592
Capital lease obligation (discontinued operations)		—			(34,592	)

See accompanying notes.

8

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

May 31, 2012

(reviewed)

General

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), is a holding company that through its subsidiaries in the United States develops and manages general acute care hospitals that principally provide specialized surgeries. The Company through its subsidiaries in China and Hong Kong also (1) provided healthcare management services to a hospital in China until February 28, 2011; and (2) invests in debt and equity securities, including short-term investments in initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings. The Company through its United States subsidiaries (1) owns and operates one general acute care hospital in Pasadena, Texas, and (2) owns one general acute care hospital in Garland, Texas, which was closed on September 30, 2011, and accordingly this business is classified as “Discontinued Operations” for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 (see Note below on Discontinued Operations). The Company is currently composed of two divisions: U.S. and Corporate.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying reviewed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The majority of the Company’s expenses are “cost of revenue” items. Costs that could be classified as general and administrative by the Company would include the corporate office costs, including advertising and marketing expenses, which were approximately $1.5 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $4.3 million and $4.8 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These reviewed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements at August 31, 2011. Operating results for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending August 31, 2012.

Reorganization of Segments and Reclassification

The Industry Segment “U.S. Division” comprises of the Company’s Pasadena facility. In the prior year it was classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Company at the present time has the U.S. Division and the Corporate Division. Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. The impact of such reclassification was not significant to the prior year’s overall presentation, except for (1) presenting the Pasadena facility as continuing operations under U.S. Division, which was presented in the prior year as discontinued operations, and (2) the presentation of the various subsidiaries (except for Dynacq Huai Bei Healthcare, Inc. (“Dynacq-Huai Bei”) and Sino Bond Inc. Limited (“Sino Bond”), which are now shown as part of the Corporate Division) in China as discontinued operations under the Corporate Division, which in the previous year was shown as part of continuing operations under the China Division.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Investments in Available-for-Sale and Trading Securities

The Company has invested in various bonds. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012, based on the quoted market prices as of that date. These investments are subject to default risk. The Company intends to hold these for a minimum period of an additional 12 months. Unrealized gains in the fair value are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related income tax effect. The Company monitors its investment portfolio for any decline in fair value that is other than temporary and records any such impairment as an impairment loss.

9

The Company also invests in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. These investments are classified as trading securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012. These investments are subject to fluctuations in the market price. During the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had a net gain (loss) of $(206,726) and $33,504 in trading of these securities, respectively.

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable

In March 2010, the Company purchased an apartment in Hong Kong as an investment for $2,014,207. This apartment was used as a security to obtain an 18-year mortgage loan of $1,245,775 from a financial institution, with a variable interest rate at the lower of 3-month Hang Seng Interbank Offered Rates plus 0.7% or 2.9% below the Hong Kong Dollar best lending rate quoted by the financial institution. The effective interest rate at May 31, 2012 was 1.1%. The Company has paid down $48,085 and $47,657 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and the current and long-term portions of the note payable as of May 31, 2012 are $64,385 and $1,043,258, respectively. Depreciation expense associated with the apartment was $12,912 in each year for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, and $38,735 in each year for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011.

In November 2011 and September 2010, the Company borrowed $116,339 and $65,000 as notes payable from a financial institution at an interest rate of 4.5% and 6%, which notes are to be repaid in 36 and 24 monthly installments, respectively, and are secured by specific equipments purchased at our Pasadena facility. The Company has paid down $46,315 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012, and the current and long-term portions of the notes payable as of May 31, 2012 are $49,261 and $56,914, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of medical supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by use of the average cost method.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant of the Company’s estimates is the determination of revenue to recognize for the services the Company provides and the determination of the contractual allowance. See “Revenue Recognition” below for further discussion. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates used in the preparation of these financial statements.

Discontinued Operations

Under ASC Topic 360-10-35, Property, Plant, and Equipment – Subsequent Measurement (formerly referred to as SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), we classify assets to be disposed of as held for sale or, if appropriate, discontinued operations when they have received appropriate approvals to be disposed of by our management or Board of Directors. Cash flows from our discontinued businesses are reflected as discontinued operating, investing, and financing activities in our statement of cash flows. We had $6,580,101 of assets of discontinued operations and $615,598 of liabilities of discontinued operations as of May 31, 2012.

U.S. Division

The Company had made the decision to sell its Garland facility as of August 31, 2010, and its operation was classified as discontinued operations for the year ended August 31, 2010. However, the Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and accordingly its operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 continue to be classified as discontinued operations. The Company plans to either sell the Garland facility or pursue converting it into an ambulatory surgical center, if and when the Company can identify and generate a steady referral source for outpatient cases. The Company intended to sell its Pasadena facility also, and had it classified as discontinued operations, as of August 31, 2010. However, since a sale was not consummated during the 12-month period following the decision to sell, the operations of the Pasadena facility have been reclassified as continuing operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The Company is continuing to revamp its operations at the Pasadena facility by modifying the business model and controlling expenses. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in turning the facility around.

10

The Company had an independent appraisal done for both the hospitals in October 2011, and based on each hospital’s valuation, expected sale proceeds, and expected cash flows has determined that there is no impairment charge required in connection with the foregoing disposal activities. Because we do not intend to sell the accounts receivable of hospitals in discontinued operations, the receivables are included in our accounts receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Corporate Division

The Company’s operations at Second People’s Hospital and its various proposed businesses in China, including but not limited to sandstone mining, mined coal trading, natural gas stations and sale of artifacts have been classified as discontinued operations. The Company’s two foreign subsidiaries, Dynacq-Huai Bei and Sino Bond, are the only two companies that continue to be classified as continuing operations, and its other foreign subsidiaries have been reclassified as discontinued operations.

The following is a summary of financial information related to our discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. We have reclassified prior period financial statements to exclude these businesses from continuing operations.

11

Discontinued Operations

	Three months ended May 31, 2012								Three months ended May 31, 2011
	U.S. Division			Corporate Division		Total			U.S. Division			Corporate Division			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	24,887		$	—	$	24,887		$	(453,291	)	$	—		$	(453,291	)
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		11,049			—		11,049			663,636			509			664,145
Medical services and supplies		—			—		—			201,884			—			201,884
Other operating expenses		338,388			—		338,388			536,330			218,868			755,198
Depreciation and amortization		—			—		—			—			5,053			5,053
Total costs and expenses		349,437			—		349,437			1,401,850			224,430			1,626,280
Operating loss		(324,550	)		—		(324,550	)		(1,855,141	)		(224,430	)		(2,079,571	)
Other income (expense), net		(64,091	)		—		(64,091	)		(122,998	)		48,902			(74,096	)
Loss before income taxes		(388,641	)		—		(388,641	)		(1,978,139	)		(175,528	)		(2,153,667	)
Benefit for income taxes		—			—		—			671,957			81,350			753,307
Loss on discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(388,641	)		—		(388,641	)		(1,306,182	)		(94,178	)		(1,400,360	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets		—			—		—			—			—			—
Benefit for income taxes		—			—		—			—			—			—
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets, net of income taxes		—			—		—			—			—			—
Total loss on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	(388,641	)	$	—	$	(388,641	)	$	(1,306,182	)	$	(94,178	)	$	(1,400,360	)

	Nine months ended May 31, 2012									Nine months ended May 31, 2011
	U.S. Division			Corporate Division			Total			U.S. Division			Corporate Division			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	343,474		$	—		$	343,474		$	834,758		$	831,232		$	1,665,990
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		177,852			22,511			200,363			1,998,554			556,609			2,555,163
Medical services and supplies		267,551			—			267,551			678,135			406,452			1,084,587
Other operating expenses		871,503			98,493			969,996			1,818,635			577,100			2,395,735
Depreciation and amortization		—			5,175			5,175			—			26,233			26,233
Total costs and expenses		1,316,906			126,179			1,443,085			4,495,324			1,566,394			6,061,718
Operating loss		(973,432	)		(126,179	)		(1,099,611	)		(3,660,566	)		(735,162	)		(4,395,728	)
Other income (expense), net		(85,147	)		63,904			(21,243	)		(120,185	)		240,376			120,191
Loss before income taxes		(1,058,579	)		(62,275	)		(1,120,854	)		(3,780,751	)		(494,786	)		(4,275,537	)
Benefit for income taxes		—			—			—			1,257,175			233,093			1,490,268
Loss on discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(1,058,579	)		(62,275	)		(1,120,854	)		(2,523,576	)		(261,693	)		(2,785,269	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets		—			(229,201	)		(229,201	)		—			(187,041	)		(187,041	)
Benefit for income taxes		—			—			—			—			65,464			65,464
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets, net of income taxes		—			(229,201	)		(229,201	)		—			(121,577	)		(121,577	)
Total loss on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	(1,058,579	)	$	(291,476	)	$	(1,350,055	)	$	(2,523,576	)	$	(383,270	)	$	(2,906,846	)

12

	May 31, 2012						August 31, 2011
	U.S. Division		Corporate Division		Total		U.S. Division		Corporate Division		Total
Current assets	$	—	$	120,954	$	120,954	$	260,020	$	118,734	$	378,754
Property and equipment, net		6,459,147		—		6,459,147		6,530,773		—		6,530,773
Total assets	$	6,459,147	$	120,954	$	6,580,101	$	6,790,793	$	118,734	$	6,909,527
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	—	$	615,598	$	615,598	$	—	$	604,302	$	604,302
Total liabilities	$	—	$	615,598	$	615,598	$	—	$	604,302	$	604,302

13

Net Loss per Share

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to the Company:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(3,191,399	)	$	(8,625,826	)	$	(6,053,184	)	$	(9,956,105	)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		49,767			1,531			133,287			4,294
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.		(3,141,632	)		(8,624,295	)		(5,919,897	)		(9,951,811	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(388,641	)		(1,400,360	)		(1,120,854	)		(2,785,269	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			(229,201	)		(121,577	)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(3,530,273	)	$	(10,024,655	)	$	(7,269,952	)	$	(12,858,657	)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding		14,543,626			14,176,960			14,473,626			14,176,960
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.61	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.70	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(0.03	)		(0.10	)		(0.08	)		(0.20	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			(0.02	)		(0.01	)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.71	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.91	)

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options determined using the treasury stock method. However, if it is anti-dilutive, the dilutive effect of the stock options is not included in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share. Stock options with exercise prices exceeding current market prices that were excluded from the computation of net income (loss) per share amounted to approximately 2,603,000 shares and 1,071,000 shares for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Stock Based Compensation

Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan

In August 2011, we mailed an Information Statement to all of our stockholders of record as of July 29, 2011. The Information Statement disclosed that our Board of Directors had approved, and the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock had executed an Action by Written Consent of Stockholders in Lieu of a Special Meeting (the “Written Consent”), approving the adoption of the Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”).

14

The purpose of the 2011 Plan is to strengthen the Company by providing an incentive to its employees, officers, consultants and directors and thereby encouraging them to devote their abilities and industry to the success of the Company’s business enterprise. It is intended that this purpose be achieved by extending to employees, officers, consultants and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries an added long-term incentive for high levels of performance and unusual efforts through the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance awards and restricted stock. The Company has reserved 15,000,000 shares of common stock for future issuance under the 2011 Plan.

On November 14, 2011, the Compensation Committee granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 200,000 shares under the 2011 Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $1.07 to two employees. These stock options will vest based on certain operating performance criteria, and expire after five years. The shares underlying these stock options are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).

On January 12, 2012, the Compensation Committee granted stock options to purchase 250,000 shares under the 2011 Plan, with an exercise price of $1.10 to the Company’s chief executive officer, Eric K. Chan. These stock options will vest in annual installments of 25 percent beginning on the first anniversary date, and expire after ten years. The shares underlying these stock options are registered under the Securities Act.

On February 6, 2012, the Compensation Committee granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of one million shares under the 2011 Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $1.00 to various employees. These stock options will vest based on certain operating performance criteria, and expire after five years. The shares underlying these stock options are registered under the Securities Act.

As of May 31, 2012, there remain 1,150,000 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and 13,850,000 shares which can be issued under the 2011 Plan after giving effect to shares issued and canceled.

2000 Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2000 Incentive Plan (“2000 Plan”) provides for options and other stock-based awards that may be granted to eligible employees, officers, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company or its subsidiaries. The 2000 Plan does not have a fixed termination date, provided that no incentive stock option can be granted subsequent to August 29, 2011. As of May 31, 2012, there remain 1,802,566 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and no new stock options awards will be issued under the 2000 Plan.

The 2011 Plan and the 2000 Plan (the “Plans”) are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The Committee has the power to determine which eligible employees will receive awards, the timing and manner of the grant of such awards, the exercise price of stock options (which may not be less than market value on the date of grant), the number of shares, and all of the terms of the awards. The Company may at any time amend or terminate the 2011 Plan. However, no amendment that would impair the rights of any participant with respect to outstanding grants can be made without the participant’s prior consent. Stockholder approval of an amendment to the Plans is necessary only when required by applicable law or stock exchange rules.

Generally, options granted become exercisable in annual installments of 25 percent beginning on the first anniversary date, and expire after five to ten years.

The following table summarizes the stock option activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 (share amounts in thousands):

	Shares			Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1)
Outstanding, August 31, 2011		2,206		$	2.41	$	—	$	—
Granted		1,450			1.03		0.52		—
Exercised		—			—		—		—
Expired or canceled		(703	)		1.67		—		—
Outstanding, May 31, 2012		2,953		$	1.91	$	—	$	—

⁽¹⁾  These amounts represent the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of Dynacq common stock on May 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011, as reported on the NASDAQ stock market, for all in-the-money options outstanding. For exercised options, intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of Dynacq common stock on the date of exercise.

15

For the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no stock options exercised.

The following summarizes information related to stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2012, and related weighted average price and life information:

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
	(Share Amounts In Thousands)
$ 1.00 – 1.10		1,150		6.0	$	1.03		—	$	—
$ 1.86		994		9.1		1.86		—		—
$ 2.50 – 2.75		576		1.1		2.54		576		2.54
$ 4.90 – 4.96		233		2.4		4.90		233		4.90
Total		2,953		5.8	$	1.91		809	$	3.22

For the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $46,136 and $78,369, respectively. For the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $196,070 and $82,620, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding stock options as of May 31, 2012 was $1,126,000, and will be recognized, in general, over 3.5 years. The weighted average time to recognize the compensation expense is 1.8 years.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

On September 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC Topic 825-10-25, “Financial Instruments” (formerly referred to as SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (“SFAS 159”)), which permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The adoption of ASC Topic 825-10-25 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements because the Company did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or financial liabilities that were not already recorded at fair value.

On September 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (formerly referred to as SFAS 157) for our financial assets and liabilities. Management uses the fair value hierarchy of ASC Topic 820, which gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets. The fair value of financial instruments is estimated based on market trading information, where available. Absent published market values for an instrument or other assets, management uses observable market data to arrive at its estimates of fair value. Management believes that the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2	Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted price for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other input that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

16

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance related to fair value disclosure requirements. The new guidance resulted in a change in the Company’s accounting policy effective March 1, 2010. Under this guidance, companies will be required to make additional disclosures concerning significant transfers of amounts between the Level 1 and Level 2 fair value disclosures, as well as further disaggregation of the types of activity that were previously disclosed in the rollforward of Level 3 fair value disclosures. Further, the guidance clarifies the level of aggregation of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy that may be presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured and reported in the Company’s statement of financial position at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2012, segregated among the appropriate levels within the fair value hierarchy:

	Quoted prices in active markets for identical		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$	—	$	15,501,936	$	—
Trading securities		1,272,541		—		—

The Company’s investments in Level 1 are in equity stocks at a cost of $1,967,570. The Company’s investments in Level 2 are in perpetual bonds traded on the European markets, at a cost of $8,435,146.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company as a whole is the U.S. Dollar. The Company has designated the Chinese Yuan Renminbi as the functional currency for its subsidiaries in mainland China, and the U.S. Dollar for Sino Bond in Hong Kong. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Income and expense are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income within Stockholders’ Equity.

Revenue Recognition

Background

The Company’s revenue recognition policy is significant because net patient service revenue is a primary component of its results of operations. Revenue is recognized as services are delivered. The determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in connection with the Company’s services is subject to significant judgments and estimates, which are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company has established billing rates for its medical services which it bills as gross revenue as services are delivered. Gross billed revenues are then reduced by the Company’s estimate of the discount (contractual allowance) to arrive at net patient service revenues. Net patient service revenues may not represent amounts ultimately collected. The Company adjusts current period revenue for actual differences in estimated revenue recorded in prior periods and actual cash collections.

17

Contractual Allowance

The Company computes its contractual allowance based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months. The following table shows gross revenues and contractual allowances for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Gross billed charges	$	4,597,898		$	5,267,354		$	13,344,516		$	16,192,097
Contractual allowance(1)		3,677,236			13,739,526			9,612,165			20,525,641
Net revenue	$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)
Contractual allowance percentage(1)		80	%		261	%		72	%		127	%

⁽¹⁾ The contractual allowance percentage, excluding the stop-loss fee dispute amount booked in the quarter ended May 31, 2011, which is discussed below, would have been 66% and 63% for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively.

A significant amount of our net revenue results from Texas workers’ compensation claims, which are governed by the rules and regulations of the Texas Department of Workers’ Compensation (“TDWC”) and the workers’ compensation healthcare networks. If our hospital chooses to participate in a network, the amount of revenue that will be generated from workers’ compensation claims will be governed by the network contract.

For claims arising prior to the implementation of workers’ compensation networks and out of network claims, inpatient and outpatient surgical services are either reimbursed pursuant to the Acute Care In-Patient Hospital Fee Guideline or at a “fair and reasonable” rate for services in which the fee guideline is not applicable. Starting March 1, 2008, the Texas Workers’ Compensation 2008 Acute Care Hospital Outpatient and Inpatient Facility Fee Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) became effective. Under these Guidelines, the reimbursement amounts are determined by applying the most recently adopted and effective Medicare reimbursement formula and factors; however, if the maximum allowable reimbursement for the procedure performed cannot be calculated using these Guidelines, then reimbursement is determined on a fair and reasonable basis.

Based on these Guidelines, the reimbursement due the Company for workers’ compensation cases is lower than we previously experienced. The Company has continued accepting Texas workers’ compensation cases, and has not made any substantial changes in its focus towards such cases. Our net patient service revenue for Texas workers’ compensation cases as a percentage of gross billings has decreased primarily as a result of lower reimbursement rates for workers’ compensation procedures still being performed.

Should we disagree with the amount of reimbursement provided by a third-party payer, we are required to pursue the MDR process at the TDWC to request proper reimbursement for services. From January 2007 to November 2008, the Company had been successful in its pursuit of collections regarding the stop-loss cases pending before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (“SOAH”), receiving positive rulings in over 90% of its claims presented for administrative determination. The 2007 district court decision upholding our interpretation of the statute as applied to the stop-loss claims was appealed by certain insurance carriers, and on November 13, 2008 the Third Court of Appeals determined that in order for a hospital to be reimbursed at 75% of its usual and customary audited charges for an inpatient admission, the hospital must not only bill at least $40,000, but also show that the admission involved unusually costly and unusually extensive services. Procedurally, the decision means that each case where a carrier raised an issue regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly or unusually extensive would be remanded to either SOAH or MDR for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided meet these standards, once the definitions of those standards are determined. As a result of the Third Court of Appeals opinion, any stop-loss cases pending at SOAH have been remanded to the TDWC since these cases have not been reviewed or decided by the two-prong standard decided by the Third Court of Appeals. The SOAH Administrative Law judges determined that the most appropriate location for these cases is the TDWC, pending a final, non-appealable decision.

A petition asking the Texas Supreme Court to review the Third Court of Appeals decision has been denied. Therefore, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals decision. The Texas Supreme Court’s decision has further delayed final adjudication in these pending stop-loss cases. The uncertain outcome in these cases will depend on a very lengthy process. We anticipate further, lengthy litigation at the Travis County District Courts and the Texas Courts of Appeals. Because of this lengthy process and the uncertainty of recovery in these cases, collection of a material amount of funds in these pending stop-loss cases is not anticipated during the 2012 fiscal year.

18

Through May 2012, insurance carriers have voluntarily paid the awards in the decisions and orders issued by SOAH, plus interest, in approximately 180 cases, involving approximately $11 million in claims. In most of these cases, the carriers have requested refunds of the payments made in the event that the SOAH decisions and orders are reversed on appeal. Our request that the TDWC Commissioner enforce the awards which were not voluntarily paid by the carriers was refused in approximately 130 cases. Motions filed seeking a refund in some cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid have been granted and the Company has been ordered to refund approximately $3.7 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. In September and October 2011, the Company deposited these amounts as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. We anticipate that similar motions requesting remand and a refund for awards voluntarily paid will be filed and will likely be granted by the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. If and when these additional motions are granted, the Company will be ordered to refund an additional $7.7 million, not including prejudgment interest. The Company has appealed the judgments requiring a refund to the carriers. The appeal of the refund judgments will progress simultaneously to the adjudication of those cases remanded for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and will likely be ordered to be refunded. Once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that voluntary payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured.

Due to the uncertainties associated with these stop-loss fee dispute cases, in fiscal year 2011, the Company recognized an increase of $10,254,990 in the contractual allowance at our Pasadena facility (and an additional amount of $779,583 in the contractual allowance at our Garland facility, which is classified as discontinued operations), and $1,751,478 in interest expense at our Pasadena facility (and an additional interest expense of $132,339 at our Garland facility).

Claims regarding payment for hospital outpatient services remain pending at the TDWC. It is expected that these claims will be adjudicated at SOAH and ultimately in the Texas district and appellate courts. The basis for reimbursement for these services made the subject of these pending cases is the determination of “fair and reasonable” charges. In 2007, we received unfavorable rulings from SOAH in all of our appeals of unfavorable decisions related to services provided in 2001 and 2002. The 179 cases, which were appealed to the Travis County district courts, challenged the constitutionality of the relevant statutory language. The Company received an unfavorable ruling in its lead case in March 2009, which ruling was appealed to and was upheld by the Third Court of Appeals on August 26, 2010. The Texas Supreme Court denied a petition asking for review of the Third Court of Appeals decision. The unfavorable interpretation by the Texas Court of Appeal in our lead case negatively affects the recovery of additional reimbursement, not only in the lead case, but in the remaining 178 cases. Consequently, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals’ ruling that interprets the applicable statute and fee guideline to require that the amount that will be paid to a provider must not only be at a “fair and reasonable rate” but also must “ensure the quality of medical care” and “achieve effective cost control” and be the same or less than that charged to others with an equivalent standard of living. This ruling will impact cases in which a fee guideline was not applicable, specifically all pending cases involving ambulatory surgical services provided in 2001 and 2002 as well as all pending cases involving hospital outpatient services provided prior to March 1, 2008, when the Guidelines took effect. Since the Third Court of Appeals’ unfavorable ruling, collection, if any, in these cases depends on the Company’s ability to establish the criteria in this ruling. The Company was given the opportunity to establish the criteria in approximately 80 cases, which were set for hearing on the merits from March through May 2012. Post-Trial briefing is ongoing in these cases, and the first decision is expected by July 31, 2012. Additionally, the Company will have the opportunity to continue to establish the criteria in several hundred cases currently pending at SOAH during the 2012 and 2013 fiscal years.

We are currently pursuing claims against two healthcare agents relating to contracts with certain of our facilities which set out reimbursement guidelines by several workers’ compensation carriers at a minimum of 70% of the facility’s charges. Discovery is continuing on these claims to determine which carriers are involved, the amount of reimbursement due to us, and the data used to determine “usual and customary” market rates for medical services in specific geographic regions.

19

Due to the uncertainties regarding the accounts receivable in the MDR process, the 2008 and 2010 Third Court of Appeals’ opinions and our legal counsel’s advice that settlements with insurance carriers have virtually stopped, the Company had fully reserved all accounts receivable related to the MDR process as of August 31, 2008. Any monies collected for these MDR accounts receivable will be recorded as current period’s net patient service revenues.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable represent net receivables for services provided by the Company. At each balance sheet date management reviews the accounts receivable for collectibility.

The contractual allowance stated as a percentage of gross receivables at the balance sheet dates is larger than the contractual allowance percentage used to reduce gross billed charges due to the application of partial cash collections to the outstanding gross receivable balances, without any adjustment being made to the contractual allowance. The contractual allowance amounts netted against gross receivables are not adjusted until such time as the final collections on an individual receivable are recognized.

Discontinued Operations

Revenue Recognition Policy

In China, the local government Department of Health establishes billing rates for a hospital’s sale of prescription medication and medical services. A majority of the services provided by Second People’s Hospital is to cash pay patients, who pay for the services in advance. For services provided under the local government’s social healthcare insurance program, we are generally paid at approximately 95% of billed charges two to three months after the date of service. The remaining 5% of billed charges is evaluated by the local government Department of Health on a semi-annual basis and may be paid to the hospital after that evaluation is complete. As of February 28, 2011, the Company made the decision to terminate the management agreement with the Rui An City Department of Health, and is currently in negotiation with them to finalize the terms, including the effective date of termination. The Company incurred bad debt expenses of $24,755 in fiscal year 2011, prior to the termination of the management agreement on February 28, 2011, related to denials under the social healthcare insurance program. Since the amount of bad debt expense is minimal, it has been included with Other Operating Expenses in the income statement.

Noncontrolling Interest

The equity of minority investors (minority investors are generally physician groups and other healthcare providers that perform surgeries at the Company’s facilities) in certain subsidiaries of the Company is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest reported in the consolidated income statements reflect the respective interests in the income or loss of the limited partnerships or limited liability companies attributable to the minority investors (equity interest ranged from 1.75% to 3.00% at May 31, 2012).

Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive loss consists of net loss and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) represents certain components of revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are included in comprehensive loss, but are excluded from net loss. Other comprehensive income (loss) amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity, net of tax, and for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

20

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net loss	$	(3,530,273	)	$	(10,024,655	)	$	(7,269,952	)	$	(12,858,657	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $795, $62,028, $(12,549) and $228,097, respectively		1,480			115,197			(23,302	)		423,610
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency gains included in net income, net of taxes of $-0-, $-0-, $(501,273) and $-0-, respectively		—			—			(921,318	)		—
Change in valuation of investment available-for-sale, net of taxes of $(918,435), $628,420, $(1,016,034) and $986,970, respectively		(1,705,666	)		1,167,067			(1,886,922	)		1,832,944
Total other comprehensive loss, net of taxes		(5,234,459	)		(8,742,391	)		(10,101,494	)		(10,602,103	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—			—			—			—
Comprehensive loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(5,234,459	)	$	(8,742,391	)	$	(10,101,494	)	$	(10,602,103	)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:

	May 31, 2012		August 31, 2011
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $4,395 and $518,217, respectively	$	8,161	$	952,782
Change in valuation of investment available-for-sale, net of taxes of $2,484,447 and $3,500,481, respectively		4,613,972		6,500,894
Total accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes of $2,488,842 and $4,018,698, respectively	$	4,622,133	$	7,453,676

Contingencies

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company has recognized, in fiscal year 2011, an increase of $12.9 million in the contractual allowance and related interest expense at our Pasadena and Garland facilities. For a detailed discussion of this, see Revenue Recognition Policy under Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Motions filed seeking a refund in some cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid have been granted and the Company has been ordered to refund approximately $3.7 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. In September and October 2011, the Company deposited these amounts as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. We anticipate that similar motions requesting remand and a refund for awards voluntarily paid will be filed and will likely be granted by the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. If and when these additional motions are granted, the Company will be ordered to refund an additional $7.7 million, not including prejudgment interest. The Company has appealed the judgments requiring a refund to the carriers. The appeal of the refund judgments will progress simultaneously to the adjudication of those cases remanded for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and will likely be ordered to be refunded. Once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that voluntary payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured.

21

The Company maintains various insurance policies that cover each of its U.S. facilities; including occurrence medical malpractice coverage. In addition, all physicians granted privileges at the Company’s U.S. facilities are required to maintain medical malpractice insurance coverage. The Company also maintains general liability and property insurance coverage for each U.S. facility, including flood coverage. The Company does not currently maintain workers’ compensation coverage in Texas. In regard to the Employee Health Insurance Plan, the Company is self-insured with specific and aggregate re-insurance with stop-loss levels appropriate for the Company’s group size. Coverage is maintained in amounts management deems adequate.

The management agreement for the Second People’s Hospital required that 1% of the drug income, and drug income in excess of 40% of total sales, of the hospital be paid to the government. This requirement was designed to control the cost of drugs by discouraging the sale by the hospital of drugs purchased from other than approved drug vendors. However, the local government has not published a list of approved drug vendors and therefore has not enforced the payment provision since the inception of the original management agreement. The Company has been advised by a local attorney that enforcement of that provision is remote, so it has not accrued the amount that would be payable to the local government if this provision were enforced. If the government were to enforce this provision, Dynacq-Huai-Bei could potentially owe approximately $1.6 million to the government for the period of time since inception of the original management contract on the hospital to May 31, 2012.

The Company is routinely involved in litigation and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business. Specifically, all judicial review of unsatisfactory determinations of reimbursement amounts due us for our Texas facilities’ fees must be made in the district courts of Travis County, Texas in what can often be a lengthy procedure.

Industry Segments and Geographic Information

The Industry Segment “U.S. Division” comprises of the Company’s Pasadena facility. In the prior year it was classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Company at the present time has the U.S. Division and the Corporate Division.

Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. The impact of such reclassification was not significant to the prior year’s overall presentation, except for (1) presenting the Pasadena facility as continuing operations under U.S. Division, which was presented in the prior year as discontinued operations, and (2) the presentation of the various subsidiaries (except for Dynacq-Huai Bei and Sino Bond, which are now shown as part of the Corporate Division) in China as discontinued operations under the Corporate Division, which in the previous year was shown as part of continuing operations under the China Division.

The Company had made the decision to sell its Garland facility as of August 31, 2010, and its operation was classified as discontinued operations for the year ended August 31, 2010. However, the Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and accordingly its operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 continue to be classified as “Discontinued Operations” (see Discontinued Operations below). The Company plans to either sell the Garland facility or pursue converting it into an ambulatory surgical center, if and when the Company can identify and generate a steady referral source for outpatient cases. The Company intended to sell its Pasadena facility also, and had it classified as discontinued operations, as of August 31, 2010. However, since a sale was not consummated during the 12-month period following the decision to sell, the operations of the Pasadena facility have been reclassified as continuing operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The Company is continuing to revamp its operations at the Pasadena facility by modifying the business model and controlling expenses. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in turning the facility around.

From March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2011, Dynacq Huai Bei Healthcare, Inc. (“Dynacq-Huai Bei”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company provided healthcare management services to the Second People’s Hospital in Rui An, China. The Company organized Dynacq-Huai Bei in April 2008 under the laws of the People’s Republic of China. Dynacq-Huai Bei was responsible for funding any operating deficits, and was entitled to any operating profits, of that hospital during the management period. Due to continued losses at the Second People’s Hospital, the Company made the decision to terminate the management agreement with the Rui An City Department of Health, and is currently in negotiation with them to finalize the terms, including the effective date of termination. The Company ceased providing healthcare management services to the Second People’s Hospital as of February 28,

22

2011. The Company has written off the fixed assets and inventory balances as of February 28, 2011, and does not expect any further losses due to the termination of this management agreement related to the Second People’s Hospital. We have accounted for the operations of the Second People’s Hospital in Rui An, China as discontinued operations, and have reclassified prior period financial statements to exclude them from continuing operations.

Dynacq-Huai Bei and the Rui An City Department of Health had also previously entered into an agreement assigning to Dynacq-Huai Bei the right to manage the Third People’s Hospital in Rui An, which hospital is currently under construction. Dynacq-Huai Bei and the Rui An City Department of Health, in November 2010, mutually agreed to terminate this agreement, due to continued delays in the construction of the Third People’s Hospital. Accordingly, Dynacq-Huai Bei will not be managing the Third People’s Hospital.

The Company has also organized Sino Bond Inc. Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“Sino Bond”) to hold and manage investments in Hong Kong. Sino Bond invests in debt and equity securities in Europe and Asia, including initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings.

At the present time, the Company’s subsidiaries in China and Hong Kong are not pursuing any new line of business and/or projects.

The Company has invested in various bonds. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012, based on the quoted market prices as of that date. As of May 31, 2012, these securities are valued at approximately $15.5 million. The Company intends to hold these for a minimum period of an additional 12 months. During the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company also traded in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had gains (losses) of $(149,625) and $48,499, respectively. During the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the trading in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange generated gains (losses) of $(206,726) and $33,504, respectively. The Company, through a subsidiary in Hong Kong, has expanded its investments in debt and equity securities in Europe and Asia and has engaged the services of an investment banker to recommend such investment opportunities. The Company’s primary investment focus will be on growth companies from mainland China. The Company anticipates making short-term investments in these entities through initial public offerings (held mostly through the Hong Kong Stock Exchange) and pre-initial public offerings.

Discontinued Operations

On September 29, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the closure of the Garland facility, included in our U.S. division, effective September 30, 2011. Prior to that, in August 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company had approved a plan to dispose of the Garland facility due to continued operating losses. The Garland facility had experienced decreases in net patient revenues and number of cases, generally attributable to the loss of physicians from our medical staff. The opening of a new hospital near our Garland facility has had a direct adverse impact on our ability to retain members of the medical staff at that facility and consequently on our patient volume. The Garland facility was operating at a loss, and the Board of Directors believes that ceasing operations of the facility at that time was in the Company’s best interest. The Company has estimated a closing cost of $625,000. However, the ongoing losses incurred will be reduced due to the closing of the facility.

The Company had an independent appraisal done in October 2011 for both the hospitals, and based on each hospital’s valuation, expected sale proceeds, and expected cash flows has determined that there is no impairment charge required in connection with the foregoing disposal activities.

The Company has discontinued operations of all its foreign subsidiaries, except for Dynacq-HuaiBei and Sino Bond, and has either closed or is in the process of closing them.

The Corporate Division includes interest and other income related to the investments in available-for-sale and trading securities, corporate personnel compensation expenses, and general and administrative expenses. Such expenses and income are not allocated to our operating division, as they relate to our general corporate activities.

We generally evaluate performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and non-recurring charges and other criteria. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. There are no transfers between segments.

23

Summarized financial information concerning the business segments from continuing operations is as follows:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues from external customers
Net patient service revenues
U.S. Division	$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)
Corporate		—			—			—			—
Consolidated	$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)
Loss before taxes and discontinued operations
U.S. Division	$	(1,619,824	)	$	(12,469,388	)	$	(3,609,351	)	$	(12,982,781	)
Corporate		(1,571,575	)		(757,770	)		(2,443,833	)		(2,241,335	)
Consolidated	$	(3,191,399	)	$	(13,227,158	)	$	(6,053,184	)	$	(15,224,116	)

	May 31, 2012		August 31, 2011
Total Assets
U.S. Division	$	7,872,771	$	8,763,015
Corporate		36,769,946		50,550,958
Assets of continuing operations		44,642,717		59,313,973
Assets of discontinued operations		6,580,101		6,909,527
Consolidated	$	51,222,818	$	66,223,500

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. Such forward-looking statements relate to future events or future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our Company’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. You must read the following discussion of the results of our business and our operations and financial condition in conjunction with our reviewed consolidated financial statements, including the notes, included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.

Update on Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no changes to the critical accounting policies used in our reporting of results of operations and financial position for the three months ended May 31, 2012. For a discussion of our critical accounting policies see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.

24

Results of Operations

	Thee Months Ended May 31, 2012									Three Months Ended May 31, 2011
	U.S. Division			Corporate			Total			U.S. Division			Corporate			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	920,662		$	—		$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	—		$	(8,472,172	)
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		1,115,666			1,184,527			2,300,193			1,055,127			699,799			1,754,926
Medical services and supplies		460,642			—			460,642			366,479			—			366,479
Other operating expenses		716,837			392,900			1,109,737			963,624			713,940			1,677,564
Depreciation and amortization		115,248			45,069			160,317			—			37,456			37,456
Total costs and expenses		2,408,393			1,622,496			4,030,889			2,385,230			1,451,195			3,836,425
Operating loss		(1,487,731	)		(1,622,496	)		(3,110,227	)		(10,857,402	)		(1,451,195	)		(12,308,597	)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income		8,980			(295,050	)		(286,070	)		16,571			318,968			335,539
Interest income		—			349,032			349,032			—			377,314			377,314
Interest expense		(141,073	)		(3,061	)		(144,134	)		(1,628,557	)		(2,857	)		(1,631,414	)
Total other income (expense), net		(132,093	)		50,921			(81,172	)		(1,611,986	)		693,425			(918,561	)
Loss before income taxes from continuing operations	$	(1,619,824	)	$	(1,571,575	)		(3,191,399	)	$	(12,469,388	)	$	(757,770	)		(13,227,158	)
Benefit for income taxes								—									4,601,332
Loss from continuing operations								(3,191,399	)								(8,625,826	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes								(388,641	)								(1,400,360	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes								—									—
Net loss								(3,580,040	)								(10,026,186	)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest								49,767									1,531
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.							$	(3,530,273	)							$	(10,024,655	)
Operational statistics (Number of medical procedures) for Pasadena facility:
Inpatient:
Bariatric		20									17
Orthopedic		7									3
Other		6									3
Total inpatient procedures		33									23
Outpatient:
Orthopedic		17									19
Other		129									152
Total outpatient procedures		146									171
Total procedures		179									194

25

Results of Operations (continued)

	Nine Months Ended May 31, 2012									Nine Months Ended May 31, 2011
	U.S. Division			Corporate			Total			U.S. Division			Corporate			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	3,732,351		$	—		$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)	$	—		$	(4,333,544	)
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		3,045,092			2,951,782			5,996,874			3,261,216			2,097,553			5,358,769
Medical services and supplies		1,027,268			—			1,027,268			1,150,499			—			1,150,499
Other operating expenses		2,520,356			1,261,506			3,781,862			2,650,589			2,381,163			5,031,752
Depreciation and amortization		339,886			130,529			470,415			—			128,410			128,410
Total costs and expenses		6,932,602			4,343,817			11,276,419			7,062,304			4,607,126			11,669,430
Operating loss		(3,200,251	)		(4,343,817	)		(7,544,068	)		(11,395,848	)		(4,607,126	)		(16,002,974	)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income		20,791			953,581			974,372			55,569			1,257,236			1,312,805
Interest income		—			955,235			955,235			—			1,117,767			1,117,767
Interest expense		(429,891	)		(8,832	)		(438,723	)		(1,642,502	)		(9,212	)		(1,651,714	)
Total other income (expense), net		(409,100	)		1,899,984			1,490,884			(1,586,933	)		2,365,791			778,858
Loss before income taxes from continuing operations	$	(3,609,351	)	$	(2,443,833	)		(6,053,184	)	$	(12,982,781	)	$	(2,241,335	)		(15,224,116	)
Benefit for income taxes								—									5,268,011
Loss from continuing operations								(6,053,184	)								(9,956,105	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes								(1,120,854	)								(2,785,269	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes								(229,201	)								(121,577	)
Net loss								(7,403,239	)								(12,862,951	)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest								133,287									4,294
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.							$	(7,269,952	)							$	(12,858,657	)
Operational statistics (Number of medical procedures) for Pasadena facility:
Inpatient:
Bariatric		50									53
Orthopedic		8									17
Other		51									11
Total inpatient procedures		109									81
Outpatient:
Orthopedic		70									62
Other		302									414
Total outpatient procedures		372									476
Total procedures		481									557

26

Three Months Ended May 31, 2012 Compared to the Three Months Ended May 31, 2011

U.S. Division

Through May 31, 2012, insurance carriers have voluntarily paid the awards in the decisions and orders issued by SOAH, plus interest, in approximately 180 cases, involving approximately $11 million in claims. In most of these cases, the carriers have requested refunds of the payments made in the event that the SOAH decisions and orders are reversed on appeal. Our request that the TDWC Commissioner enforce the awards which were not voluntarily paid by the carriers was refused in approximately 130 cases. Motions filed seeking a refund in some cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid have been granted and the Company has been ordered to refund approximately $3.7 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. In September and October 2011, the Company deposited these amounts as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. We anticipate that similar motions requesting remand and a refund for awards voluntarily paid will be filed and will likely be granted by the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. If and when these additional motions are granted, the Company will be ordered to refund an additional $7.7 million, not including prejudgment interest. The Company has appealed the judgments requiring a refund to the carriers. The appeal of the refund judgments will progress simultaneously to the adjudication of those cases remanded for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and will likely be ordered to be refunded. Once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that voluntary payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured.

Due to the uncertainties associated with these stop-loss fee dispute cases, in fiscal year 2011, the Company recognized an increase of $10,254,990 in the contractual allowance at our Pasadena facility (and an additional amount of $779,583 in the contractual allowance at our Garland facility, which is classified as discontinued operations), and $1,751,478 in interest expense at our Pasadena facility (and an additional interest expense of $132,339 at our Garland facility).

Excluding the above mentioned stop-loss contractual allowance of $10,254,990, net patient service revenue decreased by $862,156, or 48%, from $1,782,818 to $920,662, and total surgical cases decreased by 8% from 194 cases for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to 179 cases for the three months ended May 31, 2012. While the number of cases decreased by 8%, net patient service revenue decreased by 48%. The change in percentage decrease in net patient service revenue compared to the decrease in the number of cases is primarily due to a change in the surgical mix of cases. Decreases in net patient revenues and number of cases are generally attributable to the loss of physicians from our medical staff. Subsequent to the period ended May 31, 2012, a physician from our medical staff, who accounted for 30% and 14% of total gross billed charges for three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is unable to continue his practice due to personal reasons. The Company is making efforts to find a replacement for this physician at the present time; however, there can be no assurance given that we will succeed in this process.

Total costs and expenses increased by $23,163, or 1%, from $2,385,230 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $2,408,393 for the three months ended May 31, 2012. The following discusses the various changes in costs and expenses:

• Compensation and benefits increased by $60,539, or 6%, primarily due to increase in the Company’s self-funded health care costs of its employees, partially offset by a reduction in workforce due to lower net patient service revenues.

• Medical services and supplies expenses increased by $94,163, or 26%, while the number of surgery cases decreased 8%. The increase in medical services and supplies was due to a change in the surgical mix of cases, and also due to write off of obsolete supplies.

27

• Other operating expenses decreased by $246,787, or 26%, primarily associated with lower net patient service revenues.

• Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $115,248 in 2012 compared to 2011. The Company had ceased depreciating property and equipment for its Pasadena facility in the prior year since it was classified as discontinued operations, and was being measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. However, in the current year, the Pasadena facility’s operations are classified as continuing operations, and thus its property and equipment are being depreciated.

Other expense for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 of $132,093 and $1,611,986, respectively, includes interest expense associated with the stop-loss cases discussed above.

Corporate Division

Compensation and benefits includes all corporate personnel compensation and benefits, and it increased by $484,728, or 69%, in 2012, compared to 2011. The increase in compensation and benefits was due to the following reasons: (1) the Company retained the services of Dr. Eric Chan, as its chief executive officer starting January 10, 2012, and (2) the Compensation Committee approved a bonus of $300,000 payable to the chief financial officer of the Company for his role in winding down the operations in Hong Kong; the Committee recognized that he has been working above and beyond the norm to revive the Company’s business including actively working on marketing and several special projects and that he has also been instrumental in providing continuity in management during the transition of the Company’s new chief executive officer, and (3) the Company continues to make efforts to increase its net patient service revenues and has hired additional marketing personnel during the three months ended May 31, 2012.

Other operating expenses include primarily administrative expenses for managing various projects the Company was undertaking in China and Hong Kong, related marketing expenses and rent for an apartment for our chief executive officer in Hong Kong. The Company has made the decision to not pursue any new line of business and/or projects, and has also terminated the apartment lease. Other operating expenses also includes all the corporate general and administrative expenses in the U.S., including other professional fees such as legal expenses and audit expenses. Other operating expenses decreased by $321,040, from $713,940 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $392,900 for the three months ended May 31, 2012. For the three months ended May 31, 2011, the Company’s subsidiary in Hong Kong incurred the following costs: (1) marketing fees of $150,000, (2) rent of $49,672 for an apartment for the Company’s chief executive officer in Hong Kong, and (3) other administrative support services fees. These expenses were not incurred for the three months ended May 31, 2012. The Company also incurred lower professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses primarily associated with lower net revenues.

Rent and other income (expense) decreased by $614,018, from $318,968 other income, net, for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $(295,050) other expense, net, for the three months ended May 31, 2012. Rent and other income for the three months ended May 31, 2012 includes (1) foreign currency losses of $178,597, primarily on investments in Euro bonds, and (2) a loss of $149,625 on short-term investments in trading securities in Hong Kong. Rent and other income for the three months ended May 31, 2011 includes (1) foreign currency exchange gains of $178,877, primarily on investments in Euro bonds, (2) a gain of $48,499 on short-term investments in trading securities in Hong Kong, and (3) other miscellaneous income primarily related to its Baton Rouge facility, which was sold in 2007.

Interest income of $349,032 and $377,314 for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are primarily related to the Company’s investments in bonds.

Investments in securities

The Company has invested in various bonds. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012, based on the quoted market prices as of that date. As of May 31, 2012, these securities are valued at approximately $15.5 million. Unrealized gains in these investments of $4.6 million are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as at May 31, 2012, net of taxes of $2.5 million. The Company intends to hold these for a minimum period of an additional 12 months. During the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company also traded in initial public offerings

28

of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had gains (losses) of $(149,625) and $48,499, respectively. The Company, through a subsidiary in Hong Kong, has expanded its investments in debt and equity securities in Europe and Asia and has engaged the services of an investment banker to recommend such investment opportunities. The Company’s primary investment focus will be on growth companies from mainland China. The Company anticipates making short-term investments in these entities through initial public offerings (held mostly through the Hong Kong Stock Exchange) and pre-initial public offerings.

For the three months ended May 31, 2012, the Company did not recognize any tax benefits applicable to the operating loss. The balance sheet reflects an increase in the deferred tax asset of $1,529,856 due to a reduction in deferred tax liability related to the foreign currency exchange gain realized and a decline in value of the available-for-sale securities.

Discontinued Operations

Garland Facility (discontinued operations)

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases discussed above, in fiscal year 2011, the Company recognized an increase of $779,583 in the contractual allowance, and an additional interest expense of $132,339, at our Garland facility.

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and accordingly its operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 continue to be classified as discontinued operations. The Company plans to either sell the Garland facility or pursue converting it into an ambulatory surgical center, if and when the Company can identify and generate a steady referral source for outpatient cases.

Total costs and expenses decreased by $1,052,413, from $1,401,850 for the three months ended May 31, 2011 to $349,437 for the three months ended May 31, 2012, due to the closure of the facility on September 30, 2011.

Corporate (discontinued operations)

The Corporate Division revenue includes net patient service revenues from Second People’s Hospital in Rui An, China. Due to continued losses at the Second People’s Hospital, the Company made the decision to terminate the management agreement as of February 28, 2011 with the Rui An City Department of Health, and is currently in negotiation with them to finalize the terms, including the effective date of termination.

The Corporate Division also includes other operating expenses the Company incurred at certain of its subsidiaries in China while pursuing various projects. All of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, except for Dynacq-Huai Bei and Sino Bond, have been reclassified as discontinued operations. The Company incurred $-0- and $224,430 in total costs and expenses at these subsidiaries during the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Loss before income taxes in these subsidiaries was $-0- and $175,528 for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Nine Months Ended May 31, 2012 Compared to the Nine Months Ended May 31, 2011

U.S. Division

Through May 31, 2012, insurance carriers have voluntarily paid the awards in the decisions and orders issued by SOAH, plus interest, in approximately 180 cases, involving approximately $11 million in claims. In most of these cases, the carriers have requested refunds of the payments made in the event that the SOAH decisions and orders are reversed on appeal. Our request that the TDWC Commissioner enforce the awards which were not voluntarily paid by the carriers was refused in approximately 130 cases. Motions filed seeking a refund in some cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid have been granted and the Company has been ordered to refund approximately $3.7 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. In September and October 2011, the Company deposited these amounts as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. We anticipate that similar motions requesting remand and a refund for awards voluntarily paid will be filed and will likely be granted by the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas.

29

If and when these additional motions are granted, the Company will be ordered to refund an additional $7.7 million, not including prejudgment interest. The Company has appealed the judgments requiring a refund to the carriers. The appeal of the refund judgments will progress simultaneously to the adjudication of those cases remanded for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and will likely be ordered to be refunded. Once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that voluntary payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured.

Due to the uncertainties associated with these stop-loss fee dispute cases, in fiscal year 2011, the Company recognized an increase of $10,254,990 in the contractual allowance at our Pasadena facility (and an additional amount of $779,583 in the contractual allowance at our Garland facility, which is classified as discontinued operations), and $1,751,478 in interest expense at our Pasadena facility (and an additional interest expense of $132,339 at our Garland facility).

Excluding the above mentioned stop-loss contractual allowance of $10,254,990, net patient service revenue decreased by $2,189,095, or 37%, from $5,921,446 to $3,732,351, and total surgical cases decreased by 14% from 557 cases for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 to 481 cases for the nine months ended May 31, 2012. While the number of cases decreased by 14%, net patient service revenue decreased by 37%. The change in percentage decrease in net patient service revenue compared to the decrease in the number of cases is primarily due to a change in the surgical mix of cases. Decreases in net patient revenues and number of cases are generally attributable to the loss of physicians from our medical staff. Subsequent to the period ended May 31, 2012, a physician from our medical staff, who accounted for 25% and 5% of total gross billed charges for nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is unable to continue his practice due to personal reasons. The Company is making efforts to find a replacement for this physician at the present time; however, there can be no assurance given that we will succeed in this process.

Total costs and expenses decreased by $129,702, or 2%, from $7,062,304 for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 to $6,932,602 for the nine months ended May 31, 2012. The following discusses the various changes in costs and expenses:

• Compensation and benefits decreased by $216,124, or 7%, primarily associated with reduction in workforce due to lower net patient service revenues.

• Medical services and supplies expenses decreased by $123,231, or 11%, while the number of surgery cases decreased 14%. The percentage decrease in medical services and supplies was lower than the percentage decrease in the number of surgery cases due to a change in the surgical mix of cases.

• Other operating expenses decreased by $130,233, or 5%, primarily associated with lower net patient service revenues.

• Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $339,886 in 2012 compared to 2011. The Company had ceased depreciating property and equipment for its Pasadena facility in the prior year since it was classified as discontinued operations, and was being measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. However, in the current year, the Pasadena facility’s operations are classified as continuing operations, and thus its property and equipment are being depreciated.

Other income (expense) includes interest expense, primarily associated with the stop-loss cases discussed above.

Corporate Division

Compensation and benefits includes all corporate personnel compensation and benefits, and it increased by $854,229, or 41%, in 2012, compared to 2011. The increase in compensation and benefits was due to the following reasons: (1) for the nine months ended May 31, 2012, there was a non-cash compensation expense of $196,070, related to employees’ incentive stock options granted in fiscal years 2007, 2011 and 2012. However, for the nine

30

months ended May 31, 2011, due to the non-cash compensation expense true-up in 2011 based on forfeiture of incentive stock options, the expense was $82,620, (2) during the current fiscal year, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock to Dr. Kelly Larkin as consideration for Dr. Larkin’s employment as the Company’s marketing director, and took a compensation charge of $50,000 related to the issuance, (3) the Company retained the services of Dr. Eric Chan, as its chief executive officer starting January 10, 2012, (4) the chief financial officer of the Company had a reduction in his compensation for part of the nine months in 2011, whereas for the nine months in 2012, the Compensation Committee reinstated his compensation to $200,000, effective February 1, 2012, and paid him a sum of $77,000, which equates to the prior reductions in his compensation from January 1, 2010 to January 31, 2012, (5) the Compensation Committee approved a bonus of $300,000 payable to the chief financial officer of the Company for his role in winding down the operations in Hong Kong; the Committee recognized that he has been working above and beyond the norm to revive the Company’s business including actively working on marketing and several special projects and that he has also been instrumental in providing continuity in management during the transition of the Company’s new chief executive officer, and (6) the Company continues to make efforts to increase its net patient service revenues and has hired additional marketing personnel during the nine months ended May 31, 2012. Subsequent to the quarter ended May 31, 2012, in July 2012, the employment agreement with Dr. Larkin was terminated.

Other operating expenses include primarily administrative expenses for managing various projects the Company was undertaking in China and Hong Kong, related marketing expenses and rent for an apartment for our chief executive officer in Hong Kong. The Company has made the decision to not pursue any new line of business and/or projects, and has also terminated the apartment lease. Other operating expenses also includes all the corporate general and administrative expenses in the U.S., including other professional fees such as legal expenses and audit expenses. Other operating expenses decreased by $1,119,657, from $2,381,163 for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 to $1,261,506 for the nine months ended May 31, 2012. For the nine months ended May 31, 2011, the Company’s subsidiary in Hong Kong incurred the following costs: (1) marketing fees of $450,000, (2) rent of $149,398 for an apartment for the Company’s chief executive officer in Hong Kong, and (3) other administrative support services fees. These expenses were not incurred for the nine months ended May 31, 2012. The Company also incurred lower professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses primarily associated with lower net revenues.

Rent and other income decreased by $303,655, from $1,257,236 for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 to $953,581 for the nine months ended May 31, 2012. Rent and other income for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 includes (1) a foreign currency gain of $1,422,590 realized due to the monies invested in China coming back to the U.S. The Company had invested in its foreign subsidiaries in China during the last few years, and due to a favorable change in exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and the Chinese Yuan Renminbi, the Company had accumulated other comprehensive income of $1,422,590. This amount was realized as a gain during the nine months ended May 31, 2012 upon the return of investments from the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in China, (2) a loss of $206,726 due to fair valuation of trading securities as of May 31, 2012, and (3) foreign currency exchange losses of $356,670, primarily on investments in Euro bonds. Rent and other income for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 includes (1) a $720,696 refund received from the Rui An City Department of Health as part of the negotiation of termination of the assignment agreement to manage the Third People’s Hospital, and write-off of associated liabilities of $43,840 (the decision to terminate the agreement was based on the continued delays in the construction of the hospital), (2) foreign currency exchange gains of $285,134, primarily on investments in Euro bonds, and (3) a gain of $33,504 on short-term investments in trading securities in Hong Kong.

Interest income of $955,235 and $1,117,767 for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011, respectively, are primarily related to the Company’s investments in bonds.

Investments in securities

The Company has invested in various bonds. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012, based on the quoted market prices as of that date. As of May 31, 2012, these securities are valued at approximately $15.5 million. Unrealized gains in these investments of $4.6 million are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as at May 31, 2012, net of taxes of $2.5 million. The Company intends to hold these for a minimum period of an additional 12 months. During the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company also traded in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had gains (losses) of $(206,726) and $33,504, respectively. The Company, through a subsidiary in Hong Kong, has expanded its investments in debt and equity

31

securities in Europe and Asia and has engaged the services of an investment banker to recommend such investment opportunities. The Company’s primary investment focus will be on growth companies from mainland China. The Company anticipates making short-term investments in these entities through initial public offerings (held mostly through the Hong Kong Stock Exchange) and pre-initial public offerings.

For the nine months ended May 31, 2012, the Company did not recognize any tax benefits applicable to the operating loss. The balance sheet reflects an increase in the deferred tax asset of $1,529,856 due to a reduction in deferred tax liability related to the foreign currency exchange gain realized and a decline in value of the available-for-sale securities.

Discontinued Operations

Garland Facility (discontinued operations)

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases discussed above, in fiscal year 2011, the Company recognized an increase of $779,583 in the contractual allowance, and an additional interest expense of $132,339, at our Garland facility.

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and accordingly its operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 continue to be classified as discontinued operations. The Company plans to either sell the Garland facility or pursue converting it into an ambulatory surgical center, if and when the Company can identify and generate a steady referral source for outpatient cases. Net patient service revenue decreased by $491,284, from $834,758 to $343,474, due to the closure of the facility on September 30, 2011.

Total costs and expenses decreased by $3,178,418, from $4,495,324 for the nine months ended May 31, 2011 to $1,316,906 for the nine months ended May 31, 2012, due to the closure of the facility on September 30, 2011.

Corporate (discontinued operations)

The Corporate Division revenue includes net patient service revenues from Second People’s Hospital in Rui An, China. Due to continued losses at the Second People’s Hospital, the Company made the decision to terminate the management agreement as of February 28, 2011 with the Rui An City Department of Health, and is currently in negotiation with them to finalize the terms, including the effective date of termination. The loss before income taxes at the Second People’s Hospital for the nine months ended February 28, 2011 was $368,553.

The Corporate Division also includes other operating expenses the Company incurred at certain of its subsidiaries in China while pursuing various projects. All of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, except for Dynacq-Huai Bei and Sino Bond, have been reclassified as discontinued operations. The Company incurred $126,179 and $457,561 in total costs and expenses at these subsidiaries during the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Loss before income taxes in these subsidiaries was $62,275 and $313,274 for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, loss on disposal of discontinued operations in China was $229,201 for the nine months ended May 31, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a detailed discussion of our liquidity, contractual obligations and commitments. The information presented below updates and should be read in conjunction with the information disclosed in that Form 10-K.

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash flow used in operating activities for continuing activities was $10,666,176 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012, primarily due to a net loss before discontinued operations of $5,919,897, net changes in income tax related accounts of $1,655,662 and decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $5,216,521, of which a decrease of $3,703,252 was due to cash deposits made by the Company into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds in the stop-loss fee dispute cases. These decreases were partially offset by reduction in accounts receivable of $736,501, and depreciation and amortization of $470,415.

32

In addition, cash flow used in operating activities for discontinued operations was $1,032,418 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012, primarily due to a net loss from discontinued operations of $1,350,055, partially offset by a reduction in inventories of $260,020.

Total cash flow used in operating activities for continuing and discontinued operations combined was $11,698,594 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012.

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash flow used in investing activities for continuing activities was $159,919 for purchase of equipment at the Pasadena facility.

In addition, cash flow provided by investing activities for discontinued operations was $14,000 for sale of equipment at the Dallas facility.

Total cash flow used in investing activities for continuing and discontinued operations combined was $145,919 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012.

Cash flows from financing activities

Cash flow provided by financing activities for continuing activities was $52,100. In November 2011, the Company borrowed $116,339 as note payable from a financial institution at an interest rate of 4.5%. This note payable is to be repaid in 36 monthly installments and is secured by specific equipment purchased at our Pasadena facility. The Company has paid $46,315 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012 towards notes payable for equipment purchased. In addition, the Company paid $48,085 towards a mortgage loan for the purchase of an apartment in Hong Kong. During the nine months ended May 31, 2012, the Company received contributions of $100,000 for sale of non-controlling interests in our Pasadena facility’s operations.

The Company had working capital of $7,856,860 as of May 31, 2012 and maintained a liquid position by a current ratio of approximately 1.5 to 1.

We believe we will be able to meet our ongoing liquidity and cash needs for fiscal year 2012 through the combination of available cash and cash flow from operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Presentation of Comprehensive Income: In June 2011, the FASB amended its guidance governing the presentation of comprehensive income. The amended guidance eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Under the new guidance, an entity can elect to present items of net income and other comprehensive income in one continuous statement referred to as the statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. While the options for presenting other comprehensive income change under the guidance, other portions of the current guidance will not change. For public entities, these changes are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operation.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not required.

33

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation to assess the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of May 31, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of error or fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management’s override of the control. The design of any systems of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company is routinely involved in litigation and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business. Specifically, all judicial review of unsatisfactory determinations of reimbursement amounts due us for our Texas facilities’ fees must be made in the district courts of Travis County, Texas in what can often be a lengthy procedure. Please refer to Revenue Recognition, as well as Business – Government Regulation – Texas Workers’ Compensation Systems in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, for a detailed description of the MDR process and our accounts receivable. The Company cannot predict whether any litigation or administrative proceeding to which it is currently a party will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The Company’s Risk Factors as disclosed in its Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2011 have not materially changed.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mining Safety Disclosures.

None.

34

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

EXHIBIT NO.	IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
Exhibit 15.1	Awareness Letter of KWCO, P.C.
Exhibit 23.1	Consent of KWCO, P.C.
Exhibit 31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
**101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document.
**101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
**101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document.
**101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

35

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DYNACQ HEALTHCARE, INC.
Date: July 13, 2012	By:	/s/ Eric K. Chan
		Eric K. Chan
		Chief Executive Officer (duly authorized officer)
Date: July 13, 2012	By:	/s/ Philip S. Chan
		Philip S. Chan
		Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

36

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT NO.	IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
Exhibit 15.1	Awareness Letter of KWCO, P.C.
Exhibit 23.1	Consent of KWCO, P.C.
Exhibit 31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
**101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document.
**101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
**101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document.
**101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

37

EX-15.1

EXHIBIT 15.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

AWARENESS LETTER

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

We are aware that our report dated July 13, 2012 on our review of the interim consolidated financial statements of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. as of and for the three and nine month periods ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 and included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2012 is incorporated by reference in the Company’s Registration Statements No. 333-72756 and 333-176740. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered as part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ KWCO, P.C.

KWCO, P.C.

Houston, Texas

July 13, 2012

EX-23.1

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation of our review report dated July 13, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. included in the Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended May 31, 2012.

/s/ KWCO, P.C.

KWCO, P.C.

Houston, Texas

July 13, 2012

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Eric K. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Eric K. Chan

Eric K. Chan

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

Date: July 13, 2012

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Philip S. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Philip S. Chan

Philip S. Chan

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)

Date: July 13, 2012

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric K. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Eric K. Chan

Eric K. Chan

Chief Executive Officer

July 13, 2012

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip S. Chan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Philip S. Chan

Philip S. Chan

Chief Financial Officer

July 13, 2012

XML

Cash and Cash Equivalents

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Cash and Cash Equivalents [Abstract]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

XML

Reorganization of Segments and Reclassification

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Reorganization of Segments and Reclassification [Abstract]

Reorganization of Segments and Reclassification

Reorganization of Segments and Reclassification

The Industry Segment “U.S. Division” comprises of the Company’s Pasadena facility. In the prior year it was classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Company at the present time has the U.S. Division and the Corporate Division. Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. The impact of such reclassification was not significant to the prior year’s overall presentation, except for (1) presenting the Pasadena facility as continuing operations under U.S. Division, which was presented in the prior year as discontinued operations, and (2) the presentation of the various subsidiaries (except for Dynacq Huai Bei Healthcare, Inc. (“Dynacq-Huai Bei”) and Sino Bond Inc. Limited (“Sino Bond”), which are now shown as part of the Corporate Division) in China as discontinued operations under the Corporate Division, which in the previous year was shown as part of continuing operations under the China Division.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	May 31, 2012	Aug. 31, 2011
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 12,758,429	$ 24,315,160
Accounts receivable, net of contractual allowances of approximately $188,615,000 and $188,513,000 at May 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011, respectively	455,778	1,192,279
Inventories	413,132	550,441
Trading securities	1,272,541	1,471,644
Interest receivable	232,417	192,366
Prepaid expenses	194,947	272,414
Income tax receivable	2,363,724	2,363,724
Assets of discontinued operations	6,580,101	6,909,527
Total current assets	24,271,069	37,267,555
Investments available-for-sale	15,501,936	18,722,274
Investment in real estate, net	1,902,306	1,941,041
Property and equipment, net	6,892,718	7,168,864
Income tax receivable	868,249	868,249
Deferred tax asset	1,529,856
Other assets	256,684	255,517
Total assets	51,222,818	66,223,500
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	1,861,632	2,346,720
Accrued liabilities	13,723,607	18,430,553
Current portion of notes payable	113,646	97,918
Current portion of capital lease obligations	99,726	94,044
Liabilities of discontinued operations	615,598	604,302
Total current liabilities	16,414,209	21,573,537
Non-current liabilities:
Long-term portion of notes payable	1,100,173	1,093,961
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations	113,640	189,161
Total liabilities	17,628,022	22,856,659
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 14,543,626 and 14,426,960 shares issued at May 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011	14,544	14,427
Additional paid-in capital	10,093,456	9,780,837
Accumulated other comprehensive income	4,622,133	7,453,676
Retained earnings	18,784,332	26,054,284
Total Dynacq stockholders' equity	33,514,465	43,303,224
Non-controlling interest	80,331	63,617
Total equity	33,594,796	43,366,841
Total liabilities and equity	$ 51,222,818	$ 66,223,500

XML

General

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

General [Abstract]

General

General

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), is a holding company that through its subsidiaries in the United States develops and manages general acute care hospitals that principally provide specialized surgeries. The Company through its subsidiaries in China and Hong Kong also (1) provided healthcare management services to a hospital in China until February 28, 2011; and (2) invests in debt and equity securities, including short-term investments in initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings. The Company through its United States subsidiaries (1) owns and operates one general acute care hospital in Pasadena, Texas, and (2) owns one general acute care hospital in Garland, Texas, which was closed on September 30, 2011, and accordingly this business is classified as “Discontinued Operations” for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 (see Note below on Discontinued Operations). The Company is currently composed of two divisions: U.S. and Corporate.

XML

Contingencies

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Contingencies [Abstract]

Contingencies

Contingencies

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company has recognized, in fiscal year 2011, an increase of $12.9 million in the contractual allowance and related interest expense at our Pasadena and Garland facilities. For a detailed discussion of this, see Revenue Recognition Policy under Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Motions filed seeking a refund in some cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid have been granted and the Company has been ordered to refund approximately $3.7 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. In September and October 2011, the Company deposited these amounts as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. We anticipate that similar motions requesting remand and a refund for awards voluntarily paid will be filed and will likely be granted by the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. If and when these additional motions are granted, the Company will be ordered to refund an additional $7.7 million, not including prejudgment interest. The Company has appealed the judgments requiring a refund to the carriers. The appeal of the refund judgments will progress simultaneously to the adjudication of those cases remanded for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and will likely be ordered to be refunded. Once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that voluntary payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured.

The Company maintains various insurance policies that cover each of its U.S. facilities; including occurrence medical malpractice coverage. In addition, all physicians granted privileges at the Company’s U.S. facilities are required to maintain medical malpractice insurance coverage. The Company also maintains general liability and property insurance coverage for each U.S. facility, including flood coverage. The Company does not currently maintain workers’ compensation coverage in Texas. In regard to the Employee Health Insurance Plan, the Company is self-insured with specific and aggregate re-insurance with stop-loss levels appropriate for the Company’s group size. Coverage is maintained in amounts management deems adequate.

The management agreement for the Second People’s Hospital required that 1% of the drug income, and drug income in excess of 40% of total sales, of the hospital be paid to the government. This requirement was designed to control the cost of drugs by discouraging the sale by the hospital of drugs purchased from other than approved drug vendors. However, the local government has not published a list of approved drug vendors and therefore has not enforced the payment provision since the inception of the original management agreement. The Company has been advised by a local attorney that enforcement of that provision is remote, so it has not accrued the amount that would be payable to the local government if this provision were enforced. If the government were to enforce this provision, Dynacq-Huai-Bei could potentially owe approximately $1.6 million to the government for the period of time since inception of the original management contract on the hospital to May 31, 2012.

The Company is routinely involved in litigation and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business. Specifically, all judicial review of unsatisfactory determinations of reimbursement amounts due us for our Texas facilities’ fees must be made in the district courts of Travis County, Texas in what can often be a lengthy procedure.

XML

Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying reviewed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The majority of the Company’s expenses are “cost of revenue” items. Costs that could be classified as general and administrative by the Company would include the corporate office costs, including advertising and marketing expenses, which were approximately $1.5 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $4.3 million and $4.8 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These reviewed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements at August 31, 2011. Operating results for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending August 31, 2012.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	May 31, 2012	Aug. 31, 2011
Consolidated Balance Sheets [Abstract]
Contractual allowances for accounts receivable	$ 188,615,000	$ 188,513,000
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued
Preferred stock, shares outstanding
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	100,000,000	100,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	14,543,626	14,426,960

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

On September 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC Topic 825-10-25, “Financial Instruments” (formerly referred to as SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (“SFAS 159”)), which permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The adoption of ASC Topic 825-10-25 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements because the Company did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or financial liabilities that were not already recorded at fair value.

On September 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (formerly referred to as SFAS 157) for our financial assets and liabilities. Management uses the fair value hierarchy of ASC Topic 820, which gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets. The fair value of financial instruments is estimated based on market trading information, where available. Absent published market values for an instrument or other assets, management uses observable market data to arrive at its estimates of fair value. Management believes that the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2	Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted price for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other input that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance related to fair value disclosure requirements. The new guidance resulted in a change in the Company’s accounting policy effective March 1, 2010. Under this guidance, companies will be required to make additional disclosures concerning significant transfers of amounts between the Level 1 and Level 2 fair value disclosures, as well as further disaggregation of the types of activity that were previously disclosed in the rollforward of Level 3 fair value disclosures. Further, the guidance clarifies the level of aggregation of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy that may be presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured and reported in the Company’s statement of financial position at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2012, segregated among the appropriate levels within the fair value hierarchy:

	Quoted prices in active markets for identical		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$	—	$	15,501,936	$	—
Trading securities		1,272,541		—		—

The Company’s investments in Level 1 are in equity stocks at a cost of $1,967,570. The Company’s investments in Level 2 are in perpetual bonds traded on the European markets, at a cost of $8,435,146.

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	Jul. 13, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	DYNACQ HEALTHCARE INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000890908
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	May 31, 2012
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--08-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		14,543,626

XML

Foreign Currency Translation

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Foreign Currency Translation [Abstract]

Foreign Currency Translation

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company as a whole is the U.S. Dollar. The Company has designated the Chinese Yuan Renminbi as the functional currency for its subsidiaries in mainland China, and the U.S. Dollar for Sino Bond in Hong Kong. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Income and expense are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income within Stockholders’ Equity.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	May 31, 2011	May 31, 2012	May 31, 2011
Consolidated Statements of Operations [Abstract]
Net patient service revenue	$ 920,662	$ (8,472,172)	$ 3,732,351	$ (4,333,544)
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits	2,300,193	1,754,926	5,996,874	5,358,769
Medical services and supplies	460,642	366,479	1,027,268	1,150,499
Other operating expenses	1,109,737	1,677,564	3,781,862	5,031,752
Depreciation and amortization	160,317	37,456	470,415	128,410
Total costs and expenses	4,030,889	3,836,425	11,276,419	11,669,430
Operating loss	(3,110,227)	(12,308,597)	(7,544,068)	(16,002,974)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income (expense)	(286,070)	335,539	974,372	1,312,805
Interest income	349,032	377,314	955,235	1,117,767
Interest expense	(144,134)	(1,631,414)	(438,723)	(1,651,714)
Total other income (expense), net	(81,172)	(918,561)	1,490,884	778,858
Loss before income taxes from continuing operations	(3,191,399)	(13,227,158)	(6,053,184)	(15,224,116)
Benefit for income taxes		4,601,332		5,268,011
Loss from continuing operations	(3,191,399)	(8,625,826)	(6,053,184)	(9,956,105)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(388,641)	(1,400,360)	(1,120,854)	(2,785,269)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes			(229,201)	(121,577)
Net loss	(3,580,040)	(10,026,186)	(7,403,239)	(12,862,951)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	49,767	1,531	133,287	4,294
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	(3,530,273)	(10,024,655)	(7,269,952)	(12,858,657)
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ (0.22)	$ (0.61)	$ (0.41)	$ (0.70)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$ (0.03)	$ (0.10)	$ (0.08)	$ (0.20)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes			$ (0.02)	$ (0.01)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ (0.25)	$ (0.71)	$ (0.51)	$ (0.91)
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding	14,543,626	14,176,960	14,473,626	14,176,960
Amounts attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.:
Net loss before discontinued operations	(3,141,632)	(8,624,295)	(5,919,897)	(9,951,811)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(388,641)	(1,400,360)	(1,120,854)	(2,785,269)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes			(229,201)	(121,577)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ (3,530,273)	$ (10,024,655)	$ (7,269,952)	$ (12,858,657)

XML

Inventories

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Inventories [Abstract]

Inventories

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of medical supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by use of the average cost method.

XML

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable [Abstract]

Investment In Real Estate and Notes Payable

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable

In March 2010, the Company purchased an apartment in Hong Kong as an investment for $2,014,207. This apartment was used as a security to obtain an 18-year mortgage loan of $1,245,775 from a financial institution, with a variable interest rate at the lower of 3-month Hang Seng Interbank Offered Rates plus 0.7% or 2.9% below the Hong Kong Dollar best lending rate quoted by the financial institution. The effective interest rate at May 31, 2012 was 1.1%. The Company has paid down $48,085 and $47,657 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and the current and long-term portions of the note payable as of May 31, 2012 are $64,385 and $1,043,258, respectively. Depreciation expense associated with the apartment was $12,912 in each year for the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, and $38,735 in each year for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011.

In November 2011 and September 2010, the Company borrowed $116,339 and $65,000 as notes payable from a financial institution at an interest rate of 4.5% and 6%, which notes are to be repaid in 36 and 24 monthly installments, respectively, and are secured by specific equipments purchased at our Pasadena facility. The Company has paid down $46,315 during the nine months ended May 31, 2012, and the current and long-term portions of the notes payable as of May 31, 2012 are $49,261 and $56,914, respectively.

XML

Industry Segments and Geographic Information

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Industry Segments and Geographic Information [Abstract]

Industry Segments and Geographic Information

Industry Segments and Geographic Information

The Industry Segment “U.S. Division” comprises of the Company’s Pasadena facility. In the prior year it was classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Company at the present time has the U.S. Division and the Corporate Division.

Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. The impact of such reclassification was not significant to the prior year’s overall presentation, except for (1) presenting the Pasadena facility as continuing operations under U.S. Division, which was presented in the prior year as discontinued operations, and (2) the presentation of the various subsidiaries (except for Dynacq-Huai Bei and Sino Bond, which are now shown as part of the Corporate Division) in China as discontinued operations under the Corporate Division, which in the previous year was shown as part of continuing operations under the China Division.

The Company had made the decision to sell its Garland facility as of August 31, 2010, and its operation was classified as discontinued operations for the year ended August 31, 2010. However, the Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and accordingly its operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 continue to be classified as “Discontinued Operations” (see Discontinued Operations below). The Company plans to either sell the Garland facility or pursue converting it into an ambulatory surgical center, if and when the Company can identify and generate a steady referral source for outpatient cases. The Company intended to sell its Pasadena facility also, and had it classified as discontinued operations, as of August 31, 2010. However, since a sale was not consummated during the 12-month period following the decision to sell, the operations of the Pasadena facility have been reclassified as continuing operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The Company is continuing to revamp its operations at the Pasadena facility by modifying the business model and controlling expenses. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in turning the facility around.

From March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2011, Dynacq Huai Bei Healthcare, Inc. (“Dynacq-Huai Bei”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company provided healthcare management services to the Second People’s Hospital in Rui An, China. The Company organized Dynacq-Huai Bei in April 2008 under the laws of the People’s Republic of China. Dynacq-Huai Bei was responsible for funding any operating deficits, and was entitled to any operating profits, of that hospital during the management period. Due to continued losses at the Second People’s Hospital, the Company made the decision to terminate the management agreement with the Rui An City Department of Health, and is currently in negotiation with them to finalize the terms, including the effective date of termination. The Company ceased providing healthcare management services to the Second People’s Hospital as of February 28, 2011. The Company has written off the fixed assets and inventory balances as of February 28, 2011, and does not expect any further losses due to the termination of this management agreement related to the Second People’s Hospital. We have accounted for the operations of the Second People’s Hospital in Rui An, China as discontinued operations, and have reclassified prior period financial statements to exclude them from continuing operations.

Dynacq-Huai Bei and the Rui An City Department of Health had also previously entered into an agreement assigning to Dynacq-Huai Bei the right to manage the Third People’s Hospital in Rui An, which hospital is currently under construction. Dynacq-Huai Bei and the Rui An City Department of Health, in November 2010, mutually agreed to terminate this agreement, due to continued delays in the construction of the Third People’s Hospital. Accordingly, Dynacq-Huai Bei will not be managing the Third People’s Hospital.

The Company has also organized Sino Bond Inc. Limited, a Hong Kong corporation (“Sino Bond”) to hold and manage investments in Hong Kong. Sino Bond invests in debt and equity securities in Europe and Asia, including initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings.

At the present time, the Company’s subsidiaries in China and Hong Kong are not pursuing any new line of business and/or projects.

The Company has invested in various bonds. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012, based on the quoted market prices as of that date. As of May 31, 2012, these securities are valued at approximately $15.5 million. The Company intends to hold these for a minimum period of an additional 12 months. During the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company also traded in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had gains (losses) of $(149,625) and $48,499, respectively. During the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the trading in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange generated gains (losses) of $(206,726) and $33,504, respectively. The Company, through a subsidiary in Hong Kong, has expanded its investments in debt and equity securities in Europe and Asia and has engaged the services of an investment banker to recommend such investment opportunities. The Company’s primary investment focus will be on growth companies from mainland China. The Company anticipates making short-term investments in these entities through initial public offerings (held mostly through the Hong Kong Stock Exchange) and pre-initial public offerings.

Discontinued Operations

On September 29, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the closure of the Garland facility, included in our U.S. division, effective September 30, 2011. Prior to that, in August 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company had approved a plan to dispose of the Garland facility due to continued operating losses. The Garland facility had experienced decreases in net patient revenues and number of cases, generally attributable to the loss of physicians from our medical staff. The opening of a new hospital near our Garland facility has had a direct adverse impact on our ability to retain members of the medical staff at that facility and consequently on our patient volume. The Garland facility was operating at a loss, and the Board of Directors believes that ceasing operations of the facility at that time was in the Company’s best interest. The Company has estimated a closing cost of $625,000. However, the ongoing losses incurred will be reduced due to the closing of the facility.

The Company had an independent appraisal done in October 2011 for both the hospitals, and based on each hospital’s valuation, expected sale proceeds, and expected cash flows has determined that there is no impairment charge required in connection with the foregoing disposal activities.

The Company has discontinued operations of all its foreign subsidiaries, except for Dynacq-HuaiBei and Sino Bond, and has either closed or is in the process of closing them.

The Corporate Division includes interest and other income related to the investments in available-for-sale and trading securities, corporate personnel compensation expenses, and general and administrative expenses. Such expenses and income are not allocated to our operating division, as they relate to our general corporate activities.

We generally evaluate performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and non-recurring charges and other criteria. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. There are no transfers between segments.

Summarized financial information concerning the business segments from continuing operations is as follows:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues from external customers
Net patient service revenues
U.S. Division	$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)
Corporate		—			—			—			—
Consolidated	$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)
Loss before taxes and discontinued operations
U.S. Division	$	(1,619,824	)	$	(12,469,388	)	$	(3,609,351	)	$	(12,982,781	)
Corporate		(1,571,575	)		(757,770	)		(2,443,833	)		(2,241,335	)
Consolidated	$	(3,191,399	)	$	(13,227,158	)	$	(6,053,184	)	$	(15,224,116	)

	May 31, 2012		August 31, 2011
Total Assets
U.S. Division	$	7,872,771	$	8,763,015
Corporate		36,769,946		50,550,958
Assets of continuing operations		44,642,717		59,313,973
Assets of discontinued operations		6,580,101		6,909,527
Consolidated	$	51,222,818	$	66,223,500

XML

Revenue Recognition

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Revenue Recognition [Abstract]

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Background

The Company’s revenue recognition policy is significant because net patient service revenue is a primary component of its results of operations. Revenue is recognized as services are delivered. The determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in connection with the Company’s services is subject to significant judgments and estimates, which are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company has established billing rates for its medical services which it bills as gross revenue as services are delivered. Gross billed revenues are then reduced by the Company’s estimate of the discount (contractual allowance) to arrive at net patient service revenues. Net patient service revenues may not represent amounts ultimately collected. The Company adjusts current period revenue for actual differences in estimated revenue recorded in prior periods and actual cash collections.

Contractual Allowance

The Company computes its contractual allowance based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months. The following table shows gross revenues and contractual allowances for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Gross billed charges	$	4,597,898		$	5,267,354		$	13,344,516		$	16,192,097
Contractual allowance (1)		3,677,236			13,739,526			9,612,165			20,525,641
Net revenue	$	920,662		$	(8,472,172	)	$	3,732,351		$	(4,333,544	)
Contractual allowance percentage (1)		80	%		261	%		72	%		127	%

⁽¹⁾ The contractual allowance percentage, excluding the stop-loss fee dispute amount booked in the quarter ended May 31, 2011, which is discussed below, would have been 66% and 63% for the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2011, respectively.

A significant amount of our net revenue results from Texas workers’ compensation claims, which are governed by the rules and regulations of the Texas Department of Workers’ Compensation (“TDWC”) and the workers’ compensation healthcare networks. If our hospital chooses to participate in a network, the amount of revenue that will be generated from workers’ compensation claims will be governed by the network contract.

For claims arising prior to the implementation of workers’ compensation networks and out of network claims, inpatient and outpatient surgical services are either reimbursed pursuant to the Acute Care In-Patient Hospital Fee Guideline or at a “fair and reasonable” rate for services in which the fee guideline is not applicable. Starting March 1, 2008, the Texas Workers’ Compensation 2008 Acute Care Hospital Outpatient and Inpatient Facility Fee Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) became effective. Under these Guidelines, the reimbursement amounts are determined by applying the most recently adopted and effective Medicare reimbursement formula and factors; however, if the maximum allowable reimbursement for the procedure performed cannot be calculated using these Guidelines, then reimbursement is determined on a fair and reasonable basis.

Based on these Guidelines, the reimbursement due the Company for workers’ compensation cases is lower than we previously experienced. The Company has continued accepting Texas workers’ compensation cases, and has not made any substantial changes in its focus towards such cases. Our net patient service revenue for Texas workers’ compensation cases as a percentage of gross billings has decreased primarily as a result of lower reimbursement rates for workers’ compensation procedures still being performed.

Should we disagree with the amount of reimbursement provided by a third-party payer, we are required to pursue the MDR process at the TDWC to request proper reimbursement for services. From January 2007 to November 2008, the Company had been successful in its pursuit of collections regarding the stop-loss cases pending before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (“SOAH”), receiving positive rulings in over 90% of its claims presented for administrative determination. The 2007 district court decision upholding our interpretation of the statute as applied to the stop-loss claims was appealed by certain insurance carriers, and on November 13, 2008 the Third Court of Appeals determined that in order for a hospital to be reimbursed at 75% of its usual and customary audited charges for an inpatient admission, the hospital must not only bill at least $40,000, but also show that the admission involved unusually costly and unusually extensive services. Procedurally, the decision means that each case where a carrier raised an issue regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly or unusually extensive would be remanded to either SOAH or MDR for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided meet these standards, once the definitions of those standards are determined. As a result of the Third Court of Appeals opinion, any stop-loss cases pending at SOAH have been remanded to the TDWC since these cases have not been reviewed or decided by the two-prong standard decided by the Third Court of Appeals. The SOAH Administrative Law judges determined that the most appropriate location for these cases is the TDWC, pending a final, non-appealable decision.

A petition asking the Texas Supreme Court to review the Third Court of Appeals decision has been denied. Therefore, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals decision. The Texas Supreme Court’s decision has further delayed final adjudication in these pending stop-loss cases. The uncertain outcome in these cases will depend on a very lengthy process. We anticipate further, lengthy litigation at the Travis County District Courts and the Texas Courts of Appeals. Because of this lengthy process and the uncertainty of recovery in these cases, collection of a material amount of funds in these pending stop-loss cases is not anticipated during the 2012 fiscal year.

Through May 2012, insurance carriers have voluntarily paid the awards in the decisions and orders issued by SOAH, plus interest, in approximately 180 cases, involving approximately $11 million in claims. In most of these cases, the carriers have requested refunds of the payments made in the event that the SOAH decisions and orders are reversed on appeal. Our request that the TDWC Commissioner enforce the awards which were not voluntarily paid by the carriers was refused in approximately 130 cases. Motions filed seeking a refund in some cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid have been granted and the Company has been ordered to refund approximately $3.7 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. In September and October 2011, the Company deposited these amounts as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. We anticipate that similar motions requesting remand and a refund for awards voluntarily paid will be filed and will likely be granted by the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. If and when these additional motions are granted, the Company will be ordered to refund an additional $7.7 million, not including prejudgment interest. The Company has appealed the judgments requiring a refund to the carriers. The appeal of the refund judgments will progress simultaneously to the adjudication of those cases remanded for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and will likely be ordered to be refunded. Once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that voluntary payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured.

Due to the uncertainties associated with these stop-loss fee dispute cases, in fiscal year 2011, the Company recognized an increase of $10,254,990 in the contractual allowance at our Pasadena facility (and an additional amount of $779,583 in the contractual allowance at our Garland facility, which is classified as discontinued operations), and $1,751,478 in interest expense at our Pasadena facility (and an additional interest expense of $132,339 at our Garland facility).

Claims regarding payment for hospital outpatient services remain pending at the TDWC. It is expected that these claims will be adjudicated at SOAH and ultimately in the Texas district and appellate courts. The basis for reimbursement for these services made the subject of these pending cases is the determination of “fair and reasonable” charges. In 2007, we received unfavorable rulings from SOAH in all of our appeals of unfavorable decisions related to services provided in 2001 and 2002. The 179 cases, which were appealed to the Travis County district courts, challenged the constitutionality of the relevant statutory language. The Company received an unfavorable ruling in its lead case in March 2009, which ruling was appealed to and was upheld by the Third Court of Appeals on August 26, 2010. The Texas Supreme Court denied a petition asking for review of the Third Court of Appeals decision. The unfavorable interpretation by the Texas Court of Appeal in our lead case negatively affects the recovery of additional reimbursement, not only in the lead case, but in the remaining 178 cases. Consequently, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals’ ruling that interprets the applicable statute and fee guideline to require that the amount that will be paid to a provider must not only be at a “fair and reasonable rate” but also must “ensure the quality of medical care” and “achieve effective cost control” and be the same or less than that charged to others with an equivalent standard of living. This ruling will impact cases in which a fee guideline was not applicable, specifically all pending cases involving ambulatory surgical services provided in 2001 and 2002 as well as all pending cases involving hospital outpatient services provided prior to March 1, 2008, when the Guidelines took effect. Since the Third Court of Appeals’ unfavorable ruling, collection, if any, in these cases depends on the Company’s ability to establish the criteria in this ruling. The Company was given the opportunity to establish the criteria in approximately 80 cases, which were set for hearing on the merits from March through May 2012. Post-Trial briefing is ongoing in these cases, and the first decision is expected by July 31, 2012. Additionally, the Company will have the opportunity to continue to establish the criteria in several hundred cases currently pending at SOAH during the 2012 and 2013 fiscal years.

We are currently pursuing claims against two healthcare agents relating to contracts with certain of our facilities which set out reimbursement guidelines by several workers’ compensation carriers at a minimum of 70% of the facility’s charges. Discovery is continuing on these claims to determine which carriers are involved, the amount of reimbursement due to us, and the data used to determine “usual and customary” market rates for medical services in specific geographic regions.

Due to the uncertainties regarding the accounts receivable in the MDR process, the 2008 and 2010 Third Court of Appeals’ opinions and our legal counsel’s advice that settlements with insurance carriers have virtually stopped, the Company had fully reserved all accounts receivable related to the MDR process as of August 31, 2008. Any monies collected for these MDR accounts receivable will be recorded as current period’s net patient service revenues.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable represent net receivables for services provided by the Company. At each balance sheet date management reviews the accounts receivable for collectibility.

The contractual allowance stated as a percentage of gross receivables at the balance sheet dates is larger than the contractual allowance percentage used to reduce gross billed charges due to the application of partial cash collections to the outstanding gross receivable balances, without any adjustment being made to the contractual allowance. The contractual allowance amounts netted against gross receivables are not adjusted until such time as the final collections on an individual receivable are recognized.

Discontinued Operations

Revenue Recognition Policy

In China, the local government Department of Health establishes billing rates for a hospital’s sale of prescription medication and medical services. A majority of the services provided by Second People’s Hospital is to cash pay patients, who pay for the services in advance. For services provided under the local government’s social healthcare insurance program, we are generally paid at approximately 95% of billed charges two to three months after the date of service. The remaining 5% of billed charges is evaluated by the local government Department of Health on a semi-annual basis and may be paid to the hospital after that evaluation is complete. As of February 28, 2011, the Company made the decision to terminate the management agreement with the Rui An City Department of Health, and is currently in negotiation with them to finalize the terms, including the effective date of termination. The Company incurred bad debt expenses of $24,755 in fiscal year 2011, prior to the termination of the management agreement on February 28, 2011, related to denials under the social healthcare insurance program. Since the amount of bad debt expense is minimal, it has been included with Other Operating Expenses in the income statement.

XML

Net Loss Per Share

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Net Loss Per Share [Abstract]

Net Loss Per Share

Net Loss per Share

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to the Company:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(3,191,399	)	$	(8,625,826	)	$	(6,053,184	)	$	(9,956,105	)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		49,767			1,531			133,287			4,294
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.		(3,141,632	)		(8,624,295	)		(5,919,897	)		(9,951,811	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(388,641	)		(1,400,360	)		(1,120,854	)		(2,785,269	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			(229,201	)		(121,577	)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(3,530,273	)	$	(10,024,655	)	$	(7,269,952	)	$	(12,858,657	)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding		14,543,626			14,176,960			14,473,626			14,176,960
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.61	)	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.70	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(0.03	)		(0.10	)		(0.08	)		(0.20	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			(0.02	)		(0.01	)
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.71	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(0.91	)

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options determined using the treasury stock method. However, if it is anti-dilutive, the dilutive effect of the stock options is not included in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share. Stock options with exercise prices exceeding current market prices that were excluded from the computation of net income (loss) per share amounted to approximately 2,603,000 shares and 1,071,000 shares for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

XML

Use of Estimates

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Use of Estimates [Abstract]

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant of the Company’s estimates is the determination of revenue to recognize for the services the Company provides and the determination of the contractual allowance. See “Revenue Recognition” below for further discussion. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates used in the preparation of these financial statements.

XML

Discontinued Operations

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Discontinued Operations [Abstract]

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued Operations

Under ASC Topic 360-10-35, Property, Plant, and Equipment – Subsequent Measurement (formerly referred to as SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets), we classify assets to be disposed of as held for sale or, if appropriate, discontinued operations when they have received appropriate approvals to be disposed of by our management or Board of Directors. Cash flows from our discontinued businesses are reflected as discontinued operating, investing, and financing activities in our statement of cash flows. We had $6,580,101 of assets of discontinued operations and $615,598 of liabilities of discontinued operations as of May 31, 2012.

U.S. Division

The Company had made the decision to sell its Garland facility as of August 31, 2010, and its operation was classified as discontinued operations for the year ended August 31, 2010. However, the Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and accordingly its operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 continue to be classified as discontinued operations. The Company plans to either sell the Garland facility or pursue converting it into an ambulatory surgical center, if and when the Company can identify and generate a steady referral source for outpatient cases. The Company intended to sell its Pasadena facility also, and had it classified as discontinued operations, as of August 31, 2010. However, since a sale was not consummated during the 12-month period following the decision to sell, the operations of the Pasadena facility have been reclassified as continuing operations for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The Company is continuing to revamp its operations at the Pasadena facility by modifying the business model and controlling expenses. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in turning the facility around.

The Company had an independent appraisal done for both the hospitals in October 2011, and based on each hospital’s valuation, expected sale proceeds, and expected cash flows has determined that there is no impairment charge required in connection with the foregoing disposal activities. Because we do not intend to sell the accounts receivable of hospitals in discontinued operations, the receivables are included in our accounts receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Corporate Division

The Company’s operations at Second People’s Hospital and its various proposed businesses in China, including but not limited to sandstone mining, mined coal trading, natural gas stations and sale of artifacts have been classified as discontinued operations. The Company’s two foreign subsidiaries, Dynacq-Huai Bei and Sino Bond, are the only two companies that continue to be classified as continuing operations, and its other foreign subsidiaries have been reclassified as discontinued operations.

The following is a summary of financial information related to our discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. We have reclassified prior period financial statements to exclude these businesses from continuing operations.

Discontinued Operations

	Three months ended May 31, 2012								Three months ended May 31, 2011
	U.S. Division			Corporate Division		Total			U.S. Division			Corporate Division			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	24,887		$	—	$	24,887		$	(453,291	)	$	—		$	(453,291	)
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		11,049			—		11,049			663,636			509			664,145
Medical services and supplies		—			—		—			201,884			—			201,884
Other operating expenses		338,388			—		338,388			536,330			218,868			755,198
Depreciation and amortization		—			—		—			—			5,053			5,053
Total costs and expenses		349,437			—		349,437			1,401,850			224,430			1,626,280
Operating loss		(324,550	)		—		(324,550	)		(1,855,141	)		(224,430	)		(2,079,571	)
Other income (expense), net		(64,091	)		—		(64,091	)		(122,998	)		48,902			(74,096	)
Loss before income taxes		(388,641	)		—		(388,641	)		(1,978,139	)		(175,528	)		(2,153,667	)
Benefit for income taxes		—			—		—			671,957			81,350			753,307
Loss on discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(388,641	)		—		(388,641	)		(1,306,182	)		(94,178	)		(1,400,360	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets		—			—		—			—			—			—
Benefit for income taxes		—			—		—			—			—			—
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets, net of income taxes		—			—		—			—			—			—
Total loss on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	(388,641	)	$	—	$	(388,641	)	$	(1,306,182	)	$	(94,178	)	$	(1,400,360	)

	Nine months ended May 31, 2012									Nine months ended May 31, 2011
	U.S. Division			Corporate Division			Total			U.S. Division			Corporate Division			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	343,474		$	—		$	343,474		$	834,758		$	831,232		$	1,665,990
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		177,852			22,511			200,363			1,998,554			556,609			2,555,163
Medical services and supplies		267,551			—			267,551			678,135			406,452			1,084,587
Other operating expenses		871,503			98,493			969,996			1,818,635			577,100			2,395,735
Depreciation and amortization		—			5,175			5,175			—			26,233			26,233
Total costs and expenses		1,316,906			126,179			1,443,085			4,495,324			1,566,394			6,061,718
Operating loss		(973,432	)		(126,179	)		(1,099,611	)		(3,660,566	)		(735,162	)		(4,395,728	)
Other income (expense), net		(85,147	)		63,904			(21,243	)		(120,185	)		240,376			120,191
Loss before income taxes		(1,058,579	)		(62,275	)		(1,120,854	)		(3,780,751	)		(494,786	)		(4,275,537	)
Benefit for income taxes		—			—			—			1,257,175			233,093			1,490,268
Loss on discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(1,058,579	)		(62,275	)		(1,120,854	)		(2,523,576	)		(261,693	)		(2,785,269	)
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets		—			(229,201	)		(229,201	)		—			(187,041	)		(187,041	)
Benefit for income taxes		—			—			—			—			65,464			65,464
Loss on disposal of discontinued assets, net of income taxes		—			(229,201	)		(229,201	)		—			(121,577	)		(121,577	)
Total loss on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	(1,058,579	)	$	(291,476	)	$	(1,350,055	)	$	(2,523,576	)	$	(383,270	)	$	(2,906,846	)

	May 31, 2012						August 31, 2011
	U.S. Division		Corporate Division		Total		U.S. Division		Corporate Division		Total
Current assets	$	—	$	120,954	$	120,954	$	260,020	$	118,734	$	378,754
Property and equipment, net		6,459,147		—		6,459,147		6,530,773		—		6,530,773
Total assets	$	6,459,147	$	120,954	$	6,580,101	$	6,790,793	$	118,734	$	6,909,527
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	—	$	615,598	$	615,598	$	—	$	604,302	$	604,302
Total liabilities	$	—	$	615,598	$	615,598	$	—	$	604,302	$	604,302

XML

Stock Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Stock Based Compensation [Abstract]

Stock Based Compensation

Stock Based Compensation

Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan

In August 2011, we mailed an Information Statement to all of our stockholders of record as of July 29, 2011. The Information Statement disclosed that our Board of Directors had approved, and the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock had executed an Action by Written Consent of Stockholders in Lieu of a Special Meeting (the “Written Consent”), approving the adoption of the Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”).

The purpose of the 2011 Plan is to strengthen the Company by providing an incentive to its employees, officers, consultants and directors and thereby encouraging them to devote their abilities and industry to the success of the Company’s business enterprise. It is intended that this purpose be achieved by extending to employees, officers, consultants and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries an added long-term incentive for high levels of performance and unusual efforts through the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance awards and restricted stock. The Company has reserved 15,000,000 shares of common stock for future issuance under the 2011 Plan.

On November 14, 2011, the Compensation Committee granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 200,000 shares under the 2011 Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $1.07 to two employees. These stock options will vest based on certain operating performance criteria, and expire after five years. The shares underlying these stock options are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).

On January 12, 2012, the Compensation Committee granted stock options to purchase 250,000 shares under the 2011 Plan, with an exercise price of $1.10 to the Company’s chief executive officer, Eric K. Chan. These stock options will vest in annual installments of 25 percent beginning on the first anniversary date, and expire after ten years. The shares underlying these stock options are registered under the Securities Act.

On February 6, 2012, the Compensation Committee granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of one million shares under the 2011 Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $1.00 to various employees. These stock options will vest based on certain operating performance criteria, and expire after five years. The shares underlying these stock options are registered under the Securities Act.

As of May 31, 2012, there remain 1,150,000 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and 13,850,000 shares which can be issued under the 2011 Plan after giving effect to shares issued and canceled.

2000 Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2000 Incentive Plan (“2000 Plan”) provides for options and other stock-based awards that may be granted to eligible employees, officers, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company or its subsidiaries. The 2000 Plan does not have a fixed termination date, provided that no incentive stock option can be granted subsequent to August 29, 2011. As of May 31, 2012, there remain 1,802,566 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and no new stock options awards will be issued under the 2000 Plan.

The 2011 Plan and the 2000 Plan (the “Plans”) are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The Committee has the power to determine which eligible employees will receive awards, the timing and manner of the grant of such awards, the exercise price of stock options (which may not be less than market value on the date of grant), the number of shares, and all of the terms of the awards. The Company may at any time amend or terminate the 2011 Plan. However, no amendment that would impair the rights of any participant with respect to outstanding grants can be made without the participant’s prior consent. Stockholder approval of an amendment to the Plans is necessary only when required by applicable law or stock exchange rules.

Generally, options granted become exercisable in annual installments of 25 percent beginning on the first anniversary date, and expire after five to ten years.

The following table summarizes the stock option activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2012 (share amounts in thousands):

	Shares			Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1)
Outstanding, August 31, 2011		2,206		$	2.41	$	—	$	—
Granted		1,450			1.03		0.52		—
Exercised		—			—		—		—
Expired or canceled		(703	)		1.67		—		—
Outstanding, May 31, 2012		2,953		$	1.91	$	—	$	—

⁽¹⁾  These amounts represent the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of Dynacq common stock on May 31, 2012 and August 31, 2011, as reported on the NASDAQ stock market, for all in-the-money options outstanding. For exercised options, intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of Dynacq common stock on the date of exercise.

For the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no stock options exercised.

The following summarizes information related to stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2012, and related weighted average price and life information:

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
	(Share Amounts In Thousands)
$ 1.00 – 1.10		1,150		6.0	$	1.03		—	$	—
$ 1.86		994		9.1		1.86		—		—
$ 2.50 – 2.75		576		1.1		2.54		576		2.54
$ 4.90 – 4.96		233		2.4		4.90		233		4.90
Total		2,953		5.8	$	1.91		809	$	3.22

For the three months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $46,136 and $78,369, respectively. For the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $196,070 and $82,620, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding stock options as of May 31, 2012 was $1,126,000, and will be recognized, in general, over 3.5 years. The weighted average time to recognize the compensation expense is 1.8 years.

XML

Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Abstract]

Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive loss consists of net loss and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) represents certain components of revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are included in comprehensive loss, but are excluded from net loss. Other comprehensive income (loss) amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity, net of tax, and for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net loss	$	(3,530,273	)	$	(10,024,655	)	$	(7,269,952	)	$	(12,858,657	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $795, $62,028, $(12,549) and $228,097, respectively		1,480			115,197			(23,302	)		423,610
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency gains included in net income, net of taxes of $-0-, $-0-, $(501,273) and $-0-, respectively		—			—			(921,318	)		—
Change in valuation of investment available-for-sale, net of taxes of $(918,435), $628,420, $(1,016,034) and $986,970, respectively		(1,705,666	)		1,167,067			(1,886,922	)		1,832,944
Total other comprehensive loss, net of taxes		(5,234,459	)		(8,742,391	)		(10,101,494	)		(10,602,103	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		—			—			—			—
Comprehensive loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(5,234,459	)	$	(8,742,391	)	$	(10,101,494	)	$	(10,602,103	)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:

	May 31, 2012		August 31, 2011
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $4,395 and $518,217, respectively	$	8,161	$	952,782
Change in valuation of investment available-for-sale, net of taxes of $2,484,447 and $3,500,481, respectively		4,613,972		6,500,894
Total accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes of $2,488,842 and $4,018,698, respectively	$	4,622,133	$	7,453,676

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	May 31, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$ (7,269,952)	$ (12,858,657)
Less loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	1,350,055	2,906,846
Net loss before discontinued operations	(5,919,897)	(9,951,811)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss before discontinued operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	470,415	128,410
Loss (gain) on trading securities	206,726	(33,504)
Deferred income taxes	(1,655,662)	(4,416,605)
Noncontrolling interest	(133,287)	(4,294)
Charge for stock options to employees	196,070	82,620
Charge for non-controlling interest sale and issuance of stock awards	166,666
Foreign currency exchange losses (gains)	309,759	(243,389)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	736,501	1,271,784
Interest receivable	(40,051)	(22,955)
Inventories	137,309	92,400
Prepaid expenses	77,467	113,353
Income taxes receivable		1,663,059
Other assets	(1,671)	12,721
Accounts payable	(485,088)	75,620
Accrued liabilities	(4,731,433)	11,841,880
Cash provided by (used in) continuing activities	(10,666,176)	609,289
Cash used in discontinued activities	(1,032,418)	(2,171,929)
Net cash used in operating activities	(11,698,594)	(1,562,640)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of trading securities		(5,330,795)
Sales proceeds of trading securities		4,064,743
Purchase of equipment	(159,919)	(42,124)
Cash used in continuing activities	(159,919)	(1,308,176)
Cash provided by (used in) discontinued activities	14,000	(67,059)
Net cash used in investing activities	(145,919)	(1,375,235)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from notes payable	116,339	65,000
Principal payments on notes payable	(94,400)	(68,490)
Payments on capital lease	(69,839)	(29,994)
Contributions from, and distributions to, noncontrolling interest, net	100,000
Cash provided by (used in) continuing activities	52,100	(33,484)
Cash used in discontinued activities		(69,687)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	52,100	(103,171)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	235,682	679,088
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(11,556,731)	(2,361,958)
Cash at beginning of period	24,315,160	27,665,945
Cash at end of period	12,758,429	25,303,987
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Interest	737,816	32,974
Income taxes	0	0
Non cash investing and financing activities:
Investments available-for-sale	(2,902,956)	2,819,914
Accumulated other comprehensive income	1,886,921	(1,832,944)
Deferred tax liabilities	1,016,035	(986,970)
Equipment from capital lease (discontinued operations)		34,592
Capital lease obligation (discontinued operations)		$ (34,592)

XML

Investments in Available-For-Sale and Trading Securities

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Investments in Available-For-Sale and Trading Securities [Abstract]

Investments in Available-For-Sale and Trading Securities

Investments in Available-for-Sale and Trading Securities

The Company has invested in various bonds. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012, based on the quoted market prices as of that date. These investments are subject to default risk. The Company intends to hold these for a minimum period of an additional 12 months. Unrealized gains in the fair value are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related income tax effect. The Company monitors its investment portfolio for any decline in fair value that is other than temporary and records any such impairment as an impairment loss.

The Company also invests in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. These investments are classified as trading securities, and are carried at fair value as of May 31, 2012. These investments are subject to fluctuations in the market price. During the nine months ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had a net gain (loss) of $(206,726) and $33,504 in trading of these securities, respectively.

XML

Noncontrolling Interest

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2012

Noncontrolling Interest [Abstract]

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling Interest

The equity of minority investors (minority investors are generally physician groups and other healthcare providers that perform surgeries at the Company’s facilities) in certain subsidiaries of the Company is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest reported in the consolidated income statements reflect the respective interests in the income or loss of the limited partnerships or limited liability companies attributable to the minority investors (equity interest ranged from 1.75% to 3.00% at May 31, 2012).